IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p2121-d1603201.html

Towards More Water-Efficient Agriculture: A Study on the Impact of China’s Water Resource Tax on Agricultural Water Use Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Xun Lu

    (School of Economics and Finance, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Xinyue Ke

    (School of Economics and Finance, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Yixuan Ma

    (School of Economics and Finance, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Mingdong Jiang

    (Department of Public Administration, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)

Abstract

Water resource tax can regulate water consumption through economic leveraging, enhance water conservation awareness among enterprises and society, and optimize the industrial structure, thus promoting rational water resource use and sustainable development. However, the current water resource tax reform in China is still in the pilot exploration stage, and it is unclear if it will actually increase agricultural water use efficiency. We built a multi-period double-difference model and a mediation effect model based on 2011–2022 inter-provincial panel data in order to investigate the water resource tax reform’s impact on agricultural water conservation and its trajectory. The findings demonstrate that agricultural water use efficiency has been greatly increased by the water resource tax reform, and this conclusion remains strong even after parallel trend and placebo testing. The tax reform has primarily increased agricultural water use efficiency through crop cultivation structural adjustments and water-saving technologies’ advancement. When examining inter-provincial disparities, we found a more evident policy impact in economically developed and water-scarce regions. Further results show that the water resource tax reform has significantly reduced the groundwater portion of the regional water use structure, which indicates that it has synergistically curbed groundwater exploitation and promoted regional ecological restoration. Moreover, this paper demonstrates that the policy has realized water conservation in agriculture while avoiding a negative effect on agricultural economic growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Xun Lu & Xinyue Ke & Yixuan Ma & Mingdong Jiang, 2025. "Towards More Water-Efficient Agriculture: A Study on the Impact of China’s Water Resource Tax on Agricultural Water Use Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2121-:d:1603201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2121/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2121/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Støstad, Morten Nyborg & Cowell, Frank, 2024. "Inequality as an externality: Consequences for tax design," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    2. Pan, Junyu & Peng, Jie & Yang, Xiaodong & Xuan, Siyuan, 2023. "Does water rights trading promote resources utilisation efficiency and green growth? Evidence from China's resources trading policy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    3. Llop, Maria, 2008. "Economic impact of alternative water policy scenarios in the Spanish production system: An input-output analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1-2), pages 288-294, December.
    4. Ørum, Jens Erik & Boesen, Mads Vejlby & Jovanovic, Zorica & Pedersen, Søren Marcus, 2010. "Farmers' incentives to save water with new irrigation systems and water taxation--A case study of Serbian potato production," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(3), pages 465-471, December.
    5. Leticia Gallego Valero & Encarnación Moral Pajares & Isabel María Román Sánchez, 2018. "The Tax Burden on Wastewater and the Protection of Water Ecosystems in EU Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, January.
    6. Wang, Shuhong & Li, Weiyao & Zhang, Ying & Song, Malin & Chen, Xueli & Cui, Lianbiao, 2024. "The impact of a natural resource protection policy on economic development: Based on a policy evaluation of China’s coal resource tax reform," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ouyang, Jinlong & Long, Enshen & Hokao, Kazunori, 2010. "Rebound effect in Chinese household energy efficiency and solution for mitigating it," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 5269-5276.
    2. Max Lobeck & Morten Nyborg Støstad, 2023. "The Consequences of Inequality: Beliefs and Redistributive Preferences," Working Papers halshs-04423608, HAL.
    3. Zhao, Ke-Xin & Xu, Fei-Ran & Zhou, Yan & Ma, Tao, 2024. "The heterogeneous effects of non-hydro renewable energy and water resources on industrial development of the Yellow river and Yangtze river basins," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    4. Amine Chekireb & Julio Goncalves & Hubert Stahn & Agnes Tomini, 2021. "Private exploitation of the North-Western Sahara Aquifer System," Working Papers halshs-03457972, HAL.
    5. Deparade, Darius & Jarmolinski, Lennart & Mohr, Peter, 2025. "Behavioral interventions, tax compliance and consequences on inequality," Discussion Papers 2025/4, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    6. Simona Bungau & Delia Mirela Tit & Katalin Fodor & Gabriela Cioca & Maricel Agop & Ciprian Iovan & Delia Carmen Nistor Cseppento & Adrian Bumbu & Cristiana Bustea, 2018. "Aspects Regarding the Pharmaceutical Waste Management in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, August.
    7. Fontecha, John E. & Nikolaev, Alexander & Walteros, Jose L. & Zhu, Zhenduo, 2022. "Scientists wanted? A literature review on incentive programs that promote pro-environmental consumer behavior: Energy, waste, and water," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    8. Gao, Hongchao & Wei, Tong & Lou, Inchio & Yang, Zhifeng & Shen, Zhenyao & Li, Yingxia, 2014. "Water saving effect on integrated water resource management," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 50-58.
    9. Cristian Mardones & Tamara Muñoz, 2018. "Environmental taxation for reducing greenhouse gases emissions in Chile: an input–output analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(6), pages 2545-2563, December.
    10. Barrera-Rodríguez, Oscar & Chávez, Emmanuel, 2025. "Capital vs. labour: The effect of income sources on attitudes toward the top 1 percent," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    11. Rodrigues, Gonçalo C. & Paredes, Paula & Gonçalves, José M. & Alves, Isabel & Pereira, Luis S., 2013. "Comparing sprinkler and drip irrigation systems for full and deficit irrigated maize using multicriteria analysis and simulation modelling: Ranking for water saving vs. farm economic returns," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 85-96.
    12. Yang Yang & Zhengwei Huang & Weijun He & Jianghong Li & Liang Yuan, 2025. "Can water rights trading improve water resources use efficiency: empirical evidence from China’s pilot program," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(7), pages 17029-17049, July.
    13. Schratzenstaller, Margit, 2025. "Behavioral responses to inheritance taxation – A review of the empirical literature," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 238-260.
    14. Xin, Jing & Zhou, Hui & Yang, Hongqiang & Sheng, Jichuan, 2025. "The command paradox: Unraveling the impact of command-and-control water conservation policies on water-use technical efficiency," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    15. Wang, Yaosheng & Jensen, Christian R. & Liu, Fulai, 2017. "Nutritional responses to soil drying and rewetting cycles under partial root-zone drying irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 254-259.
    16. Li, Changxin & Yan, Dongyang & Jin, Leshan, 2025. "How does the certification of water rights bring water-saving behaviors to farmers?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    17. Theodore Mariolis & Christos Tsirimokos, 2024. "Environmental multipliers for circular flow–positive-profit economies: formulation, implications and empirical illustration," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 147-175, September.
    18. Llop, Maria & Pié, Laia, 2008. "Input-output analysis of alternative policies implemented on the energy activities: An application for Catalonia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 1642-1648, May.
    19. Asensio Buendía Hernández & Francisco Javier André & Francisco Javier Santos-Arteaga, 2024. "On the Evolution and Determinants of Water Efficiency in the Regions of Spain," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 38(9), pages 3093-3112, July.
    20. Abdeslam Boudhar & Said Boudhar & Aomar Ibourk, 2017. "An input–output framework for analysing relationships between economic sectors and water use and intersectoral water relationships in Morocco," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 6(1), pages 1-25, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2121-:d:1603201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.