IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i15p6955-d1714183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Implementation Effects, Multi-Objective Scheme Selection, and Element Regulation of China’s Carbon Market

Author

Listed:
  • Yue Ma

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)

  • Ling Miao

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)

  • Lianyong Feng

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)

Abstract

With the proposal of China’s “dual carbon” goal, the carbon market has become a vital tool for controlling carbon emissions. This study constructs a system dynamics model encompassing carbon trading, the economy, energy, population, and the environment, and conducts simulation analysis against the backdrop of China’s national carbon market’s implementation. The results indicate that the implementation of China’s national carbon market significantly promotes carbon emissions reduction, albeit at the cost of some economic development in the short term. However, the suppressive effect of the carbon market on carbon emissions is stronger than its negative impact on economic growth. The effects of carbon reduction strengthen with increases in carbon price, quota auction, CCER price, penalty severity, and the quota reduction rate and weaken with a higher CCER offset ratio. A moderate reduction in the tightening quota reduction rate is more conducive to achieving coordinated development across the multiple objectives of carbon reduction, economic development, and energy structure. Under the constraints of multiple objectives involving carbon reduction, economic development, and energy structure, the reasonable range for carbon prices is between CNY 77.9 and CNY 118.9 per ton, with the maximum quota auction of 23.4%. Additionally, the reasonable range for the quota reduction rates is between 0.84% and 2.18%, with the penalty severity set at 7.

Suggested Citation

  • Yue Ma & Ling Miao & Lianyong Feng, 2025. "Research on the Implementation Effects, Multi-Objective Scheme Selection, and Element Regulation of China’s Carbon Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-19, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6955-:d:1714183
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6955/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6955/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bellora, Cecilia & Fontagné, Lionel, 2023. "EU in search of a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    2. Zhang, Zixuan & Chen, Huaichao, 2022. "Dynamic interaction of renewable energy technological innovation, environmental regulation intensity and carbon pressure: Evidence from China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 420-430.
    3. Zhang, Wei & Li, Jing & Li, Guoxiang & Guo, Shucen, 2020. "Emission reduction effect and carbon market efficiency of carbon emissions trading policy in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    4. Sato, Misato & Rafaty, Ryan & Calel, Raphael & Grubb, Michael, 2022. "Allocation, allocation, allocation! The political economy of the development of the European Union Emissions Trading System," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115431, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Munnings, Clayton & Morgenstern, Richard D. & Wang, Zhongmin & Liu, Xu, 2016. "Assessing the design of three carbon trading pilot programs in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 688-699.
    6. Yucai Hu & Ranran Li & Lei Du & Shenggang Ren & Julien Chevallier, 2022. "Could SO2 and CO2 emissions trading schemes achieve co-benefits of emissions reduction?," Post-Print halshs-04250307, HAL.
    7. Elzen, Michel den & Fekete, Hanna & Höhne, Niklas & Admiraal, Annemiek & Forsell, Nicklas & Hof, Andries F. & Olivier, Jos G.J. & Roelfsema, Mark & van Soest, Heleen, 2016. "Greenhouse gas emissions from current and enhanced policies of China until 2030: Can emissions peak before 2030?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 224-236.
    8. Xu, Lei & Chen, Nengcheng & Chen, Zeqiang, 2017. "Will China make a difference in its carbon intensity reduction targets by 2020 and 2030?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 874-882.
    9. Claudia Doblinger & Michael Dowling & Roland Helm, 2016. "An institutional perspective of public policy and network effects in the renewable energy industry: enablers or disablers of entrepreneurial behaviour and innovation?," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1-2), pages 126-156, January.
    10. Ren, Yi-Shuai & Huynh, Toan Luu Duc & Liu, Pei-Zhi & Narayan, Seema, 2024. "Is the carbon emission trading scheme conducive to promoting energy transition? Some empirical evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    11. Liu, Yunqiang & Liu, Sha & Shao, Xiaoyu & He, Yanqiu, 2022. "Policy spillover effect and action mechanism for environmental rights trading on green innovation: Evidence from China's carbon emissions trading policy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    12. Tang, Ling & Shi, Jiarui & Bao, Qin, 2016. "Designing an emissions trading scheme for China with a dynamic computable general equilibrium model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 507-520.
    13. Jin, Cheng & Lv, Zhiwei & Li, Zengrong & Sun, Kehan, 2023. "Green finance, renewable energy and carbon neutrality in OECD countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 279-284.
    14. repec:hal:cesptp:halshs-04331408 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Hu, Yucai & Li, Ranran & Du, Lei & Ren, Shenggang & Chevallier, Julien, 2022. "Could SO2 and CO2 emissions trading schemes achieve co-benefits of emissions reduction?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qidi Wang & Jinyan Zhan & Hailin Zhang & Yuhan Cao & Zheng Yang & Quanlong Wu & Ali Raza Otho, 2025. "China’s Carbon Emissions Trading Market: Current Situation, Impact Assessment, Challenges, and Suggestions," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-27, August.
    2. Gao, Ming, 2023. "The impacts of carbon trading policy on China's low-carbon economy based on county-level perspectives," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    3. Zhu, Bingcheng & Huang, Hongyun & Liu, Ying & Zhang, Ning, 2025. "Twin goals, one policy: Cost-effective collaborative abatement via new energy cities," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    4. Song, Xiang & Wang, Dingyu & Zhang, Xuantao & He, Yuan & Wang, Yong, 2022. "A comparison of the operation of China's carbon trading market and energy market and their spillover effects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    5. Tian, Kang & Yu, Mingyang & Hong, Xiong & Chen, Zhen & He, Ke & Wang, Haoyu & Shi, Lei, 2025. "Measurement and spatiotemporal dynamic evolution of regional ecological efficiency in China from the perspective of undesirable outputs," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1897-1913.
    6. Weng, Zhixiong & Liu, Tingting & Wu, Yufeng & Cheng, Cuiyun, 2022. "Air quality improvement effect and future contributions of carbon trading pilot programs in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    7. Fan, Xinghua & Li, Xuxia & Yin, Jiuli & Tian, Lixin & Liang, Jiaochen, 2019. "Similarity and heterogeneity of price dynamics across China’s regional carbon markets: A visibility graph network approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 739-746.
    8. Zhou, Peng & Huang, Xiaoqi & Song, Frank M., 2024. "The deterrent effect of environmental judicature on firms' pollution emissions: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    9. Li, Wei & Lu, Can & Ding, Yi & Zhang, Yan-Wu, 2017. "The impacts of policy mix for resolving overcapacity in heavy chemical industry and operating national carbon emission trading market in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 509-524.
    10. Shen, Jun & He, Jiana & Liu, Xiuli & Shi, Qinqin, 2025. "Complementarity or crowding out? The impact of environmental policy combination on renewable energy technology innovation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    11. Wang, Jie & Xiong, Yiling & Tian, Xin & Liu, Shangwei & Li, Jiashuo & Tanikawa, Hiroki, 2018. "Stagnating CO2 emissions with in-depth socioeconomic transition in Beijing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1714-1725.
    12. Yan, Xiaolei & He, Taiyi, 2024. "Wish fulfilment or wishful thinking? – Assessing the outcomes of China's pilot carbon emissions trading scheme on green economy efficiency in China's cities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    13. Wang, Xiao-Qing & Su, Chi-Wei & Lobonţ, Oana-Ramona & Li, Hao & Nicoleta-Claudia, Moldovan, 2022. "Is China's carbon trading market efficient? Evidence from emissions trading scheme pilots," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    14. Na Yu & Jianghua Chen & Lei Cheng, 2022. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Carbon Emission Reduction between Government and Enterprises under Carbon Quota Trading Policy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-22, July.
    15. Wang, Kai-Hua & Liu, Lu & Zhong, Yifan & Lobonţ, Oana-Ramona, 2022. "Economic policy uncertainty and carbon emission trading market: A China's perspective," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    16. Qi Jiang & Zhigang Yin, 2023. "The Optimal Path for China to Achieve the “Dual Carbon” Target from the Perspective of Energy Structure Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-32, June.
    17. Xuehui Yang & Jiaping Zhang & Lehua Bi & Yiming Jiang, 2023. "Does China’s Carbon Trading Pilot Policy Reduce Carbon Emissions? Empirical Analysis from 285 Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-24, March.
    18. Wang, Bo & Gong, Siyu & Yang, Yang, 2024. "Unveiling the relation between digital technology and low-carbon innovation: Carbon emission trading policy as an antecedent," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    19. Wu, Jiahao & Zhao, Yuhuan & Fan, Shunan & Zhao, Ziyi & Zuo, Sumin & Wang, Jiayang, 2025. "Study on the diffusion of China Certified Emission Reduction scheme under carbon trading mechanism: Based on the tripartite evolutionary game model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    20. Deng, Haiyan & Zhang, Wenjia & Liu, Dan, 2023. "Does carbon emission trading system induce enterprises’ green innovation?," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6955-:d:1714183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.