IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i15p6881-d1712455.html

Complement or Crowd Out? The Impact of Cross-Tool Carbon Control Policy Combination on Green Innovation in Chinese Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Jun Shen

    (Collaborative Innovation Center for Resource-Based Economy Transformation, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China)

  • Jiana He

    (Collaborative Innovation Center for Resource-Based Economy Transformation, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China)

  • Xiuli Liu

    (Collaborative Innovation Center for Resource-Based Economy Transformation, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China)

  • Qinqin Shi

    (Collaborative Innovation Center for Resource-Based Economy Transformation, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China)

Abstract

In order to fulfill the commitment to the “dual carbon goal” at an early date, China has implemented a series of carbon control policies. However, the actual impact of these policy combinations on green innovation in Chinese cities remains unknown. Taking the implementation of the low-carbon pilot policy (LCP) and the carbon emission trading pilot policy (CET) as the research opportunity, this paper uses panel data from 276 prefecture-level cities and a multiple-period difference-in-differences (DID) model to explore the impact of carbon control policy combination on green innovation in China and their mechanisms. The results indicate the following: A single LCP or CET can significantly boost green innovation. However, the impact of cross-tool carbon control policy combination on green innovation is notably greater than that of a single policy, with a trend of increasing effectiveness over time. Even after a series of robustness tests, this conclusion remains valid. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the promotion effect is more significant in the eastern region and high-level administrative cities. The policy combination incentivizes green innovation through fiscal technology expenditure and public environmental awareness, focusing more on fostering strategic green innovation. Consequently, the Chinese government should tailor policy combinations to specific contexts, expand their implementation judiciously, and consistently drive forward green innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jun Shen & Jiana He & Xiuli Liu & Qinqin Shi, 2025. "Complement or Crowd Out? The Impact of Cross-Tool Carbon Control Policy Combination on Green Innovation in Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-26, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6881-:d:1712455
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6881/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6881/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marit E. Klemetsen & Brita Bye & Arvid Raknerud, 2018. "Can Direct Regulations Spur Innovations in Environmental Technologies? A Study on Firm‐Level Patenting," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 120(2), pages 338-371, April.
    2. Cai, Xiqian & Lu, Yi & Wu, Mingqin & Yu, Linhui, 2016. "Does environmental regulation drive away inbound foreign direct investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 73-85.
    3. Simon Alder & Lin Shao & Fabrizio Zilibotti, 2016. "Economic reforms and industrial policy in a panel of Chinese cities," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 305-349, December.
    4. Gao, Kang & Yuan, Yijun, 2022. "Government intervention, spillover effect and urban innovation performance: Empirical evidence from national innovative city pilot policy in China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    5. Chun He & Yun-Peng Wang & Kai Tang, 2023. "Impact of Low-Carbon City Construction Policy on Green Innovation Performance in China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(1), pages 15-26, January.
    6. Luo, Juan & Jin, Xiaoman & Hu, Yiming, 2024. "Top-down or bottom-up? Government policies, public awareness and carbon reduction," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 118-129.
    7. Zhao, Xin & Xu, Yong & Vasa, László & Shahzad, Umer, 2023. "Entrepreneurial ecosystem and urban innovation: Contextual findings in the lens of sustainable development from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    8. Liu, Bin & Gan, Lu & Huang, Kun & Hu, Shiyang, 2023. "The impact of low-carbon city pilot policy on corporate green innovation: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PA).
    9. Guo, Rui & Zhang, Yujie & Chen, Kaihua & Wang, Yufei & Ning, Lutao, 2025. "Heterogeneous impact of green finance instruments on firms' green innovation novelty: Policy mix or mess?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    10. Zhang, Pan & Zhou, Danping & Guo, Junhua, 2023. "Policy complementary or policy crowding-out? Effects of cross-instrumental policy mix on green innovation in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    11. Li, Xiaoyu & Yao, Xilong, 2020. "Can energy supply-side and demand-side policies for energy saving and emission reduction be synergistic?--- A simulated study on China's coal capacity cut and carbon tax," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    12. Shen, Jun & He, Jiana & Liu, Xiuli & Shi, Qinqin, 2025. "Complementarity or crowding out? The impact of environmental policy combination on renewable energy technology innovation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    13. Lori Bennear & Robert Stavins, 2007. "Second-best theory and the use of multiple policy instruments," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 37(1), pages 111-129, May.
    14. Kleinebrahm, Max & Weinand, Jann Michael & Naber, Elias & McKenna, Russell & Ardone, Armin, 2023. "Analysing municipal energy system transformations in line with national greenhouse gas reduction strategies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    15. Victor Chernozhukov & Denis Chetverikov & Mert Demirer & Esther Duflo & Christian Hansen & Whitney Newey & James Robins, 2018. "Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 21(1), pages 1-68, February.
    16. Jiang, Zhenyu & Wang, Zongjun & Lan, Xiao, 2021. "How environmental regulations affect corporate innovation? The coupling mechanism of mandatory rules and voluntary management," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    17. Zhou, Xiaoxiao & Dai, Mengsi & Liu, Li, 2024. "Green credit, carbon emission trading and corporate green innovation: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    18. Tian, Yanping & Song, Wenjing & Liu, Min, 2021. "Assessment of how environmental policy affects urban innovation: Evidence from China’s low-carbon pilot cities program," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 41-56.
    19. Ma, Yechi & Sha, Yezhou & Wang, Zilong & Zhang, Wenjing, 2023. "The effect of the policy mix of green credit and government subsidy on environmental innovation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    20. Eugénie Joltreau & Katrin Sommerfeld, 2019. "Why does emissions trading under the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) not affect firms’ competitiveness? Empirical findings from the literature," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 453-471, April.
    21. Francesco Crespi & Claudia Ghisetti & Francesco Quatraro, 2015. "Environmental and innovation policies for the evolution of green technologies: a survey and a test," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 5(2), pages 343-370, December.
    22. Borghesi, Simone & Cainelli, Giulio & Mazzanti, Massimiliano, 2015. "Linking emission trading to environmental innovation: Evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 669-683.
    23. Ozusaglam, Serdal & Kesidou, Effie & Wong, Chee Yew, 2018. "Performance effects of complementarity between environmental management systems and environmental technologies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 112-122.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jing Zhang & Jun Shen & Zhifang Wu & Lei Nie, 2025. "Pollution Transfer or Industrial Upgrading: The Impact of Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction Fiscal Policy on Urban Green Total Factor Productivity in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-24, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shen, Jun & He, Jiana & Liu, Xiuli & Shi, Qinqin, 2025. "Complementarity or crowding out? The impact of environmental policy combination on renewable energy technology innovation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    2. Liu, Yaobin & Deng, Weifeng & Wen, Huwei & Li, Shuoshuo, 2024. "Promoting green technology innovation through policy synergy: Evidence from the dual pilot policy of low-carbon city and innovative city," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 957-977.
    3. Yanhong Feng & Shuanglian Chen & Pierre Failler, 2020. "Productivity Effect Evaluation on Market-Type Environmental Regulation: A Case Study of SO 2 Emission Trading Pilot in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-27, October.
    4. Xianxian Fan & Yunlei Zhou & Qiang Xie, 2025. "Assessment on the synergistic effect of pollution and carbon reductions in low-carbon city pilot policy: based on effectiveness and efficiency perspectives," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 12945-12969, June.
    5. Hu, Hui & Qi, Shaozhou & Chen, Yuanzhi, 2023. "Using green technology for a better tomorrow: How enterprises and government utilize the carbon trading system and incentive policies," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    6. Guo, Shu & Zhang, ZhongXiang, 2023. "Green credit policy and total factor productivity: Evidence from Chinese listed companies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    7. Ren, Shenggang & Hu, Yucai & Zheng, Jingjing & Wang, Yangjie, 2020. "Emissions trading and firm innovation: Evidence from a natural experiment in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    8. Mathilde Maurel & Thomas Pernet & Zhao Ruili, 2019. "Financial Dependencies, Environmental Regulation and Pollution Intensity: Evidence From China," Post-Print halshs-02423350, HAL.
    9. Luo, Shiyue & Lu, Mingyue & Ye, Jinhui & Guo, Yuying & Hao, Yu, 2025. "Nurturing finance and harvesting intelligence: The green growth of urban industrial intelligence fueled by green finance," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    10. Lin, Weiming & Chen, Jianling & Zheng, Yi & Dai, Yongwu, 2019. "Effects of the EU Emission Trading Scheme on the international competitiveness of pulp-and-paper industry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    11. Yantuan Yu & Ning Zhang, 2025. "Revealing the Power of Market-Based Energy Policy: Evidence from China’s Energy Quota Trading System Using Machine Learning," Working papers 2025rwp-258, Yonsei University, Yonsei Economics Research Institute.
    12. Cenjie Liu & Chunbo Ma & Rui Xie, 2020. "Structural, Innovation and Efficiency Effects of Environmental Regulation: Evidence from China’s Carbon Emissions Trading Pilot," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 75(4), pages 741-768, April.
    13. Ai, Hongshan & Tan, Xiaoqing & Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Emrouznejad, Ali & Liu, Fan & Song, Malin, 2025. "Renewable energy transition and sustainable development: Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    14. Li, Ruiqian & Ramanathan, Ramakrishnan, 2024. "The interactive effect of environmental penalties and environmental subsidies on corporate environmental innovation: Is more better or worse?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    15. Zhang, Jingxue & Yu, Shiwei & Zhang, Yue-Jun & Su, Bin & Sun, Ya-Fang, 2025. "How do renewable energy policies affect energy green development? Evidence from Chinese listed energy firms," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    16. Wang, Ruqi & Xu, Pei & Gao, Honggui, 2024. "Rectifying local governments’ strategic environmental enforcement: Can refined air pollution monitoring enhance local air quality in China?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 978-995.
    17. Lu, Yuchen & Gao, Yuqiang & Zhang, Yu & Wang, Junrong, 2022. "Can the green finance policy force the green transformation of high-polluting enterprises? A quasi-natural experiment based on “Green Credit Guidelines”," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    18. Cenjie Liu & Zhongbao Zhou & Qing Liu & Rui Xie & Ximei Zeng, 2020. "Can a low-carbon development path achieve win-win development: evidence from China’s low-carbon pilot policy," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 1199-1219, October.
    19. Zhang, Tingyu & Pu, Zhengning, 2025. "Can energy-consuming rights trading promote green continuous innovation in enterprises? The moderating role of digitization," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    20. Marc Baudry & Alienor Cameron, 2022. "The case for a Carbon Border Adjustment: Where do economists stand?," Working Papers hal-04159819, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6881-:d:1712455. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.