IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i9p1552-d110429.html

Spatial Equity Measure on Urban Ecological Space Layout Based on Accessibility of Socially Vulnerable Groups—A Case Study of Changting, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yanhua Yuan

    (School of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
    Nanjing Engineering Consulting Center, Nanjing 210005, China)

  • Jiangang Xu

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China)

  • Zhenbo Wang

    (Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

Abstract

The improper layout of urban public parks leads to the difference between citizens sharing or not sharing this kind of public resource, particularly in the historical districts of mountainous cities in China. The purpose of this study is to explore the spatial equity and quantitative measures of urban public parks’ layouts by building a demand index of socially vulnerable groups sharing public parks based on the accessibility evaluation model. In this paper, Changting—a famous national historical and cultural city—is taken as the empirical object, then the accessibility and social equity of public parks is quantitatively measured with the aid of the field investigation method, the spatial analysis model of geographic information system (GIS) and the SPSS statistical analysis method. The results indicate that it is feasible to measure the spatial equity of urban public parks with the accessibility and demand index of socially vulnerable groups, and it can effectively characterize the rationality and social equity of urban ecological space. It shows that a degree of spatial mismatch exists between the distribution of urban public parks and that of residents, that is to say the spatial distribution of public parks is not equitable in terms of accessibility or residents’ demands. Therefore, the data suggest that the spatial patterns and accessibility levels of parks in Changting County—especially the historical districts—should be further improved and perfected to achieve high levels of accessibility and equity through urban green space system planning. The paper may be used as a scientific reference for the planning and construction of ecological urban spaces. It can also provide useful decision-making guidance for urban planners in investigating, analyzing, and adjusting the distribution of public service facilities to achieve equitable outcomes, while promoting the harmonious and sustainable development of mountainous cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanhua Yuan & Jiangang Xu & Zhenbo Wang, 2017. "Spatial Equity Measure on Urban Ecological Space Layout Based on Accessibility of Socially Vulnerable Groups—A Case Study of Changting, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-20, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:9:p:1552-:d:110429
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/9/1552/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/9/1552/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jared Hewko & Karen E Smoyer-Tomic & M John Hodgson, 2002. "Measuring Neighbourhood Spatial Accessibility to Urban Amenities: Does Aggregation Error Matter?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(7), pages 1185-1206, July.
    2. M Truelove, 1993. "Measurement of Spatial Equity," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 11(1), pages 19-34, March.
    3. E Talen & L Anselin, 1998. "Assessing Spatial Equity: An Evaluation of Measures of Accessibility to Public Playgrounds," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 30(4), pages 595-613, April.
    4. Kim, Chul-Woung & Lee, Sang-Yi & Hong, Seong-Chul, 2005. "Equity in utilization of cancer inpatient services by income classes," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 187-200, May.
    5. Kinman, Edward L., 1999. "Evaluating health service equity at a primary care clinic in Chilimarca, Bolivia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 49(5), pages 663-678, September.
    6. Anh T. Le & Paul W. Miller, 2005. "Participation in Higher Education: Equity and Access?," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 81(253), pages 152-165, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jun Yang & Andong Guo & Xueming Li & Tai Huang, 2018. "Study of the Impact of a High-Speed Railway Opening on China’s Accessibility Pattern and Spatial Equality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-13, August.
    2. Elsa A. Pérez-Paredes & Aleksandra Krstikj, 2020. "Spatial Equity in Urban Public Space (UPS) Based on Analysis of Municipal Public Policy Omissions: A Case Study of Atizapán de Zaragoza, State of México," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Houde, Maxime & Apparicio, Philippe & Séguin, Anne-Marie, 2018. "A ride for whom: Has cycling network expansion reduced inequities in accessibility in Montreal, Canada?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 9-21.
    4. Buket Özdemir Işık & Sara Demir, 2017. "Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for the Sustainability of Historical–Cultural Structures on the Trabzon Coastline," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Jinghong Shen & Jianquan Cheng & Wencong Huang & Fantao Zeng, 2020. "An Exploration of Spatial and Social Inequalities of Urban Sports Facilities in Nanning City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-19, May.
    6. Haque, Md. Nazmul & Sharifi, Ayyoob, 2024. "Who are marginalized in accessing urban ecosystem services? A systematic literature review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    7. Xingchuan Gao & Tao Li & Xiaoshu Cao, 2019. "Spatial Fairness and Changes in Transport Infrastructure in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Area from 1976 to 2016," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, January.
    8. Maria Jose Perez-Pereda & Aleksandra Krstikj & Jose Emmanuel Ramirez-Marquez, 2024. "Improving Fairness and Equity by Minimizing Community Vulnerability to Food Accessibility: A Computational Urbanism Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 171(2), pages 567-584, January.
    9. Jizhou Chen & Xiaobin Li & Jialing Chen & Lijun Xu & Hao Feng & Rong Zhu, 2025. "Identifying and Prioritising Public Space Demands in Historic Districts: Perspectives from Tourists and Local Residents in Yangzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-49, September.
    10. Siqi Yu & Xigang Zhu & Qian He, 2020. "An Assessment of Urban Park Access Using House-Level Data in Urban China: Through the Lens of Social Equity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-19, March.
    11. Yan Xu & Weixuan Song & Chunhui Liu, 2018. "Social-Spatial Accessibility to Urban Educational Resources under the School District System: A Case Study of Public Primary Schools in Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    12. Liwen Liu & Ming Zhang, 2021. "The Impacts of High-Speed Rail on Regional Accessibility and Spatial Development—Updated Evidence from China’s Mid-Yangtze River City-Cluster Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    13. Hongzan Jiao & Chengcong Li & Yang Yu & Zhenghong Peng, 2020. "Urban Public Green Space Equity against the Context of High-Speed Urbanization in Wuhan, Central China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-21, November.
    14. Adriana A. Zuniga-Teran & Andrea K. Gerlak, 2019. "A Multidisciplinary Approach to Analyzing Questions of Justice Issues in Urban Greenspace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, May.
    15. Nazmul Haque, Md. & Sharifi, Ayyoob, 2024. "Justice in access to urban ecosystem services: A critical review of the literature," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    16. K M Atikur Rahman & Dunfu Zhang, 2018. "Analyzing the Level of Accessibility of Public Urban Green Spaces to Different Socially Vulnerable Groups of People," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-27, October.
    17. Sadooghi, Seyed Ehsan & Taleai, Mohammad & Abolhasani, Somaie, 2022. "Simulation of urban growth scenarios using integration of multi-criteria analysis and game theory," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    18. Rashid A. Mushkani & Haruka Ono, 2021. "Spatial Equity of Public Parks: A Case Study of Kabul City, Afghanistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-13, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karner, Alex, 2018. "Assessing public transit service equity using route-level accessibility measures and public data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 24-32.
    2. Michiel N. Daams & Paolo Veneri, 2017. "Living Near to Attractive Nature? A Well-Being Indicator for Ranking Dutch, Danish, and German Functional Urban Areas," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 133(2), pages 501-526, September.
    3. Hyunjoong Kim & Fahui Wang, 2019. "Disparity in Spatial Access to Public Daycare and Kindergarten across GIS-Constructed Regions in Seoul, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-14, October.
    4. Christopher M. Bacon & Gregory A. Baker, 2017. "The rise of food banks and the challenge of matching food assistance with potential need: towards a spatially specific, rapid assessment approach," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(4), pages 899-919, December.
    5. Jacobson, Jerry Owen & Robinson, Paul & Bluthenthal, Ricky N., 2007. "A multilevel decomposition approach to estimate the role of program location and neighborhood disadvantage in racial disparities in alcohol treatment completion," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 462-476, January.
    6. Richard Fry & Scott Orford & Sarah Rodgers & Jennifer Morgan & David Fone, 2020. "A best practice framework to measure spatial variation in alcohol availability," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(3), pages 381-399, March.
    7. Chen, Wendong & Cheng, Long & Chen, Xuewu & Chen, Jingxu & Cao, Mengqiu, 2021. "Measuring accessibility to health care services for older bus passengers: A finer spatial resolution," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    8. Yoo Min Park & Mei-Po Kwan, 2020. "Understanding Racial Disparities in Exposure to Traffic-Related Air Pollution: Considering the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Population Distribution," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-14, February.
    9. Brendan Houng & Moshe Justman, 2015. "Out-Of-Sample Predictions Of Access To Higher Education And School Value-Added," Working Papers 1511, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Economics.
    10. Funke, Michael & Niebuhr, Annekatrin, 2000. "Spatial R&D Spillovers and Economic Growth - Evidence from West Germany," Discussion Paper Series 26396, Hamburg Institute of International Economics.
    11. Mabon, Leslie & Shih, Wan-Yu, 2018. "What might ‘just green enough’ urban development mean in the context of climate change adaptation? The case of urban greenspace planning in Taipei Metropolis, Taiwan," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 224-238.
    12. Sedigheh Lotfi & M. Koohsari, 2009. "Analyzing Accessibility Dimension of Urban Quality of Life: Where Urban Designers Face Duality Between Subjective and Objective Reading of Place," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 94(3), pages 417-435, December.
    13. Dadashpoor, Hashem & Rostami, Faramarz, 2017. "Measuring spatial proportionality between service availability, accessibility and mobility: Empirical evidence using spatial equity approach in Iran," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 44-55.
    14. Alejandro Díaz-Bautista, 2003. "Convergence And Economic Growth Considering Human Capital And R&D Spillovers," Remef - Revista Mexicana de Economía y Finanzas Nueva Época REMEF (The Mexican Journal of Economics and Finance), Instituto Mexicano de Ejecutivos de Finanzas, IMEF, vol. 2(2), pages 127-143, Junio 200.
    15. Cutts, Bethany B. & Darby, Kate J. & Boone, Christopher G. & Brewis, Alexandra, 2009. "City structure, obesity, and environmental justice: An integrated analysis of physical and social barriers to walkable streets and park access," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 1314-1322, November.
    16. Barón, Juan D. & Cobb-Clark, Deborah A., 2010. "Are Young People's Educational Outcomes Linked to their Sense of Control?," IZA Discussion Papers 4907, IZA Network @ LISER.
    17. Buly A Cardak & Chris Ryan, 2006. "Why are high ability individuals from poor backgrounds under-represented at university?," Working Papers 2006.04, School of Economics, La Trobe University.
    18. Joseli Macedo & Mônica A Haddad, 2016. "Equitable distribution of open space: Using spatial analysis to evaluate urban parks in Curitiba, Brazil," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(6), pages 1096-1117, November.
    19. Dustin T. Duncan & Jared Aldstadt & Márcia C. Castro & David R. Williams & John Whalen & Kellee White, 2012. "Space, race, and poverty: Spatial inequalities in walkable neighborhood amenities?," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 26(17), pages 409-448.
    20. Jeff Borland & Michael Coelli, 2016. "Labour Market Inequality in Australia," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 92(299), pages 517-547, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:9:p:1552-:d:110429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.