IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v85y2025ics0969698925000864.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer behavior toward cultured meat in the foodservice industry: Insights from IPA and fsQCA analysis on shifting trends

Author

Listed:
  • Quan, Lanji
  • Han, Heesup

Abstract

Cultured meat is gaining prominence as a food of the future, attracting the attention of researchers and consumers. This study explores the key factors influencing consumer visit intentions for cultured meat restaurants through safety, quality, and ethical value propositions. By conducting interviews with 32 participants and an online survey with 571 respondents, this study employs importance-performance analysis (IPA) and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to analyze complex relationships among these factors. The findings identify eight critical attributes of cultured meat that influence consumer decisions, providing strategic insights for restaurant marketers in China. Notably, the study reveals that while novelty and ethical concerns play a role, key determinants such as price, quality, nutritional benefits, and aversion significantly impact visit intentions. The fsQCA results emphasize the importance of combined attributes rather than single factors, highlighting the interplay between consumer perceptions and restaurant success. These results advance the understanding of cultured meat adoption and contribute to both theoretical and practical discussions on consumer behavior in the foodservice industry. Ultimately, this study offers implications for restaurant industry managers and policymakers aiming to effectively develop the cultured meat market.

Suggested Citation

  • Quan, Lanji & Han, Heesup, 2025. "Consumer behavior toward cultured meat in the foodservice industry: Insights from IPA and fsQCA analysis on shifting trends," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:85:y:2025:i:c:s0969698925000864
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698925000864
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104307?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xialei Duan & Lawal Mohammed Marafa & Chung-Shing Chan & Han Xu & Lewis T. O. Cheung, 2020. "Measuring the Gaps in the Projected Image and Perceived Image of Rural Tourism Destinations in China’s Yangtze River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Joseph F. Hair & Marcelo L.D.S. Gabriel & Dirceu da Silva & Sergio Braga Junior, 2019. "Development and validation of attitudes measurement scales: fundamental and practical aspects," RAUSP Management Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 54(4), pages 490-507, October.
    3. Sharkasi, Nora & De Maeyer, Peter & Lababdi, Houyem chaib & AlMansoori, Salma & Agag, Gomaa, 2025. "A sustainable step forward: Exploring factors influencing the purchase intentions towards remanufactured products using fsQCA," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    4. Dul, Jan, 2016. "Identifying single necessary conditions with NCA and fsQCA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 1516-1523.
    5. Alshehri, Abdullah, 2025. "When the recipe is more important than the ingredients, understanding factors affecting customer loyalty in unmanned convenience store using fsQCA," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    6. Wei Fu & Hongping Zhang & Jeremy E. Whaley & Youn-Kyung Kim, 2023. "Do Consumers Perceive Cultivated Meat as a Sustainable Substitute to Conventional Meat? Assessing the Facilitators and Inhibitors of Cultivated Meat Acceptance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-16, July.
    7. Tóth, Zsófia & Thiesbrummel, Christoph & Henneberg, Stephan C. & Naudé, Peter, 2015. "Understanding configurations of relational attractiveness of the customer firm using fuzzy set QCA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 723-734.
    8. Jinkyung Jenny Kim & Myong Jae Lee & Heesup Han, 2020. "Smart Hotels and Sustainable Consumer Behavior: Testing the Effect of Perceived Performance, Attitude, and Technology Readiness on Word-of-Mouth," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-18, October.
    9. Amar Razzaq & Yifan Tang & Ping Qing, 2021. "Towards Sustainable Diets: Understanding the Cognitive Mechanism of Consumer Acceptance of Biofortified Foods and the Role of Nutrition Information," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-17, January.
    10. Bhattacharyya, Jishnu & Balaji, M.S. & Jiang, Yangyang, 2023. "Causal complexity of sustainable consumption: Unveiling the equifinal causes of purchase intentions of plant-based meat alternatives," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    11. Rana, Jyoti & Paul, Justin, 2017. "Consumer behavior and purchase intention for organic food: A review and research agenda," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 157-165.
    12. Saini, Munish & Prakash, Gyan & Yaqub, Muhammad Zafar & Agarwal, Reeti, 2024. "Why do people purchase plant-based meat products from retail stores? Examining consumer preferences, motivations and drivers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    13. Costa-Font, Montserrat & Gil, José M. & Traill, W. Bruce, 2008. "Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: Review and implications for food policy," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 99-111, April.
    14. Lee, Jiyoung & Yu, Jongsik & Radic, Aleksandar & Han, Heesup, 2024. "Uncovering air traveler purchase behavior: Influence of airline goods product characteristics towards repurchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    15. Golan, Elise H. & Krissoff, Barry & Kuchler, Fred & Calvin, Linda & Nelson, Kenneth E. & Price, Gregory K., 2004. "Traceability In The U.S. Food Supply: Economic Theory And Industry Studies," Agricultural Economic Reports 33939, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    16. Karijn Bonne & Wim Verbeke, 2008. "Religious values informing halal meat production and the control and delivery of halal credence quality," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 25(1), pages 35-47, January.
    17. Jung, Inhaeng Noah & Sharma, Amit & Mattila, Anna S., 2022. "The impact of supermarket credibility on purchase intention of novel food," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Issam Laguir & Rebecca Stekelorum & Lamia Laguir & Raffaele Staglianò, 2021. "Managing corporate social responsibility in the bank sector: A fuzzy and disaggregated approach," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(4), pages 1324-1334, July.
    2. Liang, Xiaoning & Frösén, Johanna, 2020. "Examining the link between marketing controls and firm performance: The mediating effect of market-focused learning capability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 545-556.
    3. Olya, Hossein G.T. & Al-ansi, Amr, 2018. "Risk assessment of halal products and services: Implication for tourism industry," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 279-291.
    4. van der Meer, M. & Schruff-Lim, E.M. & Onwezen, M.C. & Fischer, A.R.H., 2025. "“Planting†meat substitutes in the meat shelf: An online and two supermarket field experiments to explore the effect of placing meat substitutes next to meat," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    5. Cozzio, Claudia & Volgger, Michael & Taplin, Ross & Woodside, Arch G., 2020. "Nurturing tourists’ ethical food consumption: Testing the persuasive strengths of alternative messages in a natural hotel setting," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 268-279.
    6. D'Souza, Clare & Brouwer, Anne Renée & Singaraju, Stephen, 2022. "Veganism: Theory of planned behaviour, ethical concerns and the moderating role of catalytic experiences," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    7. Qigan Shao & Changchang Jiang & James J. H. Liou & Peiyao Su & Ying Yuan & Zhu Dan, 2025. "Exploring the Influencing Factors of Digital Transformation: Empirical Results From SMEs in China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(4), pages 2364-2380, June.
    8. Zhao, Xin & Xu, Yong & Vasa, László & Shahzad, Umer, 2023. "Entrepreneurial ecosystem and urban innovation: Contextual findings in the lens of sustainable development from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    9. Resende Filho, Moises de Andrade, 2007. "A Principal-Agent Model for Investigating Traceability Systems Incentives on Food Safety," 105th Seminar, March 8-10, 2007, Bologna, Italy 7897, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Edward Royzman & Corey Cusimano & Robert F. Leeman, 2017. "What lies beneath? Fear vs. disgust as affective predictors of absolutist opposition to genetically modified food and other new technologies," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 12(5), pages 466-480, September.
    11. Banterle, Alessandro & Stranieri, Stefanella, 2008. "The consequences of voluntary traceability system for supply chain relationships. An application of transaction cost economics," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 560-569, December.
    12. Anxin Xu & Chenwen Wei & Manhua Zheng & Lili Sun & Decong Tang, 2022. "Influence of Perceived Value on Repurchase Intention of Green Agricultural Products: From the Perspective of Multi-Group Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    13. Kentaka Aruga, 2017. "Consumer responses to food produced near the Fukushima nuclear plant," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 19(4), pages 677-690, October.
    14. Henrik Serup Christensen & Lauri Rapeli, 2021. "Immediate rewards or delayed gratification? A conjoint survey experiment of the public’s policy preferences," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(1), pages 63-94, March.
    15. Mathieu Lambotte & Stephane Cara & Valentin Bellassen, 2021. "Correction to: Once a quality-food consumer, always a quality-food consumer? Consumption patterns of organic, label rouge, and geographical indications in French scanner data," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 102(4), pages 479-480, December.
    16. Aleksandra Kowalska & Julia Wojciechowska-Solis & Milena Bieniek & Monika Ratajczyk & Louise Manning, 2023. "Declared non-buyers of organic food: A study of young British and Polish consumer profiles," Ekonomista, Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne, issue 1, pages 28-50.
    17. Rusitha Wijekoon & Mohamad Fazli Sabri, 2021. "Determinants That Influence Green Product Purchase Intention and Behavior: A Literature Review and Guiding Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-40, May.
    18. Sandra Ferreira & Olga Pereira, 2023. "Antecedents of Consumers’ Intention and Behavior to Purchase Organic Food in the Portuguese Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-13, June.
    19. Andy Felix Jităreanu & Mioara Mihăilă & Alexandru-Dragoș Robu & Florin-Daniel Lipșa & Carmen Luiza Costuleanu, 2022. "Dynamic of Ecological Agriculture Certification in Romania Facing the EU Organic Action Plan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, September.
    20. Michelson, Hope & Fairbairn, Anna & Ellison, Brenna & Maertens, Annemie & Manyong, Victor, 2021. "Misperceived quality: Fertilizer in Tanzania," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:85:y:2025:i:c:s0969698925000864. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.