IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p8035-d1743634.html

From Microbial Heuristics to Institutional Resilience: Principles for Ecosystem Stewardship in the Anthropocene

Author

Listed:
  • Salvador Sánchez-Carrillo

    (Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Spanish Research Council (MNCN-CSIC), 28006 Madrid, Spain)

  • David G. Angeler

    (Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Spanish Research Council (MNCN-CSIC), 28006 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

This essay proposes a transdisciplinary framework that positions cooperation as a foundational principle for ecosystem stewardship in the Anthropocene. Drawing from microbial ecology, evolutionary theory, and sustainability science, we argue that cooperation, rather than competition, is a robust and scalable strategy for resilience across biological and institutional systems. In particular, microbial behaviors such as biofilm formation, quorum sensing, and horizontal gene transfer are especially pronounced in extreme environments, where cooperation becomes essential for survival. These strategies serve as functional analogues that illuminate the structural logics of resilience: interdependence, redundancy, distributed coordination, and adaptation. As the Anthropocene progresses toward increasingly extreme conditions, including potential “Hothouse Earth” scenarios driven by climate disruption, such ecological heuristics offer concrete insights into how human institutions can adapt to stress and uncertainty. Rather than reiterating familiar calls for hybrid governance, we use microbial cooperation as a heuristic to reveal the functional architecture already present in many resilient governance practices. These microbial strategies emerging from life in extreme environments demonstrate how interdependence, redundancy, and distributed coordination can create system resilience and sustainability in the long run. By translating microbial survival strategies into institutional design principles, this framework reframes ecosystem stewardship not as a normative ideal, but as an ecological imperative grounded in the evolutionary logic of cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Salvador Sánchez-Carrillo & David G. Angeler, 2025. "From Microbial Heuristics to Institutional Resilience: Principles for Ecosystem Stewardship in the Anthropocene," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-24, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:8035-:d:1743634
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/8035/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/8035/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles Stubblefield, 2018. "Managing the Planet: The Anthropocene, Good Stewardship, and the Empty Promise of a Solution to Ecological Crisis," Societies, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-25, June.
    2. Miquel Salvador & David Sancho, 2021. "The Role of Local Government in the Drive for Sustainable Development Public Policies. An Analytical Framework Based on Institutional Capacities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Joseph Drew & Bligh Grant, 2017. "Subsidiarity: More than a Principle of Decentralization—a View from Local Government," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 47(4), pages 522-545.
    4. Krister Andersson & Elinor Ostrom, 2008. "Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 41(1), pages 71-93, March.
    5. Ronald Brunner, 2010. "Adaptive governance as a reform strategy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 43(4), pages 301-341, December.
    6. Tim Staub & S. Aqeel Tirmizi, 2025. "Navigating Emerging Climate Crises Through Adaptive Polycentric Meta-networks," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 165-181, April.
    7. David Bidwell & Benjamin K. Sovacool, 2023. "Uneasy tensions in energy justice and systems transformation," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 8(4), pages 317-320, April.
    8. Pierson, Paul, 2000. "Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 94(2), pages 251-267, June.
    9. Virginia Gewin, 2021. "How to include Indigenous researchers and their knowledge," Nature, Nature, vol. 589(7841), pages 315-317, January.
    10. Fernández-I-Marín, Xavier & Knill, Christoph & Steinbacher, Christina & Steinebach, Yves, 2024. "Bureaucratic Quality and the Gap between Implementation Burden and Administrative Capacities," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 118(3), pages 1240-1260, August.
    11. Andrew J. Jordan & Dave Huitema & Mikael Hildén & Harro van Asselt & Tim J. Rayner & Jonas J. Schoenefeld & Jale Tosun & Johanna Forster & Elin L. Boasson, 2015. "Emergence of polycentric climate governance and its future prospects," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(11), pages 977-982, November.
    12. Barbara Horta e Costa & Fabrice Stephenson & Joachim Claudet, 2025. "European Union’s strict conservation targets should guide global marine policy," Nature, Nature, vol. 642(8066), pages 38-38, June.
    13. Miguel A. Altieri & Clara Ines Nicholls, 2020. "Agroecology and the emergence of a post COVID-19 agriculture," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 37(3), pages 525-526, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patricio Valdivieso & Krister P. Andersson, 2018. "What Motivates Local Governments to Invest in Critical Infrastructure? Lessons from Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-27, October.
    2. Radtke, Jörg & Ohlhorst, Dörte, 2021. "Community Energy in Germany – Bowling Alone in Elite Clubs?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    3. Tim Staub & S. Aqeel Tirmizi, 2025. "Navigating Emerging Climate Crises Through Adaptive Polycentric Meta-networks," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 165-181, April.
    4. Tiffany H. Morrison & W. Neil Adger & Katrina Brown & Maria Carmen Lemos & Dave Huitema & Terry P. Hughes, 2017. "Mitigation and adaptation in polycentric systems: sources of power in the pursuit of collective goals," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(5), September.
    5. Bitoiu Teodora & Radulescu Crina, 2015. "Craving For Balanced Public Decision-Making On Market Failure Pertaining To The Interventionist Economic Policies Strainer," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 157-164, July.
    6. Fu, Tong & Jian, Ze, 2020. "A developmental state: How to allocate electricity efficiently in a developing country," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    7. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/2b86iahfka8nib85jevjn10bsn is not listed on IDEAS
    8. David P Carter & Christopher M Weible & Saba N Siddiki & Xavier Basurto, 2016. "Integrating core concepts from the institutional analysis and development framework for the systematic analysis of policy designs: An illustration from the US National Organic Program regulation," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 28(1), pages 159-185, January.
    9. Hugo Priemus & Bert van Wee (ed.), 2013. "International Handbook on Mega-Projects," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14791.
    10. Ekaterina Domorenok & Paolo Graziano & Laura Polverari, 2021. "Policy integration, policy design and administrative capacities. Evidence from EU cohesion policy [Joined-up Government in the Western World in comparative perspective: A preliminary literature review and exploration]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 40(1), pages 58-78.
    11. Kasper Ampe & Erik Paredis & Lotte Asveld & Patricia Osseweijer & Thomas Block, 2021. "Power struggles in policy feedback processes: incremental steps towards a circular economy within Dutch wastewater policy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(3), pages 579-607, September.
    12. Nomfundo Sibiya & Mikateko Sithole & Lindelani Mudau & Mulala Danny Simatele, 2022. "Empowering the Voiceless: Securing the Participation of Marginalised Groups in Climate Change Governance in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, June.
    13. Umberto Nizza, 2025. "The market of infidelity—the effect of party switching on lawmaking productivity: evidence from Italy," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 527-557, December.
    14. Michael Mintrom & Jacqui True, 2022. "COVID-19 as a policy window: policy entrepreneurs responding to violence against women [The pandemic paradox: The consequences of COVID-19 on domestic violence]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 41(1), pages 143-154.
    15. Li, Aitong & Xu, Yuan & Shiroyama, Hideaki, 2019. "Solar lobby and energy transition in Japan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    16. Rana, Pushpendra & Chhatre, Ashwini, 2017. "Beyond committees: Hybrid forest governance for equity and sustainability," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 40-50.
    17. Xu, Wenyan & Mo, Wenting, 2024. "Institutional unlocking or technological unlocking? The logic of carbon unlocking in the new energy vehicle industry in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    18. Odysseas Christou, 2021. "Energy Security in Turbulent Times Towards the European Green Deal," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(3), pages 360-369.
    19. FitzGerald Cathal & O’Malley Eoin & Broin Deiric Ó, 2019. "Policy success/policy failure: A framework for understanding policy choices," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 67(2), pages 1-24, May.
    20. Frame, Damien & Hannon, Matthew & Bell, Keith & McArthur, Stephen, 2018. "Innovation in regulated electricity distribution networks: A review of the effectiveness of Great Britain's Low Carbon Networks Fund," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 121-132.
    21. Barbara Quimby & Arielle Levine, 2018. "Participation, Power, and Equity: Examining Three Key Social Dimensions of Fisheries Comanagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:8035-:d:1743634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.