IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i14p6550-d1704053.html

Reduced Soil Moisture Decreases Nectar Sugar Resources Offered to Pollinators in the Popular White Mustard ( Brassica alba L.) Crop: Experimental Evidence from Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Bożena Denisow

    (Department of Botany and Plant Physiology, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 15 Akademicka St., 20-950 Lublin, Poland)

  • Sławomir Michałek

    (Department of Botany and Plant Physiology, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 15 Akademicka St., 20-950 Lublin, Poland)

  • Monika Strzałkowska-Abramek

    (Department of Botany and Plant Physiology, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 15 Akademicka St., 20-950 Lublin, Poland)

  • Urszula Bronowicka-Mielniczuk

    (Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Sciences, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 28 Głęboka St., 20-612 Lublin, Poland)

Abstract

Climate change can severely impact plant-pollinator interactions and have serious effects on ecosystem services such as pollination. This study was carried out in 2023 and 2024, and it examined the effects of drought on flowering and nectar production in one cultivar of white mustard ( Brassica alba cv. Palma), an important entomophilous crop of the temperate zone with several attributes that make it promising for sustainable agricultural practices. Drought-stressed plants delayed the flowering time, shortened the flowering duration, and developed significantly fewer flowers. Nectar production in white mustard depends on soil moisture levels and short-term changes in meteorological conditions (e.g., air humidity, air temperature). At reduced soil moisture, the total sugar yield per plant decreased by 60%, compared to control plants, resulting in lower availability of caloric food resources, which should be considered when developing strategies supporting pollinators. Changes in floral traits resulted in differences in the frequency of insect visits, which may exert a negative impact on white mustard pollination under drought stress and may have indirect consequences for seed yield resulting from increased drought intensity associated with climate change. The results provide important data for the management of the white mustard crop and indicate the need for broader evaluation of cultivars to promote drought-resistant B. alba cultivars.

Suggested Citation

  • Bożena Denisow & Sławomir Michałek & Monika Strzałkowska-Abramek & Urszula Bronowicka-Mielniczuk, 2025. "Reduced Soil Moisture Decreases Nectar Sugar Resources Offered to Pollinators in the Popular White Mustard ( Brassica alba L.) Crop: Experimental Evidence from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-15, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6550-:d:1704053
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6550/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6550/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mei Bie & Kai Song & He Dong & Wanru Zhao & Hongze Lin & Dongfang Shi & Duo Liu, 2025. "Advancing Sustainable Agriculture Through Bumblebee Pollination: Bibliometric Insights and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Teodoro Semeraro & Aurelia Scarano & Angelo Leggieri & Antonio Calisi & Monica De Caroli, 2023. "Impact of Climate Change on Agroecosystems and Potential Adaptation Strategies," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Małgorzata Bożek & Bożena Denisow & Monika Strzałkowska-Abramek & Ewelina Chrzanowska & Krystyna Winiarczyk, 2023. "Non-Forest Woody Vegetation: A Critical Resource for Pollinators in Agricultural Landscapes—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Gedyon Tamiru Mena & Janina Gospodarek, 2024. "White Mustard, Sweet Alyssum, and Coriander as Insectary Plants in Agricultural Systems: Impacts on Ecosystem Services and Yield of Crops," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-27, March.
    5. Gallai, Nicola & Salles, Jean-Michel & Settele, Josef & Vaissière, Bernard E., 2009. "Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture confronted with pollinator decline," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 810-821, January.
    6. B. Kos & H. Grčman & D. Leštan, 2003. "Phytoextraction of lead, zinc and cadmium from soil by selected plants," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 49(12), pages 548-553.
    7. Somasundaram Jayaraman & Yash P. Dang & Anandkumar Naorem & Kathryn L. Page & Ram C. Dalal, 2021. "Conservation Agriculture as a System to Enhance Ecosystem Services," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-14, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Balzan, Mario V & Caruana, Julio & Zammit, Annrica, 2018. "Assessing the capacity and flow of ecosystem services in multifunctional landscapes: Evidence of a rural-urban gradient in a Mediterranean small island state," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 711-725.
    2. Smith, Helen F. & Sullivan, Caroline A., 2014. "Ecosystem services within agricultural landscapes—Farmers' perceptions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 72-80.
    3. Kathrin Stenchly & Marc Victor Hansen & Katharina Stein & Andreas Buerkert & Wilhelm Loewenstein, 2018. "Income Vulnerability of West African Farming Households to Losses in Pollination Services: A Case Study from Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12, November.
    4. Grazia Zulian & Joachim Maes & Maria Luisa Paracchini, 2013. "Linking Land Cover Data and Crop Yields for Mapping and Assessment of Pollination Services in Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-21, September.
    5. Lippert, Christian & Feuerbacher, Arndt & Narjes, Manuel, 2021. "Revisiting the economic valuation of agricultural losses due to large-scale changes in pollinator populations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    6. Luciano Pilati & Vasco Boatto, 2014. "Jointness in Sites: The Case of Migratory Beekeeping," DEM Discussion Papers 2014/10, Department of Economics and Management.
    7. Nicholas W Calderone, 2012. "Insect Pollinated Crops, Insect Pollinators and US Agriculture: Trend Analysis of Aggregate Data for the Period 1992–2009," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-27, May.
    8. Soy-Massoni, Emma & Langemeyer, Johannes & Varga, Diego & Sáez, Marc & Pintó, Josep, 2016. "The importance of ecosystem services in coastal agricultural landscapes: Case study from the Costa Brava, Catalonia," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 43-52.
    9. Miettinen, Antti & Korpela, Eeva-Liisa & Hyytiäinen, Kari & Kuussaari, Mikko, 2014. "Cost-effectiveness of agri-environmental measures when aiming at promoting ecosystem service availability, species diversity or species of conservation concern," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182686, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. repec:idb:brikps:64718 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Massamba Diop & Ngonidzashe Chirinda & Adnane Beniaich & Mohamed El Gharous & Khalil El Mejahed, 2022. "Soil and Water Conservation in Africa: State of Play and Potential Role in Tackling Soil Degradation and Building Soil Health in Agricultural Lands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-29, October.
    12. Basualdo, Marina & Cavigliasso, Pablo & de Avila, Rubem Samuel & Aldea-Sánchez, Patricia & Correa-Benítez, Adriana & Harms, Jaime Martínez & Ramos, Ana Karen & Rojas-Bravo, Valeska & Salvarrey, Sheena, 2022. "Current status and economic value of insect-pollinated dependent crops in Latin America," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    13. Ioannis Arzoumanidis & Andrea Raggi & Luigia Petti, 2019. "Life Cycle Assessment of Honey: Considering the Pollination Service," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, March.
    14. Kaiwen Chen & Shuang’en Yu & Tao Ma & Jihui Ding & Pingru He & Yao Li & Yan Dai & Guangquan Zeng, 2022. "Modeling the Water and Nitrogen Management Practices in Paddy Fields with HYDRUS-1D," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, June.
    15. Lafuite, A.-S. & Loreau, M., 2017. "Time-delayed biodiversity feedbacks and the sustainability of social-ecological systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 351(C), pages 96-108.
    16. Patricia A. Henríquez-Piskulich & Constanza Schapheer & Nicolas J. Vereecken & Cristian Villagra, 2021. "Agroecological Strategies to Safeguard Insect Pollinators in Biodiversity Hotspots: Chile as a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-31, June.
    17. Centner, Terence J. & Brewer, Brady & Leal, Isaac, 2018. "Reducing damages from sulfoxaflor use through mitigation measures to increase the protection of pollinator species," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 70-76.
    18. Jones, Philip J., 2014. "Replacing soya in livestock feeds with UK-grown protein crops : prospects and implications," Centre for Agricultural Strategy - Papers and Reports 337545, University of Reading.
    19. Reddy, A. Amarender & Bhattacharya, Anindita & Reddy, S. Venku & Ricart, Sandra, 2021. "Farmers’ Distress Index: An Approach for an Action Plan to Reduce Vulnerability in the Drylands of India," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 10(11), pages 1-1.
    20. So. Asadi Kapourchal & Sa. Asadi Kapourchal & E. Pazira & M. Homaee, 2009. "Assessing radish (Raphanus sativus L.) potential for phytoremediation of lead-polluted soils resulting from air pollution," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(5), pages 202-206.
    21. Ying Cao & Zhixiong Fan & Weiqiang Chen & Zhijian Cao & Anyin Jiang, 2024. "Climate Change, Biased Technological Advances and Agricultural TFP: Empirical Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6550-:d:1704053. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.