IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i19p14624-d1256058.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Personal vs. Collective Nostalgia and Different Temporally Orientated Green Consumption

Author

Listed:
  • Han Zhang

    (Xinhuadu Business School, Minjiang University, Fuzhou 350108, China)

  • Chenhan Ruan

    (School of Economics and Management, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Lei Huang

    (Straits Institute of Minjiang University, Minjiang University, Fuzhou 350108, China)

  • Luluo Peng

    (Business School of Hunan University, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China)

  • Chuangxin Guo

    (College of Computer and Control Engineering, Minjiang University, Fuzhou 350108, China
    College of Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

Abstract

In the literature, there are discrepancies about how nostalgia affects green consumption. Both positive and negative relationships between nostalgia and green consumption are found, and most research treats all types of green consumption the same, neglecting the differences. This study tried to put the contradictory findings together by classifying green consumption into future vs. non-future green consumption and taking collective vs. personal nostalgia into account. As far as we know, this study is the first to propose this classification of green consumption, and different patterns are found, which might drive new research. This research tested our hypotheses across four randomized controlled trials with 921 valid respondents in total. Study 1 found a negative effect of personal nostalgia on future-oriented green consumption and revealed a positive relationship between collective nostalgia and non-future green consumption. The results confirmed both positive and negative effects of nostalgia on green consumption found in previous research. Study 2 revealed that the past orientation mediated personal nostalgia’s negative effect on future-oriented green consumption and collective efficacy mediated collective nostalgia’s positive effect on non-future-oriented green consumption. Study 3 tested the moderating effect of product newness on personal nostalgia and future green consumption, and a negative moderating effect was uncovered. Study 4 found a positive moderating effect of product identity on collective nostalgia and non-future-oriented green consumption.

Suggested Citation

  • Han Zhang & Chenhan Ruan & Lei Huang & Luluo Peng & Chuangxin Guo, 2023. "Personal vs. Collective Nostalgia and Different Temporally Orientated Green Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-22, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14624-:d:1256058
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14624/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14624/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jianfang Liang & Jingjun Li & Qinyuan Lei, 2022. "Exploring the Influence of Environmental Values on Green Consumption Behavior of Apparel: A Chain Multiple Mediation Model among Chinese Generation Z," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-26, October.
    2. Ethan Pancer & Lindsay McShane & Theodore J. Noseworthy, 2017. "Isolated Environmental Cues and Product Efficacy Penalties: The Color Green and Eco-labels," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(1), pages 159-177, June.
    3. Holbrook, Morris B, 1993. "Nostalgia and Consumption Preferences: Some Emerging Patterns of Consumer Tastes," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(2), pages 245-256, September.
    4. Shuli Yang & Junwu Chai, 2022. "The Influence of Enterprises’ Green Marketing Behavior on Consumers’ Green Consumption Intention—Mediating Role and Moderating Role," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    5. Gerhard Reese & Eva A. Junge, 2017. "Keep on Rockin’ in a (Plastic-)Free World: Collective Efficacy and Pro-Environmental Intentions as a Function of Task Difficulty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-13, February.
    6. Naeem Gul Gilal & Jing Zhang & Faheem Gul Gilal & Rukhsana Gul Gilal, 2020. "Bygone days and memories: the effects of nostalgic ads on consumer brand resurrection movements," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(2), pages 160-180, March.
    7. Jianrong Yao & Xiangliang Guo & Lu Wang & Hui Jiang, 2022. "Understanding Green Consumption: A Literature Review Based on Factor Analysis and Bibliometric Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-13, July.
    8. Cesare Amatulli & Matteo Angelis & Alessandro M. Peluso & Isabella Soscia & Gianluigi Guido, 2019. "The Effect of Negative Message Framing on Green Consumption: An Investigation of the Role of Shame," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(4), pages 1111-1132, July.
    9. Tangari, Andrea Heintz & Burton, Scot & Smith, Ronn J., 2015. "Now that's a Bright Idea: The Influence of Consumer Elaboration and Distance Perceptions on Sustainable Choices," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 410-421.
    10. Yue, Ting & Long, Ruyin & Chen, Hong, 2013. "Factors influencing energy-saving behavior of urban households in Jiangsu Province," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 665-675.
    11. Simona Romani & Silvia Grappi & Richard P. Bagozzi, 2016. "Corporate Socially Responsible Initiatives and Their Effects on Consumption of Green Products," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 253-264, May.
    12. Simona Romani & Silvia Grappi & Richard P. Bagozzi, 2016. "Erratum to: Corporate Socially Responsible Initiatives and Their Effects on Consumption of Green Products," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 399-399, May.
    13. Paolo Antonetti & Stan Maklan, 2014. "Feelings that Make a Difference: How Guilt and Pride Convince Consumers of the Effectiveness of Sustainable Consumption Choices," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(1), pages 117-134, September.
    14. Teodora Roman & Ionel Bostan & Adriana Manolică & Iustin Mitrica, 2015. "Profile of Green Consumers in Romania in Light of Sustainability Challenges and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-18, May.
    15. Li, Wenbo & Long, Ruyin & Chen, Hong & Geng, Jichao, 2017. "A review of factors influencing consumer intentions to adopt battery electric vehicles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 318-328.
    16. Barbara Borusiak & Andrzej Szymkowiak & Elena Horska & Natalia Raszka & Elżbieta Żelichowska, 2020. "Towards Building Sustainable Consumption: A Study of Second-Hand Buying Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, January.
    17. Li Yan & Hean Tat Keh & Xiaoyu Wang, 2021. "Powering Sustainable Consumption: The Roles of Green Consumption Values and Power Distance Belief," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 499-516, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li Yan & Hean Tat Keh & Xiaoyu Wang, 2021. "Powering Sustainable Consumption: The Roles of Green Consumption Values and Power Distance Belief," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 499-516, March.
    2. Santa, Juana Castro & Drews, Stefan, 2023. "Heuristic processing of green advertising: Review and policy implications," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    3. Diletta Acuti & Marta Pizzetti & Sara Dolnicar, 2022. "When sustainability backfires : A review on the unintended negative side-effects of product and service sustainability on consumer behavior," Post-Print hal-04381310, HAL.
    4. Jintao Lu & Licheng Ren & Siqin Yao & Jiayuan Qiao & Wadim Strielkowski & Justas Streimikis, 2019. "Comparative Review of Corporate Social Responsibility of Energy Utilities and Sustainable Energy Development Trends in the Baltic States," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-21, September.
    5. Mendini, Monica & Peter, Paula C. & Gibbert, Michael, 2018. "The dual-process model of similarity in cause-related marketing: How taxonomic versus thematic partnerships reduce skepticism and increase purchase willingness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 195-204.
    6. Septianto, Felix & Kemper, Joya A., 2021. "The effects of age cues on preferences for organic food: The moderating role of message claim," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    7. Tarunija Chandra & Vibhuti Tripathi, 2023. "Antecedents and Mediators for Building and Integrated Research Framework towards Successful Brand Revitalisation," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(1), pages 133-163.
    8. Santhiya Ramasamy & Karpal S. Dara Singh & Azlan Amran & Mehran Nejati, 2020. "Linking human values to consumer CSR perception: The moderating role of consumer skepticism," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1958-1971, July.
    9. Jin Sun & Chen Chen & Junmei Lan, 2022. "Direct Expression or Indirect Transmission? An Empirical Research on the Impacts of Explicit and Implicit Appeals in Green Advertising," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Fagang Hu & Shufen Zhang & Yaliu Yang & Kun Wang, 2023. "Analysis of Consumers’ Green Consumption Behavior against the Background of “Carbon Peak, Carbon Neutrality”—Based on Survey Data from Anhui Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-19, August.
    11. Serena Mastria & Alessandro Vezzil & Andrea De Cesarei, 2023. "Going Green: A Review on the Role of Motivation in Sustainable Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-15, October.
    12. Xie, Quan & Wang, Tianjiao (Grace), 2022. "Promoting corporate social responsibility message in COVID-19 advertising: How threat persuasion affects consumer responses to altruistic versus strategic CSR," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 315-324.
    13. Ling Zheng & Yunxia Zhu & Ruochen Jiang, 2019. "The Mediating Role of Moral Elevation in Cause-Related Marketing: A Moral Psychological Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(2), pages 439-454, May.
    14. Cesare Amatulli & Matteo Angelis & Alessandro M. Peluso & Isabella Soscia & Gianluigi Guido, 2019. "The Effect of Negative Message Framing on Green Consumption: An Investigation of the Role of Shame," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(4), pages 1111-1132, July.
    15. Mohd Sadiq & Mohd Adil & Justin Paul, 2021. "Does social influence turn pessimistic consumers green?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 2937-2950, November.
    16. Yi Luo & Hua Jiang & Linzhi Zeng, 2023. "Linking Informative and Factual CSR Communication to Reputation: Understanding CSR Motives and Organizational Identification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.
    17. Dirk C. Moosmayer & Yanyan Chen & Susannah M. Davis, 2019. "Deeds Not Words: A Cosmopolitan Perspective on the Influences of Corporate Sustainability and NGO Engagement on the Adoption of Sustainable Products in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 135-154, August.
    18. Felix Septianto & Joya A. Kemper & Fandy Tjiptono & Widya Paramita, 2021. "The Role of Authentic (vs. Hubristic) Pride in Leveraging the Effectiveness of Cost Transparency," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 174(2), pages 423-439, November.
    19. Dan-Cristian Dabija & Brandusa Mariana Bejan, 2018. "Green DIY store choice among socially responsible consumer generations," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-12, December.
    20. Lv, Xingyang & Liang, Yuqing & Luo, Jia & Liu, Yue, 2022. "Icing on the cake or gilding the lily? The impact of high-modified model images on purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14624-:d:1256058. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.