IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5912-d1688599.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Optimization of Industrial Structure Under the ‘Dual Carbon’ Goal via Multi-Objective Programming Model: Evidence from Guangdong Province, China

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Cheng

    (College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
    State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Geotechnics and Tunnelling, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China)

  • Changhong Cai

    (College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
    State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Geotechnics and Tunnelling, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China)

Abstract

With the increasing frequency of extreme weather events, global concerns regarding climate change have intensified, with carbon dioxide widely recognized as the primary driver of global warming and climate disruption. It is necessary to investigate how to develop industries to meet the constant GDP growth and minimum carbon emissions. This study investigates the optimization of industrial structure under China’s ‘Dual Carbon’ Goal in Guangdong Province from 2012 to 2017, employing a multi-objective programming model. Using the input–output table, carbon emissions across 42 industries are calculated based on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) carbon emission factor method. According to Hirschman’s theory of industrial interdependence, the economic and carbon emission linkage coefficients between these industries are obtained by calculating the Ghosh inverse matrix and the Leontief inverse matrix to analyze the economic forward and backward linkage of the industries, as well as the carbon emission forward and backward linkage. The impact of industry input and output on the urban economy and the resulting carbon emission problems are discussed, and industries are divided into encouraged and restricted industries. Using a multi-objective programming model, the expected final demand, changes in final demand, and expected carbon emissions of these industries under the ‘Dual Carbon’ Goal, with the target of maintaining the same economic growth rate and promoting carbon reduction, are analyzed. The results show that most industries in Guangdong Province need to reduce final demand, including the highest carbon-emitting industries and industries that are relatively restricted by scale in development. The policy implications of optimizing the industrial structure to reduce carbon emissions are provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Cheng & Changhong Cai, 2025. "The Optimization of Industrial Structure Under the ‘Dual Carbon’ Goal via Multi-Objective Programming Model: Evidence from Guangdong Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-20, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5912-:d:1688599
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5912/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5912/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daron Acemoglu & Philippe Aghion & Leonardo Bursztyn & David Hemous, 2012. "The Environment and Directed Technical Change," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(1), pages 131-166, February.
    2. Guoliang Fan & Anni Zhu & Hongxia Xu, 2023. "Analysis of the Impact of Industrial Structure Upgrading and Energy Structure Optimization on Carbon Emission Reduction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
    3. Chen, Ya & Pan, Yongbin & Wang, Mengyuan & Ding, Tao & Zhou, Zhixiang & Wang, Ke, 2023. "How do industrial sectors contribute to carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals? A heterogeneous energy efficiency analysis for Beijing," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 67-80.
    4. Runde Gu & Chunfa Li & Dongdong Li & Yangyang Yang & Shan Gu, 2022. "The Impact of Rationalization and Upgrading of Industrial Structure on Carbon Emissions in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Pinjie Xie & Yue Lu & Yuwen Xie, 2024. "The Influencing Factors of Carbon Emissions in the Industrial Sector: Empirical Analysis Based on a Spatial Econometric Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-24, March.
    6. Jin, Gui & Guo, Baishu & Deng, Xiangzheng, 2020. "Is there a decoupling relationship between CO2 emission reduction and poverty alleviation in China?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    7. Jaffe, Adam B. & Newell, Richard G. & Stavins, Robert N., 2005. "A tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(2-3), pages 164-174, August.
    8. Zhao, Jun & Jiang, Qingzhe & Dong, Xiucheng & Dong, Kangyin & Jiang, Hongdian, 2022. "How does industrial structure adjustment reduce CO2 emissions? Spatial and mediation effects analysis for China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    9. Pan, Xiongfeng & Wang, Mengyang & Li, Mengna, 2023. "Low-carbon policy and industrial structure upgrading: Based on the perspective of strategic interaction among local governments," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    10. Cheng, Zhonghua & Li, Lianshui & Liu, Jun, 2018. "Industrial structure, technical progress and carbon intensity in China's provinces," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2935-2946.
    11. Ye Liu & Yiyun Wu & Xiwei Zhu, 2024. "Industrial clusters and carbon emission reduction: evidence from China," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 73(2), pages 557-597, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jianshi Wang & Shangkun Yu & Mengcheng Li & Yu Cheng & Chengxin Wang, 2022. "Study of the Impact of Industrial Restructuring on the Spatial and Temporal Evolution of Carbon Emission Intensity in Chinese Provinces—Analysis of Mediating Effects Based on Technological Innovation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Fabio Antoniou & Roland Strausz, 2014. "The Effectiveness of Taxation and Feed-in Tariffs," CESifo Working Paper Series 4788, CESifo.
    3. Hu, Hui & Qi, Shaozhou & Chen, Yuanzhi, 2023. "Using green technology for a better tomorrow: How enterprises and government utilize the carbon trading system and incentive policies," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    4. Francesco Nicolli & Francesco Vona & Lionel Nesta, 2012. "Determinants of Renewable Energy Innovation: Environmental Policies vs. Market Regulation," Working Papers 201204, University of Ferrara, Department of Economics.
    5. Nicolli, Francesco & Vona, Francesco, 2012. "The Evolution of Renewable Energy Policy in OECD Countries: Aggregate Indicators and Determinants," Climate Change and Sustainable Development 130897, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    6. Muhammad, Tufail & Ni, Guohua & Chen, Zhenling & Mallek, Sabrine & Dudek, Marek & Mentel, Grzegorz, 2024. "Addressing resource curse: How mineral resources influence industrial structure dynamics of the BRI 57 oil-exporting countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    7. Bu, Yan & Wang, Erda & Möst, Dominik & Lieberwirth, Martin, 2022. "How population migration affects carbon emissions in China: Factual and counterfactual scenario analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    8. Michael Peneder & Spyros Arvanitis & Christian Rammer & Tobias Stucki & Martin Wörter, 2022. "Policy instruments and self-reported impacts of the adoption of energy saving technologies in the DACH region," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 49(2), pages 369-404, May.
    9. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/eu4vqp9ompqllr09j0h0ji242 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Pottier, Antonin & Hourcade, Jean-Charles & Espagne, Etienne, 2014. "Modelling the redirection of technical change: The pitfalls of incorporeal visions of the economy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 213-218.
    11. Fries, Steven, 2023. "Sequencing decarbonization policies to manage their macroeconomic impacts," INET Oxford Working Papers 2023-26, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    12. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/f6h8764enu2lskk9p544jc8op is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Gernot Wagner & Richard Zeckhauser, 2012. "Climate policy: hard problem, soft thinking," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 110(3), pages 507-521, February.
    14. Liu, Yaobin & Deng, Weifeng & Wen, Huwei & Li, Shuoshuo, 2024. "Promoting green technology innovation through policy synergy: Evidence from the dual pilot policy of low-carbon city and innovative city," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 957-977.
    15. Aalbers, Rob & Shestalova, Victoria & Kocsis, Viktória, 2013. "Innovation policy for directing technical change in the power sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1240-1250.
    16. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/eu4vqp9ompqllr09j0h0ji242 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Jeroen den Bergh & Ivan Savin, 2021. "Impact of Carbon Pricing on Low-Carbon Innovation and Deep Decarbonisation: Controversies and Path Forward," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 80(4), pages 705-715, December.
    18. Zhou, Xiaoxiao & Pan, Zixuan & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Song, Malin, 2020. "Directed technological progress driven by diversified industrial structural change," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 112-129.
    19. van den Bijgaart, Inge, 2017. "The unilateral implementation of a sustainable growth path with directed technical change," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 305-327.
    20. Spyros Arvanitis & Michael Peneder & Christian Rammer & Tobias Stucki & Martin Wörter, 2016. "Competitiveness and ecological impacts of green energy technologies: firm-level evidence for the DACH region," KOF Working papers 16-420, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich.
    21. Xu, Le & Yang, Lili & Li, Ding & Shao, Shuai, 2023. "Asymmetric effects of heterogeneous environmental standards on green technology innovation: Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    22. Christian Haas & Karol Kempa, 2023. "Low-Carbon Investment and Credit Rationing," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 86(1), pages 109-145, October.
    23. Cameron Hepburn & Jacquelyn Pless & David Popp, 2018. "Policy Brief—Encouraging Innovation that Protects Environmental Systems: Five Policy Proposals," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 12(1), pages 154-169.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5912-:d:1688599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.