IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p10649-d1187884.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Expression of the Country’s Modernisation in the Context of Economic Environmental Sustainability: The Case of Lithuania

Author

Listed:
  • Olga Navickienė

    (General Jonas Žemaitis Military Academy of Lithuania, Silo 5a, LT-10322 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Ieva Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė

    (General Jonas Žemaitis Military Academy of Lithuania, Silo 5a, LT-10322 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Renata Činčikaitė

    (General Jonas Žemaitis Military Academy of Lithuania, Silo 5a, LT-10322 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Mangirdas Morkūnas

    (General Jonas Žemaitis Military Academy of Lithuania, Silo 5a, LT-10322 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Asta Valackienė

    (General Jonas Žemaitis Military Academy of Lithuania, Silo 5a, LT-10322 Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

In order to develop broader scientific discussions, the authors analyze a contemporary social phenomenon in the field of sustainability—the modernisation of the country in order to preserve the ecosystem, emphasizing one of the most important aspects of modernisation—the context of economic environmental sustainability. Underscoring the importance of this study, the research problem was identified by answering the questions of how the modernisation of the country manifests itself in the context of economic environmental sustainability and what are the consequences for the society. This article examines the factors behind the country’s modernisation through the lens of its citizens. The purpose is to analyze the development of modernisation in Lithuania from the perspective of a sustainable economic environment and to form a complex system of indicators for the formation of an effective governance of a modern country. The paper is based on a quantitative empirical study to support the structural perspective of modernisation of the country, to justify an integrated system of indicators for the formation of a modern country following an analysis of the country’s modernisation trends in terms of the economic environment. The scientific value of the study: the presents paper investigates the main determinants of economic environmental sustainability of the country (effectiveness of digitalisation, infrastructure, environment, and interoperability of natural resources); behavior in line with environmental trends of the EU and subjective factors (interest in opportunities and benefits of renewable energy) was investigated; provides a methodological framework for the methods used (descriptive statistics, factor analysis (FA) and path analysis (PA). A representative cross-sectional survey of 1015 respondents are selected as main research tool. Lithuania (Case Study) served as an empirical basis for the research.

Suggested Citation

  • Olga Navickienė & Ieva Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė & Renata Činčikaitė & Mangirdas Morkūnas & Asta Valackienė, 2023. "The Expression of the Country’s Modernisation in the Context of Economic Environmental Sustainability: The Case of Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-18, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10649-:d:1187884
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10649/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10649/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiří Balcar, 2016. "Is it better to invest in hard or soft skills?," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 27(4), pages 453-470, December.
    2. Long, Xianling & Ji, Xi, 2019. "Economic Growth Quality, Environmental Sustainability, and Social Welfare in China - Provincial Assessment Based on Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 157-176.
    3. Renata Činčikaitė & Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, 2021. "An Integrated Competitiveness Assessment of the Baltic Capitals Based on the Principles of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Canning, David & Bennathan, Esra, 2000. "The social rate of return on infrastructure investments," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2390, The World Bank.
    5. Stuart Evans & Michael A. Mehling & Robert A. Ritz & Paul Sammon, 2021. "Border carbon adjustments and industrial competitiveness in a European Green Deal," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 307-317, March.
    6. Boris Nikiforovich Gerasimov & Vera Ansarovna Vasyaycheva & Kirill Borisovich Gerasimov, 2018. "Identification of the factors of competitiveness of industrial company based on the module approach," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(2), pages 677-691, December.
    7. K. C. Fung & Alicia Garcia‐Herrero & Hitomi Iizaka & Alan Siu, 2005. "Hard Or Soft? Institutional Reforms And Infrastructure Spending As Determinants Of Foreign Direct Investment In China," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 56(4), pages 408-416, December.
    8. Kirankumar S. Momaya & Sneha Bhat & Lalit Lalwani, 2017. "Institutional Growth and Industrial Competitiveness: Exploring the Role of Strategic Flexibility Taking the Case of Select Institutes in India," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 18(2), pages 111-122, June.
    9. Renata Činčikaitė & Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, 2021. "Assessment of Social Environment Competitiveness in Terms of Security in the Baltic Capitals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, June.
    10. Lawn, Philip A., 2003. "A theoretical foundation to support the Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW), Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), and other related indexes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 105-118, February.
    11. Lavopa, Alejandro & Szirmai, Adam, 2018. "Structural modernisation and development traps. An empirical approach," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 59-73.
    12. Jo Crotty & Sarah Marie Hall, 2014. "Environmental Awareness and Sustainable Development in the Russian Federation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(5), pages 311-320, September.
    13. Gunasekera, Kumudu & Anderson, William & Lakshmanan, T.R., 2008. "Highway-Induced Development: Evidence from Sri Lanka," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 2371-2389, November.
    14. Olga Navickienė & Asta Valackienė & Renata Činčikaitė & Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, 2023. "A Theoretical Model of the Development of Public Citizenship in a Sustainable Environment: Case of Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, February.
    15. Nada Al Mehrzi & Sanjay Kumar Singh, 2016. "Competing through employee engagement: a proposed framework," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 65(6), pages 831-843, July.
    16. Olga Navickienė & Ieva Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė & Renata Činčikaitė & Mangirdas Morkūnas & Asta Valackienė, 2023. "Modernisation of a Country in the Context of Social Environmental Sustainability: Example of Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    17. Nada Al Mehrzi & Sanjay Kumar Singh, 2016. "Competing through employee engagement: a proposed framework," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 65(6), pages 831-843, July.
    18. Rolandas Vitkūnas & Renata Činčikaitė & Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, 2021. "Assessment of the Impact of Road Transport Change on the Security of the Urban Social Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-15, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ionel Sergiu Pirju & Gabriela Marchis & Manuela Panaitescu & Nicolae Florin Prunău & Alisa Mihaela Ambrozie, 2023. "Foreign Direct Investments—A Perspective of Sustainability: Evidence from the Austrian and German Labor Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-18, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olga Navickienė & Ieva Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė & Renata Činčikaitė & Mangirdas Morkūnas & Asta Valackienė, 2023. "Modernisation of a Country in the Context of Social Environmental Sustainability: Example of Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Olga Navickienė & Asta Valackienė & Renata Činčikaitė & Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, 2023. "A Theoretical Model of the Development of Public Citizenship in a Sustainable Environment: Case of Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Van der Slycken, Jonas & Bleys, Brent, 2020. "A Conceptual Exploration and Critical Inquiry into the Theoretical Foundation(s) of Economic Welfare Measures," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    4. Ng, Choy Peng & Law, Teik Hua & Wong, Shaw Voon & Kulanthayan, S., 2017. "Relative improvements in road mobility as compared to improvements in road accessibility and economic growth: A cross-country analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 24-33.
    5. Renata Činčikaitė & Ieva Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė, 2022. "An Integrated Assessment of the Competitiveness of a Sustainable City within the Context of the COVID-19 Impact," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, June.
    6. Günseli BERIK, 2020. "Measuring what matters and guiding policy: An evaluation of the Genuine Progress Indicator," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 159(1), pages 71-94, March.
    7. Lazarus, Elias & Brown, Clair, 2022. "Improving the genuine progress indicator to measure comparable net welfare: U.S. and California, 1995–2017," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    8. Asnake Adraro Angelo & Kotaro Sasai & Kiyoyuki Kaito, 2023. "Assessing Critical Road Sections: A Decision Matrix Approach Considering Safety and Pavement Condition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.
    9. Hooi Lean, Hooi & Huang, Wei & Hong, Junjie, 2014. "Logistics and economic development: Experience from China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 96-104.
    10. Rolandas Vitkūnas & Renata Činčikaitė & Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, 2021. "Assessment of the Impact of Road Transport Change on the Security of the Urban Social Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-15, November.
    11. Yulin Liu & Xincheng Zhu & Yuhao Wang, 2023. "Revisiting and evaluation of the index of sustainable economic welfare based on artificial intelligence: data from 30 Chinese provinces from 2003 to 2019," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 3123-3152, April.
    12. Nermin Kişi, 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Global Research on Employee Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.
    13. Daniel Ştefan Armeanu & Georgeta Vintilă & Ştefan Cristian Gherghina, 2017. "Empirical Study towards the Drivers of Sustainable Economic Growth in EU-28 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, December.
    14. Olena Havrylchyk & Sandra Poncet, 2007. "Foreign Direct Investment in China: Reward or Remedy?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(11), pages 1662-1681, November.
    15. Emmanuel Anyigbah & Yusheng Kong & Bless Kofi Edziah & Ahotovi Thomas Ahoto & Wilhelmina Seyome Ahiaku, 2023. "Board Characteristics and Corporate Sustainability Reporting: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-26, February.
    16. Pan Zhang & Zhiguo Wang, 2019. "PM 2.5 Concentrations and Subjective Well-Being: Longitudinal Evidence from Aggregated Panel Data from Chinese Provinces," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-13, March.
    17. Matthew Abiodun Dada, 2015. "Theoretical Analysis of Microeconomic Effect of Public Investment," Asian Journal of Economic Modelling, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(1), pages 1-7, March.
    18. Stefan Pahl & Marcel P. Timmer, 2020. "Do Global Value Chains Enhance Economic Upgrading? A Long View," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(9), pages 1683-1705, July.
    19. Lan Guo & Ling Yang, 2023. "The Corporate Economic Influence and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, July.
    20. Benjamin Leard, 2011. "Joan Martinez-Alier and Ingo Ropke (eds.): Recent developments in ecological economics (2 vols.)," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 161-178, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10649-:d:1187884. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.