IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v10y2020i1p8-d308179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Equity in Urban Public Space (UPS) Based on Analysis of Municipal Public Policy Omissions: A Case Study of Atizapán de Zaragoza, State of México

Author

Listed:
  • Elsa A. Pérez-Paredes

    (Environmental Sciences Department, Instituto de Estudios Superiores de la Ciudad de México Rosario Castellanos, 07979 Mexico City, Mexico)

  • Aleksandra Krstikj

    (Escuela de Arquitectura, Arte y Diseño, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Av. Lago de Guadalupe KM 3.5, Margarita Maza de Juárez, 52926 Cd López Mateos, Estado de México, Mexico)

Abstract

International agendas, such as the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, have been established as global guidelines for equitable planning of urban centers. However, there is a lack of indicators and tools for public policy planning at the local level. Spatial equity in planning has been related to the spatial match between public facility level and residents´ distribution. The objective of this research was to assess the spatial inequity in urban public space (UPS) of Atizapán de Zaragoza, State of Mexico, and analyzed the cause of this phenomenon with a methodological framework based on the general indicator omissions in public policy. The indicator, omission of municipal public policies associated to UPS, allowed us to explain the existence of the spatial inequity in: (1) the conceptualization and interpretation that decision makers have about urban environmental development in the territory; (2) the lack of a public discussion about the sustainable vocation of the municipality; and (3) the dominant values of the actors involved in the production, planning, and installation of UPS. The significance of this phenomenon affects the recognition that UPS is a primary element for guaranteeing the rights to a healthy environment in equitable and sustainable cities and a resource for strengthening social cohesion, governance, and appropriation of public assets.

Suggested Citation

  • Elsa A. Pérez-Paredes & Aleksandra Krstikj, 2020. "Spatial Equity in Urban Public Space (UPS) Based on Analysis of Municipal Public Policy Omissions: A Case Study of Atizapán de Zaragoza, State of México," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:10:y:2020:i:1:p:8-:d:308179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/10/1/8/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/10/1/8/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mustafa Dikeç, 2001. "Justice and the Spatial Imagination," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 33(10), pages 1785-1805, October.
    2. E Talen & L Anselin, 1998. "Assessing Spatial Equity: An Evaluation of Measures of Accessibility to Public Playgrounds," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 30(4), pages 595-613, April.
    3. Mannix, Elizabeth A. & Neale, Margaret A. & Northcraft, Gregory B., 1995. "Equity, Equality, or Need? The Effects of Organizational Culture on the Allocation of Benefits and Burdens," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 276-286, September.
    4. Adriana A. Zuniga-Teran & Andrea K. Gerlak, 2019. "A Multidisciplinary Approach to Analyzing Questions of Justice Issues in Urban Greenspace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Yanhua Yuan & Jiangang Xu & Zhenbo Wang, 2017. "Spatial Equity Measure on Urban Ecological Space Layout Based on Accessibility of Socially Vulnerable Groups—A Case Study of Changting, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-20, August.
    6. Segovia, Olga, 2005. "Experiencias emblemáticas para la superación de la pobreza y precariedad urbana: espacio público," Documentos de Proyectos 3988, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aleksandra Krstikj, 2021. "Social Innovation in the Undergraduate Architecture Studio," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Peishen Wu & Mei Liu, 2022. "A Framework for the Spatial Inequality in Urban Public Facility for Urban Planning, Design and Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nazmul Haque, Md. & Sharifi, Ayyoob, 2024. "Justice in access to urban ecosystem services: A critical review of the literature," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    2. Jun Yang & Andong Guo & Xueming Li & Tai Huang, 2018. "Study of the Impact of a High-Speed Railway Opening on China’s Accessibility Pattern and Spatial Equality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-13, August.
    3. K M Atikur Rahman & Dunfu Zhang, 2018. "Analyzing the Level of Accessibility of Public Urban Green Spaces to Different Socially Vulnerable Groups of People," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-27, October.
    4. Houde, Maxime & Apparicio, Philippe & Séguin, Anne-Marie, 2018. "A ride for whom: Has cycling network expansion reduced inequities in accessibility in Montreal, Canada?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 9-21.
    5. Haque, Md. Nazmul & Sharifi, Ayyoob, 2024. "Who are marginalized in accessing urban ecosystem services? A systematic literature review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    6. Christopher M. Bacon & Gregory A. Baker, 2017. "The rise of food banks and the challenge of matching food assistance with potential need: towards a spatially specific, rapid assessment approach," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(4), pages 899-919, December.
    7. Moore, Alexander K. & Lewis, Joshua & Levine, Emma E. & Schweitzer, Maurice E., 2023. "Benevolent friends and high integrity leaders: How preferences for benevolence and integrity change across relationships," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    8. Yan Xu & Weixuan Song & Chunhui Liu, 2018. "Social-Spatial Accessibility to Urban Educational Resources under the School District System: A Case Study of Public Primary Schools in Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    9. Funke, Michael & Niebuhr, Annekatrin, 2000. "Spatial R&D Spillovers and Economic Growth - Evidence from West Germany," Discussion Paper Series 26396, Hamburg Institute of International Economics.
    10. Mabon, Leslie & Shih, Wan-Yu, 2018. "What might ‘just green enough’ urban development mean in the context of climate change adaptation? The case of urban greenspace planning in Taipei Metropolis, Taiwan," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 224-238.
    11. Sedigheh Lotfi & M. Koohsari, 2009. "Analyzing Accessibility Dimension of Urban Quality of Life: Where Urban Designers Face Duality Between Subjective and Objective Reading of Place," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 94(3), pages 417-435, December.
    12. Sabina Buczkowska & Nicolas Coulombel & Matthieu Lapparent, 2019. "A comparison of Euclidean Distance, Travel Times, and Network Distances in Location Choice Mixture Models," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1215-1248, December.
    13. Izlem Gozukara & Osman Yildirim, 2016. "Exploring the link between Distributive Justice and Innovative Behavior: Organizational Learning Capacity as a Mediator," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 6(2), pages 61-75, April.
    14. Dadashpoor, Hashem & Rostami, Faramarz, 2017. "Measuring spatial proportionality between service availability, accessibility and mobility: Empirical evidence using spatial equity approach in Iran," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 44-55.
    15. Alejandro Díaz-Bautista, 2003. "Convergence And Economic Growth Considering Human Capital And R&D Spillovers," Remef - Revista Mexicana de Economía y Finanzas Nueva Época REMEF (The Mexican Journal of Economics and Finance), Instituto Mexicano de Ejecutivos de Finanzas, IMEF, vol. 2(2), pages 127-143, Junio 200.
    16. Zhou, Jiangping & Zhang, Min & Zhu, Pengyu, 2019. "The equity and spatial implications of transit fare," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 309-324.
    17. David Martin & Sidney Swearingen, 2019. "Improving Environmental Justice Analysis of Urban Tree Ecosystem Services: A Case Study from Asheville, NC," Working Papers 19-01, Davidson College, Department of Economics.
    18. Karner, Alex, 2018. "Assessing public transit service equity using route-level accessibility measures and public data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 24-32.
    19. Rashid A. Mushkani & Haruka Ono, 2021. "Spatial Equity of Public Parks: A Case Study of Kabul City, Afghanistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-13, February.
    20. Dustin T. Duncan & Márcia C. Castro & Jared Aldstadt & David R. Williams & John Whalen & Kellee White, 2012. "Space, race, and poverty: Spatial inequalities in walkable neighborhood amenities?," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 26(17), pages 409-448.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:10:y:2020:i:1:p:8-:d:308179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.