IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p6231-d1696653.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Decision Systems in Green E-Business Models: Pricing and Channel Strategies in Low-Carbon O2O Supply Chains

Author

Listed:
  • Yulin Liu

    (School of Management & Economics, University of Electronic Science & Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China)

  • Tie Li

    (School of Management & Economics, University of Electronic Science & Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China)

  • Yang Gao

    (School of Information & Communication Engineering, University of Electronic Science & Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China)

Abstract

This paper investigates sustainable decision systems within green E-business models by analyzing how different O2O (online-to-offline) fulfillment structures affect emission-reduction efforts and pricing strategies in a two-tier supply chain consisting of a manufacturer and a new retailer. Three practical sales formats—package self-pickup, nearby delivery, and hybrid—are modeled using Stackelberg game frameworks that incorporate key factors such as inconvenience cost, logistics cost, processing fees, and emission-reduction coefficients. Results show that the manufacturer’s emission-reduction decisions and both parties’ pricing strategies are highly sensitive to cost conditions and consumer preferences. Specifically, higher inconvenience and abatement costs consistently reduce profitability and emission efforts; the hybrid model exhibits threshold-dependent advantages over single-mode strategies in terms of carbon efficiency and economic returns; and consumer green preference and distance sensitivity jointly shape optimal channel configurations. Robustness analysis confirms the model’s stability under varying parameter conditions. These insights provide theoretical and practical guidance for firms seeking to develop adaptive, low-carbon fulfillment strategies that align with sustainability goals and market demands.

Suggested Citation

  • Yulin Liu & Tie Li & Yang Gao, 2025. "Sustainable Decision Systems in Green E-Business Models: Pricing and Channel Strategies in Low-Carbon O2O Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-25, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6231-:d:1696653
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6231/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6231/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. d'Aspremont, Claude & Jacquemin, Alexis, 1990. "Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers: Erratum," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 80(3), pages 641-642, June.
    2. d'ASPREMONT, Claude & JACQUEMIN, Alexis, 1988. "Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers," LIDAM Reprints CORE 823, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    3. Cai, Jianhu & Jiang, Feiying, 2023. "Decision models of pricing and carbon emission reduction for low-carbon supply chain under cap-and-trade regulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    4. Ziyuan Zhang & Liying Yu, 2021. "Dynamic Optimization and Coordination of Cooperative Emission Reduction in a Dual-Channel Supply Chain Considering Reference Low-Carbon Effect and Low-Carbon Goodwill," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-33, January.
    5. Ghosh, Debabrata & Shah, Janat, 2015. "Supply chain analysis under green sensitive consumer demand and cost sharing contract," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 319-329.
    6. Zhao, Liuwei & Jin, Shuai & Jiang, Hongyun, 2022. "Investigation of complex dynamics and chaos control of the duopoly supply chain under the mixed carbon policy," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    7. He, Zhou & Cheng, T.C.E. & Dong, Jichang & Wang, Shouyang, 2016. "Evolutionary location and pricing strategies for service merchants in competitive O2O markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 595-609.
    8. Xianjun Geng & Yinliang (Ricky) Tan & Lai Wei, 2018. "How Add†on Pricing Interacts with Distribution Contracts," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(4), pages 605-623, April.
    9. Reza Eslamipoor & Abbas Sepehriyar, 2024. "Promoting green supply chain under carbon tax, carbon cap and carbon trading policies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 4901-4912, July.
    10. Limeng Chai & Yicheng Wang, 2022. "Exploring the Sustainable Usage Intention of BOPS: A Perspective of Channel Integration Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, October.
    11. Biao Li & Yong Geng & Xiqiang Xia & Dan Qiao, 2021. "The Impact of Government Subsidies on the Low-Carbon Supply Chain Based on Carbon Emission Reduction Level," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-19, July.
    12. Peng Xing & Junzhu Yao & Meixia Wang & Hassan Zargarzadeh, 2022. "Quality Effort Strategy of O2O Takeout Service Supply Chain under Three Operation Modes," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-14, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mathilde Aubry & Yihan Wang, 2024. "Vertical Cooperation Stability in R&D Programs: A Game Theory Analysis of the Semiconductor Industry," Post-Print hal-04852219, HAL.
    2. Aubry, Mathilde & Wang, Yihan, 2024. "Vertical cooperation stability in R&D programs: A game theory analysis of the semiconductor industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    3. Du, Xianjin & Zhan, Huimin & Zhu, Xiaoxuan & He, Xiuli, 2021. "The upstream innovation with an overconfident manufacturer in a supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    4. Hafezi, Maryam & Zhao, Xuan & Zolfagharinia, Hossein, 2023. "Together we stand? Co-opetition for the development of green products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(3), pages 1417-1438.
    5. Li, Juntao & Liu, Pengfei, 2022. "Modeling green supply chain games with governmental interventions and risk preferences under fuzzy uncertainties," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 182-200.
    6. Chen, Kehong & Fan, Yiming, 2025. "Selection of R&D techniques: The influence of spillover effects and government subsidies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    7. Grunfeld, Leo A., 2003. "Meet me halfway but don't rush: absorptive capacity and strategic R&D investment revisited," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 21(8), pages 1091-1109, October.
    8. Prokop, Jacek & Karbowski, Adam, 2013. "R&D cooperation and industry cartelization," Economics Discussion Papers 2013-41, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    9. Jérôme Dollinger & Ana Mauleon & Vincent Vannetelbosch, 2024. "R &d and market sharing agreements," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 78(3), pages 877-922, November.
    10. Cassiman, Bruno & Perez-Castrillo, David & Veugelers, Reinhilde, 2002. "Endogenizing know-how flows through the nature of R&D investments," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 775-799, June.
    11. Frey, Rainer & Hussinger, Katrin, 2006. "The role of technology in M&As: a firm-level comparison of cross-border and domestic deals," Discussion Paper Series 1: Economic Studies 2006,45, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    12. Bertrand, Olivier & Zuniga, Pluvia, 2006. "R&D and M&A: Are cross-border M&A different? An investigation on OECD countries," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 401-423, March.
    13. Levy, Nadav, 2012. "Technology sharing and tacit collusion," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 204-216.
    14. Rajeev K. Goel, 2023. "Seek foreign funds or technology? Relative impacts of different spillover modes on innovation," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1466-1488, August.
    15. Wang, Xiaoyan & Du, Qiang & Shi, Jinzhao & Li, Jingtao & Bai, Libiao, 2025. "Comparisons of emission trading scheme implementation modes in a low-carbon supply chain," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    16. Long, Jianjun & Wang, Fenglian, 2024. "Complexity of a two-stage R&D game within a cluster supply chain considering vertical R&D spillovers, effective information, and government subsidies," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 606-621.
    17. Banal-Estañol, Albert & Duso, Tomaso & Seldeslachts, Jo & Szücs, Florian, 2022. "R&D Spillovers through RJV Cooperation," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 51(4), pages 1-10.
    18. Dequiedt, V. & Versaevel, B., 2004. "Patent pools and the dynamic incentives to R&D," Working Papers 200412, Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory (GAEL).
    19. Colombo, Massimo G. & Garrone, Paola, 1998. "Common carriers' entry into multimedia services," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 77-105, March.
    20. Beck, Mathias & Junge, Martin & Kaiser, Ulrich, 2017. "Public Funding and Corporate Innovation," IZA Discussion Papers 11196, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6231-:d:1696653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.