IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i6p1065-d102041.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using an AHP-ISM Based Method to Study the Vulnerability Factors of Urban Rail Transit System

Author

Listed:
  • Liangliang Song

    (School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)

  • Qiming Li

    (School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)

  • George F. List

    (Department of Civil, Construction, & Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA)

  • Yongliang Deng

    (School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Ping Lu

    (School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
    School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China)

Abstract

As a sustainable means of public transportation, urban rail transit system undergoes rapid expansion in China. How to provide a safe and reliable service has been the subject of growing attention in this context. However, such work is challenging because rail transit systems are quite vulnerable and influenced by a set of interacting factors. Studying these vulnerability factors will contribute significantly to the operation of rail transit system. From this perspective, this paper made an exploration of the vulnerability factors based on an integrated method consisting of AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) and ISM (Interpretative Structural Modeling). Based on literature review, 21 vulnerability factors were identified. Subsequently, expert elicitation was employed to ascertain the importance of each factor and the interrelations among them. The results suggest that management and individual factors have the highest importance weights and the interrelations among vulnerability factors could be expressed as a five-layer structure, in which management factors were inclined to be at the lower level. The research provides valuable information for decision makers to take proactive strategies and reinforcement policies to guarantee safety operation of urban rail transit system and ensure urban public safety, which could promote the sustainable development of cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Liangliang Song & Qiming Li & George F. List & Yongliang Deng & Ping Lu, 2017. "Using an AHP-ISM Based Method to Study the Vulnerability Factors of Urban Rail Transit System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:6:p:1065-:d:102041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/6/1065/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/6/1065/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Berdica, Katja, 2002. "An introduction to road vulnerability: what has been done, is done and should be done," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 117-127, April.
    2. Johansson, Jonas & Hassel, Henrik & Zio, Enrico, 2013. "Reliability and vulnerability analyses of critical infrastructures: Comparing two approaches in the context of power systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 27-38.
    3. Daniel (Jian) Sun & Yuhan Zhao & Qing-Chang Lu, 2015. "Vulnerability Analysis of Urban Rail Transit Networks: A Case Study of Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Johansson, Jonas & Hassel, Henrik, 2010. "An approach for modelling interdependent infrastructures in the context of vulnerability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(12), pages 1335-1344.
    5. Thomas L. Saaty, 2013. "The Modern Science of Multicriteria Decision Making and Its Practical Applications: The AHP/ANP Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1101-1118, October.
    6. Aven, Terje, 2007. "A unified framework for risk and vulnerability analysis covering both safety and security," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(6), pages 745-754.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hui Xu & Liudan Jiao & Shulin Chen & Milan Deng & Ningxin Shen, 2018. "An Innovative Approach to Determining High-Risk Nodes in a Complex Urban Rail Transit Station: A Perspective of Promoting Urban Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Hongli Zhao & Ning Zhang & Yu Guan, 2018. "Safety Assessment Model for Dangerous Goods Transport by Air Carrier," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Xiaohong Jiang & Huiying Wang & Xiucheng Guo & Xiaolin Gong, 2019. "Using the FAHP, ISM, and MICMAC Approaches to Study the Sustainability Influencing Factors of the Last Mile Delivery of Rural E-Commerce Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Danish Farooq & Sarbast Moslem & Szabolcs Duleba, 2019. "Evaluation of Driver Behavior Criteria for Evolution of Sustainable Traffic Safety," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, June.
    5. Ping Liu & Qiming Li & Jing Bian & Liangliang Song & Xiaer Xiahou, 2018. "Using Interpretative Structural Modeling to Identify Critical Success Factors for Safety Management in Subway Construction: A China Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, June.
    6. Manideep Yenugula & Shankha Shubhra Goswami & Subramaniam Kaliappan & Rengaraj Saravanakumar & Areej Alasiry & Mehrez Marzougui & Abdulaziz AlMohimeed & Ahmed Elaraby, 2023. "Analyzing the Critical Parameters for Implementing Sustainable AI Cloud System in an IT Industry Using AHP-ISM-MICMAC Integrated Hybrid MCDM Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-35, August.
    7. Vladimir Simić & Radovan Soušek & Stefan Jovčić, 2020. "Picture Fuzzy MCDM Approach for Risk Assessment of Railway Infrastructure," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-29, December.
    8. Hong, Wei-Ting & Clifton, Geoffrey & Nelson, John D., 2022. "Rail transport system vulnerability analysis and policy implementation: Past progress and future directions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 299-308.
    9. Bouraima, Mouhamed Bayane & Qiu, Yanjun & Stević, Željko & Simić, Vladimir, 2023. "Assessment of alternative railway systems for sustainable transportation using an integrated IRN SWARA and IRN CoCoSo model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chao Fang & Piao Dong & Yi-Ping Fang & Enrico Zio, 2020. "Vulnerability analysis of critical infrastructure under disruptions: An application to China Railway High-speed," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(2), pages 235-245, April.
    2. Mohamad Darayi & Kash Barker & Joost R. Santos, 2017. "Component Importance Measures for Multi-Industry Vulnerability of a Freight Transportation Network," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1111-1136, December.
    3. Augutis, Juozas & Jokšas, Benas & Krikštolaitis, Ričardas & Urbonas, Rolandas, 2016. "The assessment technology of energy critical infrastructure," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1494-1504.
    4. Wu, Baichao & Tang, Aiping & Wu, Jie, 2016. "Modeling cascading failures in interdependent infrastructures under terrorist attacks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1-8.
    5. Nicholson, Charles D. & Barker, Kash & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose E., 2016. "Flow-based vulnerability measures for network component importance: Experimentation with preparedness planning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 62-73.
    6. Freiria, Susana & Ribeiro, Bernardete & Tavares, Alexandre O., 2015. "Understanding road network dynamics: Link-based topological patterns," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 55-66.
    7. Linn Svegrup & Jonas Johansson & Henrik Hassel, 2019. "Integration of Critical Infrastructure and Societal Consequence Models: Impact on Swedish Power System Mitigation Decisions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(9), pages 1970-1996, September.
    8. Pan, Shouzheng & Yan, Hai & He, Jia & He, Zhengbing, 2021. "Vulnerability and resilience of transportation systems: A recent literature review," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 581(C).
    9. Su, Huai & Zhang, Jinjun & Zio, Enrico & Yang, Nan & Li, Xueyi & Zhang, Zongjie, 2018. "An integrated systemic method for supply reliability assessment of natural gas pipeline networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 489-501.
    10. Payuna Uday & Karen Marais, 2015. "Designing Resilient Systems‐of‐Systems: A Survey of Metrics, Methods, and Challenges," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(5), pages 491-510, October.
    11. Bellè, Andrea & Zeng, Zhiguo & Duval, Carole & Sango, Marc & Barros, Anne, 2022. "Modeling and vulnerability analysis of interdependent railway and power networks: Application to British test systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    12. Zhao, Chen & Li, Nan & Fang, Dongping, 2018. "Criticality assessment of urban interdependent lifeline systems using a biased PageRank algorithm and a multilayer weighted directed network model," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 100-112.
    13. Senderov, S.M. & Vorobev, S.V., 2020. "Approaches to the identification of critical facilities and critical combinations of facilities in the gas industry in terms of its operability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    14. Valcamonico, Dario & Sansavini, Giovanni & Zio, Enrico, 2020. "Cooperative co-evolutionary approach to optimize recovery for improving resilience in multi-communities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    15. Dong, Mingxin & Zhang, Zhen & Liu, Yi & Zhao, Dong Feng & Meng, Yifei & Shi, Jihao, 2023. "Playing Bayesian Stackelberg game model for optimizing the vulnerability level of security incident system in petrochemical plants," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    16. Galvan, Giulio & Agarwal, Jitendra, 2020. "Assessing the vulnerability of infrastructure networks based on distribution measures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    17. Xueguo Xu & Chen Xu & Wenxin Zhang, 2022. "Research on the Destruction Resistance of Giant Urban Rail Transit Network from the Perspective of Vulnerability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-26, June.
    18. Sun, Daniel (Jian) & Guan, Shituo, 2016. "Measuring vulnerability of urban metro network from line operation perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 348-359.
    19. Jing Liu & Huapu Lu & He Ma & Wenzhi Liu, 2017. "Network Vulnerability Analysis of Rail Transit Plans in Beijng-Tianjin-Hebei Region Considering Connectivity Reliability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-17, August.
    20. Li, Tao & Rong, Lili & Yan, Kesheng, 2019. "Vulnerability analysis and critical area identification of public transport system: A case of high-speed rail and air transport coupling system in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 55-70.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:6:p:1065-:d:102041. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.