IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/assjnl/v14y2018i1p40.html

Review on Reformulation of the Mean-Variance Model with Real-life Trading Restrictions

Author

Listed:
  • Feng Li

Abstract

In this paper, we consider a class of portfolio selection problems with cardinality and minimum buy-in threshold constraints in real-life which can be formulated as mixed-integer quadratic programming (MIQP). Two reformulation methods that generate the same tight continuous relaxation of original problem are compared in the context under the branch-and-bound algorithm, one is the Perspective Reformulation and another is the Lift-and-Convexification Reformulation (LCR). Computational results show that the (PC) is more competitive than the (LCR) method in terms of computing time and nodes in MIQP solver CPLEX 12.7, what's more, this outperformance becomes more obvious as the size of instances grows.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng Li, 2018. "Review on Reformulation of the Mean-Variance Model with Real-life Trading Restrictions," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(1), pages 1-40, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:14:y:2018:i:1:p:40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/download/70545/39829
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/view/70545
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rockafellar, R. Tyrrell & Uryasev, Stanislav, 2002. "Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1443-1471, July.
    2. X. Cui & X. Zheng & S. Zhu & X. Sun, 2013. "Convex relaxations and MIQCQP reformulations for a class of cardinality-constrained portfolio selection problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1409-1423, August.
    3. Gautam Mitra & Frank Ellison & Alan Scowcroft, 2007. "Quadratic programming for portfolio planning: Insights into algorithmic and computational issues Part II — Processing of portfolio planning models with discrete constraints," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(4), pages 249-258, November.
    4. Gautam Mitra & Frank Ellison & Alan Scowcroft, 2007. "Quadratic programming for portfolio planning: Insights into algorithmic and computational issues," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(3), pages 200-214, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaojin Zheng & Xiaoling Sun & Duan Li, 2014. "Improving the Performance of MIQP Solvers for Quadratic Programs with Cardinality and Minimum Threshold Constraints: A Semidefinite Program Approach," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 690-703, November.
    2. P. Bonami & M. A. Lejeune, 2009. "An Exact Solution Approach for Portfolio Optimization Problems Under Stochastic and Integer Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(3), pages 650-670, June.
    3. Panos Xidonas & Christis Hassapis & George Mavrotas & Christos Staikouras & Constantin Zopounidis, 2018. "Multiobjective portfolio optimization: bridging mathematical theory with asset management practice," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 267(1), pages 585-606, August.
    4. Zhi-Long Dong & Fengmin Xu & Yu-Hong Dai, 2020. "Fast algorithms for sparse portfolio selection considering industries and investment styles," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 78(4), pages 763-789, December.
    5. Khodamoradi, T. & Salahi, M. & Najafi, A.R., 2020. "Robust CCMV model with short selling and risk-neutral interest rate," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 547(C).
    6. Cui, Xueting & Zhu, Shushang & Sun, Xiaoling & Li, Duan, 2013. "Nonlinear portfolio selection using approximate parametric Value-at-Risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 2124-2139.
    7. M. Kaina & L. Rüschendorf, 2009. "On convex risk measures on L p -spaces," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 69(3), pages 475-495, July.
    8. Pu Huang & Dharmashankar Subramanian, 2012. "Iterative estimation maximization for stochastic linear programs with conditional value-at-risk constraints," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 441-458, November.
    9. Zhi Chen & Melvyn Sim & Huan Xu, 2019. "Distributionally Robust Optimization with Infinitely Constrained Ambiguity Sets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1328-1344, September.
    10. Dominique Guégan & Wayne Tarrant, 2012. "On the necessity of five risk measures," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 533-552, November.
    11. Soren Bettels & Stefan Weber, 2024. "An Integrated Approach to Importance Sampling and Machine Learning for Efficient Monte Carlo Estimation of Distortion Risk Measures in Black Box Models," Papers 2408.02401, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2025.
    12. Giovanni Masala & Filippo Petroni, 2023. "Drawdown risk measures for asset portfolios with high frequency data," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 265-289, June.
    13. Young Kim & Rosella Giacometti & Svetlozar Rachev & Frank Fabozzi & Domenico Mignacca, 2012. "Measuring financial risk and portfolio optimization with a non-Gaussian multivariate model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 201(1), pages 325-343, December.
    14. Ke Zhou & Jiangjun Gao & Duan Li & Xiangyu Cui, 2017. "Dynamic mean–VaR portfolio selection in continuous time," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(10), pages 1631-1643, October.
    15. Malavasi, Matteo & Ortobelli Lozza, Sergio & Trück, Stefan, 2021. "Second order of stochastic dominance efficiency vs mean variance efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 1192-1206.
    16. Rostagno, Luciano Martin, 2005. "Empirical tests of parametric and non-parametric Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) measures for the Brazilian stock market index," ISU General Staff Papers 2005010108000021878, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    17. Andreas H Hamel, 2018. "Monetary Measures of Risk," Papers 1812.04354, arXiv.org.
    18. Steven Kou & Xianhua Peng, 2014. "On the Measurement of Economic Tail Risk," Papers 1401.4787, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2015.
    19. So Yeon Chun & Alexander Shapiro & Stan Uryasev, 2012. "Conditional Value-at-Risk and Average Value-at-Risk: Estimation and Asymptotics," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(4), pages 739-756, August.
    20. Sarah Yini Gao & David Simchi-Levi & Chung-Piaw Teo & Zhenzhen Yan, 2019. "Disruption Risk Mitigation in Supply Chains: The Risk Exposure Index Revisited," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 831-852, May.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:14:y:2018:i:1:p:40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.