IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i15p6955-d1714183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Implementation Effects, Multi-Objective Scheme Selection, and Element Regulation of China’s Carbon Market

Author

Listed:
  • Yue Ma

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)

  • Ling Miao

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)

  • Lianyong Feng

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)

Abstract

With the proposal of China’s “dual carbon” goal, the carbon market has become a vital tool for controlling carbon emissions. This study constructs a system dynamics model encompassing carbon trading, the economy, energy, population, and the environment, and conducts simulation analysis against the backdrop of China’s national carbon market’s implementation. The results indicate that the implementation of China’s national carbon market significantly promotes carbon emissions reduction, albeit at the cost of some economic development in the short term. However, the suppressive effect of the carbon market on carbon emissions is stronger than its negative impact on economic growth. The effects of carbon reduction strengthen with increases in carbon price, quota auction, CCER price, penalty severity, and the quota reduction rate and weaken with a higher CCER offset ratio. A moderate reduction in the tightening quota reduction rate is more conducive to achieving coordinated development across the multiple objectives of carbon reduction, economic development, and energy structure. Under the constraints of multiple objectives involving carbon reduction, economic development, and energy structure, the reasonable range for carbon prices is between CNY 77.9 and CNY 118.9 per ton, with the maximum quota auction of 23.4%. Additionally, the reasonable range for the quota reduction rates is between 0.84% and 2.18%, with the penalty severity set at 7.

Suggested Citation

  • Yue Ma & Ling Miao & Lianyong Feng, 2025. "Research on the Implementation Effects, Multi-Objective Scheme Selection, and Element Regulation of China’s Carbon Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-19, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6955-:d:1714183
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6955/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6955/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6955-:d:1714183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.