IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i12p5265-d1673720.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on China’s Railway Freight Pricing Under Carbon Emissions Trading Mechanism

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoyong Wei

    (Postgraduate Department of China Academy of Railway Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Huaixiang Wang

    (Transportation & Economics Research Institute, China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited, Beijing 100081, China)

Abstract

Amid intensified global climate mitigation efforts, integrating rail freight into carbon emissions trading schemes became critical under China’s “Dual-Carbon” strategy. Despite rail’s significantly lower emissions intensity compared to road transport, existing pricing frameworks inadequately internalized its environmental externalities, which limited its competitive advantage. To address this gap, this study systematically reviewed international and domestic practices of integrating transport into carbon trading systems and developed a novel “four-layer, three-dimensional” emissions trading scheme (ETS) framework tailored specifically for China’s rail freight sector. Employing a Stackelberg bilevel optimization model, this study analyzed how carbon quotas and pricing influenced rail operators’ pricing and investment decisions. The results showed that under optimized quotas and carbon prices, railway enterprises were able to generate surplus carbon credits, creating new revenue streams and enabling freight rate reductions. This “carbon revenue–freight rate feedback loop” not only delivered environmental benefits but also enhanced rail’s economic competitiveness. Overall, this study significantly advances the understanding of carbon-based pricing mechanisms in railway freight, providing robust theoretical insights and actionable policy guidance for achieving sustainable decarbonization in China’s transport sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoyong Wei & Huaixiang Wang, 2025. "Research on China’s Railway Freight Pricing Under Carbon Emissions Trading Mechanism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-31, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5265-:d:1673720
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5265/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5265/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert W. Hahn & Robert N. Stavins, 2011. "The Effect of Allowance Allocations on Cap-and-Trade System Performance," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 54(S4), pages 267-294.
    2. R. H. Coase, 2013. "The Problem of Social Cost," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(4), pages 837-877.
    3. Shuling Chen & Jianhong Wu & Yueqi Zong, 2020. "The Impact of the Freight Transport Modal Shift Policy on China’s Carbon Emissions Reduction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Hu, Jing & Crijns-Graus, Wina & Lam, Long & Gilbert, Alyssa, 2015. "Ex-ante evaluation of EU ETS during 2013–2030: EU-internal abatement," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 152-163.
    5. Xiao-Yi Li & Bao-Jun Tang, 2017. "Incorporating the transport sector into carbon emission trading scheme: an overview and outlook," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 88(2), pages 683-698, September.
    6. Michael Wang & Bill Wang & Ahmad Abareshi, 2020. "Blockchain Technology and Its Role in Enhancing Supply Chain Integration Capability and Reducing Carbon Emission: A Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Chih Chang, Ching & Chia Lai, Tin, 2013. "Carbon allowance allocation in the transportation industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1091-1097.
    8. Wang, Li & Shao, Yuhui & Sun, Youxia & Wang, Yanan, 2023. "Rent-seeking, promotion pressure and green economic efficiency: Evidence from China," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 47(1).
    9. Li, Zhiguo & Wang, Jie, 2022. "Spatial spillover effect of carbon emission trading on carbon emission reduction: Empirical data from pilot regions in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    10. repec:dau:papers:123456789/10174 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meredith Fowlie & Mar Reguant & Stephen P. Ryan, 2016. "Market-Based Emissions Regulation and Industry Dynamics," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 124(1), pages 249-302.
    2. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2017_020 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Baudry, Marc & Faure, Anouk & Quemin, Simon, 2021. "Emissions trading with transaction costs," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    4. Jan Abrell & Johanna Cludius & Sascha Lehmann & Joachim Schleich & Regina Betz, 2022. "Corporate Emissions-Trading Behaviour During the First Decade of the EU ETS," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 83(1), pages 47-83, September.
    5. Andrea Flori & Alessandro Spelta, 2025. "Carbon trade biases and the emerging mesoscale structure of the European Emissions Trading System network," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Jessika Richter & Luis Mundaca, 2015. "Achieving and maintaining institutional feasibility in emissions trading: the case of New Zealand," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 20(8), pages 1487-1509, December.
    7. Robert N. Stavins, 2011. "The Problem of the Commons: Still Unsettled after 100 Years," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(1), pages 81-108, February.
    8. Sato, Misato & Rafaty, Ryan & Calel, Raphael & Grubb, Michael, 2022. "Allocation, allocation, allocation! The political economy of the development of the European Union Emissions Trading System," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115431, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Stefano Carattini & Eli P. Fenichel & Alexander Gordan & Patrick Gourley, 2020. "For want of a chair: Teaching price formation using a cap and trade game," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(1), pages 52-66, January.
    10. Fernández-Huertas Moraga, Jesús & Rapoport, Hillel, 2014. "Tradable immigration quotas," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 94-108.
    11. Ashwin Rode, 2021. "Rent Seeking over Tradable Emission Permits," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 78(2), pages 257-285, February.
    12. Nicola De Vivo & Giovanni Marin, 2018. "How neutral is the choice of the allocation mechanism in cap-and-trade schemes? Evidence from the EU-ETS," Argomenti, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Department of Economics, Society & Politics, vol. 9(9), pages 1-24, January-A.
    13. Wang, Xu & Zhu, Lei & Liu, Pengfei, 2021. "Manipulation via endowments: Quantifying the influence of market power on the emission trading scheme," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    14. Sisi Ju & Peng Zhang, 2025. "Carbon Emission Reduction Decision-Making in an Online Freight Platform Service Supply Chain Under Carbon Trading Mechanism," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-31, June.
    15. Jūratė Jaraitė-Kažukauskė & Andrius Kažukauskas, 2015. "Do Transaction Costs Influence Firm Trading Behaviour in the European Emissions Trading System?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 62(3), pages 583-613, November.
    16. Xu, Jiuping & Yang, Xin & Tao, Zhimiao, 2015. "A tripartite equilibrium for carbon emission allowance allocation in the power-supply industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 62-80.
    17. Khalid S. Al-Abdulqader & Abdul-Jalil Ibrahim & JingKai Ong & Ahmed A. Khalifa, 2025. "Does Carbon Pricing Matter? Evidence from a Global Sample," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-19, February.
    18. Steven G. Medema, 2020. "The Coase Theorem at Sixty," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 58(4), pages 1045-1128, December.
    19. Yin, Chuanzhong & Zhang, Zi-Ang & Fu, Xiaowen & Ge, Ying-En, 2024. "A low-carbon transportation network: Collaborative effects of a rail freight subsidy and carbon trading mechanism," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    20. Itkonen, Juha, 2017. "Efficiency and dependency in a network of linked permit markets," Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers 20/2017, Bank of Finland.
    21. Dong, Zhaoyingzi & Xiao, Yue, 2024. "Carbon emissions trading policy and climate injustice: A study on economic distributional impacts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5265-:d:1673720. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.