IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p8035-d1743634.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Microbial Heuristics to Institutional Resilience: Principles for Ecosystem Stewardship in the Anthropocene

Author

Listed:
  • Salvador Sánchez-Carrillo

    (Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Spanish Research Council (MNCN-CSIC), 28006 Madrid, Spain)

  • David G. Angeler

    (Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Spanish Research Council (MNCN-CSIC), 28006 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

This essay proposes a transdisciplinary framework that positions cooperation as a foundational principle for ecosystem stewardship in the Anthropocene. Drawing from microbial ecology, evolutionary theory, and sustainability science, we argue that cooperation, rather than competition, is a robust and scalable strategy for resilience across biological and institutional systems. In particular, microbial behaviors such as biofilm formation, quorum sensing, and horizontal gene transfer are especially pronounced in extreme environments, where cooperation becomes essential for survival. These strategies serve as functional analogues that illuminate the structural logics of resilience: interdependence, redundancy, distributed coordination, and adaptation. As the Anthropocene progresses toward increasingly extreme conditions, including potential “Hothouse Earth” scenarios driven by climate disruption, such ecological heuristics offer concrete insights into how human institutions can adapt to stress and uncertainty. Rather than reiterating familiar calls for hybrid governance, we use microbial cooperation as a heuristic to reveal the functional architecture already present in many resilient governance practices. These microbial strategies emerging from life in extreme environments demonstrate how interdependence, redundancy, and distributed coordination can create system resilience and sustainability in the long run. By translating microbial survival strategies into institutional design principles, this framework reframes ecosystem stewardship not as a normative ideal, but as an ecological imperative grounded in the evolutionary logic of cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Salvador Sánchez-Carrillo & David G. Angeler, 2025. "From Microbial Heuristics to Institutional Resilience: Principles for Ecosystem Stewardship in the Anthropocene," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-24, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:8035-:d:1743634
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/8035/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/8035/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles Stubblefield, 2018. "Managing the Planet: The Anthropocene, Good Stewardship, and the Empty Promise of a Solution to Ecological Crisis," Societies, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-25, June.
    2. Miquel Salvador & David Sancho, 2021. "The Role of Local Government in the Drive for Sustainable Development Public Policies. An Analytical Framework Based on Institutional Capacities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Joseph Drew & Bligh Grant, 2017. "Subsidiarity: More than a Principle of Decentralization—a View from Local Government," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 47(4), pages 522-545.
    4. Krister Andersson & Elinor Ostrom, 2008. "Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 41(1), pages 71-93, March.
    5. Ronald Brunner, 2010. "Adaptive governance as a reform strategy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 43(4), pages 301-341, December.
    6. Tim Staub & S. Aqeel Tirmizi, 2025. "Navigating Emerging Climate Crises Through Adaptive Polycentric Meta-networks," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 165-181, April.
    7. David Bidwell & Benjamin K. Sovacool, 2023. "Uneasy tensions in energy justice and systems transformation," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 8(4), pages 317-320, April.
    8. Pierson, Paul, 2000. "Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 94(2), pages 251-267, June.
    9. Virginia Gewin, 2021. "How to include Indigenous researchers and their knowledge," Nature, Nature, vol. 589(7841), pages 315-317, January.
    10. Fernández-I-Marín, Xavier & Knill, Christoph & Steinbacher, Christina & Steinebach, Yves, 2024. "Bureaucratic Quality and the Gap between Implementation Burden and Administrative Capacities," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 118(3), pages 1240-1260, August.
    11. Andrew J. Jordan & Dave Huitema & Mikael Hildén & Harro van Asselt & Tim J. Rayner & Jonas J. Schoenefeld & Jale Tosun & Johanna Forster & Elin L. Boasson, 2015. "Emergence of polycentric climate governance and its future prospects," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(11), pages 977-982, November.
    12. Barbara Horta e Costa & Fabrice Stephenson & Joachim Claudet, 2025. "European Union’s strict conservation targets should guide global marine policy," Nature, Nature, vol. 642(8066), pages 38-38, June.
    13. Miguel A. Altieri & Clara Ines Nicholls, 2020. "Agroecology and the emergence of a post COVID-19 agriculture," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 37(3), pages 525-526, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patricio Valdivieso & Krister P. Andersson, 2018. "What Motivates Local Governments to Invest in Critical Infrastructure? Lessons from Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-27, October.
    2. Radtke, Jörg & Ohlhorst, Dörte, 2021. "Community Energy in Germany – Bowling Alone in Elite Clubs?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    3. Tim Staub & S. Aqeel Tirmizi, 2025. "Navigating Emerging Climate Crises Through Adaptive Polycentric Meta-networks," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 165-181, April.
    4. Tiffany H. Morrison & W. Neil Adger & Katrina Brown & Maria Carmen Lemos & Dave Huitema & Terry P. Hughes, 2017. "Mitigation and adaptation in polycentric systems: sources of power in the pursuit of collective goals," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(5), September.
    5. Bitoiu Teodora & Radulescu Crina, 2015. "Craving For Balanced Public Decision-Making On Market Failure Pertaining To The Interventionist Economic Policies Strainer," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 157-164, July.
    6. Fu, Tong & Jian, Ze, 2020. "A developmental state: How to allocate electricity efficiently in a developing country," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    7. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/2b86iahfka8nib85jevjn10bsn is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Ricardo Serra Borsatto & Vanilde Ferreira Souza-Esquerdo & Henrique Carmona Duval & Fernando Silveira Franco & Fabio Grigoletto, 2022. "Winning hearts and minds through a policy promoting the agroecological paradigm in universities," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(1), pages 5-18, March.
    9. Kjerstin Kjøndal, 2020. "Nordic Cooperation in the Nuclear Safety Sector: High, Low, or Differentiated Integration?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 33-43.
    10. Bhardwaj, Chandan & Axsen, Jonn & Kern, Florian & McCollum, David, 2020. "Why have multiple climate policies for light-duty vehicles? Policy mix rationales, interactions and research gaps," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 309-326.
    11. Silvia Peppoloni & Giuseppe Di Capua, 2021. "Geoethics to Start Up a Pedagogical and Political Path towards Future Sustainable Societies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-20, September.
    12. David P Carter & Christopher M Weible & Saba N Siddiki & Xavier Basurto, 2016. "Integrating core concepts from the institutional analysis and development framework for the systematic analysis of policy designs: An illustration from the US National Organic Program regulation," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 28(1), pages 159-185, January.
    13. Moshe Maor, 2025. "Towards a theory of policy bubbles," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 58(2), pages 403-424, June.
    14. Sills, Erin & Pfaff, Alexander & Andrade, Luiza & Kirkpatrick, Justin & Dickson, Rebecca, 2020. "Investing in local capacity to respond to a federal environmental mandate: Forest & economic impacts of the Green Municipality Program in the Brazilian Amazon," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    15. Giliberto Capano & Andrea Lippi, 2017. "How policy instruments are chosen: patterns of decision makers’ choices," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 50(2), pages 269-293, June.
    16. Carter, Michael & Morrow, John, 2014. "The political economy of inclusive rural growth," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 60268, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Eriksson, Martin & Pettersson, Thomas, 2012. "Adapting to liberalization: government procurement of interregional passenger transports in Sweden, 1989–2008," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 182-188.
    18. Sebastian Heidebrecht, 2024. "From Market Liberalism to Public Intervention: Digital Sovereignty and Changing European Union Digital Single Market Governance," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 205-223, January.
    19. Baldini, Carolina & Marasas, Mariana Edith & Tittonell, Pablo & Drozd, Andrea Alejandra, 2022. "Urban, periurban and horticultural landscapes – Conflict and sustainable planning in La Plata district, Argentina," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    20. Van Vliet, Olaf & Kaeding, Michael, 2007. "Globalisation, European Integration and Social Protection – Patterns of Change or Continuity?," MPRA Paper 20808, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. Nikolai, Rita & Helbig, Marcel, 2019. "Der (alte) Streit um die Grundschulzeit: Von Kontinuitäten und Brüchen der Kaiserzeit bis heute [The (old) battles on the lenght of primary schooling: stability and ruptures since the imperial peri," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 12(2), pages 289-303.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:8035-:d:1743634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.