IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4435-d1655002.html

Ethical Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Among Ecuadorian University Students

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge Buele

    (Centro de Investigación en Mecatrónica y Sistemas Interactivos (MIST), Facultad de Ingenierías, Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica, Ambato 180103, Ecuador)

  • Ángel Ramón Sabando-García

    (Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Económicas y Humanitarias, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador Sede Santo Domingo, Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas, Santo Domingo 230150, Ecuador)

  • Bosco Javier Sabando-García

    (Programa de Odontología, Enfermería y Medicina, Universidad San Gregorio de Portoviejo—USGP, Portoviejo 130105, Ecuador)

  • Hugo Yánez-Rueda

    (Facultad de Jurisprudencia y Ciencias Políticas, Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica, Ambato 180103, Ecuador)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence has transformed educational environments by facilitating processes such as information retrieval, assisted writing, automated feedback, and personalized tutoring. Within university settings, the adoption of technologies capable of autonomously generating content has increased rapidly, becoming a common academic resource for students. However, this accelerated integration poses ethical challenges, particularly when such tools are used without a clear understanding of their implications. This study aimed to examine how students’ emotional attitudes (affective), understanding (cognitive), and practical use (behavioral) of AI relate to their ethical engagement with these technologies. A structured questionnaire was administered to 833 university students in Ecuador. The instrument showed excellent internal consistency (α = 0.992; Ω = 0.992), and the validity analyses confirmed that the dimensions measured distinct but related constructs. ChatGPT was reported as the most used tool (62.2%), followed by Gemini and Siri. The structural model indicated that emotional and cognitive dimensions substantially influenced ethical behavior (β = 0.413 and β = 0.567, respectively), whereas frequent use alone exhibited no significant effect (β = −0.128; p = 0.058). These results suggest that ethical engagement with AI is primarily driven by reflection and knowledge rather than habit. This study contributes to the literature by modeling how different learning dimensions shape ethical behavior in AI use and underscores the relevance of aligning academic practices with socially responsible uses of emerging technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge Buele & Ángel Ramón Sabando-García & Bosco Javier Sabando-García & Hugo Yánez-Rueda, 2025. "Ethical Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Among Ecuadorian University Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-16, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4435-:d:1655002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4435/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4435/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joseph F. Hair & Marcelo L.D.S. Gabriel & Dirceu da Silva & Sergio Braga Junior, 2019. "Development and validation of attitudes measurement scales: fundamental and practical aspects," RAUSP Management Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 54(4), pages 490-507, October.
    2. Xianpu Xu & Yuchen Song, 2023. "Is There a Conflict between Automation and Environment? Implications of Artificial Intelligence for Carbon Emissions in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Chuhao Wu & He Zhang & John M. Carroll, 2024. "AI Governance in Higher Education: Case Studies of Guidance at Big Ten Universities," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Prema Nedungadi & Kai-Yu Tang & Raghu Raman, 2024. "The Transformative Power of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Achieving the Sustainable Development Goal of Quality Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-27, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmed Sadek Abdelmagid & Naif Mohammed Jabli & Abdullah Yahya Al-Mohaya & Ahmed Ali Teleb, 2025. "Integrating Interactive Metaverse Environments and Generative Artificial Intelligence to Promote the Green Digital Economy and e-Entrepreneurship in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-30, June.
    2. Kingsley Ofosu-Ampong & Julius Adu-Ntim, 2025. "Transformational Leadership, AI Competitiveness, and Project Performance: A Moderation Analysis," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 67-79, December.
    3. Lei Wang & Qi Zhang, 2025. "Relationships among push motivation, pull motivation, social influence, attitude, and intention to engage in livestreaming internship programs in labs," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. repec:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:22:p:15-20 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Jianzhe Luo & Xianpu Xu & Lei Liu, 2025. "Identifying the Impact of Green Fiscal Policy on Urban Carbon Emissions: New Insights from the Energy Saving and Emission Reduction Pilot Policy in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-27, August.
    6. Agnieszka Izabela Baruk, 2025. "Generation Z's Involvement in Social Media in the Context of Its Representatives' Readiness to Shape the Marketing Activities of Enterprises," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 952-977.
    7. Ljubi, Klara & Groznik, Aleš, 2023. "Role played by social factors and privacy concerns in autonomous vehicle adoption," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1-15.
    8. Pham Quang Huy & Vu Kien Phuc, 2026. "Digital twin fosters social entrepreneurship for smart sustainable infrastructure: mediating role of environmental management accounting practices," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-29, January.
    9. Ping Han & Tingting He & Can Feng & Yihan Wang, 2024. "Research on Whether Artificial Intelligence Affects Industrial Carbon Emission Intensity Based on the Perspective of Industrial Structure and Government Intervention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-19, October.
    10. Emmanuel Uche & Abdullah Emre Caglar & Magdalena Radulescu, 2025. "Assessing the environmental sustainability corridor in Japan: the role of artificial intelligence and low-carbon energy," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    11. Pedro Henrique Rodrigues de Sousa & Edgar Reyes Junior & Víctor del Corte Lora, 2024. "Development, validation, and reliability of a measurement scale for investigating the principle of intercooperation," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(2), pages 553-572, June.
    12. Dian Wang & ZhiBin Zhang & NiYa Peng, 2025. "The Impact and Spatial Effects of Industrial Intelligence on Carbon Emissions in Chinese Cities," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
    13. Khan Tahsina & Khaled Amin Md. & Nahar Rezbin & Ramayah Thurasamy & Hassan Farheen, 2025. "Employees’ Brand Knowledge for Heightening Brand Endorsement in the Service Industry," Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 28(1), pages 75-102.
    14. Subhra Mondal & Subhankar Das & Vasiliki G. Vrana, 2024. "Exploring the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Achieving a Net Zero Carbon Economy in Emerging Economies: A Combination of PLS-SEM and fsQCA Approaches to Digital Inclusion and Climate Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-35, November.
    15. Sonia Najam Shaikh & Jan Muhammad Sohu & Suman Shaikh & Fatima Zahra Kherazi & Sanam Soomro, 2025. "Artificial Intelligence Adoption, Green HRM, and Employee Behavior: Driving Environmental Sustainability in SMEs with Organizational Culture as a Moderator," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, October.
    16. Yueqi Sun & Junlong Ti & Fang Yang & Hsing Hung Chen, 2025. "Blessing or Curse? The Impact of the Penetration of Industrial Robots on Green Sustainable Transformation in Chinese High-Energy-Consuming Industries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-21, February.
    17. Marcelo Luiz Dias da Silva Gabriel & Joseph F. Hair Jr. & Dirceu da Silva & Sérgio Silva Braga Jr., 2024. "Embracing Fallibility in Quantitative Research: Thoughts and Remarks on Exploratory Factor Analysis and beyond," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 28(Vol. 28 N), pages 240053-2400.
    18. Kaya-Kasikci, Sevgi & Glass, Chris R. & Camero, Eglis Chacon & Minaeva, Ekaterina, 2025. "University Positioning in AI Policies: Comparative Insights from National Policies and Non-State Actor Influences in China, the European Union, India, Russia, and the United States," SocArXiv a42rs_v1, Center for Open Science.
    19. Twinkle Singh & Jeanne Poulose & Vinod Sharma, 2025. "Data-Driven Sustainability: Revolutionizing Hospital Supply Chains through Big Data Analytics," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-32, March.
    20. Manoj Kumar Verma & Vinit Kumar & Mayank Yuvaraj, 2024. "Semiotic scale for library software interfaces: Development and validation," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 75(6), pages 704-716, June.
    21. Ionica Oncioiu & Anca Roxana Bularca, 2025. "Artificial Intelligence Governance in Higher Education: The Role of Knowledge-Based Strategies in Fostering Legal Awareness and Ethical Artificial Intelligence Literacy," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4435-:d:1655002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.