IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i15p11922-d1209475.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Longitudinal History-Based Review of the Product-Service System: Past, Present, and Future

Author

Listed:
  • Eloiza Kohlbeck

    (Graduate Program in Production Engineering, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88040-900, Brazil)

  • Paulo Augusto Cauchick-Miguel

    (Graduate Program in Production Engineering, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88040-900, Brazil
    Production Engineering Department, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88040-900, Brazil)

  • Glauco Henrique de Sousa Mendes

    (Production Engineering Department, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos 13565-905, Brazil)

  • Thayla Tavares de Sousa Zomer

    (Fundação Dom Cabral Business School, São Paulo 04548-004, Brazil)

Abstract

The research field of product-service systems (PSS) has experienced rapid growth since it emerged at the end of the 80s. Consequently, the conceptual structure of the PSS research field has expanded, and this phenomenon has driven novel research topics and future trends. This study analyzes the evolution and conceptual structure of the PSS research field since its emergence. A systematic literature review based on a bibliometric analysis was conducted, followed by a co-keyword analysis and content analysis, aiming to develop a historical overview of the nature of the research. The dataset involved 868 studies published between 1988 and 2022. The results present an analysis of the evolution of the literature in the following periods: (i) from 1988 to 2015, referred to in this study as the ‘past’, and (ii) from 2016 to 2022 (the ‘present’). A comparative analysis of the two periods is carried out, and the main topics and research trends and perspectives for future studies are identified (the ‘future’). Some of the main research topics include digitalization and sustainability, for which discussions on smart PSS, life-cycle management, ecodesign, knowledge management, development of assessment tools, simulation, and modeling technologies, have appeared. Research opportunities for future studies aligned with those topics are also identified, e.g., map key success factors to positive implementation of proposals that reconcile PSS with digitalization.

Suggested Citation

  • Eloiza Kohlbeck & Paulo Augusto Cauchick-Miguel & Glauco Henrique de Sousa Mendes & Thayla Tavares de Sousa Zomer, 2023. "A Longitudinal History-Based Review of the Product-Service System: Past, Present, and Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11922-:d:1209475
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11922/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11922/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hamid Darvish & Yaşar Tonta, 2016. "Diffusion of nanotechnology knowledge in Turkey and its network structure," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 107(2), pages 569-592, May.
    2. Vinit Parida & Joakim Wincent, 2019. "Why and how to compete through sustainability: a review and outline of trends influencing firm and network-level transformation," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Renato Camodeca & Alex Almici, 2021. "Digital Transformation and Convergence toward the 2030 Agenda’s Sustainability Development Goals: Evidence from Italian Listed Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Saccani, Nicola & Visintin, Filippo & Rapaccini, Mario, 2014. "Investigating the linkages between service types and supplier relationships in servitized environments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 226-238.
    5. Arnold Tukker, 2004. "Eight types of product–service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(4), pages 246-260, July.
    6. Nicolas Haber & Mario Fargnoli, 2021. "Sustainable Product-Service Systems Customization: A Case Study Research in the Medical Equipment Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, June.
    7. Yong Chen & Zhengjie Wu & Wenchao Yi & Bingjia Wang & Jianhua Yao & Zhi Pei & Jiaoliao Chen, 2022. "Bibliometric Method for Manufacturing Servitization: A Review and Future Research Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-26, July.
    8. Akbar, Payam & Hoffmann, Stefan, 2020. "Creating value in product service systems through sharing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 495-505.
    9. Waltman, Ludo & van Eck, Nees Jan & Noyons, Ed C.M., 2010. "A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 629-635.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alberto de la Calle & Inmaculada Freije & Aitor Oyarbide, 2021. "Digital Product–Service Innovation and Sustainability: A Multiple-Case Study in the Capital Goods Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, June.
    2. Nicolas Haber & Mario Fargnoli, 2022. "Product-Service Systems for Circular Supply Chain Management: A Functional Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Guijie Zhang & Luning Liu & Fangfang Wei, 2019. "Key nodes mining in the inventor–author knowledge diffusion network," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(3), pages 721-735, March.
    4. Chankook Park, 2022. "Expansion of servitization in the energy sector and its implications," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(4), July.
    5. Johannes Matschewsky, 2019. "Unintended Circularity?—Assessing a Product-Service System for its Potential Contribution to a Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, May.
    6. Mario Fargnoli & Nicolas Haber & Massimo Tronci, 2022. "Case Study Research to Foster the Optimization of Supply Chain Management through the PSS Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, February.
    7. Farsi, Maryam & Erkoyuncu, John Ahmet, 2021. "An agent-based approach to quantify the uncertainty in Product-Service System contract decisions: A case study in the machine tool industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    8. Mar’atus Sholihah & Tatsuru Maezono & Yuya Mitake & Yoshiki Shimomura, 2020. "Formulating Service-Oriented Strategies for Servitization of Manufacturing Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-30, November.
    9. Sabrina Weigel & Karsten Hadwich, 2019. "Erfolgsfaktoren von Dienstleistungsnetzwerken im Kontext der Servicetransformation – Eine qualitative Analyse [Success Factors of Service Networks in the Context of Servitization – A Qualitative An," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 71(1), pages 1-43, March.
    10. Batista, Luciano & Davis-Poynter, Simon & Ng, Irene & Maull, Roger, 2017. "Servitization through outcome-based contract – A systems perspective from the defence industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 133-143.
    11. Mostaghel, Rana & Chirumalla, Koteshwar, 2021. "Role of customers in circular business models," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 35-44.
    12. Ornella Benedettini & Andy Neely, 2018. "Investigating a revised service transition concept," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 12(4), pages 701-730, December.
    13. Yanto Chandra, 2018. "Mapping the evolution of entrepreneurship as a field of research (1990–2013): A scientometric analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, January.
    14. Lutz Bornmann & Robin Haunschild & Sven E. Hug, 2018. "Visualizing the context of citations referencing papers published by Eugene Garfield: a new type of keyword co-occurrence analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(2), pages 427-437, February.
    15. Balland, Pierre-Alexandre & Boschma, Ron, 2022. "Do scientific capabilities in specific domains matter for technological diversification in European regions?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).
    16. Nine Klaassen & Arno Scheepens & Bas Flipsen & Joost Vogtlander, 2020. "Eco-Efficient Value Creation of Residential Street Lighting Systems by Simultaneously Analysing the Value, the Costs and the Eco-Costs during the Design and Engineering Phase," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, June.
    17. Radoslaw Miskiewicz, 2022. "Clean and Affordable Energy within Sustainable Development Goals: The Role of Governance Digitalization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-17, December.
    18. Núria Bautista-Puig & Daniela De Filippo & Elba Mauleón & Elías Sanz-Casado, 2019. "Scientific Landscape of Citizen Science Publications: Dynamics, Content and Presence in Social Media," Publications, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-22, February.
    19. Zhang, Yi & Huang, Ying & Porter, Alan L. & Zhang, Guangquan & Lu, Jie, 2019. "Discovering and forecasting interactions in big data research: A learning-enhanced bibliometric study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 795-807.
    20. Huang, Youlin & Qian, Lixian, 2021. "Consumer adoption of electric vehicles in alternative business models," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11922-:d:1209475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.