IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i11p8648-d1156603.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Importance of Architectural Icons of the City of Szczecin for the Transformation of Landscape Identity and Promotion of the City’s Image

Author

Listed:
  • Wojciech Bal

    (Department of Contemporary Architecture, Theory and Methodology of Design, West Pomeranian University of Technology, 70-310 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Magdalena Czalczynska-Podolska

    (Department of Contemporary Architecture, Theory and Methodology of Design, West Pomeranian University of Technology, 70-310 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Maja Nieścior

    (Department of Contemporary Architecture, Theory and Methodology of Design, West Pomeranian University of Technology, 70-310 Szczecin, Poland)

Abstract

The practice of promoting an image of the city using architectural objects, and the need to identify or create architectural icons in urban spaces, outlined in this article, occurs in many cities worldwide. The city of Szczecin in Poland, the subject of this research, is no exception. The turbulent history of the city, which for years remained within the borders of Germany, makes it particularly worth analyzing in these terms because it shows the shifting popularity of architectural objects in the context of changing political, cultural, and economic conditions. The research presented here aims to identify iconic objects commonly exploited to build an image of Szczecin, assess their prominent features, and analyze changes over time in their popularity and use for these purposes. The historical and interpretive research was based on a detailed analysis of old and contemporary architectural objects of Szczecin depicted in postcards from the last hundred years, from the period spanning 1920 to 2023. The analysis covered several digital databases containing archival and contemporary postcards. This analysis enables the identification of the most popular objects, suggests the key characteristics of iconic buildings, and identifies four basic types of buildings, which are distinct in terms of purpose, message, and the specific image of the city to which each contributes. The duration of each type as a popular object, the strength of its impact on the city’s image, and its importance for the urban landscape are also identified. The research revealed that: architecturally iconic buildings are created concerning political, economic, and social conditions and the need to promote a specific image of the city, certain features contribute to a building’s potential as an architectural icon, and the strength of the building’s impact, its importance for the city landscape, and the possibility of creating a specific image depending on its iconic type.

Suggested Citation

  • Wojciech Bal & Magdalena Czalczynska-Podolska & Maja Nieścior, 2023. "The Importance of Architectural Icons of the City of Szczecin for the Transformation of Landscape Identity and Promotion of the City’s Image," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-37, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8648-:d:1156603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8648/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8648/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniele Ronsivalle, 2023. "Relevance and Role of Contemporary Architecture Preservation—Assessing and Evaluating Architectural Heritage as a Contemporary Landscape: A Study Case in Southern Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Nataša Danilović Hristić & Marija Lalošević & Nebojša Stefanović, 2023. "Implementation of Urban Solution for New Faculty Facilities within Spatial Historical and Cultural Units—A Case Study of Belgrade, Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Nadia Alaily-Mattar & Georgia Lindsay & Alain Thierstein, 2022. "Star architecture and urban transformation: introduction to the special issue," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 1-12, January.
    4. J. Dreher & N. Alaily-Mattar & A. Thierstein, 2023. "Star architecture projects and their effects: tracing the evidence," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 65-83, January.
    5. Andrea Garzulino & Maria Paola Borgarino & Davide Del Curto, 2021. "When GIS Joins the Conservation Management Plan of a 20th-Century Architectural Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-37, April.
    6. Georgia Lindsay, 2018. "One icon, two audiences: how the Denver Art Museum used their new building to both brand the city and bolster civic pride," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 193-205, March.
    7. Majken Schultz & Tor Hernes, 2013. "A Temporal Perspective on Organizational Identity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 1-21, February.
    8. Nadia Alaily-Mattar & Johannes Dreher & Alain Thierstein, 2018. "Repositioning cities through star architecture: how does it work?," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 169-192, March.
    9. Matt Patterson, 2022. "Revitalization, transformation and the ‘Bilbao effect’: testing the local area impact of iconic architectural developments in North America, 2000–2009," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 32-49, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Koen Gaast & Jan Eelco Jansma & Sigrid Wertheim-Heck, 2023. "Between ambitions and actions: how citizens navigate the entrepreneurial process of co-producing sustainable urban food futures," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 1287-1302, September.
    2. Bövers, Jana & Hoon, Christina, 2021. "Surviving disruptive change: The role of history in aligning strategy and identity in family businesses," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 12(4).
    3. Suddaby, Roy & Ganzin, Max & Minkus, Alison, 2017. "Craft, magic and the re-enchantment of the world," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 285-296.
    4. Agnieszka Starzyk & Kinga Rybak-Niedziółka & Janusz Marchwiński & Ewa Rykała & Elena Lucchi, 2023. "Spatial Relations between the Theatre and Its Surroundings: An Assessment Protocol on the Example of Warsaw (Poland)," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, June.
    5. Coraiola, Diego M. & Suddaby, Roy & Foster, William M., 2017. "Capacidades mnemônicas: Memória coletiva como capacidade dinâmica," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 57(3), May.
    6. Jeffrey S. Bednar & Benjamin M. Galvin & Blake E. Ashforth & Ella Hafermalz, 2020. "Putting Identification in Motion: A Dynamic View of Organizational Identification," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 200-222, January.
    7. Alexandra Bertschi-Michel & Philipp Sieger & Thomas Wittig & Andreas Hack, 2023. "Sacrifice, Protect, and Hope for the Best: Family Ownership, Turnaround Moves, and Crisis Survival," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(4), pages 1132-1168, July.
    8. Betty Feng, Jing & Liu, Steven Y.H. & Anne Liu, Leigh, 2023. "Cognitive antecedents of EMNEs’ dynamic capabilities: A case study of global identity at Lenovo," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    9. Korin, Heidi & Seeck, Hannele & Liikamaa, Kirsi, 2023. "Reflecting on the past—a key to facilitating learning in strategy practice?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118464, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Raghu Garud & Henri A. Schildt & Theresa K. Lant, 2014. "Entrepreneurial Storytelling, Future Expectations, and the Paradox of Legitimacy," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1479-1492, October.
    11. Janssen, M. & Stoopendaal, A.M.V. & Putters, K., 2015. "Situated novelty: Introducing a process perspective on the study of innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(10), pages 1974-1984.
    12. Nicholas S. Argyres & Alfredo De Massis & Nicolai J. Foss & Federico Frattini & Geoffrey Jones & Brian S. Silverman, 2020. "History‐informed strategy research: The promise of history and historical research methods in advancing strategy scholarship," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 343-368, March.
    13. Helene Loe Colman & Birgitte Grøgaard & Inger G. Stensaker, 2022. "Organizational identity work in MNE subsidiaries: Managing dual embeddedness," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(9), pages 1997-2022, December.
    14. Elsahn, Ziad & Earl, Anna, 2022. "Alternative ways of studying time in qualitative international business research: A review and future agenda," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(3).
    15. O'Reilly, Charles A., III & Tushman, Michael L., 2013. "Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future," Research Papers 2130, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    16. Hee‐Chan Song, 2023. "Identity Conflict Amidst Environmental Change: An Ethnography of a Korean Buddhist Temple," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(4), pages 889-923, June.
    17. Christensen, Lars Thøger & Morsing, Mette & Thyssen, Ole, 2020. "Timely hypocrisy? Hypocrisy temporalities in CSR communication," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 327-335.
    18. Eliza Sochacka & Magdalena Rzeszotarska-Pałka, 2021. "Social Perception and Urbanscape Identity of Flagship Cultural Developments in Szczecin (in the Re-Urbanization Context)," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-29, April.
    19. Innan Sasaki & Josip Kotlar & Davide Ravasi & Eero Vaara, 2020. "Dealing with revered past: Historical identity statements and strategic change in Japanese family firms," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 590-623, March.
    20. Brinkerink, Jasper & Rondi, Emanuela & Benedetti, Carlotta & Arzubiaga, Unai, 2020. "Family business or business family? Organizational identity elasticity and strategic responses to disruptive innovation," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 11(4).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8648-:d:1156603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.