IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8384-d1752701.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incorporating Carbon Fees into the Efficiency Evaluation of Taiwan’s Steel Industry Using Data Envelopment Analysis with Negative Data

Author

Listed:
  • Shih-Heng Yu

    (Department of Business Management, National United University, Miaoli 360301, Taiwan)

  • Ying-Sin Lin

    (Department of Business Management, National United University, Miaoli 360301, Taiwan)

  • Jia-Li Zhang

    (Department of Business Management, National United University, Miaoli 360301, Taiwan)

  • Chia-Shan Hsu

    (Department of Business Management, National United University, Miaoli 360301, Taiwan)

  • Shu-Min Cheng

    (Department of Business Management, National United University, Miaoli 360301, Taiwan)

Abstract

Carbon fees are scheduled to be levied in Taiwan, posing unprecedented challenges for the steel industry, given its high emissions and risk of carbon leakage. This study explores the potential impact of this policy on steel industry performance by incorporating projected carbon fees into the efficiency assessment. The Slacks-Based Measure (SBM) and Super SBM models in Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), which account for negative data, are used to evaluate the operational efficiencies of 30 listed steel firms across supply chain segments in 2024 under baseline and carbon fee scenarios. Results reveal that incorporating the carbon fees mitigates the upward bias that overestimates inefficient firms’ SBM scores, triggers broad efficiency declines and ranking reshuffling (most severe upstream, moderate midstream, and least downstream), and widens cross-firm efficiency dispersion. Moreover, the study finds that excessive carbon fees and operating profit deficiencies are the main input- and output-side drivers of inefficiency, highlighting improvement potential in carbon cost management and profitability gains. To date, the efficiency implications of carbon fees for Taiwan’s steel industry have remained underexplored. Our findings offer empirical insights and a timely reference for steel firms to refine sustainability strategies ahead of forthcoming carbon fees.

Suggested Citation

  • Shih-Heng Yu & Ying-Sin Lin & Jia-Li Zhang & Chia-Shan Hsu & Shu-Min Cheng, 2025. "Incorporating Carbon Fees into the Efficiency Evaluation of Taiwan’s Steel Industry Using Data Envelopment Analysis with Negative Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-18, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8384-:d:1752701
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8384/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8384/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Bank, "undated". "State and Trends of Carbon Pricing: International Carbon Markets 2024," World Bank Publications - Reports 42094, The World Bank Group.
    2. Wu, Huaqing & Lv, Kui & Liang, Liang & Hu, Hanhui, 2017. "Measuring performance of sustainable manufacturing with recyclable wastes: A case from China’s iron and steel industry," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PA), pages 38-47.
    3. Tone, Kaoru & Chang, Tsung-Sheng & Wu, Chen-Hui, 2020. "Handling negative data in slacks-based measure data envelopment analysis models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(3), pages 926-935.
    4. Tvinnereim, Endre & Mehling, Michael, 2018. "Carbon pricing and deep decarbonisation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 185-189.
    5. Shijie Ding & Jing Zhao & Meng Zhang & Sheng Yang & Hongwei Zhang, 2022. "Measuring the environmental protection efficiency and productivity of the 49 largest iron and steel enterprises in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 454-472, January.
    6. Li-Ting Yeh, 2017. "Incorporating Workplace Injury to Measure the Safety Performance of Industrial Sectors in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    8. World Bank, "undated". "State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2024," World Bank Publications - Reports 41544, The World Bank Group.
    9. Griffin, Paul W. & Hammond, Geoffrey P., 2019. "Industrial energy use and carbon emissions reduction in the iron and steel sector: A UK perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 109-125.
    10. Kim, Nam Hyok & He, Feng & Kwon, O Chol, 2023. "Combining common-weights DEA window with the Malmquist index: A case of China’s iron and steel industry," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PB).
    11. Tone, Kaoru, 2002. "A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 32-41, November.
    12. Jyh-Woei Lin, 2025. "How Can Carbon Fees Help Taiwan Reduce Carbon Emissions?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-9, February.
    13. Fukuyama, Hirofumi & Liu, Hui-hui & Song, Yao-yao & Yang, Guo-liang, 2021. "Measuring the capacity utilization of the 48 largest iron and steel enterprises in China," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(2), pages 648-665.
    14. Paradi, Joseph C. & Rouatt, Stephen & Zhu, Haiyan, 2011. "Two-stage evaluation of bank branch efficiency using data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 99-109, January.
    15. Wu, Rongxin & Tan, Zhizhou & Lin, Boqiang, 2023. "Does carbon emission trading scheme really improve the CO2 emission efficiency? Evidence from China's iron and steel industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    16. Li, Ke & Zou, Danyu & Li, Hailing, 2023. "Environmental regulation and green technical efficiency: A process-level data envelopment analysis from Chinese iron and steel enterprises," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    17. Ray, Subhash C. & Kim, Hiung Joon, 1995. "Cost efficiency in the US steel industry: A nonparametric analysis using data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 654-671, February.
    18. Tone, Kaoru, 2001. "A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 498-509, May.
    19. Rong Liu & Feng He & Jianyu Ren, 2021. "Promoting or Inhibiting? The Impact of Enterprise Environmental Performance on Economic Performance: Evidence from China’s Large Iron and Steel Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, June.
    20. Zakeri, Atefe & Dehghanian, Farzad & Fahimnia, Behnam & Sarkis, Joseph, 2015. "Carbon pricing versus emissions trading: A supply chain planning perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 197-205.
    21. Yongrok Choi & Yanni Yu & Hyoung Seok Lee, 2018. "A Study on the Sustainable Performance of the Steel Industry in Korea Based on SBM-DEA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vicente J. Bolós & Rafael Benítez & Vicente Coll-Serrano, 2023. "Continuous models combining slacks-based measures of efficiency and super-efficiency," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(2), pages 363-391, June.
    2. Hosseini, Keyvan & Stefaniec, Agnieszka, 2019. "Efficiency assessment of Iran's petroleum refining industry in the presence of unprofitable output: A dynamic two-stage slacks-based measure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    3. Lee, Hsuan-Shih, 2025. "Variable range measure: A new range measure for super-efficiency model based on DDF in presence of nonpositive data," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    4. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2015. "Efficiency of the banking system in Vietnam under financial liberalization," OSF Preprints qsf6d, Center for Open Science.
    5. Tone, Kaoru & Sahoo, Biresh K., 2005. "Evaluating cost efficiency and returns to scale in the Life Insurance Corporation of India using data envelopment analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 261-285, December.
    6. Lee, Hsuan-Shih, 2022. "Integrating SBM model and Super-SBM model: a one-model approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    7. Ruirui Fang & Yue Ma & Lianyong Feng, 2025. "A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Impact of China’s Carbon Market on Carbon Emission Efficiency from the Total-Factor Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Liu, John S. & Lu, Louis Y.Y. & Lu, Wen-Min, 2016. "Research fronts in data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 33-45.
    9. Tone, Kaoru & Toloo, Mehdi & Izadikhah, Mohammad, 2020. "A modified slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(2), pages 560-571.
    10. Lee, Hsuan-Shih, 2021. "Slacks-based measures of efficiency and super-efficiency in presence of nonpositive data," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    11. Ashrafi, Ali & Seow, Hsin-Vonn & Lee, Lai Soon & Lee, Chew Ging, 2013. "The efficiency of the hotel industry in Singapore," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 31-34.
    12. Chen, Yufeng & Ni, Liangfu & Liu, Kelong, 2021. "Does China's new energy vehicle industry innovate efficiently? A three-stage dynamic network slacks-based measure approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    13. Ruijing Zheng & Yu Cheng & Haimeng Liu & Wei Chen & Xiaodong Chen & Yaping Wang, 2022. "The Spatiotemporal Distribution and Drivers of Urban Carbon Emission Efficiency: The Role of Technological Innovation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-22, July.
    14. Muliaman Hadad & Maximilian Hall & Karligash Kenjegalieva & Wimboh Santoso & Richard Simper, 2011. "Banking efficiency and stock market performance: an analysis of listed Indonesian banks," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 1-20, July.
    15. Jo, Ah-Hyun & Chang, Young-Tae, 2023. "The effect of airport efficiency on air traffic, using DEA and multilateral resistance terms gravity models," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    16. Hongli Liu & Xiaoyu Yan & Jinhua Cheng & Jun Zhang & Yan Bu, 2021. "Driving Factors for the Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity in Technical Efficiency of China’s New Energy Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    17. Yi-Chung Hsu, 2014. "Efficiency in government health spending: a super slacks-based model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 111-126, January.
    18. Mousavi, Mohammad M. & Ouenniche, Jamal & Xu, Bing, 2015. "Performance evaluation of bankruptcy prediction models: An orientation-free super-efficiency DEA-based framework," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 64-75.
    19. Fan Wang & Lili Feng & Jin Li & Lin Wang, 2020. "Environmental Regulation, Tenure Length of Officials, and Green Innovation of Enterprises," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-16, March.
    20. Ningyi Liu & Yongyu Wang, 2022. "Urban Agglomeration Ecological Welfare Performance and Spatial Convergence Research in the Yellow River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8384-:d:1752701. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.