IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i20p8903-d1498587.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Thermal Comfort Conditions in the Working Environments of Seasonal Agricultural Workers in Csa Koppen Climate Type

Author

Listed:
  • Nihat Karakuş

    (Vocational School of Serik G-S. Sural, Akdeniz University, 07500 Antalya, Türkiye)

  • Serdar Selim

    (Faculty of Science, Akdeniz University, 07070 Antalya, Türkiye)

  • Ceren Selim

    (Faculty of Architecture, Akdeniz University, 07070 Antalya, Türkiye)

  • Rifat Olgun

    (Vocational School of Serik G-S. Sural, Akdeniz University, 07500 Antalya, Türkiye)

  • Ahmet Koç

    (Diyarbakır Vocational School of Technical Sciences, Dicle University, 21200 Diyarbakır, Türkiye)

  • Zeynep R. Ardahanlıoğlu

    (Vocational School of Fethiye Ali Sıtkı Mefharet Kocman, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, 48000 Fethiye, Türkiye)

  • Sülem Şenyiğit Doğan

    (Diyarbakır Vocational School of Technical Sciences, Dicle University, 21200 Diyarbakır, Türkiye)

  • Nisa Ertoy

    (Vocational School of Technical Sciences, Akdeniz University, 07070 Antalya, Türkiye)

Abstract

This study focuses on determining the thermal comfort conditions of seasonal agricultural workers during the hot periods of the year when agricultural production is intense in the Aksu/Türkiye region, which is characterized by the Csa climate type according to the Köppen–Geiger climate classification. In this study, the thermal comfort conditions of seasonal agricultural workers working on open farmlands were evaluated in ten-day, monthly, and seasonal periods for 6 months between 5:00 and 21:00 h using the modified Physiological Equivalent Temperature (mPET) index in the Rayman Pro software according to their activity energy during work. The results of the study reveal that increased activity energy leads to a decrease in thermal comfort conditions of agricultural workers, mPET values of agricultural workers engaged in soil cultivation (Group II) are 2.1 to 2.9 °C higher than the mPET values of workers engaged in plant care and harvesting (Group I), and the agricultural workers in Group II are exposed to more heat stress. The thermal comfort conditions of agricultural workers in Group I deteriorate between 09:00 and 16:00 h with mPET values between 34.1 and 35.3 °C and those of agricultural workers in Group II deteriorate between 08:00 and 17:00 h with mPET values between 34.3 and 37.7 °C. In this context, the daily comfortable working time in the morning and afternoon was found to be 9 h for Group I and 7 h for Group II. Overall, determining the comfortable working hours of agricultural workers in regions with different climate types in future studies will be an important resource for decision-makers in developing strategies to protect the health and increase the productivity of agricultural workers.

Suggested Citation

  • Nihat Karakuş & Serdar Selim & Ceren Selim & Rifat Olgun & Ahmet Koç & Zeynep R. Ardahanlıoğlu & Sülem Şenyiğit Doğan & Nisa Ertoy, 2024. "Evaluation of Thermal Comfort Conditions in the Working Environments of Seasonal Agricultural Workers in Csa Koppen Climate Type," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8903-:d:1498587
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8903/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8903/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leonidas G. Ioannou & Lydia Tsoutsoubi & Konstantinos Mantzios & Giorgos Gkikas & Jacob F. Piil & Petros C. Dinas & Sean R. Notley & Glen P. Kenny & Lars Nybo & Andreas D. Flouris, 2021. "The Impacts of Sun Exposure on Worker Physiology and Cognition: Multi-Country Evidence and Interventions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-26, July.
    2. Peng Zhu & Jennifer Burney & Jinfeng Chang & Zhenong Jin & Nathaniel D. Mueller & Qinchuan Xin & Jialu Xu & Le Yu & David Makowski & Philippe Ciais, 2022. "Warming reduces global agricultural production by decreasing cropping frequency and yields," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 12(11), pages 1016-1023, November.
    3. Hertel, Thomas & Cicero Zanetti De Lima, 2020. "Climate Impacts on Agriculture: Searching for Keys under the Streetlight," GTAP Working Papers 6155, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.
    4. Chen, Shuai & Gong, Binlei, 2021. "Response and adaptation of agriculture to climate change: Evidence from China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    5. Jerry L. Hatfield & John Antle & Karen A. Garrett & Roberto Cesar Izaurralde & Terry Mader & Elizabeth Marshall & Mark Nearing & G. Philip Robertson & Lewis Ziska, 2020. "Indicators of climate change in agricultural systems," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 163(4), pages 1719-1732, December.
    6. Rietta S. Wagoner & Nicolas I. López-Gálvez & Jill G. de Zapien & Stephanie C. Griffin & Robert A. Canales & Paloma I. Beamer, 2020. "An Occupational Heat Stress and Hydration Assessment of Agricultural Workers in North Mexico," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-13, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Le Sun & Congmou Zhu & Shaofeng Yuan & Lixia Yang & Shan He & Wuyan Li, 2022. "Exploring the Impact of Digital Inclusive Finance on Agricultural Carbon Emission Performance in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Yan Chen & Xiaohong Chen & Hongshan Ai & Xiaoqing Tan, 2022. "Temperature and Migration Intention: Evidence from the Unified National Graduate Entrance Examination in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-23, August.
    3. Laura J. Elstub & Shimra J. Fine & Karl E. Zelik, 2021. "Exoskeletons and Exosuits Could Benefit from Mode-Switching Body Interfaces That Loosen/Tighten to Improve Thermal Comfort," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Dai, Zhifeng & Zhu, Haoyang, 2024. "Climate policy uncertainty and urban green total factor productivity: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    5. Jiao, Xiyu & Pretis, Felix & Schwarz, Moritz, 2024. "Testing for coefficient distortion due to outliers with an application to the economic impacts of climate change," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 239(1).
    6. Mevlude Akbulut‐Yuksel & Naci Mocan & Semih Tumen & Belgi Turan, 2024. "The crime effect of refugees," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(2), pages 472-508, March.
    7. Zhang, Qizheng & Qian, Zesen & Wang, Shuo & Yuan, Lingran & Gong, Binlei, 2022. "Productivity drain or productivity gain? The effect of new technology adoption in the oilfield market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    8. Zesen Qian & Lingran Yuan & Shuo Wang & Qizheng Zhang & Binlei Gong, 2021. "Epidemics, Convergence, and Common Prosperity: Evidence from China," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 29(6), pages 117-138, November.
    9. repec:ags:aaea22:335522 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Neubauer, Florian & Wall, Alan & Njuki, Eric & Bravo-Ureta, Boris, 2023. "Climatic Effects and Farming Performance: An Overview of Selected Studies," 2023 Inter-Conference Symposium, April 19-21, 2023, Montevideo, Uruguay 338540, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Liu, Ziheng, 2025. "CO2-driven crop comparative advantage and planting decision: Evidence from US cropland," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    12. Mkaddem, Chamseddine & Mahjoubi, Soufiane, 2022. "Climate change and its impact on water consumption in Tunisia: Evidence from ARDL approach," MPRA Paper 115658, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Dec 2022.
    13. Soyoka Okamura & Ken Miura & Chieko Umetsu, 2025. "Do Zambian farmers manage climate risks?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(2), pages 440-486, May.
    14. Ding, Yugang & Xu, Jiangmin, 2023. "Global vulnerability of agricultural commodities to climate risk: Evidence from satellite data," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 669-687.
    15. Luis Guillermo Becerra-Valbuena, 2021. "Droughts and Agricultural Adaptation to Climate Change," Working Papers halshs-03420657, HAL.
    16. Wang, Teng & Yi, Fujin & Liu, Huilin & Wu, Ximing & Zhong, Funing, 2021. "Can Agricultural Mechanization Have a Mitigation Effect on China's Yield Variability?," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315098, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Ren, Xiaohang & An, Yaning & Jin, Chenglu & Yan, Cheng, 2024. "Weathering the policy storm: How climate strategy volatility shapes corporate total factor productivity," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    18. Nooshin Karimi Alavijeh & Narges Salehnia, 2024. "Climate change, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and agricultural development in the Middle East and North African countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 21125-21145, August.
    19. Hai Li & Hui Liu, 2023. "Climate Change, Farm Irrigation Facilities, and Agriculture Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    20. Matthew Gammans & Pierre Mérel & Ariel Ortiz‐Bobea, 2025. "Double cropping as an adaptation to climate change in the United States," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 107(2), pages 532-557, March.
    21. François Bareille & Raja Chakir, 2024. "Structural identification of weather impacts on crop yields: Disentangling agronomic from adaptation effects," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(3), pages 989-1019, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8903-:d:1498587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.