IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i21p9522-d1512274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Digitalization Imperative: Unveiling the Impacts of Eco-Industry Integration on Sectoral Growth and Transformation

Author

Listed:
  • Xingyi Li

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Changxin Liu

    (Institutes of Policy and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China)

  • Jiaxin Zhou

    (School of Economics, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100070, China)

  • Jingjing Yan

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Tianle Liu

    (School of Economics and Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China)

Abstract

In the context of the global shift toward sustainable development, ecosystem-based ecological industries have become a critical area of focus for achieving green economic transformation and promoting the harmonious development of both society and the environment. This paper aims to explore the impact of industrial integration on the progression of ecological production within the framework of digitalization, with a particular emphasis on key sectors such as agriculture, forestry, and tourism. Utilizing multi-group data from 284 cities spanning the period 2011 to 2020, the study establishes a relationship between industrial integration and the growth of ecological industries, employing a two-way fixed effects model for analysis. The results demonstrate that industrial integration within ecological sectors significantly fosters sectoral development through two main mechanisms: the extension of industrial value chains and cross-sectoral synergies. Moreover, in the era of the digital economy, digitalization plays a pivotal role in facilitating the integrated development of ecological industries. The study further identifies that digital technology, digital finance, and digital expertise serve as mediating factors in this integration process. It is recommended that future initiatives focus on leveraging digital tools to enhance the integration of ecological industries, thereby advancing industrial growth. Furthermore, China is encouraged to continue promoting the integrated development of ecological industries by supporting the expansion of industrial value chains and fostering intersectoral cooperation. Simultaneously, the role of digitalization should be emphasized, with particular attention to the incorporation of relevant digital components into the industrial integration process moving forward.

Suggested Citation

  • Xingyi Li & Changxin Liu & Jiaxin Zhou & Jingjing Yan & Tianle Liu, 2024. "The Digitalization Imperative: Unveiling the Impacts of Eco-Industry Integration on Sectoral Growth and Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-34, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9522-:d:1512274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9522/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9522/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Doganova, Liliana & Eyquem-Renault, Marie, 2009. "What do business models do?: Innovation devices in technology entrepreneurship," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 1559-1570, December.
    2. Yafei Wang & Huanhuan Huang & Jing Liu & Jin Ren & Tingting Gao & Xinrui Chen, 2023. "Rural Industrial Integration’s Impact on Agriculture GTFP Growth: Influence Mechanism and Empirical Test Using China as an Example," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-21, February.
    3. Rosenberg, Nathan, 1963. "Technological Change in the Machine Tool Industry, 1840–1910," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(4), pages 414-443, December.
    4. Yingji Liu & Manchao Zhang & Qun Cao & Erhong Wang & Bingkun Zou, 2023. "Can Integration of Agriculture and Tourism Promote Rural Green Development?—Empirical Evidence from 152 Cities in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Gwendolyn K. Lee, 2007. "The significance of network resources in the race to enter emerging product markets: the convergence of telephony communications and computer networking, 1989–2001," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 17-37, January.
    6. Geum, Youngjung & Kim, Moon-Soo & Lee, Sungjoo, 2016. "How industrial convergence happens: A taxonomical approach based on empirical evidences," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 112-120.
    7. Cameron, Gavin & Proudman, James & Redding, Stephen, 2005. "Technological convergence, R&D, trade and productivity growth," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 775-807, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dai, Jiapeng & Mehmood, Usman & Nassani, Abdelmohsen A., 2025. "Empowering sustainability through energy efficiency, green innovations, and the sharing economy: Insights from G7 economies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sick, Nathalie & Preschitschek, Nina & Leker, Jens & Bröring, Stefanie, 2019. "A new framework to assess industry convergence in high technology environments," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 84, pages 48-58.
    2. Sick, Nathalie & Bröring, Stefanie, 2022. "Exploring the research landscape of convergence from a TIM perspective: A review and research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    3. Zhao, Shengchao & Zeng, Deming & Li, Jian & Feng, Ke & Wang, Yao, 2023. "Quantity or quality: The roles of technology and science convergence on firm innovation performance," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    4. Zhou, Yuan & Dong, Fang & Kong, Dejing & Liu, Yufei, 2019. "Unfolding the convergence process of scientific knowledge for the early identification of emerging technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 205-220.
    5. Chunbo Zhou & Marios Sotiriadis, 2021. "Exploring and Evaluating the Impact of ICTs on Culture and Tourism Industries’ Convergence: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, October.
    6. Ohlert, Simon & Laibach, Natalie & Harms, Rainer & Bröring, Stefanie, 2025. "Opportunity recognition in the tension field of knowledge and learning: The case of converging industries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    7. Richard Harris & John Moffat, 2011. "R&D, Innovation and Exporting," SERC Discussion Papers 0073, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    8. repec:use:tkiwps:1818 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Mark Knell & Simone Vannuccini, 2022. "Tools and concepts for understanding disruptive technological change after Schumpeter," Jena Economics Research Papers 2022-005, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    10. Seongkyoon Jeong & Jong-Chan Kim & Jae Young Choi, 2015. "Technology convergence: What developmental stage are we in?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 104(3), pages 841-871, September.
    11. repec:use:tkiwps:3232 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Dejing Kong & Jianzhong Yang & Lingfeng Li, 2020. "Early identification of technological convergence in numerical control machine tool: a deep learning approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 1983-2009, December.
    13. Tim Benijts, 2014. "A Business Sustainability Model for Government Corporations. A Belgian Case Study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 204-216, March.
    14. Aleksandra Parteka & Joanna Wolszczak-Derlacz, 2013. "The Impact of Trade Integration with the European Union on Productivity in a Posttransition Economy: The Case of Polish Manufacturing Sectors," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(2), pages 84-104, March.
    15. Godart, Frédéric & Pistilli, Luca, 2024. "The multifaceted concept of disruption: A typology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    16. Sofia Patsali, 2019. "Opening the black box of university-suppliers' co-invention: some field study evidence," Working Papers of BETA 2019-46, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    17. Palo, Teea & Åkesson, Maria & Löfberg, Nina, 2019. "Servitization as business model contestation: A practice approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 486-496.
    18. Richard Dion & Robert Fay, 2008. "Understanding Productivity: A Review of Recent Technical Research," Discussion Papers 08-3, Bank of Canada.
    19. Parrado, Ramiro & De Cian, Enrica, 2014. "Technology spillovers embodied in international trade: Intertemporal, regional and sectoral effects in a global CGE framework," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 76-89.
    20. Lehoux, P. & Daudelin, G. & Williams-Jones, B. & Denis, J.-L. & Longo, C., 2014. "How do business model and health technology design influence each other? Insights from a longitudinal case study of three academic spin-offs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 1025-1038.
    21. Emmanuel Chavez, 2020. "The Effects of Public R&D Subsidies on Private R&D Activities in Mexico," Working Papers halshs-02355106, HAL.
    22. Ugur, Mehmet & Trushin, Eshref & Solomon, Edna & Guidi, Francesco, 2016. "R&D and productivity in OECD firms and industries: A hierarchical meta-regression analysis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(10), pages 2069-2086.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9522-:d:1512274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.