IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4723-d1660653.html

Exploring the Relationship Between Cultivated Land Regulations, Agricultural Productivity, and Trade Efficiency: A Comparative Analysis Among China, Russia, and Kyrgyzstan Under the Belt and Road Initiative

Author

Listed:
  • Zhumash Babazov

    (College of Management, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Chunbin Li

    (College of Management, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

Abstract

Ensuring food security and sustainable land management is a global priority, particularly within countries participating in the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). This study investigates the role of cultivated land regulation systems in influencing agricultural productivity and trade efficiency, focusing on China, Russia, and Kyrgyzstan. Despite the critical role of cultivated land, variations in land-regulation policies and regional practices have led to disparate outcomes in agricultural productivity, sustainability, and trade efficiency. A comparative methodology was employed, integrating descriptive statistics, regression modeling, and geospatial analysis to evaluate yield trends, irrigation coverage, land-use efficiency, and trade performance between 2016 and 2022. Data were sourced from government reports, international databases, and satellite imagery. The results indicate that China’s centralized land-regulation policies—such as the Red Line Policy—have stabilized arable land, enhanced average crop yields (6.1 tons/ha in 2022), and significantly expanded agricultural export volumes. In Russia, land consolidation and modernization efforts have improved productivity (2.9 tons/ha in 2022) and export capacities, though limited irrigation remains a challenge. Kyrgyzstan, while showing gradual improvements through cooperative farming, continues to face fragmentation, infrastructure deficiencies, and limited trade growth. The study concludes that harmonized and targeted land-regulation policies—coupled with infrastructure investments and regulatory alignment—are essential to secure productivity, improve trade efficiency, and strengthen agricultural resilience across BRI countries. Strengthened investments in infrastructure, land-tenure security, and policy alignment across BRI countries are recommended to enhance food security and agricultural trade efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhumash Babazov & Chunbin Li, 2025. "Exploring the Relationship Between Cultivated Land Regulations, Agricultural Productivity, and Trade Efficiency: A Comparative Analysis Among China, Russia, and Kyrgyzstan Under the Belt and Road Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-24, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4723-:d:1660653
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4723/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4723/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William M. Liefert & Olga Liefert, 2012. "Russian Agriculture during Transition: Performance, Global Impact, and Outlook," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 34(1), pages 37-75.
    2. Lerman, Zvi & Sedik, David, 2013. "Cooperatives in Kyrgyzstan: Findings from a Survey of Cooperatives and Users," Discussion Papers 164527, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Department of Agricultural Economics and Management.
    3. Hongxing Yao & Mohammed Ismail Alhussam & Omar Abu Risha & Bilal Ahmed Memon, 2020. "Analyzing the Relationship between Agricultural FDI and Food Security: Evidence from Belt and Road Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Bo Wang & Siyu Gong & Yang Yang, 2023. "Innovation capability, global cooperation, and sustainable development along the Belt and Road Initiative," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(5), pages 3490-3512, October.
    5. Feder, Gershon & Feeny, David, 1991. "Land Tenure and Property Rights: Theory and Implications for Development Policy," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 5(1), pages 135-153, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Msangi, Haji Athumani & Löhr, Katharina & Sieber, Stefan & Waized, Betty & Ndyetabula, Daniel Wilson, 2023. "Maximizing impact: The power of combining land tenure formalization and productive social safety nets programmes in Tanzania," 2023 Seventh AAAE/60th AEASA Conference, September 18-21, 2023, Durban, South Africa 365859, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    2. Cuffaro, Nadia, 1997. "Population growth and agriculture in poor countries: A review of theoretical issues and empirical evidence," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(7), pages 1151-1163, July.
    3. Kanchanaroek, Yingluk & Termansen, Mette & Quinn, Claire, 2013. "Property rights regimes in complex fishery management systems: A choice experiment application," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 363-373.
    4. Besley, Timothy, 1995. "Property Rights and Investment Incentives: Theory and Evidence from Ghana," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 103(5), pages 903-937, October.
    5. Tian, Guangjin & Duan, Jinlong & Yang, Lan, 2021. "Spatio-temporal pattern and driving mechanisms of cropland circulation in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    6. Junyan Tian, 2023. "Does agricultural official development assistance facilitate foreign direct investment in agriculture: Evidence from 63 developing countries," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(3), pages 702-718, September.
    7. Meinzen-Dick, Ruth Suseela & di Gregorio, Monica & Dohrn, Stephan, 2008. "Decentralization, Pro-Poor Land Policies, and Democratic Governance," CAPRi Working Papers 44353, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    8. Lei Fu & Weiyi Liang, 2025. "How Improving the Quality of Foreign Direct Investment Can Promote Sustainable Development: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-29, April.
    9. Fernandes, Vitor Bukvar & Reydon, Bastiaan Philip, 2024. "An exploration of the relationship between land governance and development through a systematic review of interventions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    10. Ayalew, Hailemariam & Admasu, Yeshwas & Chamberlin, Jordan, 2021. "Is land certification pro-poor? Evidence from Ethiopia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    11. Agboola, Alirat Olayinka & Scofield, David & Amidu, Abdul-Rasheed, 2017. "Understanding property market operations from a dual institutional perspective: The case of Lagos, Nigeria," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 89-96.
    12. Marcello De Maria, 2019. "Understanding Land in the Context of Large-Scale Land Acquisitions: A Brief History of Land in Economics," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, January.
    13. Guirkinger, Catherine & Platteau, Jean-Philippe, 2015. "Transformation of the family farm under rising land pressure: A theoretical essay," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 112-137.
    14. Ishchukova, N. & Smutka, L., . "Comparative Advantage: Products Mapping of the Russian Agricultural Exports," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 5(3), pages 1-12.
    15. Yue Jin & Chen Chen & Zhanyi Shi, 2021. "Spillover Effect of FDI on Food Exports: Based on Firm-Level Analysis in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
    16. Caio Piza & Mauricio José Serpa Barros de Moura, 2011. "How Does Land Title Affect Access to Credit? Empirical Evidence from an Emerging Economy," Working Paper Series 2211, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    17. eppermann, Andre & Balkovič, Juraj & Bundle, Sophie & Havlík, Petr & Leclère, David & Lesiv, Myroslava & Schepaschenko, Dmitry, "undated". "Crop Production Potentials In Russia And Ukraine – Intensification Versus Cropland Expansion," 2017 International Congress, August 28-September 1, 2017, Parma, Italy 260899, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Bryant, Coralie, 1996. "Strategic change through sensible projects," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 24(9), pages 1539-1550, September.
    19. Corsi, Stefano & Marchisio, Laura Viviana & Orsi, Luigi, 2017. "Connecting smallholder farmers to local markets: Drivers of collective action, land tenure and food security in East Chad," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 39-47.
    20. Kemper, Niels & Ha, Luu Viet & Klump, Rainer, 2015. "Property Rights and Consumption Volatility: Evidence from a Land Reform in Vietnam," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 107-130.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4723-:d:1660653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.