IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v7y2015i6p6919-6936d50346.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vulnerability Analysis of Urban Rail Transit Networks: A Case Study of Shanghai, China

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel (Jian) Sun

    (State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, School of Naval Architecture, Ocean & Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
    Transportation Research Center, School of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Yuhan Zhao

    (Transportation Research Center, School of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
    Department of Management, Technology and Economics, ETH Zurich, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Qing-Chang Lu

    (State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, School of Naval Architecture, Ocean & Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

Abstract

Rail transit is developing rapidly in major cities of China and has become a key component of urban transport. Nevertheless, the security and reliability in operation are significant issues that cannot be neglected. In this paper, the network and station vulnerabilities of the urban rail transit system were analyzed based on complex network and graph theories. A vulnerability evaluation model was proposed by accounting metro interchange and passenger flow and further validated by a case study of Shanghai Metro with full-scale network and real-world traffic data. It is identified that the urban rail transit network is rather robust to random attacks, but is vulnerable to the largest degree node-based attacks and the highest betweenness node-based attacks. Metro stations with a large node degree are more important in maintaining the network size, while stations with a high node betweenness are critical to network efficiency and origin-destination (OD) connectivity. The most crucial stations in maintaining network serviceability do not necessarily have the highest passenger throughput or the largest structural connectivity. A comprehensive evaluation model as proposed is therefore essential to assess station vulnerability, so that attention can be placed on appropriate nodes within the metro system. The findings of this research are of both theoretical and practical significance for urban rail transit network design and performance evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel (Jian) Sun & Yuhan Zhao & Qing-Chang Lu, 2015. "Vulnerability Analysis of Urban Rail Transit Networks: A Case Study of Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:6:p:6919-6936:d:50346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/6/6919/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/6/6919/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Derrible, Sybil & Kennedy, Christopher, 2010. "The complexity and robustness of metro networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(17), pages 3678-3691.
    2. Michael Taylor & Somenahalli Sekhar & Glen D'Este, 2006. "Application of Accessibility Based Methods for Vulnerability Analysis of Strategic Road Networks," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 267-291, September.
    3. Berdica, Katja, 2002. "An introduction to road vulnerability: what has been done, is done and should be done," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 117-127, April.
    4. Jenelius, Erik, 2009. "Network structure and travel patterns: explaining the geographical disparities of road network vulnerability," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 234-244.
    5. Zhang, Jianhua & Xu, Xiaoming & Hong, Liu & Wang, Shuliang & Fei, Qi, 2011. "Networked analysis of the Shanghai subway network, in China," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(23), pages 4562-4570.
    6. Jenelius, Erik & Petersen, Tom & Mattsson, Lars-Göran, 2006. "Importance and exposure in road network vulnerability analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(7), pages 537-560, August.
    7. Angeloudis, Panagiotis & Fisk, David, 2006. "Large subway systems as complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 367(C), pages 553-558.
    8. Cadarso, Luis & Marín, Ángel & Maróti, Gábor, 2013. "Recovery of disruptions in rapid transit networks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 15-33.
    9. Raveau, Sebastián & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & de Grange, Louis, 2011. "A topological route choice model for metro," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 138-147, February.
    10. Zhang, Jianhua & Zhao, Mingwei & Liu, Haikuan & Xu, Xiaoming, 2013. "Networked characteristics of the urban rail transit networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(6), pages 1538-1546.
    11. Nguyen, T.P. Khanh & Beugin, Julie & Marais, Juliette, 2015. "Method for evaluating an extended Fault Tree to analyse the dependability of complex systems: Application to a satellite-based railway system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 300-313.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kashin Sugishita & Yasuo Asakura, 2021. "Vulnerability studies in the fields of transportation and complex networks: a citation network analysis," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-34, March.
    2. Rodríguez-Núñez, Eduardo & García-Palomares, Juan Carlos, 2014. "Measuring the vulnerability of public transport networks," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 50-63.
    3. Sun, Daniel (Jian) & Guan, Shituo, 2016. "Measuring vulnerability of urban metro network from line operation perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 348-359.
    4. Zhang, Jianhua & Wang, Shuliang & Wang, Xiaoyuan, 2018. "Comparison analysis on vulnerability of metro networks based on complex network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 496(C), pages 72-78.
    5. Zhang, Jianhua & Wang, Shuliang & Zhang, Zhaojun & Zou, Kuansheng & Shu, Zhan, 2016. "Characteristics on hub networks of urban rail transit networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 447(C), pages 502-507.
    6. Jing, Weiwei & Xu, Xiangdong & Pu, Yichao, 2020. "Route redundancy-based approach to identify the critical stations in metro networks: A mean-excess probability measure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    7. Jenelius, Erik & Mattsson, Lars-Göran, 2012. "Road network vulnerability analysis of area-covering disruptions: A grid-based approach with case study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 746-760.
    8. Yingying Xing & Jian Lu & Shengdi Chen & Sunanda Dissanayake, 2017. "Vulnerability analysis of urban rail transit based on complex network theory: a case study of Shanghai Metro," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 501-525, October.
    9. Pan, Shouzheng & Yan, Hai & He, Jia & He, Zhengbing, 2021. "Vulnerability and resilience of transportation systems: A recent literature review," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 581(C).
    10. Yang, Zhijie & Chen, Xiaolong, 2018. "Evolution assessment of Shanghai Urban Rail Transit Network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 503(C), pages 1263-1274.
    11. Balijepalli, Chandra & Oppong, Olivia, 2014. "Measuring vulnerability of road network considering the extent of serviceability of critical road links in urban areas," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 145-155.
    12. Elisa Frutos Bernal & Angel Martín del Rey, 2019. "Study of the Structural and Robustness Characteristics of Madrid Metro Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-24, June.
    13. Zhang, Jianhua & Wang, Meng, 2019. "Transportation functionality vulnerability of urban rail transit networks based on movingblock: The case of Nanjing metro," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 535(C).
    14. Federico Rupi & Silvia Bernardi & Guido Rossi & Antonio Danesi, 2015. "The Evaluation of Road Network Vulnerability in Mountainous Areas: A Case Study," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 397-411, June.
    15. Zhang, Jianhua & Song, Bo & Zhang, Zhaojun & Liu, Haikuan, 2014. "An approach for modeling vulnerability of the network of networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 412(C), pages 127-136.
    16. Li, Tao & Rong, Lili & Yan, Kesheng, 2019. "Vulnerability analysis and critical area identification of public transport system: A case of high-speed rail and air transport coupling system in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 55-70.
    17. Yu Miao & Anning Ni, 2019. "Vulnerability Analysis of Intercity Multimode Transportation Networks; A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, April.
    18. Li, Tao & Rong, Lili, 2021. "Impacts of service feature on vulnerability analysis of high-speed rail network," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 238-253.
    19. Yi Shen & Gang Ren & Bin Ran, 2021. "Cascading failure analysis and robustness optimization of metro networks based on coupled map lattices: a case study of Nanjing, China," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 537-553, April.
    20. Yingying Xing & Jian Lu & Shendi Chen, 2016. "Weighted Complex Network Analysis of Shanghai Rail Transit System," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2016, pages 1-8, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:6:p:6919-6936:d:50346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.