IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i20p14950-d1261137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Analysis of the Valorization of Woody Biomass Residues: A Comparative Study with Vine Pruning Leftovers in Portugal

Author

Listed:
  • Carla L. Simões

    (IPCA—Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, 4750-810 Barcelos, Portugal)

  • Ricardo Simoes

    (IPCA—Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, 4750-810 Barcelos, Portugal)

  • Ana Sofia Gonçalves

    (IPCA—Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, 4750-810 Barcelos, Portugal)

  • Leonel J. R. Nunes

    (ProMetheus, Unidade de Investigação em Materiais, Energia e Ambiente Para a Sustentabilidade, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Rua da Escola Industrial e Comercial de Nun’Alvares, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal
    DEGEIT—Departamento de Economia, Gestão, Engenharia Industrial e Turismo, Universidade de Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
    GOVCOPP—Unidade de Investigação em Governança, Competitividade e Políticas Públicas, Universidade de Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

Abstract

Evaluating Global Warming Potential (GWP) in waste management scenarios is crucial, especially in light of the escalating global concern for climate change and the pivotal role that waste management plays in mitigating this crisis. This research examines the GWP of three distinct waste management scenarios, each with a unique approach: (1) open burning, a method involving direct combustion with a GWP of 1600.1 kg·CO 2 eq, chiefly attributed to direct emissions without any mitigation tactics; (2) energy recovery, which capitalizes on converting waste into energy, yielding a GWP of 1255.4 kg·CO 2 eq, the reduction resulting primarily from avoided heat production; and (3) pyrolysis, an advanced thermal decomposition process that remarkably registers a negative GWP of −1595.1 kg·CO 2 eq, mainly credited to the carbon sequestration capacity of biochar production and optimal energy conversion efficiency. These outcomes emphasize the ecological merits of waste management approaches that produce lower, or even better, negative GWP values. In particular, pyrolysis emerges as a powerful way of transforming waste management into a potential carbon sink, proving crucial for climate change counteraction. Nevertheless, for effective real-world deployment, the study highlights the importance of addressing technical, economic, and societal challenges, underscoring the need for holistic, interdisciplinary research.

Suggested Citation

  • Carla L. Simões & Ricardo Simoes & Ana Sofia Gonçalves & Leonel J. R. Nunes, 2023. "Environmental Analysis of the Valorization of Woody Biomass Residues: A Comparative Study with Vine Pruning Leftovers in Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:14950-:d:1261137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/14950/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/14950/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ines Campos & Esther Marín-González & Guilherme Luz & João Barroso & Nuno Oliveira, 2019. "Renewable Energy Prosumers in Mediterranean Viticulture Social–Ecological Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Nathalia Suchek & Cristina I. Fernandes & Sascha Kraus & Matthias Filser & Helena Sjögrén, 2021. "Innovation and the circular economy: A systematic literature review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 3686-3702, December.
    3. H. Christopher Frey & Sumeet R. Patil, 2002. "Identification and Review of Sensitivity Analysis Methods," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 553-578, June.
    4. Leonel J. R. Nunes & Margarida Casau & João C. O. Matias & Marta Ferreira Dias, 2022. "Assessment of Woody Residual Biomass Generation Capacity in the Central Region of Portugal: Analysis of the Power Production Potential," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, October.
    5. Stefania Liuzzi & Chiara Rubino & Pietro Stefanizzi & Francesco Martellotta, 2022. "The Agro-Waste Production in Selected EUSAIR Regions and Its Potential Use for Building Applications: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-20, January.
    6. Margarida Casau & Marta Ferreira Dias & João C. O. Matias & Leonel J. R. Nunes, 2022. "Residual Biomass: A Comprehensive Review on the Importance, Uses and Potential in a Circular Bioeconomy Approach," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, March.
    7. Cavalcanti, Eduardo J.C. & Carvalho, Monica & B. Azevedo, Jonathan L., 2019. "Exergoenvironmental results of a eucalyptus biomass-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    8. Gaurav Kumar Porichha & Yulin Hu & Kasanneni Tirumala Venkateswara Rao & Chunbao Charles Xu, 2021. "Crop Residue Management in India: Stubble Burning vs. Other Utilizations including Bioenergy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    9. Tiago Florindo & Ana I. Ferraz & Ana C. Rodrigues & Leonel J. R. Nunes, 2022. "Residual Biomass Recovery in the Wine Sector: Creation of Value Chains for Vine Pruning," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, May.
    10. Parnali Dhar Chowdhury & C. mdad Haque & S. Michelle Driedger, 2012. "Public versus expert knowledge and perception of climate change-induced heat wave risk: a modified mental model approach," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 149-168, February.
    11. Yang, Qiushuang & Mašek, Ondřej & Zhao, Ling & Nan, Hongyan & Yu, Shitong & Yin, Jianxiang & Li, Zhaopeng & Cao, Xinde, 2021. "Country-level potential of carbon sequestration and environmental benefits by utilizing crop residues for biochar implementation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PB).
    12. Jackson, Randall W. & Neto, Amir B. Ferreira & Erfanian, Elham, 2018. "Woody biomass processing: Potential economic impacts on rural regions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 66-77.
    13. M. Jean Blair & Bruno Gagnon & Andrew Klain & Biljana Kulišić, 2021. "Contribution of Biomass Supply Chains for Bioenergy to Sustainable Development Goals," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-28, February.
    14. Kanematsu, Yuichiro & Oosawa, Kazutake & Okubo, Tatsuya & Kikuchi, Yasunori, 2017. "Designing the scale of a woody biomass CHP considering local forestry reformation: A case study of Tanegashima, Japan," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 160-172.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leonel J. R. Nunes, 2025. "Gasification Processes of Portuguese Biomass: Theoretical Analysis of Hydrogen Production Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-32, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leonel J. R. Nunes, 2025. "Gasification Processes of Portuguese Biomass: Theoretical Analysis of Hydrogen Production Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-32, August.
    2. Emilia Mary Bălan & Cristina Georgiana Zeldea & Laura Mariana Cismaș & Marioara Iordan & Cristian Mihai Cismaș & Melinda Petronela Costin, 2025. "Biological Resources for Renewable Energies in the European Union: A Hierarchical Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-25, February.
    3. Bernardine Chigozie Chidozie & Ana Luísa Ramos & José Vasconcelos Ferreira & Luís Pinto Ferreira, 2023. "Residual Agroforestry Biomass Supply Chain Simulation Insights and Directions: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Mohamed Rashwan & Nardin Farouk & Rania Pasha, 2025. "Can ESG Strategies Drive Firm Value Growth in the MENA Region?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-30, September.
    5. Makam, Vaishno Devi & Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2021. "Sensitivity analysis with χ2-divergences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 372-383.
    6. S. Cucurachi & E. Borgonovo & R. Heijungs, 2016. "A Protocol for the Global Sensitivity Analysis of Impact Assessment Models in Life Cycle Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 357-377, February.
    7. Jeetendra P. Aryal, 2022. "Contribution of Agriculture to Climate Change and Low-Emission Agricultural Development in Asia and the Pacific," ADBI Working Papers 1340, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    8. Gürbüz, Emine Yağız & Güler, Onur Vahip & Keçebaş, Ali, 2022. "Environmental impact assessment of a real geothermal driven power plant with two-stage ORC using enhanced exergo-environmental analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1110-1123.
    9. Ahmad, Farhan & Bask, Anu & Laari, Sini & Robinson, Craig V., 2023. "Business management perspectives on the circular economy: Present state and future directions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    10. Tunahan Çınar & Mehmet Fatih Cakır & Abdurrahim Aydın, 2025. "Assessment of environmental and atmospheric impacts of stubble burning in Mardin-Diyarbakır (Southeastern of Türkiye): a remote sensing approach," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(15), pages 17895-17912, August.
    11. Joanicjusz Nazarko & Ewa Chodakowska & Łukasz Nazarko, 2022. "Evaluating the Transition of the European Union Member States towards a Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-24, May.
    12. Ángela Triguero & María C. Cuerva & Francisco J. Sáez‐Martínez, 2022. "Closing the loop through eco‐innovation by European firms: Circular economy for sustainable development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2337-2350, July.
    13. Rubee Singh & Amit Joshi & Hiranya Dissanayake & Deshika Nainanayake & Vikas Kumar, 2025. "Harnessing Artificial Intelligence and Human Resource Management for Circular Economy and Sustainability: A Conceptual Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Agee, Philip & Nikdel, Leila & McCoy, Andrew & Kianpour rad, Simin & Gao, Xinghua, 2024. "Manufactured housing: Energy burden outcomes from measured and simulated building performance data," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    15. Maurizio Bressan & Elena Campagnoli & Carlo Giovanni Ferro & Valter Giaretto, 2022. "Rice Straw: A Waste with a Remarkable Green Energy Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, February.
    16. Carla Silva & Patricia Moniz & Ana Cristina Oliveira & Samuela Vercelli & Alberto Reis & Teresa Lopes da Silva, 2022. "Cascading Crypthecodinium cohnii Biorefinery: Global Warming Potential and Techno-Economic Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-26, May.
    17. Luis V. G. Fachini & Pedro Leineker Ochoski Machado & Kamal A. R. Ismail & Felipe M. Biglia & Aleffe J. C. Vaz & Romeu M. Szmoski & Thiago Antonini Alves, 2025. "Experimental Assessment of a Passive Waste Heat Recovery System Using Thermosyphons and Thermoelectric Generators for Integration into District Heating Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-33, September.
    18. Emanuele Borgonovo, 2006. "Measuring Uncertainty Importance: Investigation and Comparison of Alternative Approaches," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(5), pages 1349-1361, October.
    19. Dahl Winters & Kwaku Boakye & Steven Simske, 2022. "Toward Carbon-Neutral Concrete through Biochar–Cement–Calcium Carbonate Composites: A Critical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-25, April.
    20. Simone Sehnem & Adriane A. Farias S. L. de Queiroz & Susana Carla Farias Pereira & Gabriel dos Santos Correia & Edson Kuzma, 2022. "Circular economy and innovation: A look from the perspective of organizational capabilities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 236-250, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:14950-:d:1261137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.