IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i12p7210-d837390.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Destruction Resistance of Giant Urban Rail Transit Network from the Perspective of Vulnerability

Author

Listed:
  • Xueguo Xu

    (School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Chen Xu

    (School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Wenxin Zhang

    (School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

Abstract

Giant urban rail transit (GURT) systems have been formed in many metropolises and play a critical role in addressing serious traffic congestion. Unfortunately, as a dynamic and complex system, the vulnerability of GURT networks under various failure scenarios will be more prominent as the network expansion continues. Thus, it is imperative to explore the complex structural characteristics of the network and improve the ability to deal with the disturbance of emergencies. In this study, the destruction resistance of GURT networks with scale growth is illustrated from a vulnerability perspective. Specifically, taking Shanghai rail transit (SHRT) system as an example, the network topology model is constructed using the Space L method, and the network structure characteristics are analyzed based on the complex network theory. In addition, five attack strategies are developed to represent random and targeted attacks during the simulation of network failure, and two metrics are determined to evaluate the network vulnerability. Some meaningful results have been obtained: (i) The Shanghai rail transit planning network (SHRTPN) has increased the network efficiency by more than 10% over the Shanghai rail transit operating network (SHRTON) and has effectively enhanced the network destruction resistance. (ii) The SHRT network is a small-world network and shows significant vulnerability under the targeted attacks. The failure of only 3% high betweenness stations in SHRTON can lead to a 66.2% decrease in the network efficiency and a 75.8% decrease in the largest connected component (LCC) ratio. (iii) Attacking stations will cause more severe network failures than attacking edges, and it is necessary to focus on preventing catastrophic network failure caused by the critical station’s failure breaking the threshold. Finally, the strategies for improving the destruction resistance of GURT networks are proposed. The findings of this research can provide an essential reference for the rational planning, safety protection, and sustainable construction of GURT systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Xueguo Xu & Chen Xu & Wenxin Zhang, 2022. "Research on the Destruction Resistance of Giant Urban Rail Transit Network from the Perspective of Vulnerability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-26, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7210-:d:837390
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7210/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7210/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cats, Oded & Krishnakumari, Panchamy, 2020. "Metropolitan rail network robustness," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 549(C).
    2. Berdica, Katja, 2002. "An introduction to road vulnerability: what has been done, is done and should be done," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 117-127, April.
    3. Derrible, Sybil & Kennedy, Christopher, 2010. "The complexity and robustness of metro networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(17), pages 3678-3691.
    4. Jiangang Shi & Shiping Wen & Xianbo Zhao & Guangdong Wu, 2019. "Sustainable Development of Urban Rail Transit Networks: A Vulnerability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-24, March.
    5. López, Fernando A. & Páez, Antonio & Carrasco, Juan A. & Ruminot, Natalia A., 2017. "Vulnerability of nodes under controlled network topology and flow autocorrelation conditions," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 77-87.
    6. Zhou, Jian & Huang, Ning & Coit, David W. & Felder, Frank A., 2018. "Combined effects of load dynamics and dependence clusters on cascading failures in network systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 116-126.
    7. Duncan J. Watts & Steven H. Strogatz, 1998. "Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 393(6684), pages 440-442, June.
    8. Cao, Xian-Bin & Hong, Chen & Du, Wen-Bo & Zhang, Jun, 2013. "Improving the network robustness against cascading failures by adding links," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 35-40.
    9. Zhang, Xu & Zhang, Wei & Lee, Paul Tae-Woo, 2020. "Importance rankings of nodes in the China Railway Express network under the Belt and Road Initiative," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 134-147.
    10. Daniel (Jian) Sun & Yuhan Zhao & Qing-Chang Lu, 2015. "Vulnerability Analysis of Urban Rail Transit Networks: A Case Study of Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-18, May.
    11. Dui, Hongyan & Chen, Shuanshuan & Wang, Jia, 2021. "Failure-oriented maintenance analysis of nodes and edges in network systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    12. Cats, Oded & Vermeulen, Alex & Warnier, Martijn & van Lint, Hans, 2020. "Modelling growth principles of metropolitan public transport networks," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    13. C. von Ferber & T. Holovatch & Yu. Holovatch & V. Palchykov, 2009. "Public transport networks: empirical analysis and modeling," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 68(2), pages 261-275, March.
    14. Jingyi Lin & Yifang Ban, 2013. "Complex Network Topology of Transportation Systems," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(6), pages 658-685, November.
    15. Zhang, Jianhua & Xu, Xiaoming & Hong, Liu & Wang, Shuliang & Fei, Qi, 2011. "Networked analysis of the Shanghai subway network, in China," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(23), pages 4562-4570.
    16. Meng, Yangyang & Tian, Xiangliang & Li, Zhongwen & Zhou, Wei & Zhou, Zhijie & Zhong, Maohua, 2020. "Exploring node importance evolution of weighted complex networks in urban rail transit," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 558(C).
    17. Hui Xu & Liudan Jiao & Shulin Chen & Milan Deng & Ningxin Shen, 2018. "An Innovative Approach to Determining High-Risk Nodes in a Complex Urban Rail Transit Station: A Perspective of Promoting Urban Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    18. Latora, Vito & Marchiori, Massimo, 2002. "Is the Boston subway a small-world network?," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 314(1), pages 109-113.
    19. Robert J. Lempert & David G. Groves & Steven W. Popper & Steve C. Bankes, 2006. "A General, Analytic Method for Generating Robust Strategies and Narrative Scenarios," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 514-528, April.
    20. Dunn, Sarah & Wilkinson, Sean M., 2016. "Increasing the resilience of air traffic networks using a network graph theory approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 39-50.
    21. Feng Xie & David Levinson, 2009. "Modeling the Growth of Transportation Networks: A Comprehensive Review," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 291-307, September.
    22. Seaton, Katherine A. & Hackett, Lisa M., 2004. "Stations, trains and small-world networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 339(3), pages 635-644.
    23. Cats, Oded, 2017. "Topological evolution of a metropolitan rail transport network: The case of Stockholm," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 172-183.
    24. Sun, Lishan & Huang, Yuchen & Chen, Yanyan & Yao, Liya, 2018. "Vulnerability assessment of urban rail transit based on multi-static weighted method in Beijing, China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 12-24.
    25. von Ferber, C. & Holovatch, T. & Holovatch, Yu. & Palchykov, V., 2007. "Network harness: Metropolis public transport," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 380(C), pages 585-591.
    26. Jing Liu & Huapu Lu & He Ma & Wenzhi Liu, 2017. "Network Vulnerability Analysis of Rail Transit Plans in Beijng-Tianjin-Hebei Region Considering Connectivity Reliability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-17, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hu, Jie & Wen, Weiping & Zhai, Changhai & Pei, Shunshun, 2024. "Post-earthquake functionality assessment for urban subway systems: Incorporating the combined effects of seismic performance of structural and non-structural systems and functional interdependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    2. Xu, Chen & Xu, Xueguo, 2024. "A two-stage resilience promotion approach for urban rail transit networks based on topology enhancement and recovery optimization," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 635(C).
    3. Guiqiong Xu & Chen Dong & Lei Meng, 2022. "Research on the Collaborative Innovation Relationship of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Yangtze River Delta of China: A Complex Network Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Qingjie Qi & Yangyang Meng & Xiaofei Zhao & Jianzhong Liu, 2022. "Resilience Assessment of an Urban Metro Complex Network: A Case Study of the Zhengzhou Metro," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-19, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Chen & Xu, Xueguo, 2024. "A two-stage resilience promotion approach for urban rail transit networks based on topology enhancement and recovery optimization," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 635(C).
    2. Kopsidas, Athanasios & Kepaptsoglou, Konstantinos, 2022. "Identification of critical stations in a Metro System: A substitute complex network analysis," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 596(C).
    3. Lin Zhang & Jian Lu & Bai-bai Fu & Shu-bin Li, 2018. "A Review and Prospect for the Complexity and Resilience of Urban Public Transit Network Based on Complex Network Theory," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-36, December.
    4. Jiangang Shi & Shiping Wen & Xianbo Zhao & Guangdong Wu, 2019. "Sustainable Development of Urban Rail Transit Networks: A Vulnerability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-24, March.
    5. Yangyang Meng & Qingjie Qi & Jianzhong Liu & Wei Zhou, 2022. "Dynamic Evolution Analysis of Complex Topology and Node Importance in Shenzhen Metro Network from 2004 to 2021," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    6. Luo, Ding & Cats, Oded & van Lint, Hans & Currie, Graham, 2019. "Integrating network science and public transport accessibility analysis for comparative assessment," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    7. Zhiru Wang & Wubin Ma & Albert Chan, 2020. "Exploring the Relationships between the Topological Characteristics of Subway Networks and Service Disruption Impact," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, May.
    8. Chan, Ho-Yin & Chen, Anthony & Li, Guoyuan & Xu, Xiangdong & Lam, William, 2021. "Evaluating the value of new metro lines using route diversity measures: The case of Hong Kong's Mass Transit Railway system," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    9. Yi Junmin, 2014. "System Planning of Route Diagram for China Railway Passengers Based on Network and Ergonomics," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 2(2), pages 170-177, April.
    10. Yi Shen & Gang Ren & Bin Ran, 2021. "Cascading failure analysis and robustness optimization of metro networks based on coupled map lattices: a case study of Nanjing, China," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 537-553, April.
    11. Lu, Qing-Chang & Zhang, Lei & Xu, Peng-Cheng & Cui, Xin & Li, Jing, 2022. "Modeling network vulnerability of urban rail transit under cascading failures: A Coupled Map Lattices approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    12. Pan, Shouzheng & Yan, Hai & He, Jia & He, Zhengbing, 2021. "Vulnerability and resilience of transportation systems: A recent literature review," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 581(C).
    13. Cats, Oded & Krishnakumari, Panchamy, 2020. "Metropolitan rail network robustness," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 549(C).
    14. Jing, Weiwei & Xu, Xiangdong & Pu, Yichao, 2020. "Route redundancy-based approach to identify the critical stations in metro networks: A mean-excess probability measure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    15. Zhang, Jianhua & Wang, Meng, 2019. "Transportation functionality vulnerability of urban rail transit networks based on movingblock: The case of Nanjing metro," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 535(C).
    16. Derrible, Sybil & Kennedy, Christopher, 2010. "The complexity and robustness of metro networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(17), pages 3678-3691.
    17. Hu, Jie & Wen, Weiping & Zhai, Changhai & Pei, Shunshun, 2024. "Post-earthquake functionality assessment for urban subway systems: Incorporating the combined effects of seismic performance of structural and non-structural systems and functional interdependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    18. Ting Chen & Jianxiao Ma & Zhenjun Zhu & Xiucheng Guo, 2023. "Evaluation Method for Node Importance of Urban Rail Network Considering Traffic Characteristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    19. Nan Zhang & Daniel J. Graham & Daniel Hörcher & Prateek Bansal, 2021. "A causal inference approach to measure the vulnerability of urban metro systems," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 3269-3300, December.
    20. Jing Liu & Huapu Lu & Mingyu Chen & Jianyu Wang & Ying Zhang, 2020. "Macro Perspective Research on Transportation Safety: An Empirical Analysis of Network Characteristics and Vulnerability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7210-:d:837390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.