IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i9p3775-d1639911.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Low-Carbon City Pilot Policies on Urban Green Energy Efficiency: A Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on Three Batches of Pilot Policy Implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Yilin Wang

    (School of Business, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250300, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yuanhe Du

    (School of Economics, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250300, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Rongkun Liu

    (School of Business, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250300, China)

Abstract

With the acceleration of global industrialization, energy consumption and environmental problems are becoming increasingly serious issues. As an important measure to deal with climate change in China, the low-carbon city pilot policy is of great significance to the improvement of urban green energy efficiency. Based on the panel data of 285 prefecture-level cities in China from 2011 to 2022, this paper systematically evaluates the impact of low-carbon city pilot policies on urban green energy efficiency and its mechanism. The study found that the low-carbon city pilot policy significantly improved urban green energy efficiency, with an average effect of 0.023 units. The policy effect shows obvious regional heterogeneity, especially in the eastern region, large cities, and non-resource-based cities. Further analysis shows that industry chain toughness, green finance and technological innovation are important intermediary paths for policy to play a role, and there is a significant synergy among the three. In addition, the policy also shows a spatial spillover effect, which has a positive impact on the green energy efficiency of adjacent cities. Finally, based on the results, this paper discusses and puts forward targeted suggestions for policy making. This study provides an empirical basis for optimizing low-carbon policy design and promoting regional coordinated development, and has important reference value for achieving the goal of sustainable urban development.

Suggested Citation

  • Yilin Wang & Yuanhe Du & Rongkun Liu, 2025. "The Impact of Low-Carbon City Pilot Policies on Urban Green Energy Efficiency: A Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on Three Batches of Pilot Policy Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-42, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3775-:d:1639911
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3775/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3775/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guo, Ran & Yuan, Yijun, 2020. "Different types of environmental regulations and heterogeneous influence on energy efficiency in the industrial sector: Evidence from Chinese provincial data," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    2. Wei JIANG & Wenmei KANG, 2019. "A Review on the Low-Carbon City Study: Development and Trends," Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies (CJUES), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 7(02), pages 1-12, June.
    3. William Nordhaus, 2019. "Climate Change: The Ultimate Challenge for Economics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(6), pages 1991-2014, June.
    4. Thomas Stoerk & Daniel J. Dudek & Jia Yang, 2019. "China’s national carbon emissions trading scheme: lessons from the pilot emission trading schemes, academic literature, and known policy details," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 472-486, April.
    5. Nicholas Stern, 2016. "Economics: Current climate models are grossly misleading," Nature, Nature, vol. 530(7591), pages 407-409, February.
    6. Dong-hyun Oh, 2010. "A global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 183-197, December.
    7. Jintao Ma & Qiuguang Hu & Weiteng Shen & Xinyi Wei, 2021. "Does the Low-Carbon City Pilot Policy Promote Green Technology Innovation? Based on Green Patent Data of Chinese A-Share Listed Companies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Fare, Rolf & Grosskopf, Shawna & Tyteca, Daniel, 1996. "An activity analysis model of the environmental performance of firms--application to fossil-fuel-fired electric utilities," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 161-175, August.
    9. R. D. Banker & A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1984. "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(9), pages 1078-1092, September.
    10. Zhu, Chen & Lee, Chien-Chiang, 2022. "The effects of low-carbon pilot policy on technological innovation: Evidence from prefecture-level data in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    11. Zhou, Qianling & Cui, Xiaoyong & Ni, Hongfu & Gong, Liutang, 2022. "The impact of environmental regulation policy on firms' energy-saving behavior: A quasi-natural experiment based on China's low-carbon pilot city policy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    12. Juan Aparicio & José Ruiz & Inmaculada Sirvent, 2007. "Closest targets and minimum distance to the Pareto-efficient frontier in DEA," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 209-218, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Decai Tang & Zhangming Shan & Junxia He & Ziqian Zhao, 2022. "How Do Environmental Regulations and Outward Foreign Direct Investment Impact the Green Total Factor Productivity in China? A Mediating Effect Test Based on Provincial Panel Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-32, November.
    2. Juan Aparicio & Jesus T. Pastor & Jose L. Sainz-Pardo & Fernando Vidal, 2020. "Estimating and decomposing overall inefficiency by determining the least distance to the strongly efficient frontier in data envelopment analysis," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 747-770, June.
    3. Soledad Moya & Jordi Perramon & Anselm Constans, 2005. "IFRS Adoption in Europe: The Case of Germany," Working Papers 0501, Departament Empresa, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, revised Feb 2005.
    4. Fukuyama, Hirofumi & Sekitani, Kazuyuki, 2012. "Decomposing the efficient frontier of the DEA production possibility set into a smallest number of convex polyhedrons by mixed integer programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 165-174.
    5. Chen, Xiaodong & Miao, Zhuang & Wu, Ge & Zhu, Pengyu, 2024. "City-level green growth accounting: Evidence from China's thirteen urban agglomerations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    6. Juan Aparicio & Magdalena Kapelko & Bernhard Mahlberg & Jose L. Sainz-Pardo, 2017. "Measuring input-specific productivity change based on the principle of least action," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 17-31, February.
    7. Mustapha Daruwana Ibrahim & Sahand Daneshvar & Hüseyin Güden & Bela Vizvari, 2020. "Target setting in data envelopment analysis: efficiency improvement models with predefined inputs/outputs," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 57(4), pages 1319-1336, December.
    8. Chunhua Xin & Xiufeng Lai, 2022. "Does the Environmental Information Disclosure Promote the High-Quality Development of China’s Resource-Based Cities?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-26, May.
    9. Washio, Satoshi & Yamada, Syuuji & Tanaka, Tamaki & Tanino, Tetsuzo, 2012. "Improvements by analyzing the efficient frontier in DEA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(1), pages 173-184.
    10. M. Lábaj & M. Luptáčik & E. Nežinský, 2014. "Data envelopment analysis for measuring economic growth in terms of welfare beyond GDP," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 41(3), pages 407-424, August.
    11. Kuosmanen, Timo & Kortelainen, Mika, 2007. "Valuing environmental factors in cost-benefit analysis using data envelopment analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 56-65, April.
    12. Chuanxin Xia & Yu Zhao & Qingxia Zhao & Shuo Wang & Ning Zhang, 2022. "Exact Eco-Efficiency Measurement in the Yellow River Basin: A New Non-Parametric Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    13. Vaninsky, Alexander, 2010. "Prospective national and regional environmental performance: Boundary estimations using a combined data envelopment – stochastic frontier analysis approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 3657-3665.
    14. Chu, Junfei & Hou, Tianteng & Li, Feng & Yuan, Zhe, 2024. "Dynamic bargaining game DEA carbon emissions abatement allocation and the Nash equilibrium," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    15. George Halkos & George Papageorgiou, 2016. "Spatial environmental efficiency indicators in regional waste generation: a nonparametric approach," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(1), pages 62-78, January.
    16. Ramanathan, R, 2001. "Comparative Risk Assessment of energy supply technologies: a Data Envelopment Analysis approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 197-203.
    17. Azadeh, A. & Ghaderi, S.F. & Nasrollahi, M.R., 2011. "Location optimization of wind plants in Iran by an integrated hierarchical Data Envelopment Analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 1621-1631.
    18. Halkos, George E. & Aslanidis, Panagiotis – Stavros C., 2023. "Sustainable energy development in an era of geopolitical multi-crisis. Applying productivity indices within institutional framework," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    19. Zhang, Ning & Zhao, Yu & Wang, Na, 2022. "Is China's energy policy effective for power plants? Evidence from the 12th Five-Year Plan energy saving targets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    20. Filip Fidanoski & Kiril Simeonovski & Violeta Cvetkoska, 2021. "Energy Efficiency in OECD Countries: A DEA Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3775-:d:1639911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.