IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gei/journl/v5y2018i2p64-85.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational Context Factors Influencing Procedural Justice in Performance Management System: A Research Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Umar Shahzad

    (Air University School of Management, Islamabad)

Abstract

Research in the past has highlighted the need for exploring organizational contextual factors that impact the overall performance management system in general and performance appraisal system in particular. Current research has tried to develop a comprehensive framework of organizations' contextual factors that can impact procedural justice in performance management system. Propositions have been given to elaborate the impact of those organizational contextual factors on procedural justice in performance management system according to the socio-economic conditions of the market. Study offers a detailed insight through a systematic literature review on the factors that can enhance the performance and satisfaction at the workplace. Hence, such factors have been proposed in a combined way which would help emergence of a theoretical foundation for the context of procedural justice in performance management system. This would not only help the future researchers in empirical research on it; but the practitioners may also find it helpful in understanding the contextual needs for procedural justice in performance management.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Umar Shahzad, 2018. "Organizational Context Factors Influencing Procedural Justice in Performance Management System: A Research Framework," Journal of Management Sciences, Geist Science, Iqra University, Faculty of Business Administration, vol. 5(2), pages 64-85, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gei:journl:v:5:y:2018:i:2:p:64-85
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://geistscience.com/JMS/Issue2-18/Article5/JMS1805204.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. W. Chan Kim & Renée A. Mauborgne, 1996. "Procedural Justice and Managers' In-Role and Extra-Role Behavior: The Case of the Multinational," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(4), pages 499-515, April.
    2. Aqsa Akbar, Muhammad Amir Rashid, Omer Farooq, 2018. "The Relationship between High Performance Work System and Continuance Commitment to Change: An Economic Exchange Perspective," Journal of Management Sciences, Geist Science, Iqra University, Faculty of Business Administration, vol. 5(1), pages 3-17, March.
    3. Peter Smith, 1990. "The Use of Performance Indicators in the Public Sector," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 153(1), pages 53-72, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Hewson & Keming Yu, 2008. "Quantile regression for binary performance indicators," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5), pages 401-418, September.
    2. Krzysztof Opolski & Piotr Modzelewski, 2009. "Quality and efficiency in the local government-methodological approach," Ekonomia journal, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw, vol. 22.
    3. Sandra Rothenberger, 2015. "Fairness through Transparency: The Influence of Price Transparency on Consumer Perceptions of Price Fairness," Working Papers CEB 15-008, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    4. Giovanni C. Porzio & Giancarlo Ragozini & Domenico Vistocco, 2008. "On the use of archetypes as benchmarks," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5), pages 419-437, September.
    5. Johnes, Jill, 1996. "Performance assessment in higher education in Britain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 18-33, February.
    6. Doğru Çağlar, 2021. "The Effects of Electronic Surveillance on Job Tension, Task Performance and Organizational Trust," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 12(2), pages 125-143, December.
    7. Nicholas Longford & D. B. Rubin, 2006. "Performance assessment and league tables. Comparing like with like," Economics Working Papers 994, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    8. Virginia Rosales-López, 2008. "Economics of court performance: an empirical analysis," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 231-251, June.
    9. Santhosh V.A., 2015. "A Study on the Impact of Workplace Commuting on Citizenship Behaviour of Employees Working with Public and Private Sector Organizations," Vision, , vol. 19(1), pages 13-24, March.
    10. Keirstead, James & Schulz, Niels B., 2010. "London and beyond: Taking a closer look at urban energy policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(9), pages 4870-4879, September.
    11. Hezri, Adnan A. & Dovers, Stephen R., 2006. "Sustainability indicators, policy and governance: Issues for ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 86-99, November.
    12. Corton, Maria Luisa, 2003. "Benchmarking in the Latin American water sector: the case of Peru," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 133-142, September.
    13. Lin, Shao-Lung & Hsieh, An-Tien, 2010. "The integration-responsiveness framework and subsidiary management: A response," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(8), pages 911-913, August.
    14. Wilding, Anna & Munford, Luke & Guthrie, Bruce & Kontopantelis, Evangelos & Sutton, Matt, 2022. "Family doctor responses to changes in target stringency under financial incentives," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    15. Antonio Giuffrida & Hugh Gravelle, 2001. "Measuring performance in primary care: econometric analysis and DEA," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(2), pages 163-175.
    16. Shakeel Sarwar, Jawad Iqbal, 2020. "Framework Development of High Performance Work Systems (HPWSs) and Faculty Productivity: A Qualitative Approach," Journal of Management Sciences, Geist Science, Iqra University, Faculty of Business Administration, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, March.
    17. Charness, Gary B & Brandts, Jordi, 2002. "Instituto de Análisis Económico," University of California at Santa Barbara, Economics Working Paper Series qt2rf5p3rs, Department of Economics, UC Santa Barbara.
    18. Schang, Laura & Morton, Alec & DaSilva, Philip & Bevan, Gwyn, 2014. "From data to decisions? Exploring how healthcare payers respond to the NHS Atlas of Variation in Healthcare in England," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 79-87.
    19. Constantine Boussalis & Yuval Feldman & Henry E. Smith, 2018. "Experimental analysis of the effect of standards on compliance and performance," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(2), pages 277-298, June.
    20. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2021. "Talent Conceptualisation and Talent Management Practices within the Banking Sector in Vietnam," OSF Preprints y6r4q, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gei:journl:v:5:y:2018:i:2:p:64-85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Imtiaz ARIF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://geistscience.com/JMS/index.php .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.