IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/eurcho/v21y2022i3p80-83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prospects for Agroecology in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Alan Matthews

Abstract

Agroecology is not a new concept. Its rising prominence, however, is linked to greater societal awareness of environmental pressures associated with agricultural practices, a decline in the number of farmers, the growing market power of major corporate businesses, and links between ill‐health and patterns of food consumption. In this context, agroecology is proposed as an alternative and sustainable model for agricultural production and for organising food systems. However, the uptake of agroecological practices in Europe is low. Fewer than 3 per cent of all farms have been defined as agroecological by achieving a pre‐determined threshold on all five of key management principles. Economic viability, specifically the return to labour, will be a key factor in determining the attractiveness of agroecological practices to farmers and ultimately the farming system chosen. If current market conditions and economic incentives prove to be insufficient to promote the uptake of agroecological practices, then the associated non‐market or social benefits may be key in generating appropriate rewards to farmers adopting these systems. L'agroécologie n'est pas un nouveau concept. Son importance croissante est toutefois liée à une plus grande prise de conscience par la société des pressions environnementales associées aux pratiques agricoles, à une baisse du nombre d'agriculteurs, au pouvoir de marché croissant des grandes entreprises et aux liens entre la mauvaise santé et les habitudes de consommation alimentaire. Dans ce contexte, l'agroécologie est proposée comme modèle alternatif et durable de production agricole et d'organisation des systèmes alimentaires. Cependant, l'adoption de pratiques agroécologiques en Europe est faible. Moins de 3 % de toutes les exploitations ont été définies comme agroécologiques car atteignant un seuil prédéterminé sur les cinq grands principes de gestion soutenant ce concept. La viabilité économique, en particulier le revenu du travail, sera un facteur clé pour déterminer l'attractivité des pratiques agroécologiques pour les agriculteurs et, en définitive, leur choix de système d'exploitation. Si les conditions actuelles du marché et les incitations économiques s'avèrent insuffisantes pour promouvoir l'adoption de pratiques agroécologiques, les avantages non marchands ou sociaux associés peuvent être essentiels pour générer des récompenses appropriées pour les agriculteurs qui adoptent ces systèmes. Agrarökologie ist kein neues Konzept. Ihre zunehmende Bedeutung hängt jedoch mit einem stärkeren gesellschaftlichen Bewusstsein für die mit landwirtschaftlichen Praktiken verbundenen Umweltbelastungen, mit dem Rückgang der Zahl landwirtschaftlicher Betriebe, mit der wachsenden Marktmacht großer Unternehmen und mit den Wechselwirkungen zwischen Krankheiten und Ernährungsgewohnheiten zusammen. Vor diesem Hintergrund wird die Agrarökologie als alternatives und nachhaltiges Modell für die landwirtschaftliche Produktion und die Organisation von Lebensmittelsystemen vorgeschlagen. Die Verbreitung agrarökologischer Praktiken in Europa ist jedoch gering. Weniger als 3% aller landwirtschaftlichen Betriebe wurden als agrarökologisch definiert, indem sie einen festgelegten Schwellenwert für alle fünf wichtigen Bewirtschaftungsgrundsätze erreichten. Die wirtschaftliche Tragfähigkeit, insbesondere die Arbeitsrentabilität, ist ein Schlüsselfaktor für die Attraktivität agrarökologischer Praktiken und letztlich für das gewählte Bewirtschaftungssystem. Wenn sich die aktuellen Marktbedingungen und wirtschaftlichen Anreize als unzureichend erweisen, um die Einführung agrarökologischer Verfahren zu fördern, dann können die damit verbundenen nicht‐marktbezogenen oder sozialen Vorteile der Schlüssel zu einer angemessenen Entlohnung der Landwirte und Landwirtinnen sein, die diese Systeme übernehmen.

Suggested Citation

  • Alan Matthews, 2022. "Prospects for Agroecology in Europe," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 80-83, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:21:y:2022:i:3:p:80-83
    DOI: 10.1111/1746-692X.12376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12376
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1746-692X.12376?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sophia Davidova & Nathalie Hostiou & Maria Alebaki & Alastair Bailey & Zoltan Bakucs & Julie Duval & Penelope Gouta & Stuart Henderson & Anne‐Lise Jacquot & Philippe Jeanneaux & Błażej Jendrzejewski &, 2022. "What Does Ecological Farming Mean for Farm Labour?," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 21-26, December.
    2. Andreas Mayer & Gerald Kalt & Lisa Kaufmann & Elin Röös & Adrian Muller & Rainer Weisshaidinger & Anita Frehner & Nicolas Roux & Pete Smith & Michaela C. Theurl & Sarah Matej & Karlheinz Erb, 2022. "Impacts of Scaling up Agroecology on the Sustainability of European Agriculture in 2050," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 27-36, December.
    3. Jan Douwe Van der Ploeg & Marjolein Visser, 2019. "The economic potential of agroecology: Empirical evidence from Europe," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/289295, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    4. Andrew Barnes & Helena Hansson & Larissa Billaudet & Gaëlle Leduc & Gordana Manevska Tasevska & Mary Ryan & Bethan Thompson & Luiza Toma & Sabine Duvaleix‐Tréguer & Irene Tzouramani, 2022. "European Farmer Perspectives and their Adoption of Ecological Practices," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 5-12, December.
    5. David Miller & Sophie Legras & Andrew Barnes & Mara Cazacu & Oriana Gava & Janne Helin & Katherine Irvine & Jochen Kantelhardt & Jan Landert & Laure Latruffe & Andreas Mayer & Andreas Niedermayr & And, 2022. "Creating Conditions for Harnessing the Potential of Transitions to Agroecology in Europe and Requirements for Policy," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 72-79, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ramazan Çakmakçı & Mehmet Ali Salık & Songül Çakmakçı, 2023. "Assessment and Principles of Environmentally Sustainable Food and Agriculture Systems," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-27, May.
    2. David Miller & Sophie Legras & Andrew Barnes & Mara Cazacu & Oriana Gava & Janne Helin & Katherine Irvine & Jochen Kantelhardt & Jan Landert & Laure Latruffe & Andreas Mayer & Andreas Niedermayr & And, 2022. "Creating Conditions for Harnessing the Potential of Transitions to Agroecology in Europe and Requirements for Policy," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 72-79, December.
    3. Gerald Schwarz & Francesco Vanni & David Miller & Janne Helin & Jaroslav Pražan & Fabrizio Albanito & Mihaela Fratila & Francesco Galioto & Oriana Gava & Katherine Irvine & Jan Landert & Alba Linares , 2022. "Exploring Sustainability Implications of Transitions to Agroecology: a Transdisciplinary Perspective," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 37-47, December.
    4. Laure Latruffe & Gerald Schwarz, 2022. "Insights on Transitions to Agroecological Farming from across Europe," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 3-4, December.
    5. Lucas Contarato Pilon & Jordano Vaz Ambus & Elena Blume & Rodrigo Josemar Seminoti Jacques & José Miguel Reichert, 2023. "Citrus Orchards in Agroforestry, Organic, and Conventional Systems: Soil Quality and Functioning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-28, August.
    6. Schnebelin, Éléonore, 2022. "Linking the diversity of ecologisation models to farmers' digital use profiles," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    7. Sophia Davidova & Nathalie Hostiou & Maria Alebaki & Alastair Bailey & Zoltan Bakucs & Julie Duval & Penelope Gouta & Stuart Henderson & Anne‐Lise Jacquot & Philippe Jeanneaux & Błażej Jendrzejewski &, 2022. "What Does Ecological Farming Mean for Farm Labour?," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 21-26, December.
    8. De La Cruz S., Marco & Dessein, Joost, 2021. "Beyond institutional bricolage: An ‘intertwining approach’ to understanding the transition towards agroecology in Peru," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    9. Christian Grovermann & Sylvain Quiédeville & Adrian Muller & Florian Leiber & Matthias Stolze & Simon Moakes, 2021. "Does organic certification make economic sense for dairy farmers in Europe?–A latent class counterfactual analysis," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(6), pages 1001-1012, November.
    10. Marull, Joan & Torabi, Parisa & Padró, Roc & Alabert, Aureli & La Rota, Maria José & Serrano, Tarik, 2020. "Energy-Landscape Optimization for Land Use Planning. Application in the Barcelona Metropolitan Area," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 431(C).
    11. Milford, Anna & Lien, Gudbrand & Reed, Matthew, 2021. "Different Sales Channels for Different Farmers: Local and Mainstream Marketing of Organic Fruits and Vegetables in Norway," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315058, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Nicolas Schoof & Rainer Luick & Karin Jürgens & Gwyn Jones, 2020. "Dairies in Germany: Key Factors for Grassland Conservation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, May.
    13. Nilsson, Pia & Bommarco, Riccardo & Hansson, Helena & Kuns, Brian & Schaak, Henning, 2022. "Farm performance and input self-sufficiency increases with functional crop diversity on Swedish farms," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    14. Daniel López-García & Gabriela Vázquez-Macías & Javier García-Fernández & Maggie Schmitt & Paula Ortega-Faura & Josep Lluís Espluga-Trenc, 2023. "Towards a Politics of Recognition: Exploring the Symbolic Contexts of Material Agroecological Transitions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, June.
    15. Silvia Sivini & Annamaria Vitale, 2023. "Multifunctional and Agroecological Agriculture as Pathways of Generational Renewal in Italian Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    16. Maurice Cossi Ahozonlin & Luc Hippolyte Dossa, 2020. "Diversity and Resilience to Socio-Ecological Changes of Smallholder Lagune Cattle Farming Systems of Benin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    17. Köninger, Julia & Lugato, Emanuele & Panagos, Panos & Kochupillai, Mrinalini & Orgiazzi, Alberto & Briones, Maria J.I., 2021. "Manure management and soil biodiversity: Towards more sustainable food systems in the EU," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    18. Daniel López-García & Manuel González de Molina, 2021. "An Operational Approach to Agroecology-Based Local Agri-Food Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    19. Giuseppe Gargano & Francesco Licciardo & Milena Verrascina & Barbara Zanetti, 2021. "The Agroecological Approach as a Model for Multifunctional Agriculture and Farming towards the European Green Deal 2030—Some Evidence from the Italian Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    20. Lucantoni, Dario & Sy, Mouhamed Rassoul & Goïta, Mamadou & Veyret-Picot, Maude & Vicovaro, Marcello & Bicksler, Abram & Mottet, Anne, 2023. "Evidence on the multidimensional performance of agroecology in Mali using TAPE," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:21:y:2022:i:3:p:80-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.