IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i16p12473-d1218686.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Low-Carbon Transformation Strategy for Blockchain-Based Power Supply Chain

Author

Listed:
  • Hua Pan

    (School of Economics and Management, Shanghai University of Electric Power, Shanghai 201306, China)

  • Huimin Zhu

    (School of Economics and Management, Shanghai University of Electric Power, Shanghai 201306, China)

  • Minmin Teng

    (School of Economics and Management, Shanghai University of Electric Power, Shanghai 201306, China)

Abstract

Carbon abatement in the power sector is essential to achieving the “double carbon” goal, and blockchain technology, one of the most promising emerging technologies, will assist the power sector in efficiently achieving this goal. In terms of the effectiveness of carbon abatement, comparative studies on coordination mechanisms are absent in the existing literature. On this basis, aiming at the cooperative abatement strategy between power generation generators and sellers under the carbon tax policy, this paper has developed four decision models: the Stackelberg game led by power generation enterprises, the simultaneous Nash bargaining decision by both parties, the vertical integration decision by supply chain enterprises, and the cooperative carbon emission reduction game by supply chain enterprises, to analyze the changes in electricity price, sustainability level, power sales, and profits of supply chain members. The results of the numerical analysis show that user preference for blockchain technology and an increase in the proportion of low-carbon electricity information uploaded to the blockchain can significantly improve the sustainability level of the electricity supply chain. The level of investment in green technologies by electricity producers under cooperative abatement decision-making increases compared to the electricity producer-dominated Stackelberg game model. The sustainability level of the electricity supply chain is higher under the Nash simultaneous decision than under the abatement cost-sharing decision, but the decision-maker’s profit is lower. The values of overall profit and sustainability level of the electricity supply chain are both highest under the vertically integrated decision.

Suggested Citation

  • Hua Pan & Huimin Zhu & Minmin Teng, 2023. "Low-Carbon Transformation Strategy for Blockchain-Based Power Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12473-:d:1218686
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12473/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12473/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lin, Boqiang & Qiao, Qiao, 2023. "Exploring the participation willingness and potential carbon emission reduction of Chinese residential green electricity market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    2. Cao, Yifan & Shen, Bin, 2022. "Adopting blockchain technology to block less sustainable products’ entry in global trade," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    3. Subrata Saha & Izabela Nielsen & Shib Sankar Sana, 2021. "Effect of Optimal Subsidy Rate and Strategic Behaviour of Supply Chain Members under Competition on Green Product Retailing," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-23, March.
    4. Juan Li & Xixiang Sun & Canwei Hu, 2022. "The Role of Skepticism and Transparency in Shaping Green Brand Authenticity and Green Brand Evangelism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Chen, Xu & Wang, Xiaojun & Chan, Hing Kai, 2017. "Manufacturer and retailer coordination for environmental and economic competitiveness: A power perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 268-281.
    6. Zixiao Liu & Zengming Wu & Mengnan Zhu, 2022. "Research on the Green Effect of Environmental Policies—From the Perspective of Policy Mix," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-15, November.
    7. Peng, Yongtao & Wang, Wei & Li, Shuanglin & Veglianti, Eleonora, 2022. "Competition and cooperation in the dual-channel green supply chain with customer satisfaction," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 95-113.
    8. Palsule-Desai, Omkar D., 2013. "Supply chain coordination using revenue-dependent revenue sharing contracts," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 780-796.
    9. Dayuan Li & Min Huang & Shenggang Ren & Xiaohong Chen & Lutao Ning, 2018. "Environmental Legitimacy, Green Innovation, and Corporate Carbon Disclosure: Evidence from CDP China 100," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 1089-1104, July.
    10. Ji, Ping & Ma, Xin & Li, Gang, 2015. "Developing green purchasing relationships for the manufacturing industry: An evolutionary game theory perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 155-162.
    11. Yu, Xianyu & Wu, Zemin & Wang, Qunwei & Sang, Xiuzhi & Zhou, Dequn, 2020. "Exploring the investment strategy of power enterprises under the nationwide carbon emissions trading mechanism: A scenario-based system dynamics approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    12. Li, Jianbin & Luo, Xiaomeng & Wang, Qifei & Zhou, Weihua, 2021. "Supply chain coordination through capacity reservation contract and quantity flexibility contract," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    13. Meng, Xin & Yu, Yanni, 2023. "Can renewable energy portfolio standards and carbon tax policies promote carbon emission reduction in China's power industry?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    14. Pan, Xiongfeng & Xu, Haitao & Feng, Shenghan, 2022. "The economic and environment impacts of energy intensity target constraint: Evidence from low carbon pilot cities in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    15. Bo Shang & Taotao Jiang & Zheshi Bao, 2022. "A Study on Inter-Regional Cooperation Patterns and Evolution Mechanism of Traditional and Renewable Energy Sources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-23, November.
    16. Chen, Wenbo, 2018. "Retailer-driven carbon emission abatement with consumer environmental awareness and carbon tax: Revenue-sharing versus Cost-sharingAuthor-Name: Yang, Huixiao," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 179-191.
    17. Liu, Zheng & Huang, Yu-Qing & Shang, Wen-Long & Zhao, Yuan-Jun & Yang, Zao-Li & Zhao, Zhao, 2022. "Precooling energy and carbon emission reduction technology investment model in a fresh food cold chain based on a differential game," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    18. Roth, Tamara & Utz, Manuel & Baumgarte, Felix & Rieger, Alexander & Sedlmeir, Johannes & Strüker, Jens, 2022. "Electricity powered by blockchain: A review with a European perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    19. Nie, Tengfei & Du, Shaofu, 2017. "Dual-fairness supply chain with quantity discount contracts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 491-500.
    20. Wang, Bangjun & Ji, Feng & Zheng, Jie & Xie, Kejia & Feng, Zhaolei, 2021. "Carbon emission reduction of coal-fired power supply chain enterprises under the revenue sharing contract: Perspective of coordination game," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    21. Xiangang Lan & Xiaode Zuo & Qin Tao, 2023. "Container Shipping Optimization under Different Carbon Emission Policies: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Yuyan & Wang, Dexia & Cheng, T.C.E. & Zhou, Rui & Gao, Junhong, 2023. "Decision and coordination of E-commerce closed-loop supply chains with fairness concern," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    2. Dong, Ciwei & Liu, Qingyu & Shen, Bin, 2019. "To be or not to be green? Strategic investment for green product development in a supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 193-227.
    3. Yan Shen & Tian Gao & Zizhao Song & Ji Ma, 2023. "Closed-Loop Supply Chain Decision-Making and Coordination Considering Fairness Concerns under Carbon Neutral Rewards and Punishments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-25, April.
    4. Feng, Huchen & Hu, Yu-Jie & Li, Chengjiang & Wang, Honglei, 2023. "Rolling horizon optimisation strategy and initial carbon allowance allocation model to reduce carbon emissions in the power industry: Case of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    5. Yanfang Hou & Hui Tian, 2023. "Research on the Dynamic Characteristics of Photovoltaic Power Production and Sales Based on Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Sim, Jeongeun & Kim, Bowon, 2021. "Regulatory versus consumer pressure and retailer responsibility for upstream pollution in a supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    7. Heydari, Jafar & Bineshpour, Pegah & Walther, Grit & Ülkü, M. Ali, 2022. "Reconciling conflict of interests in a green retailing channel with green sales effort," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    8. Ciwei Dong & Qingying Li & Bin Shen & Xun Tong, 2019. "Sustainability in Supply Chains with Behavioral Concerns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-7, July.
    9. Wen Jiang & Li Yuan & Lanjun Wu & Shiyue Guo, 2019. "Carbon emission reduction and profit distribution mechanism of construction supply chain with fairness concern and cap-and-trade," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-23, October.
    10. Niu, Wenju & Shen, Houcai & Zhang, Lianmin, 2022. "Impact of power structure on decarbonizing investment with uncertain innovation: A triple bottom line perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    11. Hafezi, Maryam & Zhao, Xuan & Zolfagharinia, Hossein, 2023. "Together we stand? Co-opetition for the development of green products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(3), pages 1417-1438.
    12. Sun, Shuxing & Zhang, Bin, 2022. "Operation strategies for nanostore in community group buying," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    13. Wanting Chen & Zhi-Hua Hu, 2020. "Analysis of Multi-Stakeholders’ Behavioral Strategies Considering Public Participation under Carbon Taxes and Subsidies: An Evolutionary Game Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-26, January.
    14. Zhuo, Xiaopo & Wang, Fan & Niu, Baozhuang, 2021. "Brand-owners’ vertical and horizontal alliance strategies facing dominant retailers: Effect of demand substitutability and complementarity," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    15. Qiang Han & Yuyan Wang, 2018. "Decision and Coordination in a Low-Carbon E-Supply Chain Considering the Manufacturer’s Carbon Emission Reduction Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-23, May.
    16. Fei Zou & Yanju Zhou & Caihua Yuan, 2020. "The Impact of Retailers’ Low-Carbon Investment on the Supply Chain under Carbon Tax and Carbon Trading Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-27, April.
    17. Raj, Alok & Modak, Nikunja Mohan & Kelle, Peter & Singh, Bharati, 2021. "Analysis of a dyadic sustainable supply chain under asymmetric information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(2), pages 582-594.
    18. Tang, Wenzhi & Du, Shaofu & Hu, Li & Wang, Bill & Zhu, Yangguang, 2022. "The effects of leadership in Clean Development Mechanism low-carbon operations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    19. Hui Zhang & Kai Luo & Guanqun Ni, 2022. "The effects of price subsidy and fairness concern on pricing and benefits of take-away supply chain," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 1106-1124, July.
    20. Dayuan Li & Jialin Jiang & Lu Zhang & Chen Huang & Ding Wang, 2023. "Do CEOs with Sent-Down Movement Experience Foster Corporate Environmental Responsibility?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(1), pages 147-168, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12473-:d:1218686. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.