IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v7y2015i8p10191-10209d53474.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neimark–Sacker Bifurcation Analysis and 0–1 Chaos Test of an Interactions Model between Industrial Production and Environmental Quality in a Closed Area

Author

Listed:
  • Baogui Xin

    (Nonlinear Science Center, College of Economics and Management, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China)

  • Zhiheng Wu

    (Nonlinear Science Center, College of Economics and Management, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China)

Abstract

A discrete-time model is presented to describe the complex interaction between industrial production and environmental quality in a closed area. Its Neimark–Sacker bifurcation and chaos are discussed based on Wen’s explicit Neimark–Sacker bifurcation criterion, Kuznetsov’s normal form method and center manifold theory and Gottwald and Melbourne’s 0–1 test algorithm. Numerical simulations are employed to validate the main results of this work.

Suggested Citation

  • Baogui Xin & Zhiheng Wu, 2015. "Neimark–Sacker Bifurcation Analysis and 0–1 Chaos Test of an Interactions Model between Industrial Production and Environmental Quality in a Closed Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:8:p:10191-10209:d:53474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/8/10191/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/8/10191/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xin, Baogui & Ma, Junhai & Gao, Qin, 2009. "The complexity of an investment competition dynamical model with imperfect information in a security market," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 2425-2438.
    2. Mehdi Aliehyaei & Farideh Atabi & Mohammad Khorshidvand & Marc A. Rosen, 2015. "Exergy, Economic and Environmental Analysis for Simple and Combined Heat and Power IC Engines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Dorel Paraschiv & Cristiana Tudor & Radu Petrariu, 2015. "The Textile Industry and Sustainable Development: A Holt–Winters Forecasting Investigation for the Eastern European Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-12, January.
    4. Dinda, Soumyananda, 2004. "Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 431-455, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen Zhang & Xianyi Li, 2023. "Dynamics of a Discrete Leslie–Gower Model with Harvesting and Holling-II Functional Response," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Uddin, Md. Jasim & Rana, Sarker Md. Sohel & Işık, Seval & Kangalgil, Figen, 2023. "On the qualitative study of a discrete fractional order prey–predator model with the effects of harvesting on predator population," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 175(P1).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khan, Syed Abdul Rehman & Zaman, Khalid & Zhang, Yu, 2016. "The relationship between energy-resource depletion, climate change, health resources and the environmental Kuznets curve: Evidence from the panel of selected developed countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 468-477.
    2. Fujii, Hidemichi & Managi, Shunsuke, 2013. "Which industry is greener? An empirical study of nine industries in OECD countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 381-388.
    3. Muhammad Shahbaz & Vassilios G. Papavassiliou & Amine Lahiani & David Roubaud, 2023. "Are we moving towards decarbonisation of the global economy? Lessons from the distant past to the present," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 2620-2634, July.
    4. Zanin, Luca & Marra, Giampiero, 2012. "Assessing the functional relationship between CO2 emissions and economic development using an additive mixed model approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 1328-1337.
    5. Kaika, Dimitra & Zervas, Efthimios, 2013. "The environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) theory. Part B: Critical issues," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1403-1411.
    6. Touitou Mohammed, 2021. "Empirical Analysis of the Environmental Kuznets Curve for Economic Growth and CO2 Emissions in North African Countries," Econometrics. Advances in Applied Data Analysis, Sciendo, vol. 25(2), pages 67-77, June.
    7. Erasmia Kotroni & Dimitra Kaika & Efthimios Zervas, 2020. "Environmental Kuznets Curve in Greece in the period 1960-2014," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(4), pages 364-370.
    8. Emrah Kocak & Hayriye Hilal Baglitas, 2022. "The path to sustainable municipal solid waste management: Do human development, energy efficiency, and income inequality matter?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1947-1962, December.
    9. Yue, Shen & Munir, Irfan Ullah & Hyder, Shabir & Nassani, Abdelmohsen A. & Qazi Abro, Muhammad Moinuddin & Zaman, Khalid, 2020. "Sustainable food production, forest biodiversity and mineral pricing: Interconnected global issues," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    10. Awaworyi Churchill, Sefa & Inekwe, John & Smyth, Russell & Zhang, Xibin, 2019. "R&D intensity and carbon emissions in the G7: 1870–2014," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 30-37.
    11. Juan Antonio Duro & Jordi Teixidó-Figueras & Emilio Padilla, 2017. "The Causal Factors of International Inequality in $$\hbox {CO}_{2}$$ CO 2 Emissions Per Capita: A Regression-Based Inequality Decomposition Analysis," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 67(4), pages 683-700, August.
    12. Ertürk, Mevlüde, 2016. "Çevre Kirliliği Ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerin Veri Görselleştirme Kullanarak Karşılaştırılması [The Relation Between Environmental Pollution and Economic Growth ," MPRA Paper 69879, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 08 Mar 2016.
    13. Yan, Bingqian & Xia, Yan & Jiang, Xuemei, 2023. "Carbon productivity and value-added generations: Regional heterogeneity along global value chain," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 111-125.
    14. Apergis, Nicholas & Payne, James E., 2010. "Coal consumption and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of OECD countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 1353-1359, March.
    15. Ehigiamusoe, Kizito Uyi & Lean, Hooi Hooi & Smyth, Russell, 2020. "The moderating role of energy consumption in the carbon emissions-income nexus in middle-income countries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    16. Honma, Satoshi, 2012. "Environmental and economic efficiencies in the Asia-Pacific region," MPRA Paper 43361, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Sebri, Maamar, 2009. "La Zone Méditerranéenne Face à la Pollution de L’air : Une Investigation Econométrique [The Mediterranean Zone in front of Air pollution: an Econometric Investigation]," MPRA Paper 32382, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Liddle, Brantley, 2013. "Population, Affluence, and Environmental Impact Across Development: Evidence from Panel Cointegration Modeling," MPRA Paper 52088, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. George Halkos & Iacovos Psarianos, 2016. "Exploring the effect of including the environment in the neoclassical growth model," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 18(3), pages 339-358, July.
    20. Eleni Sardianou & Vasilis Nikou & Ioannis Kostakis, 2023. "Harmonizing Sustainability Goals: Empirical Insights into Climate Change Mitigation and Circular Economy Strategies in Selected European Countries with SDG13 Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:8:p:10191-10209:d:53474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.