IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i7p2929-d1620759.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Peer Effects of Green Management Innovation in China’s Listed Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Ge Zhang

    (School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Lianmei Zhu

    (School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

Green management innovation meets the requirements of sustainable development and is conducive to achieving an organic unity of economic, social, and ecological benefits for enterprises. Based on the peer effects theory, this study constructs a fixed-effects model to empirically analyze the existence, action mechanism, moderation, and heterogeneity of peer effects on green management innovation behavior using panel data from listed Chinese companies from 2012 to 2022. The results indicate that peer effects significantly positively impact green management innovation, and the robustness test verifies the results in various ways. Furthermore, the mechanisms of peer effects from the perspectives of information learning and competition have been explored in this study. Specifically, peer effects are more likely to be promoted when enterprises possess a greater capacity for information acquisition, higher environmental uncertainty, and stronger environmental regulations. Notably, the peer effect of green management innovation is more significant for enterprises that face higher financing constraints, are in non-heavily polluting industries, and are supported by industrial policies. This study not only helps clarify the potential real motivation of corporate green management innovation but also provides strong empirical evidence for developing relevant policies and regulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ge Zhang & Lianmei Zhu, 2025. "The Peer Effects of Green Management Innovation in China’s Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-28, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:2929-:d:1620759
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/2929/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/2929/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joel Peress, 2010. "Product Market Competition, Insider Trading, and Stock Market Efficiency," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 65(1), pages 1-43, February.
    2. Mark T. Leary & Michael R. Roberts, 2014. "Do Peer Firms Affect Corporate Financial Policy?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 69(1), pages 139-178, February.
    3. Ren, Xiaohang & Zeng, Gudian & Sun, Xianming, 2023. "The peer effect of digital transformation and corporate environmental performance: Empirical evidence from listed companies in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    4. Li, Chengcheng & Wang, Xiaoqiong, 2022. "Local peer effects of corporate social responsibility," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    5. Tianheng Wang, 2022. "The peer effects of preschool: evidence from China’s middle school," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(1), pages 1-18, January.
    6. Charles F. Manski, 2000. "Economic Analysis of Social Interactions," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 14(3), pages 115-136, Summer.
    7. Rennings, Klaus, 2000. "Redefining innovation -- eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 319-332, February.
    8. Sushil Bikhchandani & Chi-fu Huang, 1993. "The Economics of Treasury Securities Markets," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 7(3), pages 117-134, Summer.
    9. Seo, Hojun, 2021. "Peer effects in corporate disclosure decisions," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1).
    10. Wang, Jiaxin & Wu, Guilin & Huang, Xiang & Sun, Di & Song, Zilong, 2023. "Peer effects of corporate product quality information disclosure: Learning and competition," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    11. Charles J. Hadlock & Joshua R. Pierce, 2010. "New Evidence on Measuring Financial Constraints: Moving Beyond the KZ Index," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 23(5), pages 1909-1940.
    12. Dennis E. Smallwood & John Conlisk, 1979. "Product Quality in Markets Where Consumers are Imperfectly Informed," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 93(1), pages 1-23.
    13. Koch, Andrew & Panayides, Marios & Thomas, Shawn, 2021. "Common ownership and competition in product markets," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 109-137.
    14. Liu, Ying & Huang, Hongyun & Mbanyele, William & Wei, Zhixing & Li, Xin, 2025. "How does green industrial policy affect corporate green innovation? Evidence from the green factory identification in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    15. Xiaoxu Zhang & Xinyu Du, 2023. "Industry and Regional Peer Effects in Corporate Digital Transformation: The Moderating Effects of TMT Characteristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, March.
    16. Ghosh, Dipankar & Olsen, Lori, 2009. "Environmental uncertainty and managers' use of discretionary accruals," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 188-205, February.
    17. Ruilong Yang & Jidong Yang, 2009. "Why Has Top Executive Compensation Increased So Much In China: A Explanation Of Peer‐Effects," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(5), pages 705-716, December.
    18. Sarah Smith & Frank Windmeijer & Edmund Wright, 2015. "Peer Effects in Charitable Giving: Evidence from the (Running) Field," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 125(585), pages 1053-1071, June.
    19. Yue Gu & Shenglin Ben & Jiamin Lv, 2022. "Peer Effect in Merger and Acquisition Activities and Its Impact on Corporate Sustainable Development: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    20. Hong Bo & Tao Li & Yanmei Sun, 2016. "Board attributes and herding in corporate investment: evidence from Chinese-listed firms," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4-6), pages 432-462, April.
    21. Rennings, Klaus & Ziegler, Andreas & Ankele, Kathrin & Hoffmann, Esther, 2006. "The influence of different characteristics of the EU environmental management and auditing scheme on technical environmental innovations and economic performance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 45-59, April.
    22. Sushil Bikhchandani & David Hirshleifer & Ivo Welch, 1998. "Learning from the Behavior of Others: Conformity, Fads, and Informational Cascades," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 12(3), pages 151-170, Summer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiali Liu & Xinran Xie & Yu Duan & Liang Tang, 2023. "Peer effects and the mechanisms in corporate capital structure: evidence from Chinese listed firms," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 14(1), pages 295-326, March.
    2. Xiaoxu Zhang & Xinyu Du, 2023. "Industry and Regional Peer Effects in Corporate Digital Transformation: The Moderating Effects of TMT Characteristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Shu, Ying & Zhuang, Xiaobin & Xu, Guanghua & Zhang, Shanfei & Ying, Rui, 2024. "Peer effects, environmental regulation and environmental financial integration—Empirical evidence from listed companies in heavily polluting industries," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1446-1458.
    4. Chien Chi Chu & Xiu‐Fen Su & Yu‐En Lin & Akihiro Omura & Bin Li & Adrian Wai‐Kong Cheung, 2023. "Love thy neighbour: Evidence from capital structure decisions," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(3), pages 2907-2933, September.
    5. Zhengyong Zhang & Jiayi You, 2024. "Does firms' ESG information disclosure have contagion effect? Evidence from China," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 3274-3296, July.
    6. Shijun Huang & Pengcheng Du & Yu Hong & Woran Wu, 2024. "Are corporate environmental, social, and governance practices contagious? The peer-effect perspective," Energy & Environment, , vol. 35(8), pages 4049-4082, December.
    7. Zhuang, Yuan & Nie, Jing & Wu, Weixing, 2022. "Peer influence and the value of cash holdings," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 265-284.
    8. Wang, Jiaxin & Wu, Guilin & Huang, Xiang & Sun, Di & Song, Zilong, 2023. "Peer effects of corporate product quality information disclosure: Learning and competition," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    9. Xiaohui Wu & Yumin Li & Chong Feng, 2023. "Green innovation peer effects in common institutional ownership networks," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 641-660, March.
    10. Ma, Defang & Wang, Mengkai & Zeng, Bo & Jiang, Hong, 2024. "Peer effects of firm environmental protection expenditures," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    11. Dimant, Eugen, 2015. "On Peer Effects: Behavioral Contagion of (Un)Ethical Behavior and the Role of Social Identity," MPRA Paper 68732, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Bailey, Warren B. & Cao, Xiaping & Yang, Zhenyi & Zhou, Sili, 2024. "Who leads and who follows? The cross-border peer effect in investment by Chinese and US firms," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    13. Li, Yan & Wang, Junkai & Mu, Zi & Li, Lingxiao, 2023. "The impact of corporate environmental responsibility on green technological innovation: A nonlinear model including mediate effects and moderate effects," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 754-769.
    14. Margaretic, Paula & Cifuentes, Rodrigo & Carreño, José Gabriel, 2021. "Banks’ interconnections and peer effects: Evidence from Chile," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    15. Cave, Joshua & Lancheros, Sandra, 2024. "Local peer influence on dividend payout decisions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    16. Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez & Valentina Minutiello & Patrizia Tettamanzi, 2022. "Gender disclosure: The impact of peer behaviour and the firm's equality policies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(2), pages 385-405, March.
    17. Zhao, Tianjiao & Wang, Hanyu, 2024. "The industry peer effect of enterprise ESG performance: the moderating effect of customer concentration," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 1499-1525.
    18. Seo, Hojun, 2021. "Peer effects in corporate disclosure decisions," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1).
    19. Ali-Rind, Asad & Boubaker, Sabri & Jarjir, Souad Lajili, 2023. "Peer effects in financial economics: A literature survey," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    20. Zhu, Qi & Jin, Sisi & Huang, Yuxuan & Yan, Cheng & Chen, Chuanglian, 2022. "Oil price uncertainty and stock price informativeness: Evidence from investment-price sensitivity in China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:2929-:d:1620759. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.