IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i9p1921-d1754278.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying and Prioritising Public Space Demands in Historic Districts: Perspectives from Tourists and Local Residents in Yangzhou

Author

Listed:
  • Jizhou Chen

    (School of Design, Jiangnan University, Lihudadao, Wuxi 214122, China)

  • Xiaobin Li

    (School of Design, Jiangnan University, Lihudadao, Wuxi 214122, China)

  • Jialing Chen

    (School of Design, Jiangnan University, Lihudadao, Wuxi 214122, China)

  • Lijun Xu

    (Yangzhou City Land Use Planning Research Centre, Yangzhou Natural Resources and Planning Bureau, Guanchao Road, Yangzhou 321000, China)

  • Hao Feng

    (School of Design, Jiangnan University, Lihudadao, Wuxi 214122, China)

  • Rong Zhu

    (School of Design, Jiangnan University, Lihudadao, Wuxi 214122, China)

Abstract

With the ongoing advancement of urban renewal and cultural tourism, public spaces within historic cultural districts face dual challenges of structural complexity and diverse user demands. There is an urgent need to establish a scientific, user-oriented evaluation system to enhance spatial quality and user satisfaction. This study takes the Nanhesha Historic and Cultural Quarter in Yangzhou as a case study, focusing on two primary user groups: tourists and local residents. Employing semi-structured interviews and grounded theory, it distils a demand evaluation framework comprising four dimensions—spatial structure, environmental perception, socio-cultural aspects, and facility systems—with a total of 21 indicators. Subsequently, employing the Delphi method, experts were invited to refine the indicators through two rounds of deliberation. The Kano model was then applied to classify the demand attributes of different groups, identifying five common demands and sixteen differentiated demands. These were categorised into three sensitivity levels. Further integrating the Satisfaction Increment Index (SII), Dissatisfaction Decrement Index (DDI), and sensitivity values, a two-dimensional prioritisation model was constructed. This yielded a unified three-tier priority system alongside independent ranking frameworks for each user group. Findings reveal that visitors prioritise immediate experiential attributes such as spatial accessibility, appropriate scale, and environmental cleanliness, whereas residents favour long-term usage-oriented aspects including cultural expression, convenient facilities, and climate adaptability. This research not only enriches the theoretical framework for studying public space perception in historic cultural districts but also provides actionable evaluation criteria and practical pathways for multi-stakeholder spatial optimisation design. It offers guidance for the high-quality, refined development of public spaces within historic quarters.

Suggested Citation

  • Jizhou Chen & Xiaobin Li & Jialing Chen & Lijun Xu & Hao Feng & Rong Zhu, 2025. "Identifying and Prioritising Public Space Demands in Historic Districts: Perspectives from Tourists and Local Residents in Yangzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-49, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:1921-:d:1754278
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/9/1921/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/9/1921/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:1921-:d:1754278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.