IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibf/riafin/v6y2013i7p47-65.html

Capabilities To Customize Production And Reconfigure Internally: Do Capabilities Influence Perceived Operating Performance And Competitive Advantage?, Las Capacidades De La Empresa Para Personalizar Su Produccion Y Reconfigurarse De Forma Interna: ¿Influencian Su Desempeno Operativo Y Su Ventaja Competitiva Percibidos?

Author

Listed:
  • Aurora Irma Maynez-Guaderrama
  • Judith Cavazos-Arroyo
  • Vianey Torres-Arguelles
  • Maria Teresa Escobedo-Portillo

Abstract

Having the best capacities allows companies to efficiently choose and implement the necessary activities to produce and deliver goods and services to their clients. Nevertheless, if the purpose is to exceed competitor performance, it is necessary for companies to deploy their capabilities in a superior manner. This work analyzes the impact of operational capacities of massive personalization and reconfiguration and competitive dimensions recognized as strategic. We examine how the affect operative development from a productive entity, and the effect of this on perceived competitive advantage. The research design was quantitative and the empirical information was examined in two stages: the first through a confirmatory factorial analysis (CFA) and the second through a system of structural equations based on covariance (SSEBC). Results confirm that: 1) a direct, positive and significant relationship between the capacity of massive personalization and perceived operative performance, 2) reconfiguration capacity affects positively, directly and significantly perceived operative development, and 3) perceived operative development influences perceived competitive advantage in a direct, positive and significant manner.

Suggested Citation

  • Aurora Irma Maynez-Guaderrama & Judith Cavazos-Arroyo & Vianey Torres-Arguelles & Maria Teresa Escobedo-Portillo, 2013. "Capabilities To Customize Production And Reconfigure Internally: Do Capabilities Influence Perceived Operating Performance And Competitive Advantage?, Las Capacidades De La Empresa Para Personalizar S," Revista Internacional Administracion & Finanzas, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 6(7), pages 47-65.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibf:riafin:v:6:y:2013:i:7:p:47-65
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.theibfr2.com/RePEc/ibf/riafin/riaf-v6n7-2013/RIAF-V6N7-2013-3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yusuf, Y. Y. & Sarhadi, M. & Gunasekaran, A., 1999. "Agile manufacturing:: The drivers, concepts and attributes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1-2), pages 33-43, May.
    2. Christoph Zott, 2003. "Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intraindustry differential firm performance: insights from a simulation study," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 97-125, February.
    3. Constance E. Helfat & Margaret A. Peteraf, 2003. "The dynamic resource‐based view: capability lifecycles," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(10), pages 997-1010, October.
    4. G. M.P. Swann, 2009. "The Economics of Innovation," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13211, August.
    5. Bruce Kogut & Udo Zander, 1992. "Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(3), pages 383-397, August.
    6. Da Silveira, Giovani & Borenstein, Denis & Fogliatto, Flavio S., 2001. "Mass customization: Literature review and research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 1-13, June.
    7. Yang, Ching-Chiao & Marlow, Peter B. & Lu, Chin-Shan, 2009. "Assessing resources, logistics service capabilities, innovation capabilities and the performance of container shipping services in Taiwan," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 4-20, November.
    8. John Hulland, 1999. "Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 195-204, February.
    9. Ingemar Dierickx & Karel Cool, 1989. "Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(12), pages 1504-1511, December.
    10. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    11. Kraaijenbrink, Jeroen & Spender, JC & Groen, Aard, 2009. "The resource-based view: A review and assessment of its critiques," MPRA Paper 21442, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Ingemar Dierickx & Karel Cool, 1989. "Asset Stock Accumulation and the Sustainability of Competitive Advantage: Reply," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(12), pages 1514-1514, December.
    13. Flynn, Barbara B. & Wu, Sarah Jinhui & Melnyk, Steven, 2010. "Operational capabilities: Hidden in plain view," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 247-256, May.
    14. Suresh Kotha, 1995. "Mass customization: Implementing the emerging paradigm for competitive advantage," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(S1), pages 21-42.
    15. Steve Brown & Kate Blackmon, 2005. "Aligning Manufacturing Strategy and Business‐Level Competitive Strategy in New Competitive Environments: The Case for Strategic Resonance," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(4), pages 793-815, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schriber, Svante & Löwstedt, Jan, 2015. "Tangible resources and the development of organizational capabilities," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 54-68.
    2. Nicolai J. Foss & Keld Laursen & Torben Pedersen, 2011. "Linking Customer Interaction and Innovation: The Mediating Role of New Organizational Practices," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 980-999, August.
    3. Lin, Yini & Wu, Lei-Yu, 2014. "Exploring the role of dynamic capabilities in firm performance under the resource-based view framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 407-413.
    4. Baraldi, Enrico & Gressetvold, Espen & Harrison, Debbie, 2012. "Resource interaction in inter-organizational networks: Foundations, comparison, and a research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 266-276.
    5. Symeonidou, Noni & Leiponen, Aija & Autio, Erkko & Bruneel, Johan, 2022. "The origins of capabilities: Resource allocation strategies, capability development, and the performance of new firms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4).
    6. Sminia, Harry & Ates, Aylin & Paton, Steve & Smith, Marisa, 2019. "High value manufacturing: Capability, appropriation, and governance," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 516-528.
    7. Yolande E. Chan & James S. Denford & Joyce Y. Jin, 2016. "Competing Through Knowledge and Information Systems Strategies: A Study of Small and Medium-Sized Firms," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(03), pages 1-37, September.
    8. Luo, Yadong & Bu, Juan, 2018. "Contextualizing international strategy by emerging market firms: A composition-based approach," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 337-355.
    9. Pontikakis Dimitrios & Papachristos Georgios & Janssen Matthijs & Norlen Hedvig & Miedzinski Michal, 2025. "System Dynamics for System Innovation," JRC Research Reports JRC143019, Joint Research Centre.
    10. Hautamäki, Pia & Heikinheimo, Minna, 2025. "Fully leveraging AI in B2B sales: Exploring sales managers’ capabilities and organizational knowledge processes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    11. Chris P. Eveleens & Frank J. Rijnsoever & Eva M. M. I. Niesten, 2017. "How network-based incubation helps start-up performance: a systematic review against the background of management theories," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 676-713, June.
    12. Miri Kim & Jaeki Song & Jason Triche, 2015. "Toward an integrated framework for innovation in service: A resource-based view and dynamic capabilities approach," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 533-546, June.
    13. Dangol, Ramesh & Bahl, Mona & Karpak, Birsen, 2015. "Timing cooperative relationships with sequential capability development process to reduce capability development trade-offs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 179-189.
    14. Heimeriks, K. & Duysters, G.M., 2004. "A study into the alliance capability development process," Working Papers 04.21, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies.
    15. Pamela Adams & Roberto Fontana & Franco Malerba, 2022. "Knowledge resources and the acquisition of spinouts," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 12(2), pages 277-313, June.
    16. Nicolai J. Foss & Peter G. Klein & Lasse B. Lien & Thomas Zellweger & Todd Zenger, 2021. "Ownership competence," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 302-328, February.
    17. Malik, Omar R., 2008. "Adapting to market liberalization: The role of dynamic capabilities, initial resource conditions, and strategic path choices in determining evolutionary fitness of Less Developed Country (LDC) firms," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 217-231, September.
    18. Laurence Capron & Will Mitchell, 2009. "Selection Capability: How Capability Gaps and Internal Social Frictions Affect Internal and External Strategic Renewal," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 294-312, April.
    19. Patnaik, Swetketu & Munjal, Surender & Varma, Arup & Sinha, Sujay, 2022. "Extending the resource-based view through the lens of the institution-based view: A longitudinal case study of an Indian higher educational institution," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 124-141.
    20. Der-Fang Hung, 2015. "Sustained Competitive Advantage and Organizational Inertia: The Cost Perspective of Knowledge Management," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 6(4), pages 769-789, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C38 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Classification Methdos; Cluster Analysis; Principal Components; Factor Analysis
    • L29 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Other
    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibf:riafin:v:6:y:2013:i:7:p:47-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mercedes Jalbert The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Mercedes Jalbert to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.