IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2419-d1050584.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Efficiency of Urban–Rural Integration in the Yangtze River Economic Belt and Its Optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Gubu Muga

    (School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
    Key Laboratory for Rule of Law Research, Ministry of Natural Resources, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Shougeng Hu

    (School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
    Key Laboratory for Rule of Law Research, Ministry of Natural Resources, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Zhilan Wang

    (School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
    Key Laboratory for Rule of Law Research, Ministry of Natural Resources, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Luyi Tong

    (School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
    Key Laboratory for Rule of Law Research, Ministry of Natural Resources, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Zongnan Hu

    (School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
    Key Laboratory for Rule of Law Research, Ministry of Natural Resources, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Hui Huang

    (School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
    Key Laboratory for Rule of Law Research, Ministry of Natural Resources, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Shijin Qu

    (School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
    Key Laboratory for Rule of Law Research, Ministry of Natural Resources, Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

China has entered a new stage of integrated development of urban and rural areas under the constraints of scarce land resources and the need for high-quality economic and social development. While there is concern about the state and speed of urban–rural integrated development (URID), increasing attention is being paid to efficiency improvement. This paper comprehensively measures the efficiency of URID from the input–output perspective, taking into account the impact of carbon emissions; it also studies the efficiency of URID and its developmental spatiotemporal characteristics in 73 cities within three major city clusters in the Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB) from 2010 to 2019, and analyzes the input–output optimization strategies for URID within each of these major urban systems. The results show that (1) the comprehensive efficiency evaluation system constructed by the study can more objectively reflect the state and trends of URID. From 2010 to 2019, the efficiency of URID in the three major city clusters in the YREB showed a downward trend; in cities with better economic development, the efficiency of URID was lower than in cities with average economic development, where carbon emission indicators showed a significant impact. (2) The spatial distribution of URID efficiency in the three major city clusters in the YREB follows an inverted “U” shape; URID efficiency in the urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River (MRYRUA) is higher than in the Chengyu urban agglomeration (CYUA), where it is higher than in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration (YRDUA). (3) The input redundancy rates are high in the indicators for culture, sports and media, energy conservation and environmental protection, urban and rural communities, and housing security expenditures. Carbon emission redundancy has a negative impact on efficiency in URID. Based on the high redundancy rates of each input–output indicator, this paper proposes methods to optimize the efficiency of URID in each of the three major city clusters and provides directional guidance for promoting the high-quality development of regional urban–rural integration.

Suggested Citation

  • Gubu Muga & Shougeng Hu & Zhilan Wang & Luyi Tong & Zongnan Hu & Hui Huang & Shijin Qu, 2023. "The Efficiency of Urban–Rural Integration in the Yangtze River Economic Belt and Its Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2419-:d:1050584
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2419/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2419/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yoruk, BarIs K. & Zaim, Osman, 2005. "Productivity growth in OECD countries: A comparison with Malmquist indices," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 401-420, June.
    2. Kevin Z. Chen & Rui Mao & Yunyi Zhou, 2022. "Rurbanomics for common prosperity: new approach to integrated urban-rural development," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Tone, Kaoru & Tsutsui, Miki, 2010. "An epsilon-based measure of efficiency in DEA - A third pole of technical efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1554-1563, December.
    4. Xin Wu & Peng Cui, 2016. "A Study of the Time–Space Evolution Characteristics of Urban–Rural Integration Development in a Mountainous Area Based on ESDA-GIS: The Case of the Qinling-Daba Mountains in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Antonio Afonso & Sonia Fernandes, 2006. "Measuring local government spending efficiency: Evidence for the Lisbon region," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(1), pages 39-53.
    6. Ila Alam & Robin Sickles, 1998. "The Relationship Between Stock Market Returns and Technical Efficiency Innovations: Evidence from the US Airline Industry," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 35-51, January.
    7. Chen, Kunqiu & Long, Hualou & Liao, Liuwen & Tu, Shuangshuang & Li, Tingting, 2020. "Land use transitions and urban-rural integrated development: Theoretical framework and China’s evidence," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    8. Christian Fertner, 2013. "The Emergence and Consolidation of the Urban-Rural Region: Migration Patterns around Copenhagen 1986–2011," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 104(3), pages 322-337, July.
    9. Alison Caffyn & Margareta Dahlstrom, 2005. "Urban-rural interdependencies: Joining up policy in practice," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 283-296.
    10. Kaoru Tone & Miki Tsutsui, 2010. "An epsilon-based measure of efficiency in DEA revisited -A third pole of technical efficiency," GRIPS Discussion Papers 09-21, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
    11. Tone, Kaoru, 2002. "A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 32-41, November.
    12. Tian, Yasi & Qian, Jing & Wang, Lei, 2021. "Village classification in metropolitan suburbs from the perspective of urban-rural integration and improvement strategies: A case study of Wuhan, central China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    13. R. D. Banker & A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1984. "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(9), pages 1078-1092, September.
    14. Lilyan E. Fulginiti & Richard K. Perrin, 1998. "Agricultural productivity in developing countries," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 19(1-2), pages 45-51, September.
    15. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1979. "Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 339-338, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. A. M. Aldanondo & V. L. Casasnovas, 2015. "Input aggregation bias in technical efficiency with multiple criteria analysis," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(6), pages 430-435, April.
    2. ChuangLin Fang & XingLiang Guan & ShaSha Lu & Min Zhou & Yu Deng, 2013. "Input–Output Efficiency of Urban Agglomerations in China: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(13), pages 2766-2790, October.
    3. Zebin Zheng & Wenjun Xiao & Ziye Cheng, 2023. "China’s Green Total Factor Energy Efficiency Assessment Based on Coordinated Reduction in Pollution and Carbon Emission: From the 11th to the 13th Five-Year Plan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Gómez-Calvet, Roberto & Conesa, David & Gómez-Calvet, Ana Rosa & Tortosa-Ausina, Emili, 2014. "Energy efficiency in the European Union: What can be learned from the joint application of directional distance functions and slacks-based measures?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 137-154.
    5. Ze Tian & Fang-Rong Ren & Qin-Wen Xiao & Yung-Ho Chiu & Tai-Yu Lin, 2019. "Cross-Regional Comparative Study on Carbon Emission Efficiency of China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt Based on the Meta-Frontier," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Carla Henriques & Clara Viseu, 2022. "Are ERDFs Devoted to Boosting ICTs in SMEs Inefficient? A Three-Stage SBM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-20, August.
    7. Feng Dong & Chang Qin & Xiaoyun Zhang & Xu Zhao & Yuling Pan & Yujin Gao & Jiao Zhu & Yangfan Li, 2021. "Towards Carbon Neutrality: The Impact of Renewable Energy Development on Carbon Emission Efficiency," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-23, December.
    8. An, Qingxian & Tao, Xiangyang & Xiong, Beibei & Chen, Xiaohong, 2022. "Frontier-based incentive mechanisms for allocating common revenues or fixed costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 294-308.
    9. Chia-Nan Wang & Kristofer Neal Castro Imperial & Ching-Chien Huang & Thanh-Tuan Dang, 2022. "Output Targeting and Runway Utilization of Major International Airports: A Comparative Analysis Using DEA," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, February.
    10. Ren, Fang-rong & Tian, Ze & Liu, Jingjing & Shen, Yu-ting, 2020. "Analysis of CO2 emission reduction contribution and efficiency of China’s solar photovoltaic industry: Based on Input-output perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    11. Shixiong Cheng & Jiahui Xie & De Xiao & Yun Zhang, 2019. "Measuring the Environmental Efficiency and Technology Gap of PM 2.5 in China’s Ten City Groups: An Empirical Analysis Using the EBM Meta-Frontier Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-22, February.
    12. Jianguo Zhao & Lei Zhang, 2023. "Fiscal Expenditure Efficiency Measurement and Its Convergence Analysis on Aging Undertakings in China: Based on a Global Super-Efficiency Slacks-Based Measure Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    13. Zhao, Pengjun & Zeng, Liangen & Li, Peilin & Lu, Haiyan & Hu, Haoyu & Li, Chengming & Zheng, Mengyuan & Li, Haitao & Yu, Zhao & Yuan, Dandan & Xie, Jinxin & Huang, Qi & Qi, Yuting, 2022. "China's transportation sector carbon dioxide emissions efficiency and its influencing factors based on the EBM DEA model with undesirable outputs and spatial Durbin model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).
    14. Cui, Qiang & Li, Ye, 2017. "Airline efficiency measures using a Dynamic Epsilon-Based Measure model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 121-134.
    15. Ashrafi, Ali & Seow, Hsin-Vonn & Lee, Lai Soon & Lee, Chew Ging, 2013. "The efficiency of the hotel industry in Singapore," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 31-34.
    16. Büschken, Joachim, 2009. "When does data envelopment analysis outperform a naïve efficiency measurement model?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(2), pages 647-657, January.
    17. Sergio Destefanis & Vania Sena, 2007. "Patterns of corporate governance and technical efficiency in Italian manufacturing," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(1), pages 27-40.
    18. Anup Kumar Bhandari & Vipin V, 2018. "Does Export Intensity Affect Firm Performance? Evidence from Basic Metal Industry in India," Working Papers id:12767, eSocialSciences.
    19. Bao Jiang & Enxin Chi & Jian Li, 2022. "Uncertain Data Envelopment Analysis for Cross Efficiency Evaluation with Imprecise Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-9, June.
    20. Pelloneová Natalie, 2023. "Evaluating Hockey Players Using Andersen and Petersen's Super-Efficiency Model: Who is the Best Czech Hockey Player in the NHL?," Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 30(3), pages 23-28, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2419-:d:1050584. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.