IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i10p4141-d1395202.html

How Does Environmental Protection Tax Affect Urban Energy Consumption in China? New Insights from the Intensity Difference-in-Differences Model

Author

Listed:
  • Xianpu Xu

    (School of Business, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China)

  • Lingyun Huang

    (School of Business, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China)

Abstract

Against the backdrop of accelerating environmental protection and resource conservation, it is of great significance to achieve energy conservation and sustainable growth. In this context, by collecting panel data from 284 cities in China from 2009 to 2021, this paper constructs an intensity difference-in-differences (I-DID) model, using the implementation of China’s environmental protection law in 2018 as an event shock, to explore the impact of environmental protection tax (EPT) on urban energy consumption. The results indicate that EPT significantly reduces urban energy consumption. After several robustness tests, the estimation results shown above still hold. The mechanism test reveals that EPT mainly reduces energy consumption by promoting urban industrial upgrading, economic openness, and technological innovation. In addition, the heterogeneity test shows that EPT has a greater impact on energy consumption in central and western cities, small and medium-sized cities, non-resource-based cities, and non-old industrial bases. Therefore, to fully improve the positive effect of EPT on urban energy consumption, we suggest increasing energy efficiency, promoting the green transformation of energy structures, enhancing the ability to open-up and innovate, and improving a differentiated regional EPT management system.

Suggested Citation

  • Xianpu Xu & Lingyun Huang, 2024. "How Does Environmental Protection Tax Affect Urban Energy Consumption in China? New Insights from the Intensity Difference-in-Differences Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-26, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:4141-:d:1395202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/10/4141/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/10/4141/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abdullah, Sabah & Morley, Bruce, 2014. "Environmental taxes and economic growth: Evidence from panel causality tests," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 27-33.
    2. Blohmke, Julian & Kemp, René & Türkeli, Serdar, 2016. "Disentangling the causal structure behind environmental regulation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 174-190.
    3. Ashenfelter, Orley C, 1978. "Estimating the Effect of Training Programs on Earnings," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 60(1), pages 47-57, February.
    4. Alina Zaharia & Maria Claudia Diaconeasa & Laura Brad & Georgiana-Raluca Lădaru & Corina Ioanăș, 2019. "Factors Influencing Energy Consumption in the Context of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-28, August.
    5. Xianpu Xu & Yuchen Song, 2023. "Is There a Conflict between Automation and Environment? Implications of Artificial Intelligence for Carbon Emissions in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.
    6. Lee, Sanghoon & Oh, Dae-Won, 2015. "Economic growth and the environment in China: Empirical evidence using prefecture level data," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 73-85.
    7. Li, Jianglong & Yang, Lisha & Long, Houyin, 2018. "Climatic impacts on energy consumption: Intensive and extensive margins," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 332-343.
    8. Mengxin Wang & Gaoke Liao & Yanling Li, 2021. "The Relationship between Environmental Regulation, Pollution and Corporate Environmental Responsibility," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-13, July.
    9. Jia, Ruining & Shao, Shuai & Yang, Lili, 2021. "High-speed rail and CO2 emissions in urban China: A spatial difference-in-differences approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    10. Beattie, Graham & Ding, Iza & La Nauze, Andrea, 2022. "Is there an energy efficiency gap in China? Evidence from an information experiment," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    11. Chen, Wenhui & Lei, Yalin, 2018. "The impacts of renewable energy and technological innovation on environment-energy-growth nexus: New evidence from a panel quantile regression," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 1-14.
    12. Xu, Yong & Li, Shanshan & Zhou, Xiaoxiao & Shahzad, Umer & Zhao, Xin, 2022. "How environmental regulations affect the development of green finance: Recent evidence from polluting firms in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 917-926.
    13. Megan Heckert & Jeremy Mennis, 2012. "The Economic Impact of Greening Urban Vacant Land: A Spatial Difference-In-Differences Analysis," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(12), pages 3010-3027, December.
    14. Li, Menghan & Liu, Xiaoxiao & Yang, Mian, 2024. "Analyzing the regional inequality of renewable energy consumption and its driving factors: Evidence from China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    15. Cortes, Gustavo S. & Gao, George P. & Silva, Felipe B.G. & Song, Zhaogang, 2022. "Unconventional monetary policy and disaster risk: Evidence from the subprime and COVID–19 crises," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    16. Wu, Haitao & Xue, Yan & Hao, Yu & Ren, Siyu, 2021. "How does internet development affect energy-saving and emission reduction? Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    17. Islam, Md. Monirul & Irfan, Muhammad & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Vo, Xuan Vinh, 2022. "Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption in Bangladesh: The relative influencing profiles of economic factors, urbanization, physical infrastructure and institutional quality," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1130-1149.
    18. Chen, Shawn Xiaoguang, 2017. "The effect of a fiscal squeeze on tax enforcement: Evidence from a natural experiment in China," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 62-76.
    19. Stefan Ambec & Mark A. Cohen & Stewart Elgie & Paul Lanoie, 2013. "The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness?," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 7(1), pages 2-22, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li Chen & Hao Cheng & Fujia Li & Zihan Song, 2025. "Can Digital Infrastructure Construction Promote Energy Conservation in Resource-Based Cities? Evidence from the “Broadband China” Strategy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-25, September.
    2. Wu, Xiuling & Sun, Xueli, 2025. "Environmental protection tax and green low-carbon development," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    3. Xianpu Xu & Yiqi Fu & Qiqi Meng & Jiarui Hu, 2025. "Identifying the Impact of Climate Policy on Urban Carbon Emissions: New Insights from China’s Environmental Protection Tax Reform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-32, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xianpu Xu & Yiqi Fu & Qiqi Meng & Jiarui Hu, 2025. "Identifying the Impact of Climate Policy on Urban Carbon Emissions: New Insights from China’s Environmental Protection Tax Reform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-32, September.
    2. Wang, Lili & Pang, Jun, 2025. "Assessing the impact of climate mitigation technology and environmental tax on renewable energy development: A dynamic threshold approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    3. Yu, Wantao & Ramanathan, Ramakrishnan & Nath, Prithwiraj, 2017. "Environmental pressures and performance: An analysis of the roles of environmental innovation strategy and marketing capability," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 160-169.
    4. Jiafeng Gu, 2021. "Effects of Patent Policy on Outputs and Commercialization of Academic Patents in China: A Spatial Difference-in-Differences Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Gao, Kang & Yuan, Yijun, 2022. "Government intervention, spillover effect and urban innovation performance: Empirical evidence from national innovative city pilot policy in China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    6. Tong Liu & Ali Imran, 2024. "Green Economy Advancement: Evaluating the Role of Digitalization, Technological Innovation, and Natural Resources in Shaping Environmental Quality Amid Globalizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-22, December.
    7. Chen, Yu & Wang, Yuandi & Zhao, Changyi, 2023. "How do high-speed rails influence city carbon emissions?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    8. Yang, Mengyang & Liu, Yawen & Wang, Jingle & Tang, Xiaobin, 2025. "How does digital trade development affect carbon emissions? Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1475-1491.
    9. Xiaodong Yang & Hayat Khan & Itbar Khan & Asif Razzaq, 2025. "Assessing the Impact Mechanism of Renewable Energy Technology Innovation on Industrial Green Transformation in China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(3), pages 13098-13120, September.
    10. Wang, Haijian & Zhou, Shaojie & Zhang, Penglong, 2024. "Clean heating and clean air: Evidence from the coal-to-gas program in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    11. Sun, Yanming & Shen, Simiao & Zhou, Chuanyu, 2023. "Does the pilot emissions trading system in China promote innovation? Evidence based on green technology innovation in the energy sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    12. Hassan, Mahmoud & Oueslati, Walid & Rousselière, Damien, 2020. "Environmental taxes, reforms and economic growth: an empirical analysis of panel data," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 44(3).
    13. Dagestani, Abd Alwahed & Shang, Yuping & Schneider, Nicolas & Cifuentes-Faura, Javier & Zhao, Xin, 2025. "Corrigendum to “Porter in China: A quasi-experimental view of market-based environmental regulation effects on firm performance” [Energy Economics Volume 126, October 2023, 106966]," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    14. Zi Hui Yin & Wei Ping Zeng, 2024. "Path to sustainable development: Can industrial intelligence and technological innovation balance economic growth and environmental quality in China?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(5), pages 4486-4504, October.
    15. Miaomiao Tao & Pierre Failler & Lim Thye Goh & Wee Yeap Lau & Hanghang Dong & Liang Xie, 2022. "Quantify the Effect of China’s Emission Trading Scheme on Low-carbon Eco-efficiency: Evidence from China’s 283 Cities," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 1-33, August.
    16. Sahu, Anjan Kumar & Mahalik, Mantu Kumar, 2025. "The linkage between income inequality, opportunity and renewable energy demand: Panel evidence from OECD economies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    17. Zhang, Yijun & Song, Yi, 2022. "Tax rebates, technological innovation and sustainable development: Evidence from Chinese micro-level data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    18. Irfan, Muhammad & Razzaq, Asif & Sharif, Arshian & Yang, Xiaodong, 2022. "Influence mechanism between green finance and green innovation: Exploring regional policy intervention effects in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    19. Pan, Minjie & Zhao, Xin & lv, Kangjuan & Rosak-Szyrocka, Joanna & Mentel, Grzegorz & Truskolaski, Tadeusz, 2023. "Internet development and carbon emission-reduction in the era of digitalization: Where will resource-based cities go?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    20. Zhu, Chen & Lee, Chien-Chiang, 2022. "The effects of low-carbon pilot policy on technological innovation: Evidence from prefecture-level data in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:4141-:d:1395202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.