IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i15p6824-d1711098.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Generator-Side Charges on Investment in Power Generation and Transmission Under Demand Uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Hirotaka Hiraiwa

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Tokyo University of Science, 2641 Yamazaki, Noda, Chiba 278-8510, Japan)

  • Kazuya Ito

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Tokyo University of Science, 2641 Yamazaki, Noda, Chiba 278-8510, Japan)

  • Ryuta Takashima

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Tokyo University of Science, 2641 Yamazaki, Noda, Chiba 278-8510, Japan)

Abstract

Given the increases in renewable energy penetration, appropriately allocating transmission costs is important in generation and transmission investment decisions. This study examines how a generator-side transmission charge affects investment decisions by power generation companies (PC) and the transmission system operator (TSO) under two frameworks differing in who decides investment timing. We compare two frameworks: (1) TSO determines investment timing and the PC determines capacity (TL framework); (2) PC determines investment timing and capacity (GL framework). We examine how variations in generator-side charges and demand uncertainty affect the optimal investment timing, capacity, and social surplus. Regarding investment timing, increases in the generator-side charge led to earlier investment in the TL framework but delayed investment in the GL framework. Concerning investment capacity, the TL framework yielded greater capacity with low uncertainty, while the GL framework supported greater capacity with high uncertainty. The magnitude of the relative social surplus of the two frameworks was reversed according to the generator-side charge and uncertainty. Specifically, the GL framework became increasingly superior to the TL framework as uncertainty increased, and this advantage was amplified by a higher generator-side charge. Policymakers should consider uncertainty and calibrate the level of generator-side charge and the allocation of decision-making authority.

Suggested Citation

  • Hirotaka Hiraiwa & Kazuya Ito & Ryuta Takashima, 2025. "The Effect of Generator-Side Charges on Investment in Power Generation and Transmission Under Demand Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-20, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6824-:d:1711098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6824/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6824/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lavrutich, Maria & Hagspiel, Verena & Siddiqui, Afzal S., 2023. "Transmission investment under uncertainty: Reconciling private and public incentives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(3), pages 1167-1188.
    2. Grimm, Veronika & Martin, Alexander & Schmidt, Martin & Weibelzahl, Martin & Zöttl, Gregor, 2016. "Transmission and generation investment in electricity markets: The effects of market splitting and network fee regimes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 493-509.
    3. Lívia Torres & Francisco S. Ramos, 2024. "Allocating Benefits Due to Shared Resources Using Shapley Value and Nucleolus in Dynamic Network Data Envelopment Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-23, February.
    4. Bahrami, Shahab & Amini, M. Hadi, 2018. "A decentralized trading algorithm for an electricity market with generation uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 520-532.
    5. Schwartz, Eduardo, 1998. "Valuing long-term commodity assets," Journal of Energy Finance & Development, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 85-99.
    6. Enzo Sauma & Shmuel Oren, 2006. "Proactive planning and valuation of transmission investments in restructured electricity markets," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 358-387, November.
    7. Avinash K. Dixit & Robert S. Pindyck, 1994. "Investment under Uncertainty," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 5474.
    8. Eduardo S. Schwartz, 1998. "Valuing Long-Term Commodity Assets," Financial Management, Financial Management Association, vol. 27(1), Spring.
    9. David Newbery, 2023. "Efficient Renewable Electricity Support: Designing an Incentive-compatible Support Scheme," The Energy Journal, , vol. 44(3), pages 1-22, May.
    10. David Newbery, 2023. "Efficient Renewable Electricity Support: Designing an Incentive-compatible Support Scheme," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 3).
    11. Enzo Sauma & Shmuel Oren, 2006. "Proactive planning and valuation of transmission investments in restructured electricity markets," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 261-290, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lavrutich, Maria & Hagspiel, Verena & Siddiqui, Afzal S., 2023. "Transmission investment under uncertainty: Reconciling private and public incentives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(3), pages 1167-1188.
    2. Simshauser, Paul & Newbery, David, 2024. "Non-firm vs priority access: On the long run average and marginal costs of renewables in Australia," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    3. Simshauser, Paul, 2024. "On static vs. dynamic line ratings in renewable energy zones," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    4. Insley, M.C. & Wirjanto, T.S., 2010. "Contrasting two approaches in real options valuation: Contingent claims versus dynamic programming," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 157-176, April.
    5. Egerer, Jonas & Grimm, Veronika & Grübel, Julia & Zöttl, Gregor, 2022. "Long-run market equilibria in coupled energy sectors: A study of uniqueness," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(3), pages 1335-1354.
    6. Ambrosius, M. & Egerer, J. & Grimm, V. & Weijde, A.H. van der, 2020. "Uncertain bidding zone configurations: The role of expectations for transmission and generation capacity expansion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(1), pages 343-359.
    7. Mikael Collan & Jyrki Savolainen & Pasi Luukka, 2017. "Investigating the effect of price process selection on the value of a metal mining asset portfolio," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 30(2), pages 107-115, July.
    8. Siddiqui, Afzal & Fleten, Stein-Erik, 2010. "How to proceed with competing alternative energy technologies: A real options analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 817-830, July.
    9. Zambujal-Oliveira, João & Mouta-Lopes, Manuel & Bangueses, Ricardo, 2021. "Real options appraisal of forestry investments under information scarcity in biomass markets," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    10. Grimm, Veronika & Grübel, Julia & Rückel, Bastian & Sölch, Christian & Zöttl, Gregor, 2020. "Storage investment and network expansion in distribution networks: The impact of regulatory frameworks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    11. van der Weijde, Adriaan Hendrik & Hobbs, Benjamin F., 2012. "The economics of planning electricity transmission to accommodate renewables: Using two-stage optimisation to evaluate flexibility and the cost of disregarding uncertainty," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 2089-2101.
    12. Lander, Diane M. & Pinches, George E., 1998. "Challenges to the Practical Implementation of Modeling and Valuing Real Options," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 38(3, Part 2), pages 537-567.
    13. Bøckman, Thor & Fleten, Stein-Erik & Juliussen, Erik & Langhammer, Håvard J. & Revdal, Ingemar, 2008. "Investment timing and optimal capacity choice for small hydropower projects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(1), pages 255-267, October.
    14. Barbosa, Luciana & Nunes, Cláudia & Rodrigues, Artur & Sardinha, Alberto, 2020. "Feed-in tariff contract schemes and regulatory uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(1), pages 331-347.
    15. Martin Weibelzahl & Alexandra Märtz, 2020. "Optimal storage and transmission investments in a bilevel electricity market model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 287(2), pages 911-940, April.
    16. Ruderer, Dominik & Zöttl, Gregor, 2018. "Transmission pricing and investment incentives," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 14-30.
    17. Kjaerland, Frode, 2007. "A real option analysis of investments in hydropower--The case of Norway," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 5901-5908, November.
    18. Egerer, Jonas & Grimm, Veronika & Kleinert, Thomas & Schmidt, Martin & Zöttl, Gregor, 2021. "The impact of neighboring markets on renewable locations, transmission expansion, and generation investment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(2), pages 696-713.
    19. Henao, A. & Sauma, E. & Reyes, T. & Gonzalez, A., 2017. "What is the value of the option to defer an investment in Transmission Expansion Planning? An estimation using Real Options," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 194-207.
    20. Faezeh Akhavizadegan & Lizhi Wang & James McCalley, 2020. "Scenario Selection for Iterative Stochastic Transmission Expansion Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6824-:d:1711098. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.