IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i19p14338-d1250079.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unveiling the Soaring Trend of Fashion Rental Services: A U.S. Consumer Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Ting Chi

    (Department of Apparel, Merchandising, Design and Textiles, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA)

  • Victoria Gonzalez

    (Department of Apparel, Merchandising, Design and Textiles, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA)

  • Justin Janke

    (Department of Apparel, Merchandising, Design and Textiles, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA)

  • Mya Phan

    (Department of Apparel, Merchandising, Design and Textiles, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA)

  • Weronika Wojdyla

    (Department of Apparel, Merchandising, Design and Textiles, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA)

Abstract

Fashion rental services have become increasingly popular due to their provision of sustainable and environmentally friendly ways of consuming fashion products. This research aimed to investigate the effects of various stimuli offered by these services, such as product variety, information quality, style conformity, and service quality, on consumer internal states (perceived performance risk, perceived financial risk, perceived social risk, perceived utilitarian value, and perceived hedonic value) and consequently their external responses (purchase intention and word of mouth). The SOR (stimulus—organism–response) model was applied, with consumer knowledge acting as a moderating variable between the stimuli and organism constructs. To examine and analyze the proposed hypotheses, an online survey was administered, resulting in 379 eligible survey responses. The findings reveal that stimuli offered by fashion rental services (product variety, information quality, style conformity, and service quality) show more significant impact on consumer perceived utilitarian value and hedonic value than perceived performance risk, financial risk, and social risk. Consequently, consumer perceived utilitarian value and hedonic value play a more influential role than perceived risks in forming the positive behavioral responses (use intention and word of mouth). No demographic variables were found to have any significant impact on the purchase intentions or word of mouth regarding fashion rental services. The proposed model shows a high explanatory power, collectively accounting for 60.1% of variance in U.S. consumers’ intention to use fashion rental services and 63.5% of variance in U.S. consumers’ WOM on fashion rental services.

Suggested Citation

  • Ting Chi & Victoria Gonzalez & Justin Janke & Mya Phan & Weronika Wojdyla, 2023. "Unveiling the Soaring Trend of Fashion Rental Services: A U.S. Consumer Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-21, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14338-:d:1250079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14338/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14338/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stacy H. Lee & Ran Huang, 2020. "Exploring the Motives for Online Fashion Renting: Insights from Social Retailing to Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Bigne, Enrique & Chatzipanagiotou, Kalliopi & Ruiz, Carla, 2020. "Pictorial content, sequence of conflicting online reviews and consumer decision-making: The stimulus-organism-response model revisited," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 403-416.
    3. Pei-Hsin Lin & Wun-Hwa Chen, 2022. "Factors That Influence Consumers’ Sustainable Apparel Purchase Intention: The Moderating Effect of Generational Cohorts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-14, July.
    4. Camilla Barbarossa & Patrick Pelsmacker, 2016. "Positive and Negative Antecedents of Purchasing Eco-friendly Products: A Comparison Between Green and Non-green Consumers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 134(2), pages 229-247, March.
    5. Victoria Gonzalez & Xingqiu Lou & Ting Chi, 2023. "Evaluating Environmental Impact of Natural and Synthetic Fibers: A Life Cycle Assessment Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, May.
    6. Sae Eun Lee & Hye Jung Jung & Kyu-Hye Lee, 2021. "Motivating Collaborative Consumption in Fashion: Consumer Benefits, Perceived Risks, Service Trust, and Usage Intention of Online Fashion Rental Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    7. Lindsay McCoy & Ting Chi, 2022. "Collaborative Consumption: A Study of Sustainability Presentation in Fashion Rental Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-25, July.
    8. Yanwen Ruan & Yingjiao Xu & Hanna Lee, 2022. "Consumer Motivations for Luxury Fashion Rental: A Second-Order Factor Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, June.
    9. Lindsay McCoy & Yuan-Ting Wang & Ting Chi, 2021. "Why Is Collaborative Apparel Consumption Gaining Popularity? An Empirical Study of US Gen Z Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Khirul Basar Mim & Tunmin (Catherine) Jai & Stacy H. Lee, 2022. "The Influence of Sustainable Positioning on eWOM and Brand Loyalty: Analysis of Credible Sources and Transparency Practices Based on the S-O-R Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    11. Rusitha Wijekoon & Mohamad Fazli Sabri, 2021. "Determinants That Influence Green Product Purchase Intention and Behavior: A Literature Review and Guiding Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-40, May.
    12. Mohd Khairy Kamarudin & Nur Izzati Mohamad Norzilan & Fatin Nur Ainaa Mustaffa & Masyitah Khidzir & Suhaili Alma’amun & Nasrul Hisyam Nor Muhamad & Mohd Fauzi Abu-Hussin & Nurul Izzah Noor Zainan & Ab, 2023. "Why Do Donors Donate? A Study on Donation-Based Crowdfunding in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, February.
    13. Yuan, Quan & Shen, Bin, 2019. "Renting fashion with strategic customers in the sharing economy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 185-195.
    14. Baek, Eunsoo & Oh, Ga-Eun (Grace), 2021. "Diverse values of fashion rental service and contamination concern of consumers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 165-175.
    15. Murphy Aycock & Eunjoo Cho & Kyuree Kim, 2023. "“I like to buy pre-owned luxury fashion products”: Understanding online second-hand luxury fashion shopping motivations and perceived value of young adult consumers," Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 327-349, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cindy Helinski & Gerhard Schewe, 2022. "The Influence of Consumer Preferences and Perceived Benefits in the Context of B2C Fashion Renting Intentions of Young Women," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-25, August.
    2. Ting Chi & Olabisi Adesanya & Hang Liu & Rebecca Anderson & Zihui Zhao, 2023. "Renting than Buying Apparel: U.S. Consumer Collaborative Consumption for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Jain, Ritu & Jain, Kokil & Behl, Abhishek & Pereira, Vijay & Del Giudice, Manlio & Vrontis, Demetris, 2022. "Mainstreaming fashion rental consumption: A systematic and thematic review of literature," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1525-1539.
    4. Lindsay McCoy & Yuan-Ting Wang & Ting Chi, 2021. "Why Is Collaborative Apparel Consumption Gaining Popularity? An Empirical Study of US Gen Z Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Luigi Leclercq-Machado & Aldo Alvarez-Risco & Romina Gómez-Prado & Berdy Briggitte Cuya-Velásquez & Sharon Esquerre-Botton & Flavio Morales-Ríos & Camila Almanza-Cruz & Sarahit Castillo-Benancio & Mar, 2022. "Sustainable Fashion and Consumption Patterns in Peru: An Environmental-Attitude-Intention-Behavior Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-18, August.
    6. Yanwen Ruan & Yingjiao Xu & Hanna Lee, 2022. "Consumer Motivations for Luxury Fashion Rental: A Second-Order Factor Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Jun Xu & Yun Zhou & Lei Jiang & Lei Shen, 2022. "Exploring Sustainable Fashion Consumption Behavior in the Post-Pandemic Era: Changes in the Antecedents of Second-Hand Clothing-Sharing in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Ting Chi & Anastasia Frattali & Hang Liu & Yini Chen, 2023. "Regenerated Cellulose Fibers (RCFs) for Future Apparel Sustainability: Insights from the U.S. Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-13, March.
    9. Pei-Hsin Lin & Wun-Hwa Chen, 2022. "Factors That Influence Consumers’ Sustainable Apparel Purchase Intention: The Moderating Effect of Generational Cohorts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-14, July.
    10. Hyejune Park & Min-Young Lee, 2022. "The Two-Sided Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Online Apparel Renting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Zhang, Lina & Zhang, Yumeng & Chutani, Anshuman, 2022. "Riding the wave of fashion rental: The role of power structures and green advertising," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    12. Chun-Hsi Vivian Chen & Yu-Cheng Chen, 2021. "Assessment of Enhancing Employee Engagement in Energy-Saving Behavior at Workplace: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, February.
    13. Chuanlan Liu & Jeremy M. Bernardoni & Zhongjie Wang, 2023. "Examining Generation Z Consumer Online Fashion Resale Participation and Continuance Intention through the Lens of Consumer Perceived Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, May.
    14. Elena Kossmann & Mónica Gómez-Suárez, 2018. "Decision-making processes for purchases of ethical products: gaps between academic research and needs of marketing practitioners," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 15(3), pages 353-370, September.
    15. Wei-Ching Wang & Chung-Hsien Lin, 2024. "Exploring the Importance of Destination Attributes of Sustainable Urban Waterfronts: Text and Data Mining of Tourists’ Online Reviews," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-17, March.
    16. Cheung, Millissa F.Y. & To, W.M., 2019. "An extended model of value-attitude-behavior to explain Chinese consumers’ green purchase behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 145-153.
    17. Lea Primožič & Andreja Kutnar, 2022. "Sustainability Communication in Global Consumer Brands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    18. Mohammad Nurul Alam & Osarodion Ogiemwonyi & Ibrahim. E. Hago & Noor Azlinna Azizan & Fariza Hashim & Md Sazzad Hossain, 2023. "Understanding Consumer Environmental Ethics and the Willingness to Use Green Products," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440221, January.
    19. Umar Nawaz Kayani & Anamul Haque & Umme Kulsum & Nishat Taslin Mohona & Fakhrul Hasan, 2023. "Modeling the Antecedents of Green Consumption Values to Promote the Green Attitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-15, August.
    20. Mauro Capestro & Greta Chiavegato, 2023. "Il consumo dei beni di lusso nel contesto della sharing economy: un caso di studio italiano," ECONOMIA E SOCIET? REGIONALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(1), pages 53-70.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14338-:d:1250079. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.