IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p8059-d1744180.html

Impact Pathways of AI-Supported Instruction on Learning Behaviors, Competence Development, and Academic Achievement in Engineering Education

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Wan

    (The College of River and Ocean Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China
    Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Hydraulic and Water Transport Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China)

  • Rui Li

    (The College of River and Ocean Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China
    Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Hydraulic and Water Transport Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China)

  • Wenjie Li

    (The College of River and Ocean Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China
    Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Hydraulic and Water Transport Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China)

  • Hongbo Du

    (The College of River and Ocean Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China
    Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Hydraulic and Water Transport Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China)

Abstract

With the increasing integration of artificial intelligence into education, traditional instructional models in Hydraulic Engineering are shifting toward competence- and performance-oriented pedagogy under the New Engineering framework. Rooted in constructivist and learner-centered theories, this study examines how AI-assisted versus traditional instruction influences learning behaviors, competence development, and academic achievement in engineering education through a quasi-experimental study involving 102 undergraduate students. Results indicate that while the AI-assisted group achieved significantly higher Midterm Report Scores and PPT Presentation Scores, no significant difference was observed in Final Exam Scores between the two groups. Multivariate regression and latent profile analysis reveal that AI-assisted instruction enhances Classroom Participation, Data Processing Ability, and Comprehensive Analytical Ability, yet falls short in fostering Practical Problem-solving Ability compared to traditional instruction. Path analysis further indicates that AI-assisted instruction improves Academic Achievement indirectly by promoting Learning Behaviors, which in turn foster Competence Development, ultimately contributing to improved Academic Achievement. By addressing a critical gap in the literature on the mechanisms of AI integration in engineering education, this study underscores the importance of optimizing learning processes rather than merely pursuing outcome enhancement, offering theoretical and practical insights for AI-integrated instructional reform in the context of New Engineering education.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Wan & Rui Li & Wenjie Li & Hongbo Du, 2025. "Impact Pathways of AI-Supported Instruction on Learning Behaviors, Competence Development, and Academic Achievement in Engineering Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-27, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:8059-:d:1744180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/8059/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/8059/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elchanan Cohn & Eric Johnson, 2006. "Class Attendance and Performance in Principles of Economics," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 211-233.
    2. Michael Gerlich, 2025. "Correction: Gerlich, M. AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking. Societies 2025, 15 , 6," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-1, September.
    3. Xuesong Zhai & Xiaoyan Chu & Ching Sing Chai & Morris Siu Yung Jong & Andreja Istenic & Michael Spector & Jia-Bao Liu & Jing Yuan & Yan Li & Ning Cai, 2021. "A Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education from 2010 to 2020," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-18, April.
    4. Michael Gerlich, 2025. "AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-28, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuna Lee & Sang-Soo Lee, 2025. "Exploring the Conceptual Model and Instructional Design Principles of Intelligent Problem-Solving Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-33, August.
    2. Alina Iorga Pisica & Razvan Octavian Giurca & Rodica Milena Zaharia, 2025. "Teaching AI in Higher Education: Business Perspective," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Yahya Hiçyilmaz, 2025. "An Innovative Approach in Arts Education: Student Experiences of Abstract Art Practices Supported by Generative Artificial Intelligence," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
    4. Dey, Ishita, 2018. "Class attendance and academic performance: A subgroup analysis," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 29-40.
    5. Hadsell, Lester, 2020. "Not for want of trying: Effort and Success of women in principles of microeconomics," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    6. Abdalmajeed Selmi Arrooqi & Mutlaq Miqad Alruqi, 2025. "Academic leadership attitudes toward employing artificial intelligence applications in developing administrative processes," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    7. Asif Ali Wagan & Abdullah Ayub Khan & Yen-Lin Chen & Por Lip Yee & Jing Yang & Asif Ali Laghari, 2023. "Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Game-Based Learning and Quality of Experience: A Novel and Secure Framework (B-AIQoE)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-12, March.
    8. Austin, Wesley A. & Totaro, Michael W., 2011. "Gender differences in the effects of Internet usage on high school absenteeism," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 192-198, April.
    9. Christopher N. Annala & Shuo Chen & Daniel R. Strang, . "The Use of PRS in Introductory Microeconomics: Some Evidence on Performance and Attendance," Journal for Economic Educators, Middle Tennessee State University, Business and Economic Research Center.
    10. Xiu Guan & Xiang Feng & A.Y.M. Atiquil Islam, 2023. "The dilemma and countermeasures of educational data ethics in the age of intelligence," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Cortinhas, Carlos, 2025. "Does nudging higher education students improve attendance and does it matter? A quasi-natural experiment," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    12. Neetan Narayan, 2025. "AI, Cognition, and the Cost of Convenience," Journal of Technology and Systems, CARI Journals Limited, vol. 7(6), pages 18-34.
    13. Arulampalam, Wiji & Naylor, Robin A. & Smith, Jeremy, 2012. "Am I missing something? The effects of absence from class on student performance," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 363-375.
    14. Dobkin, Carlos & Gil, Ricard & Marion, Justin, 2010. "Skipping class in college and exam performance: Evidence from a regression discontinuity classroom experiment," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 566-575, August.
    15. Goulas, Sofoklis & Griselda, Silvia & Megalokonomou, Rigissa, 2023. "Compulsory class attendance versus autonomy," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 935-981.
    16. Ehsan Latif & Stan Miles, 2013. "Class Attendance and Academic Performance: A Panel Data Analysis," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 32(4), pages 470-476, December.
    17. Thivyasiny Saravanan & Nurul Aisyah Kamrozzaman, 2025. "Artificial Intelligence in Primary Education: Teacher Perceptions, Instructional Decisions, and Integration Challenges in Urban Malaysia," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(9), pages 9393-9406, September.
    18. Cheng, Dorothy A., 2011. "Effects of class size on alternative educational outcomes across disciplines," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 980-990, October.
    19. Onise ALPENIDZE, 2025. "Enhancing Internationalization Management Of Higher Education Through Artificial Intelligence," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(5), pages 27-37, May.
    20. Huijuan Zhuang & Jing Dong & Su Mu & Haiming Liu, 2022. "Learning Performance Prediction and Alert Method in Hybrid Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:8059-:d:1744180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.