IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9024-d1769336.html

Evidence of Agroecological Performance in Production Systems Integrating Agroecology and Bioeconomy Actions Using TAPE in the Colombian Andean–Amazon Transition Zone

Author

Listed:
  • Yerson D. Suárez-Córdoba

    (Programa de Maestría en Sistemas Sostenibles de Producción, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad de la Amazonía, Florencia 180001, Colombia
    Programa Sostenibilidad e Intervención, Instituto Amazónico de Investigaciones Científicas SINCHI, Bogotá 111711, Colombia
    Programa Modelos de Funcionamiento y Sostenibilidad, Instituto Amazónico de Investigaciones Científicas SINCHI, Florencia 180001, Colombia)

  • Jaime A. Barrera-García

    (Programa Sostenibilidad e Intervención, Instituto Amazónico de Investigaciones Científicas SINCHI, Bogotá 111711, Colombia)

  • Armando Sterling

    (Programa Modelos de Funcionamiento y Sostenibilidad, Instituto Amazónico de Investigaciones Científicas SINCHI, Florencia 180001, Colombia)

  • Carlos H. Rodríguez-León

    (Programa Modelos de Funcionamiento y Sostenibilidad, Instituto Amazónico de Investigaciones Científicas SINCHI, Florencia 180001, Colombia)

  • Pablo A. Tittonell

    (Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (CIRAD), UPR AIDA, F-34398 Montpellier, France
    Groningen Institute of Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES), University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands)

Abstract

The expansion of conventional agricultural models in the Colombian Amazon has caused deforestation, biodiversity loss, and socio-environmental degradation. In response, agroecology and bioeconomy are emerging as key strategies to regenerate landscapes and foster sustainable production systems. We evaluated the agroecological performance of 25 farms in the Andean–Amazon transition zone of Colombia using FAO’s Tool for Agroecology Performance Evaluation (TAPE). The analysis included land cover dynamics (2002–2024), characterization of the agroecological transition based on the 10 Elements of Agroecology, and 23 economic, environmental, and social indicators. Four farm typologies were identified; among them, Mixed Family Farms (MFF) achieved the highest transition score (CAET = 60.5%) and excelled in crop diversity (64%), soil health (SHI = 4.24), productive autonomy (VA/GVP = 0.69), and household empowerment (FMEF= 85%). Correlation analyses showed strong links between agroecological practices, economic efficiency, and social cohesion. Land cover dynamics revealed a continuous decline in forest cover (12.9% in 2002 to 7.1% in 2024) and an increase in secondary vegetation, underscoring the urgent need for restorative approaches. Overall, farms further along the agroecological transition were more productive, autonomous, and socially cohesive, strengthening territorial resilience. The application of TAPE proved robust multidimensional evidence to support agroecological monitoring and decision-making, with direct implications for land use planning, rural development strategies, and sustainability policies in the Amazon. At the same time, its sensitivity to high baseline biodiversity and to the complex socio-ecological dynamics of the Colombian Amazon underscores the need to refine the methodology in future applications. By addressing these challenges, the study contributes to the broader international debate on agroecological transitions, offering insights relevant for other tropical frontiers and biodiversity-rich regions facing similar pressures.

Suggested Citation

  • Yerson D. Suárez-Córdoba & Jaime A. Barrera-García & Armando Sterling & Carlos H. Rodríguez-León & Pablo A. Tittonell, 2025. "Evidence of Agroecological Performance in Production Systems Integrating Agroecology and Bioeconomy Actions Using TAPE in the Colombian Andean–Amazon Transition Zone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-23, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9024-:d:1769336
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9024/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9024/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lupton, R.C. & Allwood, J.M., 2017. "Hybrid Sankey diagrams: Visual analysis of multidimensional data for understanding resource use," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 141-151.
    2. Deaconu, Ana & Berti, Peter R. & Cole, Donald C. & Mercille, Geneviève & Batal, Malek, 2021. "Agroecology and nutritional health: A comparison of agroecological farmers and their neighbors in the Ecuadorian highlands," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    3. El Mujtar, Verónica Andrea & Zamor, Ronie & Salmerón, Francisco & Guerrero, Adela del Socorro & Laborda, Luciana & Tittonell, Pablo & Hogan, Rose, 2023. "Lexical analysis improves the identification of contextual drivers and farm typologies in the assessment of transitions to agroecology through TAPE – A case study from rural Nicaragua," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    4. Núñez, Angie Paola Bernal & Gutiérrez-Montes, Isabel & Hernández-Núñez, Héctor Eduardo & Suárez, David Ricardo Gutiérrez & García, Gustavo Adolfo Gutiérrez & Suárez, Juan Carlos & Casanoves, Fernando , 2023. "Diverse farmer livelihoods increase resilience to climate variability in southern Colombia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    5. Lucantoni, Dario & Sy, Mouhamed Rassoul & Goïta, Mamadou & Veyret-Picot, Maude & Vicovaro, Marcello & Bicksler, Abram & Mottet, Anne, 2023. "Evidence on the multidimensional performance of agroecology in Mali using TAPE," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    6. Pizarro, D.M. & Erickson, M.G. & Gómez-Bravo, C.A. & Picasso, V.D. & Lucantoni, D. & Mottet, A. & Wattiaux, M.A., 2025. "Agroecological performance of smallholder dairy cattle systems in the Peruvian Amazon," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    7. Jan Douwe Van der Ploeg & Marjolein Visser, 2019. "The economic potential of agroecology: Empirical evidence from Europe," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/289295, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    8. Inês Costa-Pereira & Ana A. R. M. Aguiar & Fernanda Delgado & Cristina A. Costa, 2024. "A Methodological Framework for Assessing the Agroecological Performance of Farms in Portugal: Integrating TAPE and ACT Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-21, May.
    9. Angie Paola Bernal Núñez & Isabel Gutiérrez-Montes & Héctor Eduardo Hernández-Núñez & David Ricardo Gutiérrez Suárez & Gustavo Adolfo Gutiérrez García & Juan Carlos Suarez & Fernando Casanoves & Corne, 2023. "Diverse farmer livelihoods increase resilience to climate variability in southern Colombia," Post-Print hal-05180639, HAL.
    10. Davide Marino & Francesca Curcio & Francesca Benedetta Felici & Giampiero Mazzocchi, 2023. "Toward Evidence-Based Local Food Policy: An Agroecological Assessment of Urban Agriculture in Rome," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vincenzo Fiore & Massimiliano Borrello & Domenico Carlucci & Giacomo Giannoccaro & Simone Russo & Sarah Stempfle & Luigi Roselli, 2024. "The socio-economic issues of agroecology: a scoping review," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 12(1), pages 1-38, December.
    2. Pizarro, D.M. & Erickson, M.G. & Gómez-Bravo, C.A. & Picasso, V.D. & Lucantoni, D. & Mottet, A. & Wattiaux, M.A., 2025. "Agroecological performance of smallholder dairy cattle systems in the Peruvian Amazon," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    3. Pascal Genest-Richard & Caroline Halde & Patrick Mundler & Nicolas Devillers, 2025. "A Promising Niche: Current State of Knowledge on the Agroecological Contribution of Alternative Livestock Farming Practices," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-31, January.
    4. Suwan Li & Jiameng Yang & Renjie Wei & Mengyuan Qiu, 2025. "The Impact and Mechanism of National Park Construction on County-Level Livelihood and Well-Being—A Case Study in Wuyishan National Park, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-28, July.
    5. Buritica, Alexander & Ngaiwi, Mary & Moreno, Manuel & Gonzalez, Carolina & Castro-Nunez, Augusto, 2026. "Advancing sustainable Silvopastoral practices for achieving zero deforestation in the Colombian Amazon," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    6. Inès Gharbi & Fatma Aribi & Hassen Abdelhafidh & Nouha Ferchichi & Lamia Lajnef & Wael Toukabri & Mohamed Jaouad, 2025. "Assessment of the Agroecological Transition of Farms in Central Tunisia Using the TAPE Framework," Resources, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-23, May.
    7. Biancamaria Torquati & Veronica Rossi, 2025. "School food procurement policy and organic local food production: What synergies for a transition to a sustainable local food system?," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Phoebe Koundouri & Konstantinos Dellis & Christopher Deranian & Theofanis Zacharatos, 2025. "Towards a sustainable Agri-food System for Greece: Insights from the FABLE Calculator," DEOS Working Papers 2556, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    9. Laure Latruffe & Gerald Schwarz, 2022. "Insights on Transitions to Agroecological Farming from across Europe," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 3-4, December.
    10. Lucas Contarato Pilon & Jordano Vaz Ambus & Elena Blume & Rodrigo Josemar Seminoti Jacques & José Miguel Reichert, 2023. "Citrus Orchards in Agroforestry, Organic, and Conventional Systems: Soil Quality and Functioning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-28, August.
    11. Charalampos Michalakakis & Jeremy Fouillou & Richard C. Lupton & Ana Gonzalez Hernandez & Jonathan M. Cullen, 2021. "Calculating the chemical exergy of materials," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(2), pages 274-287, April.
    12. Alan Matthews, 2022. "Prospects for Agroecology in Europe," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 80-83, December.
    13. Ramazan Çakmakçı & Mehmet Ali Salık & Songül Çakmakçı, 2023. "Assessment and Principles of Environmentally Sustainable Food and Agriculture Systems," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-27, May.
    14. Annamária Harkányi & Apolka Ujj, 2024. "Impact of Nature Conservation Resources of Agroecology: Insights from Hungarian Farmers and Consumer Perspectives," Resources, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-25, November.
    15. Schnebelin, Éléonore, 2022. "Linking the diversity of ecologisation models to farmers' digital use profiles," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    16. Rigby, Aidan & Lindley, Ben & Cullen, Jonathan, 2023. "An exergy based assessment of the efficiency of nuclear fuel cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    17. De La Cruz S., Marco & Dessein, Joost, 2021. "Beyond institutional bricolage: An ‘intertwining approach’ to understanding the transition towards agroecology in Peru," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    18. Christian Grovermann & Sylvain Quiédeville & Adrian Muller & Florian Leiber & Matthias Stolze & Simon Moakes, 2021. "Does organic certification make economic sense for dairy farmers in Europe?–A latent class counterfactual analysis," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(6), pages 1001-1012, November.
    19. Marull, Joan & Torabi, Parisa & Padró, Roc & Alabert, Aureli & La Rota, Maria José & Serrano, Tarik, 2020. "Energy-Landscape Optimization for Land Use Planning. Application in the Barcelona Metropolitan Area," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 431(C).
    20. Milford, Anna & Lien, Gudbrand & Reed, Matthew, 2021. "Different Sales Channels for Different Farmers: Local and Mainstream Marketing of Organic Fruits and Vegetables in Norway," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315058, International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9024-:d:1769336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.