IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i16p7189-d1720558.html

Improving Ecosystem Services Production Efficiency by Optimizing Resource Allocation in 130 Cities of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China

Author

Listed:
  • Wenyue Hou

    (Institute of Modern Agricultural Equipment, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China)

  • Xiangyu Zheng

    (College of Environmental Sciences, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Tao Liang

    (Institute of Modern Agricultural Equipment, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China)

  • Xincong Liu

    (School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China)

  • Hengyu Pan

    (College of Environmental Sciences, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

Abstract

China has adopted extensive restoration practices to improve ecosystem function. The efficiency of these restoration efforts remains unclear, which may hinder the supply of ecosystem services (ESs). In this context, this study first employed InVEST models to clarify spatio-temporal changes in five key ESs. The static and dynamic efficiencies of ecosystem service production in 130 cities from 2015 to 2021 in the Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB) were then measured using the Super-SBM-Malmquist model, with ESs considered as outputs. The results indicated that water conservation (WC), water purification (WP), and soil retention (SR) exhibited overall declining trends, decreasing by 28.32%, 3.22%, and 10.00%, respectively, while carbon storage (CS) and habitat quality (HQ) remained steady. More than 70% of studied cities exhibited static efficiency levels below 50%, which were attributed to inefficient utilization of labor, capital, and technology. Significant spatial heterogeneity was observed, with high-efficiency cities mainly located in mountainous areas and low-efficiency cities concentrated in flat regions. The downward trend in dynamic efficiency has been reversed from a 39.02% decline in 2015–2018 to a 38.31% increase in 2018–2021, despite being adversely affected by technological regression. Finally, several policy implications are proposed, including optimizing resource allocation, introducing advanced technology and setting the intercity cooperation and complementarity mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenyue Hou & Xiangyu Zheng & Tao Liang & Xincong Liu & Hengyu Pan, 2025. "Improving Ecosystem Services Production Efficiency by Optimizing Resource Allocation in 130 Cities of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-20, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7189-:d:1720558
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7189/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7189/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiang, Bo & Bai, Yang & Wong, Christina P. & Xu, Xibao & Alatalo, Juha M., 2019. "China’s ecological civilization program–Implementing ecological redline policy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 111-114.
    2. Siyuan Cai & Xu Zhao & Cameron M. Pittelkow & Mingsheng Fan & Xin Zhang & Xiaoyuan Yan, 2023. "Optimal nitrogen rate strategy for sustainable rice production in China," Nature, Nature, vol. 615(7950), pages 73-79, March.
    3. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    4. Susaeta, Andres & Sancewich, Brian & Adams, Damian & Moreno, Paulo C., 2019. "Ecosystem Services Production Efficiency of Longleaf Pine Under Changing Weather Conditions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 24-34.
    5. Lina Ke & Qingli Jiang & Lei Wang & Yao Lu & Yu Zhao & Quanming Wang, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Evolution of Ecosystem Service Value and Its Tradeoffs and Synergies in the Liaoning Coastal Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-20, June.
    6. Yuanjie Deng & Wencong Cai & Mengyang Hou & Xiaolong Zhang & Shiyuan Xu & Nan Yao & Yajun Guo & Hua Li & Shunbo Yao, 2022. "How Eco-Efficiency Is the Forestry Ecological Restoration Program? The Case of the Sloping Land Conversion Program in the Loess Plateau, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, May.
    7. Hui Zhang & Yingqi Sun & Zhaoying Fan & Zhi Long & Shilong Wan & Zilong Zhang & Xingpeng Chen, 2023. "Analysis of County-Scale Eco-Efficiency and Spatiotemporal Characteristics in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, February.
    8. Li, Jinghui & Bai, Yang & Alatalo, Juha M., 2020. "Impacts of rural tourism-driven land use change on ecosystems services provision in Erhai Lake Basin, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    9. William W. Cooper & Lawrence M. Seiford & Kaoru Tone, 2006. "Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Uses," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-0-387-29122-2, January.
    10. Liu, Xiping & Zhang, Xiaoling & Sun, Wen, 2022. "Does the agglomeration of urban producer services promote carbon efficiency of manufacturing industry?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    11. Ouyang, Xiao & Tang, Lisha & Wei, Xiao & Li, Yonghui, 2021. "Spatial interaction between urbanization and ecosystem services in Chinese urban agglomerations," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    12. Jiang, Yanan & Guan, Dongjie & He, Xiujuan & Yin, Boling & Zhou, Lilei & Sun, Lingli & Huang, Danan & Li, Zihui & Zhang, Yanjun, 2022. "Quantification of the coupling relationship between ecological compensation and ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    13. Wang, Shuhong & Zhao, Danqing & Chen, Hanxue, 2020. "Government corruption, resource misallocation, and ecological efficiency," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    14. Wang, Yi & Wang, Huiping, 2023. "Spatial spillover effect of urban sprawl on total factor energy ecological efficiency: Evidence from 272 cities in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    15. Xu, Xibao & Jiang, Bo & Chen, Minkun & Bai, Yang & Yang, Guishan, 2020. "Strengthening the effectiveness of nature reserves in representing ecosystem services: The Yangtze River Economic Belt in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    16. Yu, Anyu & You, Jianxin & Rudkin, Simon & Zhang, Hao, 2019. "Industrial carbon abatement allocations and regional collaboration: Re-evaluating China through a modified data envelopment analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 232-243.
    17. Susaeta, Andres & Sancewich, Brian & Klizentyte, Kotryna & Soto, Jose & Joshi, Omkar, 2024. "Profit efficiency in the provision of ecosystem services in the Cross Timbers forests," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    18. Tone, Kaoru, 2002. "A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 32-41, November.
    19. Seiford, Lawrence M. & Zhu, Joe, 2002. "Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 16-20, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arsen Benga & Glediana Zeneli (Foto) & María Jesús Delgado‑Rodríguez & Sonia Lucas Santos, 2025. "Company efforts and environmental efficiency: evidence from European railways considering market-based emissions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 9977-10012, May.
    2. Taleb, Mushtaq & Khalid, Ruzelan & Ramli, Razamin & Ghasemi, Mohammad Reza & Ignatius, Joshua, 2022. "An integrated bi-objective data envelopment analysis model for measuring returns to scale," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(3), pages 967-979.
    3. Tianshu Yu & Ling Li & Tao Li, 2025. "Impact of Shrinking Cities on Carbon Emission Efficiency in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-22, April.
    4. Zhou, P. & Ang, B.W. & Poh, K.L., 2008. "A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(1), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Christina Bampatsou & George Hadjiconstantinou, 2009. "The use of the DEA method for simultaneous analysis of the interrelationships among economic growth, environmental pollution and energy consumption," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), Democritus University of Thrace (DUTH), Kavala Campus, Greece, vol. 2(2), pages 65-86, December.
    6. Zhuyuan Li & Xiaolong Wang & Run Zheng & Sanggyun Na & Chang Liu, 2022. "Evaluation Analysis of the Operational Efficiency and Total Factor Productivity of Container Terminals in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-12, October.
    7. Liu, John S. & Lu, Louis Y.Y. & Lu, Wen-Min, 2016. "Research fronts in data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 33-45.
    8. Yongrong Xin & Kengcheng Zheng & Yujiao Zhou & Yangyang Han & P. R. Tadikamalla & Qin Fan, 2022. "Logistics Efficiency under Carbon Constraints Based on a Super SBM Model with Undesirable Output: Empirical Evidence from China’s Logistics Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, April.
    9. Fang, Tao & Fang, Debin & Yu, Bolin, 2022. "Carbon emission efficiency of thermal power generation in China: Empirical evidence from the micro-perspective of power plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    10. Rashidi, Kamran & Cullinane, Kevin, 2019. "Evaluating the sustainability of national logistics performance using Data Envelopment Analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 35-46.
    11. Fang Zhang & Hong Fang & Junjie Wu & Damian Ward, 2016. "Environmental Efficiency Analysis of Listed Cement Enterprises in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-19, May.
    12. Mushtaq Taleb & Ruzelan Khalid & Ali Emrouznejad & Razamin Ramli, 2023. "Environmental efficiency under weak disposability: an improved super efficiency data envelopment analysis model with application for assessment of port operations considering NetZero," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 6627-6656, July.
    13. J Sarkis & J J Cordeiro, 2009. "Investigating technical and ecological efficiencies in the electricity generation industry: are there win-win opportunities?," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(9), pages 1160-1172, September.
    14. Cook, Wade D. & Seiford, Larry M., 2009. "Data envelopment analysis (DEA) - Thirty years on," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 1-17, January.
    15. Tao Xu & Jianxin You & Hui Li & Luning Shao, 2020. "Energy Efficiency Evaluation Based on Data Envelopment Analysis: A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    16. Lihong Zhao & Yuge Zhang & Fuzhu Li & Yuki Yi Gong & Hideyuki Hao Sun & Sing Lui So & Zehua Chen, 2025. "Spatial Network Evolution of Water Resources Green Efficiency in Yellow River Basin Urban Agglomerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-31, January.
    17. Lu, Wen-Min & Lo, Shih-Fang, 2007. "A closer look at the economic-environmental disparities for regional development in China," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(2), pages 882-894, December.
    18. Suzuki, Soushi & Nijkamp, Peter, 2016. "An evaluation of energy-environment-economic efficiency for EU, APEC and ASEAN countries: Design of a Target-Oriented DFM model with fixed factors in Data Envelopment Analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 100-112.
    19. Zhou, Peng & Poh, Kim Leng & Ang, Beng Wah, 2007. "A non-radial DEA approach to measuring environmental performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(1), pages 1-9, April.
    20. Yang Lin & Longzhong Yan & Ying-Ming Wang, 2019. "Performance Evaluation and Investment Analysis for Container Port Sustainable Development in China: An Inverse DEA Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-13, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7189-:d:1720558. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.