IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p10193-d1180605.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Is the Possibility of Commercializing African Indigenous Crops?—The Case of Ethiopia

Author

Listed:
  • Haggai Kennedy Ochieng

    (College of Liberal Arts, Duksung Women’s University, Seoul 01369, Republic of Korea)

  • Yeonsung Cho

    (Department of International Trade, Duksung Women’s University, Seoul 01369, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Africa has a rich diversity of indigenous crops whose commercial and economic value have been underutilized. Eragrostis tef is a crop with great potential for production and commercialization in Ethiopia. The nutritional and curative values of tef are recognized not only in Ethiopia but also in the global market. Economically, tef and its value chain are a source of livelihood for more than six million small-scale Ethiopian farmers. Its large-scale commercialization has the potential to transform the livelihoods of many impoverished people. However, little research has been conducted to assess Ethiopian consumers’ attitudes toward tef products. The objective of this study is to understand product attributes that would affect consumer purchasing decisions. The study is based on pasta and baby food, the two most important products that could be made out of tef. The attributes analyzed are the inclusion of tef in the products, price, organic certification, and brand origin. The study relies on survey data that were randomly collected from 318 respondents and secondary data from the central statistical agency. The attributes were subjected to conjoint analysis, a method that is commonly used in consumer market research with hypothetical products consisting of multiple attributes to understand customers’ preference for different components of the product. The results of the analysis show that the inclusion of tef flour in the products is the most important factor consumers would consider when buying pasta or baby food. Further, consumers are interested in brand origin as they have a strong inclination to buy domestic brands and prefer products with organic certification. In the case of baby food, Ethiopians are likely to buy products containing more tef flour, packaged in sealed can rather than a paper bag, and concentrated in iron or protein. However, they are less willing to pay a premium even for products they perceive to be of greater utility. The preference for domestic brands and processed food with tef implies that there is opportunity for local brands to grow if they can understand and satisfy consumer expectations. It also means that consumers are interested in business practices that promote sustainable livelihoods. Overall, these findings suggest the potential for commercialization of tef products in Ethiopia and that the development of its value chain could combat nutritional deficiencies in the country.

Suggested Citation

  • Haggai Kennedy Ochieng & Yeonsung Cho, 2023. "What Is the Possibility of Commercializing African Indigenous Crops?—The Case of Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10193-:d:1180605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10193/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10193/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kushagra Kulshreshtha & Vikas Tripathi & Naval Bajpai, 2018. "1971–2017: Evolution, exploration and test of time of conjoint analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(6), pages 2893-2919, November.
    2. Nimoh F & Asuming Brempong S & Sarpong D. B, 2012. "Consumer Preference for Processed Cowpea Products in Selected Communities of the Coastal Regions of Ghana," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 2(2), pages 113-119.
    3. Chike Okechuku & Vincent Onyemah, 1999. "Nigerian Consumer Attitudes Toward Foreign and Domestic Products," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 30(3), pages 611-622, September.
    4. Nimoh, Fred & Asuming-Brempong, S. & Sarpong, D.B., 2012. "Consumer Preference for Processed Cowpea Products in Selected Communities of the Coastal Regions of Ghana," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society (AESS), vol. 2(02), pages 1-8, June.
    5. Maguire, Kelly B. & Owens, Nicole N. & Simon, Nathalie B., 2006. "Focus on Babies: A Note on Parental Attitudes and Preferences for Organic Babyfood," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 24(2), pages 1-9.
    6. Bart Minten & David Stifel & Seneshaw Tamru, 2014. "Structural Transformation of Cereal Markets in Ethiopia," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(5), pages 611-629, May.
    7. Hikaru Hanawa Peterson & Xianghong Li, 2011. "Consumer Preferences for Product Origin and Processing Scale: The Case of Organic Baby Foods," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 93(2), pages 590-596.
    8. repec:asi:ajosrd:2012:p:113-119 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Federica DeMaria & Sophie Drogue, 2017. "EU Trade Regulation for Baby Food: Protecting Health or Trade?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(7), pages 1430-1453, July.
    2. Yuting Liu & Abdoul G. Sam, 2022. "The organic premium of baby food based on market segments," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(3), pages 533-556, July.
    3. Felix Odemero Achoja & Emmanuel Chukudinife Enujeke & Oraye Dicta Ogisi & Rebecca Tega Overehirha, 2020. "Multinomial regression analysis of yam (Dioscorea spp.) consumers` preferences and varietal diversification pattern in Nigeria," Asian Journal of Agriculture and rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(2), pages 698-707, December.
    4. Fantu Bachewe & Derek Headey & Bart Minten, 2023. "Price predictors in an extended hedonic regression framework: An application to wholesale cattle markets in Ethiopia," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 54(2), pages 289-306, March.
    5. Dubey, Prince & Bajpai, Naval & Guha, Sanjay & Kulshreshtha, Kushagra, 2020. "Mapping gender and marital roles on customer delight by value perception for mobile technology in India," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    6. Federica Demaria & Sophie S. Drogue, 2012. "Protéger la santé ou le commerce un dilemme pour les aliments pour bébés," Post-Print hal-02745379, HAL.
    7. Jérôme Lacoeuilhe & Selima Ben & Hager Turki & Samy Belaïd, 2017. "Are consumers leaning towards hedonic, symbolic or functional attributes ? Brand benefits scale development and validation in emerging markets: case of Tunisia [Des consommateurs hédonistes, symbol," Post-Print hal-01768093, HAL.
    8. Kassas, Bachir & Cao, Xiang & Gao, Zhifeng & House, Lisa A. & Guan, Zhengfei, 2023. "Consumer preferences for country of origin labeling: Bridging the gap between research estimates and real-world behavior," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    9. Berhane, Guush & Dereje, Mekdim & Minten, Bart & Tamru, Seneshaw, 2020. "The rapid-but from a low base-uptake of agricultural mechanization in Ethiopia: Patterns, implications, and challenges," IFPRI book chapters, in: An evolving paradigm of agricultural mechanization development: How much can Africa learn from Asia?, chapter 10, pages 329-375, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    10. Jin, Zhongqi & Lynch, Richard & Attia, Samaa & Chansarkar, Bal & Gülsoy, Tanses & Lapoule, Paul & Liu, Xueyuan & Newburry, William & Nooraini, Mohamad Sheriff & Parente, Ronaldo & Purani, Keyoor & Ung, 2015. "The relationship between consumer ethnocentrism, cosmopolitanism and product country image among younger generation consumers: The moderating role of country development status," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 380-393.
    11. Choudhury, Samira & Headey, Derek D., 2016. "What drives diversification of national food supplies? A cross-country analysis," IFPRI discussion papers 1581, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    12. Tamru, Seneshaw & Minten, Bart & Alemu, Dawit & Bachewe, Fantu Nisrane, 2016. "The rapid expansion of herbicide use in smallholder agriculture in Ethiopia: Patterns, drivers, and implications," ESSP working papers 94, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    13. Riera, O. & Minten, B., 2018. "Mobile phones and agricultural market performance in Ethiopia," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277107, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Riddhish N. Joshi & Yogesh C. Joshi, 2021. "An Assessment of CETSCALE in Liberalised Economy," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 4, pages 3-22.
    15. Margareta Amy Lelea & Chemeda Abedeta Garbaba & Abera Guluma & Oliver Hensel, 2022. "Gendering post-harvest loss research: responsibilities of women and men to manage maize after harvest in southwestern Ethiopia," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(4), pages 951-963, August.
    16. Uddin, Azhar & Gallardo, R. Karina, 2021. "Consumers' willingness to pay for organic, clean label, and processed with a new food technology: an application to ready meals," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 24(3), March.
    17. Gershom Endelani Mwalupaso & Xu Tian & Xianhui Geng, 2020. "Rethinking Food Production: Nexus of Mobile Phones and Production Cost Minimization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-12, April.
    18. Jayne, T.S. & Mason, Nicole M. & Burke, William J. & Ariga, Joshua, 2016. "Agricultural Input Subsidy Programs in Africa: An Assessment of Recent Evidence," Food Security International Development Working Papers 245892, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    19. Zeugner-Roth, Katharina Petra & Žabkar, Vesna, 2015. "Bridging the gap between country and destination image: Assessing common facets and their predictive validity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(9), pages 1844-1853.
    20. K. Patrick & A. Ladipo & Solomon A. Agada, 2016. "The Effects of Brand Perception in the Purchase of “Made in Italy” and “Made in China” Fashion Products in Nigeria," Economics and Management Research Projects: An International Journal, Open Access International Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 1-8, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10193-:d:1180605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.