IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4258-d1651392.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining Diverse Investors in the Clean Energy and Environmental Technology Sector: A Network Analysis from Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Hiroyoshi Iwata

    (Department of Technology Management for Innovation, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan
    Institute for Future Initiatives, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan)

  • Kotaro Kubo

    (Department of Systems Innovation, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan)

  • Hiroko Yamano

    (Institute for Future Initiatives, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan)

  • Masahiro Sugiyama

    (Institute for Future Initiatives, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan)

  • Kenji Tanaka

    (Department of Technology Management for Innovation, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan)

Abstract

Startups in the clean energy and environmental technology (CEET) sector can develop sustainable innovations, but mobilizing private finance has been difficult. As the venture capital (VC) investment model was found to be not well-suited for the CEET startups, diverse types of investors have received more attention. However, since previous studies have been dominated by a VC-centric perspective in the US and have overlooked collaborative relationships, the roles of various CEET investors have not been systematically analyzed. This study aims to analyze the diverse investors in the CEET investor network formed through co-investment syndication, using Japan as an underexplored regional context. Based on Japan’s comprehensive data from 2008 to 2022, this study examines the evolution, structure, and communities of the network. The analysis identified the development stages of the investor network: the formation stage (2008–2012), the expansion and diversification stage (2013–2017), and the stable growth stage (2018–2022). The results confirmed the strong influence of VCs, while a community analysis suggested the bridging role of governmental venture capital. The findings based on the CEET investor network contribute to expanding both the theoretical understanding and practical implications for overcoming the financing difficulties of CEET startups to address the climate change crisis.

Suggested Citation

  • Hiroyoshi Iwata & Kotaro Kubo & Hiroko Yamano & Masahiro Sugiyama & Kenji Tanaka, 2025. "Examining Diverse Investors in the Clean Energy and Environmental Technology Sector: A Network Analysis from Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4258-:d:1651392
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4258/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4258/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yael V. Hochberg & Alexander Ljungqvist & Yang Lu, 2007. "Whom You Know Matters: Venture Capital Networks and Investment Performance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 62(1), pages 251-301, February.
    2. Du, Qunyang & Li, Zhongyuan & Du, Min & Yang, Tianle, 2024. "Government venture capital and innovation performance in alternative energy production: The moderating role of environmental regulation and capital market activity," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    3. Lockett, Andy & Wright, Mike, 2001. "The syndication of venture capital investments," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 375-390, October.
    4. Anna Goldstein & Claudia Doblinger & Erin Baker & Laura Díaz Anadón, 2020. "Patenting and business outcomes for cleantech startups funded by the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 5(10), pages 803-810, October.
    5. Anna Goldstein & Claudia Doblinger & Erin Baker & Laura Díaz Anadón, 2020. "Author Correction: Patenting and business outcomes for cleantech startups funded by the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 5(11), pages 937-937, November.
    6. van den Heuvel, Matthias & Popp, David, 2023. "The role of venture capital and governments in clean energy: lessons from the first cleantech bubble," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    7. Gaddy, Benjamin E. & Sivaram, Varun & Jones, Timothy B. & Wayman, Libby, 2017. "Venture Capital and Cleantech: The wrong model for energy innovation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 385-395.
    8. Michael Migendt & Friedemann Polzin & Florian Schock & Florian A Täube & Paschen von Flotow, 2017. "Beyond venture capital: an exploratory study of the finance-innovation-policy nexus in cleantech," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 26(6), pages 973-996.
    9. Shikhar Ghosh & Ramana Nanda, 2010. "Venture Capital Investment in the Clean Energy Sector," Harvard Business School Working Papers 11-020, Harvard Business School.
    10. Jin, Yonghong & Zhang, Qi & Li, Sai-Ping, 2016. "Topological properties and community detection of venture capital network: Evidence from China," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 442(C), pages 300-311.
    11. Christian Hopp, 2010. "When do venture capitalists collaborate? Evidence on the driving forces of venture capital syndication," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 417-431, November.
    12. Ruling Zhang & Killian J. McCarthy & Xiao Wang & Zengrui Tian, 2021. "How Does Network Structure Impact Follow-On Financing through Syndication? Evidence from the Renewable Energy Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Harilal Krishna & Yash Kashyap & Dwarkeshwar Dutt & Ambuj D. Sagar & Abhishek Malhotra, 2023. "Understanding India’s low-carbon energy technology startup landscape," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 94-105, January.
    2. Bendig, D. & Brüss, L. & Degen, F., 2025. "Entrepreneurship in the renewable energy sector: A systematic literature review of types, characteristics, and sustainability impacts," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    3. Eric Nasica & Dominique Torre & Dominique Dufour, 2011. "Syndication in private equity industry: comparing the strategies of independent and captive venture capitalists," Post-Print halshs-00720785, HAL.
    4. Polzin, Friedemann & Sanders, Mark, 2020. "How to finance the transition to low-carbon energy in Europe?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    5. Dimitris Christopoulos & Stefan Koeppl & Monika Köppl-Turyna, 2022. "Syndication networks and company survival: evidence from European venture capital deals," Venture Capital, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 105-135, April.
    6. van den Heuvel, Matthias & Popp, David, 2023. "The role of venture capital and governments in clean energy: lessons from the first cleantech bubble," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    7. Chen Zhang & Xinghua Dang & Tao Peng & Chaokai Xue, 2019. "Dynamic Evolution of Venture Capital Network in Clean Energy Industries Based on STERGM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-25, November.
    8. Köppl-Turyna, Monika & Köppl, Stefan & Christopulos, Dimitris, 2023. "How to support cleantech start-ups? Lessons from European venture-capital deals," Research Papers 25, EcoAustria – Institute for Economic Research.
    9. Matthias van den Heuvel & David Popp, 2022. "The Role of Venture Capital and Governments in Clean Energy: Lessons from the First Cleantech Bubble," CESifo Working Paper Series 9684, CESifo.
    10. Alperovych, Yan & Hübner, Georges & Lobet, Fabrice, 2015. "How does governmental versus private venture capital backing affect a firm's efficiency? Evidence from Belgium," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 508-525.
    11. Yuejia Zhang, 2018. "Gain or pain? New evidence on mixed syndication between governmental and private venture capital firms in China," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 995-1031, December.
    12. Maiti, Moinak, 2022. "Does development in venture capital investments influence green growth?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    13. Lijiali Huang & Xueqiong Wang & Yanwen Sheng & Jinli Zhao, 2025. "Impact of Venture Capital on Urban Carbon Emissions: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-25, January.
    14. Johannes Wallmeroth & Peter Wirtz & Alexander Peter Groh, 2017. "Institutional Seed Financing, Angel Financing, and Crowdfunding of Entrepreneurial Ventures: A Literature Review," Working Papers hal-01527999, HAL.
    15. Iqbal Muhammad & Stéphanie Serve, 2025. "Performance of government venture capital (GVC): an Asian perspective," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-34, December.
    16. Nicolas Bédu & Olivier Brossard & Matthieu Montalban, 2024. "Proximity relations and the fate of VC-backed startups: Evidence from a global 33-year-long dataset," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 429-464, April.
    17. Butticè, Vincenzo & Colombo, Massimo G. & Fumagalli, Elena & Orsenigo, Carlotta, 2019. "Green oriented crowdfunding campaigns: Their characteristics and diffusion in different institutional settings," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 85-97.
    18. Sinha, Kanhaiya K. & Goel, Sanjay & Nguyen, Nga, 2024. "Differentiating between successful VC exit strategies: The influences of time-since-first-funding-received by the venture and strength of US VCs in cross-border syndicates," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    19. Miguel Meuleman & Mike Wright & Sophie Manigart & Andy Lockett, 2009. "Private Equity Syndication: Agency Costs, Reputation and Collaboration," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(5-6), pages 616-644.
    20. Tang, Xiaobo & Yao, Xingyuan & Dai, Ruyi & Wang, Qian, 2024. "Does green matter for crowdfunding? International evidence," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4258-:d:1651392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.