IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i4p1761-d1595054.html

Multifunctional Analysis of Agriculture from the Perspective of Tradeoff/Synergy: A Case Study of Sichuan Province in Western China

Author

Listed:
  • Qiang Liao

    (Institute of Agricultural Information and Rural Economics, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu 610066, China)

  • Chunyan Chen

    (Institute of Agricultural Information and Rural Economics, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu 610066, China)

  • Zhengyu Lin

    (Institute of Agricultural Information and Rural Economics, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu 610066, China)

  • Yuanli Liu

    (Institute of Agricultural Information and Rural Economics, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu 610066, China)

  • Jie Cao

    (Institute of Agricultural Information and Rural Economics, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu 610066, China)

  • Zhouling Shao

    (Institute of Agricultural Information and Rural Economics, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu 610066, China)

  • Yaowen Kou

    (Institute of Agricultural Information and Rural Economics, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu 610066, China)

Abstract

Exploring the spatiotemporal evolution pattern of agricultural functions, analyzing their tradeoff and synergies, carrying out multifunctional zoning, and determining the combination and expansion direction of agricultural functions in combination with regional development strategies are conducive to guiding the adjustment of agricultural structure and promoting the sustainable development of regional agriculture. In this context, based on the county scale and statistical data, this paper uses the agricultural function evaluation index system to measure and analyze the agricultural function index of Sichuan Province and its mutual relations. Spatial overlay analysis is used to analyze the agricultural function index for agricultural leading function zoning. Cluster analysis is used to evaluate the agricultural function results to explore the agricultural multifunctional zoning scheme of Sichuan Province. The results show that the spatial and temporal distribution of agricultural product supply, agricultural leisure, ecological services, employment and social security services are heterogeneous, and the agricultural multifunction index of Sichuan Province shows a spatial distribution pattern of high in the east and low in the west. The synergistic effect between the supply function of agricultural products and the function of employment and life security is the strongest. From 2010 to 2020, the relationships between the ecological service function and the supply function of agricultural products, the agricultural leisure function, employment, and the social security function change from irrelevant or there being a tradeoff effect to there being a significant synergistic effect. The leading areas of the ecological service function are mainly distributed in western and northern Sichuan. The leading areas of the agricultural product supply function are mainly distributed in eastern and southern Sichuan. Agricultural multifunctional zoning in Sichuan Province is divided into the agricultural leisure function, the agricultural product supply cooperative functional area, the weak cooperative functional area, the strong cooperative functional area, and the agricultural leisure priority functional area. The spatiotemporal heterogeneity of agricultural functions and the changes in tradeoffs and synergies in Sichuan Province have a significant impact on the development of agricultural functions. The research results can provide s theoretical reference for agricultural multifunctional zoning in the study area and provide guidance and suggestions for the sustainable development of agricultural economy and society in Sichuan Province.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiang Liao & Chunyan Chen & Zhengyu Lin & Yuanli Liu & Jie Cao & Zhouling Shao & Yaowen Kou, 2025. "Multifunctional Analysis of Agriculture from the Perspective of Tradeoff/Synergy: A Case Study of Sichuan Province in Western China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-21, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1761-:d:1595054
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1761/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1761/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Metta, Matteo & Ciliberti, Stefano & Obi, Chinedu & Bartolini, Fabio & Klerkx, Laurens & Brunori, Gianluca, 2022. "An integrated socio-cyber-physical system framework to assess responsible digitalisation in agriculture: A first application with Living Labs in Europe," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    2. Hua Wang & Yuxin Zhu & Jinghao Wang & Hubiao Han & Jiqiang Niu & Xueye Chen, 2022. "Modeling of spatial pattern and influencing factors of cultivated land quality in Henan Province based on spatial big data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Rao, Jyoti, 2018. "Fundamental Functionings of Landowners: Understanding the relationship between land ownership and wellbeing through the lens of ‘capability’," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 74-84.
    4. Wang, Min & Yuan, Mengchu & Han, Pingyang & Wang, Dan, 2022. "Assessing sustainable urban development based on functional spatial differentiation of urban agriculture in Wuhan, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    5. Waldron, Scott & Brown, Colin & Longworth, John, 2010. "A critique of high-value supply chains as a means of modernising agriculture in China: The case of the beef industry," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 479-487, October.
    6. Araújo Costa, Renata Cristina & Pereira, Gener Tadeu & Tarlé Pissarra, Teresa Cristina & Silva Siqueira, Diego & Sanches Fernandes, Luís Filipe & Vasconcelos, Vinicius & Fernandes, Luiz Alberto & Pach, 2019. "Land capability of multiple-landform watersheds with environmental land use conflicts," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 689-704.
    7. Lester, Sarah E. & Costello, Christopher & Halpern, Benjamin S. & Gaines, Steven D. & White, Crow & Barth, John A., 2013. "Evaluating tradeoffs among ecosystem services to inform marine spatial planning," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 80-89.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barbara Langlois & Vincent Martinet, 2023. "Defining cost-effective ways to improve ecosystem services provision in agroecosystems," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 104(2), pages 123-165, June.
    2. Fang Xia & Lingling Hou & Songqing Jin & Dongqing Li, 2020. "Land size and productivity in the livestock sector: evidence from pastoral areas in China," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(3), pages 867-888, July.
    3. Pomeroy, Caroline & Hall-Arber, Madeleine & Conway, Flaxen, 2015. "Power and perspective: Fisheries and the ocean commons beset by demands of development," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 339-346.
    4. Abdillah, Kiky Kirina & Abdul Manaf, Azima & Awang, Abd Hair, 2022. "Land tenure security for low-income residents' urban livelihoods: A human development approach review of temporary occupation license," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    5. Tu Nguyen & David M. Kling & Steven J. Dundas & Sally D. Hacker & Daniel K. Lew & Peter Ruggiero & Katherine Roy, 2023. "Quality over Quantity: Nonmarket Values of Restoring Coastal Dunes in the U.S. Pacific Northwest," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 99(1), pages 63-79.
    6. Kok, Kristiaan P.W. & Klerkx, Laurens, 2023. "Addressing the politics of mission-oriented agricultural innovation systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    7. Qu, Yang & Swales, J. Kim & Hooper, Tara & Austen, Melanie C. & Wang, Xinhao & Papathanasopoulou, Eleni & Huang, Junling & Yan, Xiaoyu, 2023. "Economic trade-offs in marine resource use between offshore wind farms and fisheries in Scottish waters," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    8. Kaiser, Brooks A. & Bakanev, Sergey & Bertelsen, Rasmus Gjedsø & Carson, Marcus & Eide, Arne & Fernandez, Linda & Halpin, Patrick & Izmalkov, Sergei & Kyhn, Line A. & Österblom, Henrik & Punt, Maarten, 2015. "Spatial issues in Arctic marine resource governance workshop summary and comment," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1-5.
    9. Guangjie Liu & Yi Xia & Li Bao, 2025. "The Evolution of Cropland Slope Structure and Its Implications for Fragmentation and Soil Erosion in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-23, May.
    10. Edwards, Eric C. & Go, Dong-Hun & Oladi, Reza, 2020. "Predator–prey dynamics in general equilibrium and the role of trade," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    11. Fang, Yan Ru & Shouquat Hossain, M.D. & Chen, Yushuo & Guo, Lanying & Wu, Xuefang & Kong, Qingyan & Yang, Pingjian, 2026. "Optimizing crop straw utilization for enhancing bioenergy production and sustainable development," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(PD).
    12. Daniella Tiemi Sasaki Okida & Osmar Abílio de Carvalho Júnior & Osmar Luiz Ferreira de Carvalho & Roberto Arnaldo Trancoso Gomes & Renato Fontes Guimarães, 2021. "Relationship between Land Property Security and Brazilian Amazon Deforestation in the Mato Grosso State during the Period 2013–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    13. Wolfert, Sjaak & Verdouw, Cor & van Wassenaer, Lan & Dolfsma, Wilfred & Klerkx, Laurens, 2023. "Digital innovation ecosystems in agri-food: design principles and organizational framework," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    14. Rao, Jyoti, 2019. "A ‘capability approach’ to understanding loses arising out of the compulsory acquisition of land in India," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 70-84.
    15. Huaxiang Chen & Lina Tang & Quanyi Qiu & Baosheng Wang & Weixiang Hu, 2020. "Spatial Trade-Offs and Temporal Evolution of Multiple Ecosystem Services in a Marine-Terrestrial Urban-Agglomeration Zone," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-18, February.
    16. Obiang Ndong, Gregory & Therond, Olivier & Cousin, Isabelle, 2020. "Analysis of relationships between ecosystem services: A generic classification and review of the literature," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    17. Ortega, David L. & Hong, Soo Jeong & Olynk Widmar, Nicole J. & Wang, H. Holly & Wu, Laping, . "Chinese aquaculture farmers’ value system and on-farm decision making," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 4(3).
    18. Jingling Bao & Liyu Mao & Yufei Liu & Shuisheng Fan, 2024. "Investigation of Spatiotemporal Changes and Impact Factors of Trade-Off Intensity in Cultivated Land Multifunctionality in the Min River Basin," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, September.
    19. Abdulai, Ibrahim Abu, 2025. "‘I feed my family but I own no land’: Understanding the complexities of women’s irrigable land access and wellbeing in northern Ghana," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    20. Miriam von Thenen & Aurelija Armoškaitė & Víctor Cordero-Penín & Sara García-Morales & Josefine B. Gottschalk & Débora Gutierrez & Malena Ripken & Pascal Thoya & Kerstin S. Schiele, 2021. "The Future of Marine Spatial Planning—Perspectives from Early Career Researchers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-12, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1761-:d:1595054. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.