IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i2p437-d1562678.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Institutional Environment and Innovativeness on Early-Stage Entrepreneurial Activities: The Moderating Effects of Reciprocity

Author

Listed:
  • Hyesu Park

    (Department of Management of Technology, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea)

  • Minjung Baek

    (Global Institute for Talented Education, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon 34051, Republic of Korea)

  • Chaewon Lee

    (Department of Business Administration, Seoul National University of Science and Technology; Seoul 01811, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

This study investigates the moderating effects of positive and negative reciprocity on the relationship between institutional environment dimensions—cognitive and normative institutions—and innovativeness on early-stage entrepreneurial activities. Utilizing logistic regression models and data from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) Adult Population Survey (APS) and the Global Preferences Survey (GPS) across 21 countries, which contains over 22,000 identified individuals, the findings reveal significant insights into how these institutional factors, innovativeness and reciprocity influence entrepreneurial activities globally. As a result of the analysis, (1) contrary to the predominant view that innovativeness universally promotes entrepreneurial success, this study identifies a significant negative relationship between innovativeness and early-stage entrepreneurial activities. (2) Positive reciprocity moderates the effects of both normative institutions and innovativeness, reducing the positive impact of normative institutions while mitigating the negative impact of innovativeness on entrepreneurial activities. (3) Conversely, negative reciprocity significantly amplifies the effects of both normative institutions and innovativeness, intensifying the positive impact of normative institutions and exacerbating the negative impact of innovativeness. By incorporating data from diverse national contexts, this research contributes to a comprehensive understanding of the factors affecting entrepreneurial activities and emphasizes the importance of fostering balanced social interactions. This approach aims to enhance the growth and sustainability of entrepreneurial activities globally, offering valuable insights for national policy development focused on sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyesu Park & Minjung Baek & Chaewon Lee, 2025. "The Impact of Institutional Environment and Innovativeness on Early-Stage Entrepreneurial Activities: The Moderating Effects of Reciprocity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-22, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:437-:d:1562678
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/437/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/437/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caliendo, Marco & Fossen, Frank & Kritikos, Alexander, 2012. "Trust, positive reciprocity, and negative reciprocity: Do these traits impact entrepreneurial dynamics?," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 394-409.
    2. Garry D. Bruton & David Ahlstrom & Krzysztof Obloj, 2008. "Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies: Where Are We Today and Where Should the Research Go in the Future," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 32(1), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Yancy Vaillant & Esteban Lafuente, 2007. "Do different institutional frameworks condition the influence of local fear of failure and entrepreneurial examples over entrepreneurial activity?," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 313-337, July.
    4. Aparicio, Sebastian & Urbano, David & Audretsch, David, 2016. "Institutional factors, opportunity entrepreneurship and economic growth: Panel data evidence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 45-61.
    5. Francisco Liñán & Yi–Wen Chen, 2009. "Development and Cross–Cultural Application of a Specific Instrument to Measure Entrepreneurial Intentions," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 33(3), pages 593-617, May.
    6. Spencer, Jennifer W. & Gomez, Carolina, 2004. "The relationship among national institutional structures, economic factors, and domestic entrepreneurial activity: a multicountry study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(10), pages 1098-1107, October.
    7. Matthew R. Marvel & G.T. Lumpkin, 2007. "Technology Entrepreneurs’ Human Capital and Its Effects on Innovation Radicalness," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 31(6), pages 807-828, November.
    8. Gupta, Vipin & MacMillan, Ian C. & Surie, Gita, 2004. "Entrepreneurial leadership: developing and measuring a cross-cultural construct," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 241-260, March.
    9. Juil Kim & Hye-ryun Jeong & Hyesu Park, 2023. "Key Drivers and Performances of Smart Manufacturing Adoption: A Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.
    10. Mary M. Crossan & Marina Apaydin, 2010. "A Multi‐Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(6), pages 1154-1191, September.
    11. Carlos Eduardo Carvalho & Carlos Ricardo Rossetto & Andrezza Aparecida Saraiva Piekas, 2021. "Innovativeness in Brazilian startups: the effect of the absorptive capacity and environmental dynamism," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 29(1), pages 1-17.
    12. Baron, Robert A. & Markman, Gideon D., 2003. "Beyond social capital: the role of entrepreneurs' social competence in their financial success," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 41-60, January.
    13. Bruton, Garry D. & Ketchen, David J. & Ireland, R. Duane, 2013. "Entrepreneurship as a solution to poverty," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 683-689.
    14. Shane, Scott, 1993. "Cultural influences on national rates of innovation," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 59-73, January.
    15. Jeffrey G. Covin & Dennis P. Slevin, 1989. "Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(1), pages 75-87, January.
    16. Aija Leiponen & Constance E. Helfat, 2010. "Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 224-236, February.
    17. Donna Marie De Carolis & Patrick Saparito, 2006. "Social Capital, Cognition, and Entrepreneurial Opportunities: A Theoretical Framework," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 30(1), pages 41-56, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. De Clercq, Dirk & Danis, Wade M. & Dakhli, Mourad, 2010. "The moderating effect of institutional context on the relationship between associational activity and new business activity in emerging economies," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 85-101, February.
    2. Folorunsho M. Ajide & James T. Dada, 2023. "Poverty, entrepreneurship, and economic growth in Africa," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(2), pages 199-226, June.
    3. Radityo Putro Handrito & Hendrik Slabbinck & Johanna Vanderstraeten, 2023. "Stuck in short-term, daily operations, or not?: Unraveling SME’s long-term orientation," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 1723-1745, December.
    4. David Urbano & Sebastian Aparicio & Victor Querol, 2016. "Social progress orientation and innovative entrepreneurship: an international analysis," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 1033-1066, December.
    5. Abd Rashid, Suliza & Masron, Tajul Ariffin & Malim, Nurhafiza Abdul Kader, 2023. "The effect of corruption on entrepreneurship in the presence of weak regulatory quality: Evidence from developing countries," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    6. Aparicio, Sebastian & Audretsch, David & Urbano, David, 2021. "Why is export-oriented entrepreneurship more prevalent in some countries than others? Contextual antecedents and economic consequences," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 56(3).
    7. Gina Santos & Carla Susana Marques & João Ferreira, 2021. "The Influence of Embeddedness on Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Strategy: A Gender Perspective in the Agri-Food Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-29, August.
    8. Adomako, Samuel & Frimpong, Kwabena & Danso, Albert & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph & Uddin, Moshfique & Kesse, Kwabena, 2020. "Home country institutional impediments and international expansion of developing country SMEs," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(5).
    9. David Urbano & David Audretsch & Sebastian Aparicio & Maria Noguera, 2020. "Does entrepreneurial activity matter for economic growth in developing countries? The role of the institutional environment," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1065-1099, September.
    10. Al Mamun, Abdullah & Thurasamy, Ramayah & Fazal, Syed Ali, 2021. "Entrepreneurial index for low-income households in Malaysia," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    11. David Urbano & Sebastian Aparicio & David Audretsch, 2019. "Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: what has been learned?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 21-49, June.
    12. Piñeiro-Chousa, Juan & López-Cabarcos, M. Ángeles & Romero-Castro, Noelia María & Pérez-Pico, Ada María, 2020. "Innovation, entrepreneurship and knowledge in the business scientific field: Mapping the research front," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 475-485.
    13. René Díaz-Pichardo & Cecilia Cantú-González & Patricia López-Hernández & Gerard McElwee, 2012. "From Farmers to Entrepreneurs," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 21(1), pages 91-116, March.
    14. Henda Omri & Anis Omri & Abdessalem Abbassi, 2024. "Macro-level determinants of entrepreneurial behavior and motivation," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 2629-2667, December.
    15. Assmann, Daisy & Ehrl, Philipp, 2021. "Individualistic culture and entrepreneurial opportunities," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 1248-1268.
    16. Ferreira, Joao J. & Fernandes, Cristina I. & Veiga, Pedro Mota & Caputo, Andrea, 2022. "The interactions of entrepreneurial attitudes, abilities and aspirations in the (twin) environmental and digital transitions? A dynamic panel data approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    17. Erik Lundmark & Anna Krzeminska & Dean A. Shepherd, 2019. "Images of Entrepreneurship: Exploring Root Metaphors and Expanding Upon Them," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(1), pages 138-170, January.
    18. Aparicio, Sebastian & Audretsch, David & Noguera, Maria & Urbano, David, 2022. "Can female entrepreneurs boost social mobility in developing countries? An institutional analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    19. Dost Mir & Arshad Muhammad & Afsar Bilal, 2018. "The Influence of Entrepreneurial Orientation on Types of Process Innovation Capabilities and Moderating Role of Social Capital," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 8(4), pages 1-15, October.
    20. Walid A. Nakara & Karim Messeghem & Andry Ramaroson, 2021. "Innovation and entrepreneurship in a context of poverty: a multilevel approach," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1601-1617, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:437-:d:1562678. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.