IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i5p4159-d1079976.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the Influence of UK Public Clients’ Characteristics on Their Own Innovation-Decision towards the Modern Methods of Construction (MMC)

Author

Listed:
  • Ali M. Saad

    (School of Built Environment, Engineering, and Computing, Leeds Beckett University, Northern Terrace, City Campus, Leeds LS2 8AG, UK)

  • Mohammed Dulaimi

    (School of Built Environment, Engineering, and Computing, Leeds Beckett University, Northern Terrace, City Campus, Leeds LS2 8AG, UK)

  • Sambo Lyson Zulu

    (School of Built Environment, Engineering, and Computing, Leeds Beckett University, Northern Terrace, City Campus, Leeds LS2 8AG, UK)

Abstract

Construction has long been identified as an industry resistant to change and innovation, a reality that has prevailed to shape its overall reputation. The public sector includes an influential client type that dominates the major percentage of construction demand and is subject to public law. The Modern Methods of Construction (MMC) have been championed recently by the UK government and early adopters upon the emergence of data indicating their effectiveness in addressing key construction challenges. However, the uptake of MMC has been low among UK construction clients, particularly among public client organisations. Theories emerge across decades to inform researchers of variable clusters that can aid a broader understanding of decision-making and innovation adoption. One of the popular innovation theories suggests a relation between the characteristics of decision-makers and their own innovation decisions. This paper, therefore, aims to investigate the characteristics that are responsible for public clients’ low MMC uptake despite the associated relative advantages. Overall, 91 public client organisations have responded to this research’s survey, reflecting their organisation’s characteristics in line with the constructs adapted from the Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) theory. Results suggest that among the ten influences that are captured from a detailed review of the literature, confidence in MMC firms supersedes all other factors in critically influencing the organisation’s favourable decision towards using MMC. Evidence provided in this paper suggests that a communication issue is presenting itself in the public construction sector, which is evident by the lack of confidence that public clients have in MMC businesses. This is the first study to utilise quantitative means to examine construction clients’ characteristics and relate the same to the adoption of construction innovation. Future research is encouraged to acknowledge the most influencing characteristics and detail how such knowledge can be embraced by supply to develop business models that can orchestrate better confidence in the public sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali M. Saad & Mohammed Dulaimi & Sambo Lyson Zulu, 2023. "Examining the Influence of UK Public Clients’ Characteristics on Their Own Innovation-Decision towards the Modern Methods of Construction (MMC)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-25, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4159-:d:1079976
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4159/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4159/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Warland & Heike Mayer, 2017. "Peculiarities of public sector clients in service innovations," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 105-124, January.
    2. Hannes Lindblad, 2019. "Black boxing BIM: the public client’s strategy in BIM implementation," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 1-12, January.
    3. Daniella Troje & Pernilla Gluch, 2020. "Populating the social realm: new roles arising from social procurement," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 55-70, January.
    4. Helen Lingard & David Oswald & Tiendung Le, 2019. "Embedding occupational health and safety in the procurement and management of infrastructure projects: institutional logics at play in the context of new public management," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(10), pages 567-583, October.
    5. Hannes Lindblad & Tina Karrbom Gustavsson, 2021. "Public clients ability to drive industry change: the case of implementing BIM," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 21-35, January.
    6. Wei Pan & Alistair Gibb & Andrew Dainty, 2007. "Perspectives of UK housebuilders on the use of offsite modern methods of construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 183-194.
    7. Lilly Rosander, 2022. "Same same but different: dynamics of a pre-procurement routine and its influence on relational contracting models," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(11-12), pages 955-972, December.
    8. Andrew Agapiou, 2021. "An Exploration of the Best Value Perceptions of Small Housebuilding Developers towards Offsite Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, April.
    9. Lizet Kuitert & Leentje Volker & Marleen H. Hermans, 2019. "Taking on a wider view: public value interests of construction clients in a changing construction industry," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(5), pages 257-277, May.
    10. Ornella Iuorio & Andrew Wallace & Kate Simpson, 2019. "Prefabs in the North of England: Technological, Environmental and Social Innovations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-14, July.
    11. Samuel Laryea, 2011. "Quality of tender documents: case studies from the UK," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 275-286.
    12. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    13. Jasper Mbachu & Raymond Nkado, 2006. "Conceptual framework for assessment of client needs and satisfaction in the building development process," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 31-44.
    14. Carpenter, Daniel P., 2004. "Protection without Capture: Product Approval by a Politically Responsive, Learning Regulator," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 98(4), pages 613-631, November.
    15. Andrea S. Patrucco & Antonella Moretto & Stefano Ronchi & Davide Luzzini, 2019. "Organisational choices in public procurement: what can public management learn from the private sector?," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(6), pages 977-1000, November.
    16. Petteri Uusitalo & Eelon Lappalainen & Olli Seppänen & Ergo Pikas & Antti Peltokorpi & Nikolai Menzhinskii & Mikko Piitulainen, 2021. "To trust or not to trust: is trust a prerequisite for solving design quality problems?," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 279-297, April.
    17. Karen Manley, 2006. "The innovation competence of repeat public sector clients in the Australian construction industry," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(12), pages 1295-1304.
    18. Richmond Juvenile Ehwi & Kwadwo Oti-Sarpong & Reyhaneh Shojaei & Gemma Burgess, 2022. "Offsite Manufacturing Research: A Systematic Review of Methodologies Used," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(1), pages 1-24, January.
    19. Abderisak Adam & Göran Lindahl, 2017. "Applying the dynamic capabilities framework in the case of a large public construction client," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(7), pages 420-431, July.
    20. Amy Fry & Tim Ryley & Robert Thring, 2018. "The Influence of Knowledge and Persuasion on the Decision to Adopt or Reject Alternative Fuel Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, August.
    21. Mark Dunlop Taylor, 2010. "A definition and valuation of the UK offsite construction sector," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(8), pages 885-896.
    22. Mark Hall & David Purchase, 2006. "Building or bodging? Attitudes to sustainability in UK public sector housing construction development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(3), pages 205-218.
    23. Fredrik Waara, 2008. "Mitigating contractual hazards in public procurement: a study of Swedish local authorities," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 137-145.
    24. Peter, Raja & Ramaseshan, B & Nayar, C.V, 2002. "Conceptual model for marketing solar based technology to developing countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 511-524.
    25. Hannus, Veronika & Sauer, Johannes, 2021. "It is not only about money —– German farmers' preferences regarding voluntary standards for farm sustainability management," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jingnan Zhang & Shichun Xu & Zhengxia He & Chengze Li & Xiaona Meng, 2022. "Factors Influencing Adoption Intention for Electric Vehicles under a Subsidy Deduction: From Different City-Level Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, May.
    2. Janne Harkonen & Arto Tolonen & Harri Haapasalo, 2018. "Modelling of Construction Products and Services for Effective Productisation," Management, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 13(4), pages 335-353.
    3. Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas & Nidhi Singh & Zoran Kalinic & Elena Carvajal-Trujillo, 2021. "Examining the determinants of continuance intention to use and the moderating effect of the gender and age of users of NFC mobile payments: a multi-analytical approach," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 133-161, June.
    4. Yoon, Junghyun & Lee, Hee Yong & Dinwoodie, John, 2015. "Competitiveness of container terminal operating companies in South Korea and the industry–university–government network," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1-14.
    5. Md. Mominur Rahman & Bilkis Akhter, 2021. "The impact of investment in human capital on bank performance: evidence from Bangladesh," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Usunier, Jean-Claude, 1998. "Oral pleasure and expatriate satisfaction: an empirical approach," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 89-110, February.
    7. Abdul Kadar Muhammad Masum & Md Abul Kalam Azad & Loo-See Beh, 2015. "Determinants of Academics' Job Satisfaction: Empirical Evidence from Private Universities in Bangladesh," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, February.
    8. Sharma, Vivek & Bhat, Dada Ab Rouf, 2020. "An empirical study exploring the relationship among human capital innovation, service innovation, competitive advantage and employee productivity in hospitality services," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 9(2), pages 1-14..
    9. Deepak, 2016. "Antecedent Value of Professional Commitment and Job Involvement in Determining Job Satisfaction," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 41(2), pages 154-164, May.
    10. Abernethy, Margaret A. & Vagnoni, Emidia, 2004. "Power, organization design and managerial behaviour," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(3-4), pages 207-225.
    11. Marianela Denegri & María Baeza & Natalia Salinas-Oñate & Verónica Peñaloza & Horacio Miranda & Ligia Orellana, 2014. "Materialism in Pedagogy Students in Chile," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 117(2), pages 505-521, June.
    12. Terason Sid, 2021. "Predicting Sports Facility Revisit Intentions Based on Experience and Mediating Effects of Perceived Value," Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 28(3), pages 35-41, September.
    13. Amy Roberts & Gregory S. Ching, 2021. "The Ebb and Flow of Study Abroad: A Comparative Analysis of PRC and International Students in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    14. Tomislav Letnik & Katja Hanžič & Giuseppe Luppino & Matej Mencinger, 2022. "Impact of Logistics Trends on Freight Transport Development in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Zhihui Wang & Liangzhen Nie & Eila Jeronen & Lihua Xu & Meiai Chen, 2023. "Understanding the Environmentally Sustainable Behavior of Chinese University Students as Tourists: An Integrative Framework," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-17, February.
    16. William Kelly & Phillips Cutright & David Hittle, 1976. "Comment on charles F. Hohm’s “social security and fertility: An international perspective”," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 13(4), pages 581-586, November.
    17. Ding, David Xin & Hu, Paul Jen-Hwa & Sheng, Olivia R. Liu, 2011. "e-SELFQUAL: A scale for measuring online self-service quality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(5), pages 508-515, May.
    18. Amolo Elvis Juma Amolo, PhD & Charles Mallans Rambo, PhD & Charles Misiko Wafula, PhD, 2021. "Alternative Risk Transfer and Performance of Power Projects in Kenya," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 8(12), pages 28-35, December.
    19. Robert P. Garrett Jr. & Jeffrey G. Covin, 2015. "Internal Corporate Venture Operations Independence and Performance: A Knowledge–Based Perspective," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(4), pages 763-790, July.
    20. Joungmin Kim & Sun Joo Ryu, 2023. "Enhancing Sustainable Design Thinking Education Efficiency: A Comparative Study of Synchronous Online and Offline Classes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-18, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4159-:d:1079976. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.