Author
Listed:
- Yuanyuan Wang
(School of Civil Engineering, Sanjiang University, Nanjing 210012, China)
- Yinlong Yan
(School of Civil Engineering, Sanjiang University, Nanjing 210012, China)
- Shiwang Yu
(School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China)
- Dongmei Bai
(School of Civil Engineering, Sanjiang University, Nanjing 210012, China)
Abstract
With the rapid advancement of urbanization, urban migrants’ willingness to participate in community affairs plays a vital role in urban social governance. However, existing studies have paid insufficient attention to the psychological mechanisms through which urban migrants translate perceptions of their residential environment into participation intentions, particularly lacking systematic examinations of the mediating role of residential satisfaction. Drawing on Social Exchange Theory, this study develops a mediation model of “environmental perception → residential satisfaction → community participation intention” to explore how urban migrants’ perceptions of their living environment shape their intention to participation in community affairs via residential satisfaction. A questionnaire survey was conducted among 315 urban migrants in Nanjing, China, and the data were analyzed using structural equation modeling. The results reveal that (1) housing conditions, supporting facilities, property management, and the humanistic environment significantly enhance residents’ residential satisfaction, thereby stimulating their intention to participate in community affairs; (2) while location attributes and transportation have no significant direct effects on community participation intention, they can promote participation indirectly through residential satisfaction; and (3) policy perception neither directly influences community participation intention nor indirectly affects it via residential satisfaction. This study uncovers the underlying mechanisms of urban migrants’ community participation, offering both theoretical insights and practical implications for improving the effectiveness of community governance.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8639-:d:1758342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.