IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4435-d1655002.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethical Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Among Ecuadorian University Students

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge Buele

    (Centro de Investigación en Mecatrónica y Sistemas Interactivos (MIST), Facultad de Ingenierías, Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica, Ambato 180103, Ecuador)

  • Ángel Ramón Sabando-García

    (Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Económicas y Humanitarias, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador Sede Santo Domingo, Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas, Santo Domingo 230150, Ecuador)

  • Bosco Javier Sabando-García

    (Programa de Odontología, Enfermería y Medicina, Universidad San Gregorio de Portoviejo—USGP, Portoviejo 130105, Ecuador)

  • Hugo Yánez-Rueda

    (Facultad de Jurisprudencia y Ciencias Políticas, Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica, Ambato 180103, Ecuador)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence has transformed educational environments by facilitating processes such as information retrieval, assisted writing, automated feedback, and personalized tutoring. Within university settings, the adoption of technologies capable of autonomously generating content has increased rapidly, becoming a common academic resource for students. However, this accelerated integration poses ethical challenges, particularly when such tools are used without a clear understanding of their implications. This study aimed to examine how students’ emotional attitudes (affective), understanding (cognitive), and practical use (behavioral) of AI relate to their ethical engagement with these technologies. A structured questionnaire was administered to 833 university students in Ecuador. The instrument showed excellent internal consistency (α = 0.992; Ω = 0.992), and the validity analyses confirmed that the dimensions measured distinct but related constructs. ChatGPT was reported as the most used tool (62.2%), followed by Gemini and Siri. The structural model indicated that emotional and cognitive dimensions substantially influenced ethical behavior (β = 0.413 and β = 0.567, respectively), whereas frequent use alone exhibited no significant effect (β = −0.128; p = 0.058). These results suggest that ethical engagement with AI is primarily driven by reflection and knowledge rather than habit. This study contributes to the literature by modeling how different learning dimensions shape ethical behavior in AI use and underscores the relevance of aligning academic practices with socially responsible uses of emerging technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge Buele & Ángel Ramón Sabando-García & Bosco Javier Sabando-García & Hugo Yánez-Rueda, 2025. "Ethical Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Among Ecuadorian University Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-16, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4435-:d:1655002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4435/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4435/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joseph F. Hair & Marcelo L.D.S. Gabriel & Dirceu da Silva & Sergio Braga Junior, 2019. "Development and validation of attitudes measurement scales: fundamental and practical aspects," RAUSP Management Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 54(4), pages 490-507, October.
    2. Xianpu Xu & Yuchen Song, 2023. "Is There a Conflict between Automation and Environment? Implications of Artificial Intelligence for Carbon Emissions in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Prema Nedungadi & Kai-Yu Tang & Raghu Raman, 2024. "The Transformative Power of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Achieving the Sustainable Development Goal of Quality Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-27, November.
    4. Chuhao Wu & He Zhang & John M. Carroll, 2024. "AI Governance in Higher Education: Case Studies of Guidance at Big Ten Universities," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-19, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yueqi Sun & Junlong Ti & Fang Yang & Hsing Hung Chen, 2025. "Blessing or Curse? The Impact of the Penetration of Industrial Robots on Green Sustainable Transformation in Chinese High-Energy-Consuming Industries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Marcelo Luiz Dias da Silva Gabriel & Joseph F. Hair Jr. & Dirceu da Silva & Sérgio Silva Braga Jr., 2024. "Embracing Fallibility in Quantitative Research: Thoughts and Remarks on Exploratory Factor Analysis and beyond," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 28(Vol. 28 N), pages 240053-2400.
    3. Kaya-Kasikci, Sevgi & Glass, Chris R. & Camero, Eglis Chacon & Minaeva, Ekaterina, 2025. "University Positioning in AI Policies: Comparative Insights from National Policies and Non-State Actor Influences in China, the European Union, India, Russia, and the United States," SocArXiv a42rs_v1, Center for Open Science.
    4. Twinkle Singh & Jeanne Poulose & Vinod Sharma, 2025. "Data-Driven Sustainability: Revolutionizing Hospital Supply Chains through Big Data Analytics," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-32, March.
    5. Manoj Kumar Verma & Vinit Kumar & Mayank Yuvaraj, 2024. "Semiotic scale for library software interfaces: Development and validation," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 75(6), pages 704-716, June.
    6. Ionica Oncioiu & Anca Roxana Bularca, 2025. "Artificial Intelligence Governance in Higher Education: The Role of Knowledge-Based Strategies in Fostering Legal Awareness and Ethical Artificial Intelligence Literacy," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, May.
    7. Hui Liang & Jingbo Fan & Yunhan Wang, 2025. "Artificial Intelligence, Technological Innovation, and Employment Transformation for Sustainable Development: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-28, April.
    8. Shamila Nabi Khan & Zahid Riaz, 2024. "Exploring the Relevance of Organizational Learning for CSR Strategy Implementation: Empirical Evidence from a Developing Economy," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 3844-3871, March.
    9. Shan Feng & Shuguang Liu, 2023. "Does AI Application Matter in Promoting Carbon Productivity? Fresh Evidence from 30 Provinces in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-19, November.
    10. Umar Bello & Prof. Kabiru Isa Dandago & Ishaq Alhaji Samaila, 2023. "Taxpayers’ Perception and Direct Assessment Tax Compliance of Micro and Small Enterprises in North-East, Nigeria," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(10), pages 1411-1421, October.
    11. Md. Mominur Rahman & Nafis Sadik, 2025. "Measuring scale for digital financial services, economic growth, performance, and environmental sustainability: evidence from EFA and CFA," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 1661-1694, April.
    12. Qian Chen & Fei Jiang & Yingzhi Guo & Raj Kush Shrestha & Qingchuo Zhang, 2025. "Community Attachment, Emotional Solidarity, and Sustainable Tourism Support: Evidence From Sagarmatha National Park, Nepal," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(3), pages 4492-4510, June.
    13. Ljubi, Klara & Groznik, Aleš, 2023. "Role played by social factors and privacy concerns in autonomous vehicle adoption," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1-15.
    14. Ping Han & Tingting He & Can Feng & Yihan Wang, 2024. "Research on Whether Artificial Intelligence Affects Industrial Carbon Emission Intensity Based on the Perspective of Industrial Structure and Government Intervention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-19, October.
    15. Xianpu Xu & Lingyun Huang, 2024. "How Does Environmental Protection Tax Affect Urban Energy Consumption in China? New Insights from the Intensity Difference-in-Differences Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-26, May.
    16. Pedro Henrique Rodrigues de Sousa & Edgar Reyes Junior & Víctor del Corte Lora, 2024. "Development, validation, and reliability of a measurement scale for investigating the principle of intercooperation," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(2), pages 553-572, June.
    17. Mehta, Nikhil Kewal Krishna & Sharma, Rohit & Cruz, Angel Contreras & Daim, Tugrul U., 2025. "Analyzing the impact of intelligence and technological factors on farmers' sustainable purchasing behavior," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    18. Luo, Qingfeng & Wang, Jingyuan, 2025. "The impact of artificial intelligence development on embodied carbon emissions: Perspectives from the production and consumption sides," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    19. Fahad Asghar & Palwasha Farooq & Muhammad Nadim & Zain ul Abidin & Fazli Wadood, 2023. "Global Financial Crisis: A critical study on Role of Auditor’s and Stakeholder," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 9(2), pages 452-458.
    20. Khan Tahsina & Khaled Amin Md. & Nahar Rezbin & Ramayah Thurasamy & Hassan Farheen, 2025. "Employees’ Brand Knowledge for Heightening Brand Endorsement in the Service Industry," Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 28(1), pages 75-102.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4435-:d:1655002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.