IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i8p3495-d1380365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can the Top Management Team’s Environmental Attention Promote Corporate Green Innovation?

Author

Listed:
  • Ying Wang

    (School of Government, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Yiyang Liu

    (School of Government, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

Abstract

Enterprise green innovation (GI) is the micro foundation for coping with the challenges of the ecological environment and achieving sustainable development. The top management team’s environmental attention (TMTEA) is crucial for guiding environmental strategy and resource investment and promoting enterprise transformation towards sustainable development and GI. Drawing on an attention-based view (ABV) and lifecycle theory, this study analyzes data from 1722 listed companies in China (2010–2021) to examine TMTEA’s impact on corporate GI and its regulatory mechanisms. The results show the following: (1) TMTEA promotes enterprise GI, particularly in the growth and decline stages. (2) Government environmental attention negatively moderates TMTEA’s influence on corporate GI. (3) Compensation and equity incentives positively moderate the TMTEA–GI relationship. These insights enrich executive attention and GI literature, aiding decision-makers and enterprises in formulating effective GI strategies. Limitations include reliance on Chinese-listed company data, potentially limiting generalizability, and the need for qualitative research to deepen understanding of management processes and governance mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying Wang & Yiyang Liu, 2024. "Can the Top Management Team’s Environmental Attention Promote Corporate Green Innovation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-22, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3495-:d:1380365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3495/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3495/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei, Jia & Wen, Jun & Wang, Xiao-Yang & Ma, Jie & Chang, Chun-Ping, 2023. "Green innovation, natural extreme events, and energy transition: Evidence from Asia-Pacific economies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    2. Rennings, Klaus, 2000. "Redefining innovation -- eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 319-332, February.
    3. Long Xue & Xuemang Zhang, 2022. "Can Digital Financial Inclusion Promote Green Innovation in Heavily Polluting Companies?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-14, June.
    4. William Ocasio, 1997. "Towards An Attention‐Based View Of The Firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(S1), pages 187-206, July.
    5. Kim, Bongsun & Kim, Eonsoo & Foss, Nicolai J., 2016. "Balancing absorptive capacity and inbound open innovation for sustained innovative performance: An attention-based view," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 80-90.
    6. Michael Lubatkin & Zeki Simsek & Yan Ling & John F. Veiga, 2006. "Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms : The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration," Post-Print hal-02311781, HAL.
    7. Alessandra Catozzella & Marco Vivarelli, 2016. "The possible adverse impact of innovation subsidies: some evidence from Italy," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 351-368, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Suming Wu & Jiahao Cheng & Xiuhao Ding, 2025. "Impact of the Top Management Teams’ Environmental Attention on Dual Green Innovation in Chinese Enterprises: The Context of Government Environmental Regulation and Absorptive Capacity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-33, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yongbo Sun & Hong Sun, 2021. "Executives’ Environmental Awareness and Eco-Innovation: An Attention-Based View," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Runar J. Solberg, 2023. "Incorporating the choice of centralized vs. decentralized resource allocation into sustainability frameworks," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 12(4), pages 239-244, December.
    3. Ardito, Lorenzo & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio, 2017. "Breadth of external knowledge sourcing and product innovation: The moderating role of strategic human resource practices," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 261-272.
    4. Lee, Jangwook & Chung, Jiyoon, 2022. "Women in top management teams and their impact on innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    5. Abdelfeteh Bitat, 2018. "Environmental regulation and eco-innovation: the Porter hypothesis refined," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 8(3), pages 299-321, September.
    6. Mário A.P.M. Silva, 2024. "Substitutability in R&D and Open Innovation: Why Competing Firms Face a Paradox of Openness?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 5204-5229, June.
    7. Christopher Kurzhals & Lorenz Graf‐Vlachy & Andreas König, 2020. "Strategic leadership and technological innovation: A comprehensive review and research agenda," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 437-464, November.
    8. Yuan, Dongliang & Wu, Xinmei & Shang, Duo & Pan, Lingling, 2025. "How government environmental attention influences corporate green innovation: A chain mediating model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    9. Barrett, Gillian & Dooley, Lawrence & Bogue, Joe, 2021. "Open innovation within high-tech SMEs: A study of the entrepreneurial founder's influence on open innovation practices," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    10. Ardito, Lorenzo & Raby, Simon & Albino, Vito & Bertoldi, Bernardo, 2021. "The duality of digital and environmental orientations in the context of SMEs: Implications for innovation performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 44-56.
    11. Xie, En & Lin, Jiaxin & Zou, Honghui, 2025. "How does outward FDI in developed economies affect the R&D of emerging economy firms? An attention-based view," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1).
    12. Shuang Huang & Abraham Y. Nahm & Zengji Song, 2023. "Government subsidies of new energy vehicle industry and enterprise innovation: Moderating role of chief executive officers' technical background," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(4), pages 2137-2147, June.
    13. Bob Walrave & A Georges L Romme & Kim E van Oorschot & Fred Langerak, 2017. "Managerial attention to exploitation versus exploration: toward a dynamic perspective on ambidexterity," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 26(6), pages 1145-1160.
    14. Liyun Liu & Huaibo Dong & Lei Qi, 2025. "How Directors with Green Backgrounds Drive Corporate Green Innovation: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-36, July.
    15. Max M. Weber & Peter Kokott, 2024. "Organizational Resilience and the Attention-Based View of the Firm—Empirical Evidence from German SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-24, May.
    16. Zhang, Feng & Zhu, Lei, 2021. "Social media strategic capability, organizational unlearning, and disruptive innovation of SMEs: The moderating roles of TMT heterogeneity and environmental dynamism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 183-193.
    17. Guoyou Qi & Hailiang Zou & Xuemei Xie, 2020. "Governmental inspection and green innovation: Examining the role of environmental capability and institutional development," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1774-1785, July.
    18. Stephan Vachon & Sara Hajmohammad, 2016. "Supply chain uncertainty and environmental management," Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 77-89, December.
    19. Xu, Jingchang & Zhang, Huixuan & Wu, Wuqing, 2023. "One novel mixed ownership reform and green innovation in private firms: Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    20. Lai, Kee-hung & Feng, Yunting & Zhu, Qinghua, 2023. "Digital transformation for green supply chain innovation in manufacturing operations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3495-:d:1380365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.