IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9095-d1771087.html

The Economic–Cultural Dynamics of Urban Regeneration: Calibrating a Tripartite Evolutionary Game and Policy Thresholds for High-Quality Operational Renovation in China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhibiao Chen

    (School of Biological Science and Biotechnology, Minnan Normal University, Zhangzhou 363000, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Leyan Yang

    (School of Architecture, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yonghong Gan

    (School of Biological Science and Biotechnology, Minnan Normal University, Zhangzhou 363000, China)

  • Zhongping Wu

    (School of Architecture, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China
    State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building and Urban Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China
    Architectural Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd., South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China)

Abstract

Cities worldwide are transitioning from demolition–redevelopment-driven expansion to high-quality regeneration centered on stock upgrading, cultural continuity, and long-term operations. Against the backdrop of China’s high-quality urban renewal phase guided by the “anti-massive demolition and construction” policy, this study constructs a calibrated tripartite evolutionary game among government, investors, and residents. By embedding culture–economy parameters—cultural renovation intensity ( k ), operational profit-sharing ratio between investors and residents ( j ), cultural identification coefficient ( i ), and cost-sharing coefficient ( w )—we establish a behavioral interaction mechanism of “cultural value conversion–benefit-sharing–cultural identification–cost-sharing.” Simulations based on replicator dynamics demonstrate that sustained tripartite cooperation requires four conditions: cultural intensity surpasses the cost threshold ( k ∈ [0.6, 0.7]); the profit-sharing ratio preserves market incentives ( j ∈ [0.25, 0.35]); cultural identification reaches a minimum threshold ( i ≥ 0.4); and residents’ cost-sharing does not exceed their benefit capacity ( w ≤ 0.2). These findings reveal the core tension in China’s high-quality urban renewal stage—namely, the challenge of instituting sustainable operational mechanisms under cultural protection constraints—and globally provide a quantifiable policy toolbox for culture-led urban regeneration.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhibiao Chen & Leyan Yang & Yonghong Gan & Zhongping Wu, 2025. "The Economic–Cultural Dynamics of Urban Regeneration: Calibrating a Tripartite Evolutionary Game and Policy Thresholds for High-Quality Operational Renovation in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-18, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9095-:d:1771087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9095/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9095/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiaqi Zhang & Longfeng Wu, 2025. "Gentrification outcomes of greening in different urbanization stages: A longitudinal analysis of Chinese cities, 2012–2020," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 52(1), pages 231-246, January.
    2. Oliver E. Williamson, 2005. "The Economics of Governance," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 95(2), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Dinghuan Yuan & Jiaxin Li & Qiuxiang Li & Yang Fu, 2024. "Tripartite Evolutionary Game and Policy Simulation: Strategic Governance in the Redevelopment of the Urban Village in Guangzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, November.
    4. Shiyuan He & Yu Li, 2024. "Understanding Impacts of Neighbourhood Micro-Renewal Through a Lens of Place Value: A Case Study of Wuhan, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, November.
    5. Linghui Liu & Dan Cheng & Tianyi Wang & Jiangni Li, 2025. "Stakeholder Strategies and Factors Influencing the Pilot Reform of Building Rental Housing on Collectively Owned Land: An Evolutionary Game Methodology," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-31, March.
    6. Wang, Yitong & Fan, Ruguo & Chen, Rongkai & Xie, Xiao & Ke, Can, 2025. "Exploring the coevolution dynamics of residents and recyclers in electric vehicle battery recycling decisions on the two-layer heterogeneous complex networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 382(C).
    7. Linzi Zheng & Yongjie Zheng & Zhengbo Fu, 2024. "The Impact of Urban Renewal on Spatial–Temporal Changes in the Human Settlement Environment in the Yangtze River Delta, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, June.
    8. Guangyu Li & Shaohua Wu & Heyuan You & Chengcheng Wang, 2025. "Governments’ behavioral strategies in cross-regional reduction of inefficient industrial land: learned from a tripartite evolutionary game model," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Luhua Li & Xiaohong Lin & Xiaoting Yang & Zhiwei Luo & Min Wang, 2024. "Digital Governance and Urban Government Service Spaces: Understanding Resident Interaction and Perception in Chinese Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, August.
    10. Fang He & Yuan Yi & Yuxuan Si, 2024. "Evolution Process of Urban Industrial Land Redevelopment in China: A Perspective of Original Land Users," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hui Sun & Yiyue Zhang & Yihan Wang & Jidong Chen & Huicang Wu, 2025. "How to Improve Collaboration in Sustainable Urban Community Renewal? An Evolutionary Game Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Schmid, Andreas, 2007. "Incentive Compatibility and Efficiency in the contractual Insurer-Provider Relationship: Economic Theory and practical Implications: The Case of North Carolina," MPRA Paper 23311, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2008.
    3. Sean M. Dougherty, 2014. "Legal Reform, Contract Enforcement and Firm Size in Mexico," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(4), pages 825-844, September.
    4. Robert Roßner & Dimitrios Zikos, 2018. "The Role of Homogeneity and Heterogeneity Among Resource Users on Water Governance: Lessons Learnt from an Economic Field Experiment on Irrigation in Uzbekistan," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(03), pages 1-30, July.
    5. Locatelli, Catherine & Rossiaud, Sylvain, 2011. "A neoinstitutionalist interpretation of the changes in the Russian oil model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 5588-5597, September.
    6. Gylfason, Thorvaldur & Hochreiter, Eduard, 2009. "Growing apart? A tale of two republics: Estonia and Georgia," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 355-370, September.
    7. Subramanian Rangan & Metin Sengul, 2009. "Information technology and transnational integration: Theory and evidence on the evolution of the modern multinational enterprise," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 40(9), pages 1496-1514, December.
    8. Richard S.J. Tol & Gary W. Yohe, 2006. "The Weakest Link Hypothesis For Adaptive Capacity: An Empirical Test," Wesleyan Economics Working Papers 2006-005, Wesleyan University, Department of Economics.
    9. Griewald, Yuliana, 2018. "The Art of the State to Intervene: Insights Into Agricultural Land Management in Russia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1-9.
    10. Zhu, Lu & He, Juan, 2026. "Effects of multiple incentive policies on carbon information disclosure strategies of power battery: A complex network evolutionary game analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    11. Kassis, Grâce & Bertrand, Nathalie, 2022. "Institutional changes in farmland governance emerging from a collective land preservation procedure upholding local food projects: Evidence from a French case study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    12. Allen, Darcy W.E. & Berg, Chris & Markey-Towler, Brendan & Novak, Mikayla & Potts, Jason, 2020. "Blockchain and the evolution of institutional technologies: Implications for innovation policy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    13. Bachev, Hrabrin, 2023. "Оценка На Институционалната Структура На Оползотворяване На Утайки От Псов В Българското Земеделие [Assessment of the institutional structure of sludge utilization in Bulgarian agriculture]," MPRA Paper 118309, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Martino, Gaetano & Frascarelli, Angelo, 2014. "Adaptation in Food Networks: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Evidences," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 4(01), pages 1-14, March.
    15. Christian Cordes & Stephan Müller & Georg Schwesinger & Sarianna M. Lundan, 2022. "Governance structures, cultural distance, and socialization dynamics: further challenges for the modern corporation," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 371-397, April.
    16. Délila Allam, 2011. "En toutes franchises : de la capacité d'obéissance à la capacité d'initiative," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00643792, HAL.
    17. Rodrigo Martins & Fernando Ribeiro Serra & André da Silva Leite & Manuel Portugal Ferreira & Dan Li, 2010. "Transactions Cost Theory influence in strategy research: A review through a bibliometric study in leading journals," Working Papers 61, globADVANTAGE, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria.
    18. Jeffery Smith, 2018. "Efficiency and Ethically Responsible Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(3), pages 603-618, July.
    19. Martino, Gaetano & Frascarelli, Angelo, 2012. "Adaptation in Food Networks: Theoretical Frame Work and Empirical Evidences," 2012 International European Forum, February 13-17, 2012, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 144981, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    20. Max Zongyuan Shang & Ken McEwan, 2021. "The make‐or‐buy decision of feed on livestock farms: Evidence from Ontario swine farms," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 69(3), pages 353-368, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9095-:d:1771087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.