IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i3p259-d65498.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Establishment of a Green Supplier Selection and Guidance Mechanism with the ANP and IPA

Author

Listed:
  • Chih-Chao Chung

    (Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, National Kaohsiung First University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung City 824, Taiwan)

  • Li-Chung Chao

    (Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, National Kaohsiung First University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung City 824, Taiwan)

  • Shi-Jer Lou

    (Graduate Institute of Technological and Vocational Education, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung 912, Taiwan)

Abstract

This study aims to establish a green supplier selection and guidance mechanism by integrating the features of an ANP (Analytic Network Process) and an IPA (Importance–Performance Analysis) to achieve sustainable management for green supply chains. Using an expert survey, this study developed green supplier selection criteria. It adopted an ANP, which allows for interdependencies and feedback between the various criteria, to select competitive green suppliers. Then, it used an IPA, which can analyze the criteria’s significance and performance levels, to provide green suppliers with direction for guidance and improvements. The green supplier selection and guidance mechanism featuring an ANP and IPA is thus established and validated through case studies. The research results showed the following: (1) the green supplier selection criteria comprise a total of 11 performance evaluation criteria from the three dimensions of operation, competence, and environmental consciousness; (2) as shown by the APN evaluation results, environmental benefits, environmental regulations, finance, technological competence, and delivery time are the top five among the overall green criteria of the company; the performance of the various suppliers is thus arranged in order, and the most competitive supplier is selected; (3) an IPA is used to analyze the criteria’s significance and supplier performance levels and to provide the suppliers with suggestions on priority improvements, including implementing the requirements in the environmental regulations, establishing comprehensive financial management procedures, improving corporate technological competence, and consolidating customer service; (4) it is suggested that an ANP and IPA should be integrated in the applications, which could simplify the green supplier selection and guidance mechanisms and increase the efficiency of supplier management, thus creating a three-win situation for the clients, the company, and the suppliers.

Suggested Citation

  • Chih-Chao Chung & Li-Chung Chao & Shi-Jer Lou, 2016. "The Establishment of a Green Supplier Selection and Guidance Mechanism with the ANP and IPA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-24, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:3:p:259-:d:65498
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/3/259/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/3/259/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abalo, Javier & Varela, Jesus & Manzano, Vicente, 2007. "Importance values for Importance-Performance Analysis: A formula for spreading out values derived from preference rankings," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 115-121, February.
    2. Weber, Charles A. & Current, John R. & Benton, W. C., 1991. "Vendor selection criteria and methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 2-18, January.
    3. Philippe-Pierre Dornier & Ricardo Ernst, 1997. "The Logistics Impact of the Channel Tunnel," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 39-59, June.
    4. Jayaram, Jayanth & Avittathur, Balram, 2015. "Green supply chains: A perspective from an emerging economy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 234-244.
    5. Huiru Zhao & Sen Guo, 2014. "Selecting Green Supplier of Thermal Power Equipment by Using a Hybrid MCDM Method for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Asanuma, Banri, 1989. "Manufacturer-supplier relationships in Japan and the concept of relation-specific skill," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 3(1), pages 1-30, March.
    7. Keith Walley, 2007. "Coopetition: An Introduction to the Subject and an Agenda for Research," International Studies of Management & Organization, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 11-31, January.
    8. Giovanna Padula & Giovanni Battista Dagnino, 2007. "Untangling the Rise of Coopetition: The Intrusion of Competition in a Cooperative Game Structure," International Studies of Management & Organization, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 32-52, January.
    9. Tognetti, Alice & Grosse-Ruyken, Pan Theo & Wagner, Stephan M., 2015. "Green supply chain network optimization and the trade-off between environmental and economic objectives," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PB), pages 385-392.
    10. Sarkis, Joseph & Zhu, Qinghua & Lai, Kee-hung, 2011. "An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 1-15, March.
    11. Peng Jia & Kannan Govindan & Tsan-Ming Choi & Sivakumar Rajendran, 2015. "Supplier Selection Problems in Fashion Business Operations with Sustainability Considerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-17, February.
    12. Jacques Houssiaux, 1957. "Le concept de « quasi-intégration » et le rôle des sous-traitants dans l'industrie," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 8(2), pages 221-247.
    13. Coghlan, Alexandra, 2012. "Facilitating reef tourism management through an innovative importance-performance analysis method," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 767-775.
    14. Shahin Mokhlesian, 2014. "How Do Contractors Select Suppliers for Greener Construction Projects? The Case of Three Swedish Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(7), pages 1-19, June.
    15. Klein, Benjamin & Crawford, Robert G & Alchian, Armen A, 1978. "Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 21(2), pages 297-326, October.
    16. Karpak, Birsen & Topcu, Ilker, 2010. "Small medium manufacturing enterprises in Turkey: An analytic network process framework for prioritizing factors affecting success," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 60-70, May.
    17. Scott E. Sampson & MICHAEL J. SHOWALTER, 1999. "The Performance-Importance Response Function: Observations and Implications," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 1-25, July.
    18. Hartmut Stadtler, 2015. "Supply Chain Management: An Overview," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, in: Hartmut Stadtler & Christoph Kilger & Herbert Meyr (ed.), Supply Chain Management and Advanced Planning, edition 5, chapter 1, pages 3-28, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chia-Nan Wang & Hong-Xuyen Thi Ho & Shih-Hsiung Luo & Tsung-Fu Lin, 2017. "An Integrated Approach to Evaluating and Selecting Green Logistics Providers for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Carlos Manzanares-Cañizares & Alberto Sánchez-Lite & Víctor F. Rosales-Prieto & José Luis Fuentes-Bargues & Cristina González-Gaya, 2022. "A 5S Lean Strategy for a Sustainable Welding Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Chih-Chao Chung & Li-Chung Chao & Chih-Hong Chen & Shi-Jer Lou, 2016. "A Balanced Scorecard of Sustainable Management in the Taiwanese Bicycle Industry: Development of Performance Indicators and Importance Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Letizia Tebaldi & Barbara Bigliardi & Eleonora Bottani, 2018. "Sustainable Supply Chain and Innovation: A Review of the Recent Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-29, October.
    5. Xiongyong Zhou & Zhiduan Xu, 2018. "An Integrated Sustainable Supplier Selection Approach Based on Hybrid Information Aggregation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-49, July.
    6. Josef-Peter Schöggl & Morgane M. C. Fritz & Rupert J. Baumgartner, 2016. "Sustainability Assessment in Automotive and Electronics Supply Chains—A Set of Indicators Defined in a Multi-Stakeholder Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Wei Song & Zhiya Chen & Xuping Wang & Qian Wang & Chenghua Shi & Wei Zhao, 2017. "Environmentally Friendly Supplier Selection Using Prospect Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-17, March.
    8. Cristina López & Rocío Ruíz-Benítez & Carmen Vargas-Machuca, 2019. "On the Environmental and Social Sustainability of Technological Innovations in Urban Bus Transport: The EU Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Piera Centobelli & Roberto Cerchione & Emilio Esposito, 2018. "Environmental Sustainability and Energy-Efficient Supply Chain Management: A Review of Research Trends and Proposed Guidelines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-36, January.
    2. Aleksander Banasik & Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard & Argyris Kanellopoulos & G. D. H. Claassen & Jack G. A. J. Vorst, 2018. "Multi-criteria decision making approaches for green supply chains: a review," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 366-396, September.
    3. Nadav Levy, 2024. "Partial ownership, control, and investment in vertical relationships," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 247-266, January.
    4. Fu, Shuke & Ge, Yingchen & Hao, Yu & Peng, Jiachao & Tian, Jiali, 2024. "Energy supply chain efficiency in the digital era: Evidence from China's listed companies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    5. Michele Preziosi & Alessia Acampora & Maria Claudia Lucchetti & Roberto Merli, 2022. "Delighting Hotel Guests with Sustainability: Revamping Importance-Performance Analysis in the Light of the Three-Factor Theory of Customer Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Miguel Afonso Sellitto & Guilherme Schreiber Pereira & Rafael Marques & Daniel Pacheco Lacerda, 2018. "Systemic Understanding of Coopetitive Behaviour in a Latin American Technological Park," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 31(5), pages 479-494, October.
    7. S. Maryam Masoumi & Nima Kazemi & Salwa Hanim Abdul-Rashid, 2019. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management in the Automotive Industry: A Process-Oriented Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-30, July.
    8. José Sousa & Xavier Fairise, 2014. "On the value of partial commitment for cooperative investment in buyer–supplier relationship," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 111(2), pages 151-171, March.
    9. Ritala, Paavo & Tidström, Annika, 2014. "Untangling the value-creation and value-appropriation elements of coopetition strategy: A longitudinal analysis on the firm and relational levels," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 498-515.
    10. Lai, Ivan Ka Wai & Hitchcock, Michael, 2015. "Importance–performance analysis in tourism: A framework for researchers," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 242-267.
    11. Albayrak, Tahir & Caber, Meltem, 2015. "Prioritisation of the hotel attributes according to their influence on satisfaction: A comparison of two techniques," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 43-50.
    12. Esmailpour, Javad & Aghabayk, Kayvan & Abrari Vajari, Mohammad & De Gruyter, Chris, 2020. "Importance – Performance Analysis (IPA) of bus service attributes: A case study in a developing country," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 129-150.
    13. Jeffrey H. Dyer & Wujin Chu, 2003. "The Role of Trustworthiness in Reducing Transaction Costs and Improving Performance: Empirical Evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 57-68, February.
    14. Cerchione, Roberto & Esposito, Emilio, 2016. "A systematic review of supply chain knowledge management research: State of the art and research opportunities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 276-292.
    15. Yen-Ching Chuang & Shu-Kung Hu & James J. H. Liou & Huai-Wei Lo, 2018. "Building a Decision Dashboard for Improving Green Supply Chain Management," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(05), pages 1363-1398, September.
    16. Lai, Ivan Ka Wai & Hitchcock, Michael, 2016. "A comparison of service quality attributes for stand-alone and resort-based luxury hotels in Macau: 3-Dimensional importance-performance analysis," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 139-159.
    17. Jeffrey H. Dyer & Harbir Singh & Prashant Kale, 2008. "Splitting the pie: rent distribution in alliances and networks," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2-3), pages 137-148.
    18. François Fulconis & Virginie Hiesse & Gilles Paché, 2011. "The 3PL Provider as Catalyst of Coopetitive Strategies-An Exploratory Study," Post-Print hal-02300882, HAL.
    19. van den Broek, Judith & Boselie, Paul & Paauwe, Jaap, 2018. "Cooperative innovation through a talent management pool: A qualitative study on coopetition in healthcare," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 135-144.
    20. Schilirò, Daniele, 2023. "Coopetition in Mearth," MPRA Paper 117457, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:3:p:259-:d:65498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.