IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i14p6437-d1701214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Metrics to Meaning: Research Trends and AHP-Driven Insights into Financial Performance in Sustainability Transitions

Author

Listed:
  • Ionela Munteanu

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania
    Faculty of Economic Studies, Ovidius University of Constanta, Aleea Universitatii no. 1, 900470 Constanta, Romania)

  • Liliana Ionescu-Feleagă

    (Department Accounting, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Bogdan Ștefan Ionescu

    (Department Accounting, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Elena Condrea

    (Faculty of Economic Studies, Ovidius University of Constanta, Aleea Universitatii no. 1, 900470 Constanta, Romania)

  • Mauro Romanelli

    (Department of Business and Economics, University of Naples Parthenope, 80133 Naples, Italy)

Abstract

Evaluating performance is a necessary and specific process across all sectors and organizational levels, shaped by context, indicators, and purpose. Considering global sustainability transitions, understanding financial performance entails a deeper perspective on technical accuracy, conceptual clarity, and systemic integration. This study investigates how financial performance is assessed and interpreted in sustainability-focused research, drawing on a bibliometric analysis of 490 articles indexed in the Web of Science from 2007 to 2023. Using SciMAT, we traced thematic evolutions and revealed a fragmented research landscape marked by competing theoretical, methodological, and practical orientations. To address this conceptual dispersion, we applied the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to evaluate five key alternatives to financial-performance assessment (quantitative measurement, definition-oriented reasoning, theoretical frameworks, experiential comparison, and integration with sustainability and ethics) against three conceptual criteria (philosophical depth, holistic scope, and multidisciplinary relevance). The results highlight a strong preference for holistic and integrative models of financial performance, with quantitative measurement ranking highest in practical terms, followed by experiential and sustainability-driven approaches. These results underscore the need to align financial evaluation more closely with sustainability values, bridging short-term metrics with long-term societal impact. By combining diachronic thematic mapping with structured decision analysis, this study advances a more reflective and forward-looking framework for performance research. It contributes to sustainability research by identifying underexplored epistemological pathways and supporting the development of financial evaluation models that are inclusive, ethically grounded, and aligned with sustainable development goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Ionela Munteanu & Liliana Ionescu-Feleagă & Bogdan Ștefan Ionescu & Elena Condrea & Mauro Romanelli, 2025. "From Metrics to Meaning: Research Trends and AHP-Driven Insights into Financial Performance in Sustainability Transitions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-28, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6437-:d:1701214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6437/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6437/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Berry & Joan Junkus, 2013. "Socially Responsible Investing: An Investor Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 112(4), pages 707-720, February.
    2. Guillen, Gonzalo & Badell, Mariana & Puigjaner, Luis, 2007. "A holistic framework for short-term supply chain management integrating production and corporate financial planning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 288-306, March.
    3. Sugumar Mariappanadar, 2025. "Human Capital to Implement Corporate Sustainability Business Strategies for Common Good," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-23, May.
    4. Piotr Trapczynski, 2013. "Determinants Of Foreign Direct Investment Performance – A Critical Literature Review," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 4(2), pages 117-132, June.
    5. Kamer-Ainur Aivaz & Daniel Teodorescu, 2022. "The Impact of the Coronavirus Pandemic on Medical Education: A Case Study at a Public University in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Mehtap Aldogan Eklund & Pedro Pinheiro, 2024. "The determinants of corporate social responsibility (CSR) committee: executive compensation, CSR-based incentives and ESG performance," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(7), pages 1240-1255, March.
    7. Thed van Leeuwen, 2006. "The application of bibliometric analyses in the evaluation of social science research. Who benefits from it, and why it is still feasible," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 66(1), pages 133-154, January.
    8. Lu Qiu & Die Hu & Yu Wang, 2020. "How do firms achieve sustainability through green innovation under external pressures of environmental regulation and market turbulence?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2695-2714, September.
    9. Dorin Jula & Lavinia Mastac & Diane Paula Corina Vancea & Kamer-Ainur Aivaz, 2025. "A Deep Dive into Institutional and Economic Influences on Poverty in Europe," Risks, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-23, May.
    10. Bahram Soltani, 2014. "The Anatomy of Corporate Fraud: A Comparative Analysis of High Profile American and European Corporate Scandals," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 120(2), pages 251-274, March.
    11. Elena Fraj-Andrés & Eva Martinez-Salinas & Jorge Matute-Vallejo, 2009. "A Multidimensional Approach to the Influence of Environmental Marketing and Orientation on the Firm’s Organizational Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 88(2), pages 263-286, August.
    12. Clarkson, Peter M. & Li, Yue & Richardson, Gordon D. & Vasvari, Florin P., 2011. "Does it really pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 122-144, March.
    13. Brown, Michael E. & Mitchell, Marie S., 2010. "Ethical and Unethical Leadership: Exploring New Avenues for Future Research," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(4), pages 583-616, October.
    14. Bahram Soltani, 2014. "The Anatomy of Corporate Fraud: A Comparative Analysis of High Profile American and European Corporate Scandals," Post-Print hal-03970654, HAL.
    15. Xu, Z., 2000. "On consistency of the weighted geometric mean complex judgement matrix in AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 126(3), pages 683-687, November.
    16. Mohd Yousuf Javed & Mohammad Hasan & Mohd Aqil & Mohd Ziaur Rehman & S. A. Atif Salar, 2024. "Exploring Sustainable Investments: How They Drive Firm Performance in Indian Private and Publicly Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-16, August.
    17. Malesios, Chrisovalantis & De, Debashree & Moursellas, Andreas & Dey, Prasanta Kumar & Evangelinos, Konstantinos, 2021. "Sustainability performance analysis of small and medium sized enterprises: Criteria, methods and framework," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    18. Piotr Trapczynski, 2013. "Determinants Of Foreign Direct Investment Performance – A Critical Literature Review," Oeconomia Copernicana, Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne Oddzial w Toruniu, Wydzial Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarzadzania UMK, vol. 4(2), pages 117-132, June.
    19. Borja Diez-Cañamero & Tania Bishara & Jose Ramon Otegi-Olaso & Rikardo Minguez & José María Fernández, 2020. "Measurement of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Corporate Sustainability Indexes, Rankings and Ratings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-36, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu, Wei & Yan, Yueyun & Zhu, Keying & Zhang, Peijue, 2024. "Can value-added tax refund policy inhibit corporate financial fraud? Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    2. María Luisa Pajuelo Moreno & Teresa Duarte-Atoche, 2019. "Relationship between Sustainable Disclosure and Performance—An Extension of Ullmann’s Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-33, August.
    3. Xin Xu & Feng Xiong & Zhe An, 2023. "Using Machine Learning to Predict Corporate Fraud: Evidence Based on the GONE Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 137-158, August.
    4. Laure de Batz & Evžen Kočenda, 2024. "Financial crime and punishment: A meta‐analysis," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 1338-1398, September.
    5. Christopher Dupuis & Ying Zheng, 2024. "Import Penetration and Corporate Misconduct: A Natural Experiment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 195(3), pages 475-506, December.
    6. Cao Xia & Wang Delei, 2024. "The intensity of environmental scandals, responsible innovation, and corporate resilience: The moderating role of relational trust," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(4), pages 1793-1807, June.
    7. Chen, Ying & Bu, Yuqiao & Fang, Libing & Xu, Yuanchu, 2025. "A new quality factor adjusted by fraud probability," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    8. Laure Batz, 2023. "Financial market enforcement in France," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 409-468, June.
    9. James Bierstaker & William D. Brink & Sameera Khatoon & Linda Thorne, 2024. "Academic Fraud and Remote Evaluation of Accounting Students: An Application of the Fraud Triangle," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 195(2), pages 425-447, November.
    10. Saffet A. Uygur & Christopher J. Napier, 2024. "Understanding Fraud in the Not-For-Profit Sector: A Stakeholder Perspective for Charities," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(3), pages 569-588, March.
    11. Mark Beasley & Allen Blay & Christina Lewellen & Michelle McAllister, 2023. "Tempering Financial Reporting Risk through Board Risk Management," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-22, November.
    12. Feng He & Xin Huang & Guanchun Liu & Ziqiao Wang, 2024. "Does CSR Engagement Deter Corporate Misconduct? Quasi-natural Experimental Evidence from Firms Joining a Government-Initiated Social Program in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 193(3), pages 555-587, September.
    13. Steven J. Hyde & Eric Bachura & Jonathan Bundy & Richard T. Gretz & Wm. Gerard Sanders, 2024. "The tangled webs we weave: Examining the effects of CEO deception on analyst recommendations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(1), pages 66-112, January.
    14. Katharina Kaupke & Dodo zu Knyphausen‐Aufseß, 2023. "Sustainability and firm value in the oil and gas industry—A vicious circle?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1129-1144, May.
    15. Liting Li & Haichao Zheng & Dongyu Chen & Bin Zhu, 2024. "Whose reviews are most valuable for predicting the default risk of peer-to-peer lending platforms? Evidence from China," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1619-1658, September.
    16. Aymen Sajjad & Gabriel Eweje & Muhammad Mustafa Raziq, 2024. "Sustainability leadership: An integrative review and conceptual synthesis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 2849-2867, May.
    17. Lai, Kee-hung & Feng, Yunting & Zhu, Qinghua, 2023. "Digital transformation for green supply chain innovation in manufacturing operations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    18. Nurlan Orazalin & Mady Baydauletov, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility strategy and corporate environmental and social performance: The moderating role of board gender diversity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1664-1676, July.
    19. Marta Szczepańczyk & Paweł Nowodziński & Adam Sikorski, 2023. "ESG Strategy and Financial Aspects Using the Example of an Oil and Gas Midstream Company: The UNIMOT Group," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-24, September.
    20. Fengxue Yin & Yanling Xiao & Rui Cao & Jianhua Zhang, 2023. "Impacts of ESG Disclosure on Corporate Carbon Performance: Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies in Heavy Pollution Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-19, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6437-:d:1701214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.